Preview

“Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping Poor”, summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
261 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
“Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping Poor”, summary
In his article “Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping Poor,” Garrett Hardin argues that our planet faces the problem of overpopulation. The reproduction rate in poor countries is much higher than in rich countries. Therefore, while population of poor nations is increasing tremendously, the ratio of rich nations steadily decreases. Hardin also introduces the concept of “The Tragedy of The Commons’’ and explains it as a negative effect on consumers of common resources around the world. It has already occurred in today’s society and not only polluted our environment but also led to overpopulation. The initiative of rich countries to help the poor resulted in creation of The World Food Bank. Yet, Hardin claims that this program stops the development of poor nations and lets them rely on rich countries when emergency occurs. While trying to find a solution for this problem and help the poor, the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations made the “Green Revolution” program, the goal of which is to teach poor nations to grow “miracle wheat” and “miracle rice.” Hardin argues that this program resulted in the spread of cancer and overloading the environment; thus, by trying to save people from starvation, other harms were created. Hardin beliefs that immigration is another push factor of the overpopulation issue because it allows people to escape from poor nations and burden the ecosystem of rich countries. Consequently, in “Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping Poor,” Garrett Hardin suggests that our planet could be saved only by following these advices otherwise, there will be nothing left to the next generations.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the passage, Garett Hardin illustrates in “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor,” he describes his stand on global overpopulation and how it may effect on the resources. Hardin creates a scenario based on lifeboat to represents how the globe is divided into two class: rich and poor nations. Hardin, implies how the lifeboat represents the limit capacity of the lifeboat. The author is assuring if population keeps overleaping, that our resources are becoming limited.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Garrett Hardin, a human ecologist, wrote an analytical essay, Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor (1974), asserts that sharing resources with the poor will be detrimental to Earth’s limited resources along with its environments. Hardin supports his assertion by describing the negative effects of sharing the resources with the poor, using the idea of overpopulation and “tragedy of the commons”, stating that if foreign countries keeps aiding the poor, as population continue to grow along with their necessities, it will demolish the environment and deplete Earth’s natural resources. His purpose is to persuade his readers that the poor would not learn to survive on their own if they continue to rely on foreign aid. In this analytical…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The increase in the number of population in poor countries is much higher than in rich countries over a given period of time. This means that while the population of poor countries is expanding massively, the proportion of rich countries consistently diminishes. Hardin presents the idea of "The Tragedy of The Commons'' and clarifies it as a negative impact on customers of shared resources around the globe. It has as of now happened in today's general public and infected our surroundings as well as helped increase overpopulation. The act of rich nations offering the poor some assistance resulted in making of The World Food Bank. Yet, Hardin claims this system stops the improvement of poor countries and gives them a chance to depend on rich nations when crisis happens. While attempting to discover an answer for this issue and help poor people, the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations made the "Green Revolution" program, the objective of this program is to show poor countries how to develop "supernatural occurrence wheat" and "marvel rice." Hardin argures that this project helped spread of malignancy and over-trying so as to burden the earth; consequently, to spare individuals from starvation, different damages were made. Hardin convictions that movement is another push variable of the overpopulation issue on the grounds that it permits individuals to escape from poor countries and weight the biological system of rich nations. Therefore, in "Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping Poor," Garrett Hardin recommends that our planet could be protected by taking his advices, or else nothing will be left for the future…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s essay, Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor, Hardin describes the wealthy population of the world as being in a single lifeboat that is almost filled until buckling while the poor population of the world treads water below. Hardin’s essay gets his readers to feel the natural instinct to survive. The lifeboat metaphor that Hardin uses relieves the wealthy population of their moral obligations to the less fortunate, but in addition, puts all of the blame and cause of the depletion of earth’s resources on the poor. As much as his argument may make sense, there are some flaws in his way of thinking. Alan Durning, who noticed that major flaws with Hardin’s essay, wrote on what he thought about the topic that Hardin has brought to his attention. In Durning’s essay, Asking How Much Is Enough, he argues that it is not overpopulation that is depleting the earth’s resources, but overconsumption of the resources by the wealthy population. The arguments in Durning’s essay makes the reader realize that the way Hardin uses the metaphorical lifeboat to persuade his readers into thinking the same thing as he does and shows that Hardin wrongly places the blame of all of earth’s financial stability problems on the poorer population.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    However, some rich countries have small birthrate. The increasing population effect the animals, planet, biological diversity and agriculture. People need land to grow their food and the Green Revolution appeared. Thompson shows that there is no easy way to stop the sprawl, but four tactics.…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States and in many other countries when women get pregnant, they often talk about the immediate bond between mother and her unborn child. However, in other countries and cultures, women don't feel a bond with their unborn children until the child is born healthy, happy and grows to a certain age. There are people who think the issue of bonding with your child is culturally based and others argue that this bonding takes place naturally. While Nancy Scheper-Hughs argues that mother-infant bonding is culturally based and occurs over a period of time, Lucinda J. Peach refutes this argument by saying that there is an immediate and natural bond between a mother and unborn child. I will compare and contrast these two articles and their…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life Boat Ethical Analysis

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle, a famous Greek philosopher, had a theory of trying to simplify the task of arguing by dividing and classifying arguments into three types. The three types are called Logos or logic-base, Pathos or emotion based, and Ethos or credibility based. The two classic essays, “Life Boat Ethics” by Garrett Hardin and “A Modest Proposal” by Johnathan Swift, the writers make good suggestions with these types of arguments over world population and world famine.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is a timely discussion of what sort of importance should we give to the issue of overpopulation and what can we do about it, directed mostly to the elected readers of this weekly publication. It works on the expansion of the line of inquiry and creates room for curiosity.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boat of Ethics

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hardin begin's his essay shedding light on a metaphor environmentalists use to help prevent pollution, stating that the earth is a spaceship, and no one has the right to waste or destroy what should be equally shared between it's inhabitants. Hardin immediately disputes this metaphor by asking "does everyone on earth have an equal right to an equal share of it's resources?" (358) Hardin points out that this metaphor causes unrealistic expectations of an equal and fair global society since there are currently not enough resources in the world to be evenly distributed. Hardin argues that the spaceship analogy is false, saying that "A true spaceship would have to be under the control of a captain, since no ship could possibly survive if its course were determined by committee. Spaceship Earth certainly has no captain; the United States is merely a toothless tiger, with little power to enforce any policy upon its bickering members." (358) Hardin instead…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People and scientists of all kinds have been trying for centuries to solve the problems of poverty, starvation and overpopulation.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1974, Harden’s “Lifeboat Ethics” came with a really harsh and serious question – “does we have a responsibility for people from third world?”. Hardin argues that the planet is like a lifeboat with such a great number of people desiring entry that if we adopt, for example, Kantian ethics, which value each person as an end-in-themselves, the boat will sink due to weight and everyone will die. Although many may argue that the sanctity of life warrants attempting to save everyone, the reality is that the lifeboat possesses a carrying capacity that dictates the number of people that can logically enter. The environment is actually such a lifeboat, and when resources are stretched while the carrying capacity is exceeded, someone has to die. When…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Island of Plenty Response

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Svetlana Feldman Professor Crowder SFELD5157@HOSTOS.CUNY.EDU March 26, 2012 Are We Selfish Or Can We Help? In “The Island of Plenty”, Montgomery emphasizes his article on social Darwinism. The United States should not share their resources with other parties to reduce the amount of hunger games going on. Other countries are in this difficult position because they are not capable of reproducing their products. The larger the population becomes, the more products are wasted. Once the population can be controlled then the resources would not become so scarce. “[s]ome of us have polluted the planet by reproducing too many of us” (399 Montgomery). The United States should help others in need because once the help stops serving others then there would be no help from others when needed. The Garden of Eden is known to be an imagery place of the Utopian world. The United States cannot be relatively compared to the Garden of Eden. Being a resident of The United States, it is not such a happy and free place. The United States is overpopulated with minorities from every place of the world. Other countries are over populated as well but with the citizens of their homeland. Once there might have been a theory that The United States was a pure place but now it is not so harmonious and peaceful as others preserve it to be. There might be enough products to support the individuals that live here but not enough power to stand alone. The United States us consuming a large amount of resources from other places. In order for The United States to receive general resources from other places, sharing theirs will help…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Living in a Life Boat

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The overpopulation problem is a hot topic in the world. The population growth brings us tremendous pressure because it grows too fast. Also the developing countries and underdeveloped counties have higher population growth rate; for example, India, China, and Indonesia. The daily news updates the information about how people help the poor countries. Are we really helping poor countries? I think no one can exactly answer this question. Garrett Hardin had an unequal opinion comparing with others in 1974. He made the analogy of the rich countries and poor countries. “Metaphorically each rich nation can be seen as a lifeboat full of comparatively rich people. In the ocean outside each lifeboat swim the poor of the world, who would like to get in, or at least to share some of the wealth.” Garrett Hardin argues for a very harsh thesis: we simply should not provide aid to people in poor countries. His argument is consequentiality: he claims that the net result of doing so would be negative. I do not agree with his opinion because of three main points.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since 1991, the southern half of Somalia, a poverty stricken African nation, has seen various tribal militias battle for dominance and power over individual regions of the country. Violence has plagued Mogadishu, the capital, since warlords ousted the former president. Mere months after the collapse of the government, men, women and children in torn clothes ran helplessly towards packages dropped from military planes towards the hot sand of their tiny village. This action was one of many attempts to help underdeveloped nations receive food by the United Nations' World Food Programme. Within his article titled "Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor", Garret Hardin, a well-known philosopher of ecology, analyzes the difficulty and ultimate ruin associated with providing aid to these nations. Hardin's argument for the preservation of well-to-do societies is embodied by his extended metaphor of each society as a lifeboat, with the citizens of developed nations riding calmly amongst a sea of drowning poverty-stricken individuals. Ultimately, Hardin argues for a very harsh thesis: regardless of the current situation, privileged nations simply should not provide aid to those individuals trapped within the vortex of underdeveloped nations. His argument is consequentialist: he claims that the net result of doing so would be negative and would, in the long run, court large-scale disaster. Although Hardin's argument appears logic-based, his excessive metaphors fail when applied to real-life scenarios, for oftentimes he misconstrues facts to create a claim that may be perceived as more accurate than reality illustrates. Furthermore, any counter-arguments Hardin feels may refute his claim are pushed aside, avoiding factual evidence that may prove his argument inaccurate or misleading. Much like a lifeboat, Hardin leaves the assertions of the "humanitarian apologists" to drown so as to avoid the overturn of his claim.…

    • 3054 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every second, minute, hours, weeks... There are babies that are born. Meaning, another person to be taken care of. Another person that will use our land resources. The problem is, there are too many people that compete for the wealth of our land has. Lucky for those people who has the money to buy the things that they need. But, how about those unfortunate people? It’s very hard to live life empty-handed. But that’s the reality. They should sacrifice everything or else, they die. How could they have a happy life if they don’t have something? Overpopulation is the reason why most of the people suffer not only in the rural but also in the urban. Children cry because they starve. Why? It’s because of poverty. Whether they like it or not, they should be satisfied in anything that is available. People even do immoral things because they think that it is the easiest yet effective way of earning. I can’t imagine how these things are happening when our country has rich natural resources! Words like, poverty, unfortunate, hardship and cruelty would have not come to life if it were not because of the overpopulation.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays