Part A (a): Ethical dilemma Should Tom tell Michael that Brenda is breaking the rules/law. Ethical egoism Under ethical egoism‚ Tom should tell Michael what Brenda is doing‚ as he is feeling worried and guilty and this would ease his mind. He could also gain benefits from Michael. Tom would do this because he is promoting his well being above everyone else’s (QUT‚ 2011). Utilitarianism Under Utilitarianism‚ Tom should tell Michael about Brenda and Mary’s arrangement‚ because Utilitarianism
Premium Ethics Morality Virtue
References: James‚ N 2010‚ Business Law‚ John Wiley and Sons‚ Milton Qld. Legislation Civil Liability Act 2002 (tas) Legal Authorities Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479 Neindorf v Junkovic (2005) 222 ALR McHale v Watson (1966) 115 CLR 199 Kondis v State
Premium Tort law Common law Tort
Business Law 101 9A 4/26/2012 Chapter 7‚ 8‚ 9 Chapter 7: Questions 1 - 5 1. What is a contract? It is an agreement that can be enforced in court. It is formed by two or more parties who agree to perform or to refrain some act in the present or the future. What is the objective theory of contracts? The intent is determined by objective facts‚ not by the personal or subjective intent‚ or belief of a party. 2. What are the four basic elements necessary to the formation of a valid
Premium Contract Contract law
BUSINESS LAW AND ETHICS Assignmen ( BA 3 ) : Teacher: David Mwaura Date of submission: 13/06/2012 Executive summary: -Introduction… -What is Corporate social responsibility ?... -Introducing Dell … -Csr strategy of Dell… -Environmental responsibility… -Ethics and compliance…
Premium Corporate social responsibility Social responsibility Greenhouse gas
Business Law Pages: 33&34 Problems: 34&35 Quinly and her husband‚ customers at Greenway Supermarkets‚ purchased several pounds of filet mignon and checked out their purchases at the newly installed self-scanners. The price listed on the package of meat totaled $38; however
Premium Ethics
Business Entities‚ Laws‚ and Regulations Paper BUS/415 March 5‚ 2012 Beth Shankle-Anderson There are different scenarios with three different forms of entities that require taking control‚ taxation‚ and possible liability issues into account. These considerations will not only serve to ensure compliance is met but also so that each establishment is protected. In the first scenario Lou and Jose plan to open a restaurant/sports bar‚ the issue is that they have not accumulated of the money‚
Premium Corporation Partnership Types of business entity
This situation between John and Mark is kind of unique. John signs a contract to sell some of his property to Mark on August 1st‚ but John delays the date until November 1st and we do not know the reason for Johns delay. This makes Mark must incur additional expenses for his national dog breeding company called Remington Sporting Dog Breeders. Mark must find a suitable alternate location to house his dogs until the new November closing date. Before I read the chapters this week I looked over this
Premium Family Ethics Management
considerations‚ and maximum efficiency of the office. This design proposal for the Solo Law Office will consider all of these aspects and corresponding justifications. Creating a quality work environment to promote flexibility and effectiveness throughout the entire law office is paramount. Solo Law Office is considering a shared office space with five other solo practitioners or a suite of office spaces adjacent from a midsized law firm. To decide which option is best‚ we need to consider the needs of both
Premium Management Strategic management Employment
BMGT 380‚ Business Law I Case 6.1‚ pg 118 Critical Legal Thinking 1. What elements are necessary to prove negligence? Basically three things must happen: • A harm must have occurred • The defendant is at fault • The plaintiff must prove that the defendant breached a duty of due care to the plaintiff. 2. Do you think that McNeil was negligent in this case? Absolutely‚ it was proven that McNeil was aware of the possible effects of individuals taking this medication with
Premium Critical thinking Negligence Law
Essentials of Business Law Chapter 29 – Questions 5 & 8 Q5. Palmer made a valid contract with Ames under which Ames was to sell Palmer’s goods on commission from January 1 to June 30. Ames made satisfactory sales up to May 15 and was about to close an unusually large order when Palmer suddenly and without notice revoked Ames’s authority to sell. Can Ames continue to sell Palmer’s goods during the unexpired term of her contract? Once Palmer initiated the revocation of Ames’s authority
Free Law