Preview

Port Arthur Massacre

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
901 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Port Arthur Massacre
Port Arthur Massacre

On Sunday, 28 April 1996, a young Tasmanian man called Martin Bryant entered a cafe located at the Port Arthur historical site, took a rifle from his bag and started indiscriminately shooting. He pulled out an automatic weapon and started firing at people from nearby sites. Driving up the road, he continued shooting. He had killed 35 people by the time he was finished.

This massacre at Port Arthur sent shock waves around the nation as it was something Australians have never experienced before. This lead to a complete reform of Australia’s gun laws. However, not many Australians saw the reform as a solution to the incidence of violence in society.

The Prime Minister at the time, John Howard, forced through some of the world’s toughest gun laws, including the national buy-back scheme, after the Martin Bryant massacre.
This caused licensed gun-owners to become furious as they thought it was have no impact.
The main legal responses to this issue involved; the government applying gun law reforms and a buy-back scheme which was also introduced by the government to ensure safety.

The gun law reform involved a stricter gun policy which allowed the government to take more action after the massacre. By the end of 1997, the state and federal government signed the National Agreement on Gun Laws. The new laws specifically targeted mass shooting, banning rapid-fire rifles and shotguns. This new law agreed that gun ownership was a privilege not a right, semi-automatic weapons must be strictly controlled and all guns must be registered, guns must be stored securely and there must be a 28 day cooling off period when buying guns.

The national firearm agreement was effective as it has met the needs of the wider Australian community by ensuring uniformity and harmonization on gun control laws. 
The ‘Australia’s New Gun Control Philosophy’ thought this law to be effective as it has taken a public health approach rather than a criminal justice

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    II. Preview main points: During the 1900s century, gun violence has shown a massive increase of…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the massacre at Port Arthur the Australian government proposed tight new gun laws. This proposal included a ban on all…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this article the purpose is to examine the case of New York. It gives in depth information about the gun laws and who is able to own one. The New York SAFE Act was implemented to assure safety to others. The shooting of twenty children and six adults in Connecticut sparked a change to be made with guns, which the New York State legislature made it clear to put restrictions on guns. The new law consists of many new regulations to those that want to carry one. Some individuals were not too happy with the tougher law, they stated citizens were the one being hurt by the law and not the criminals because they wont follow the law anyways. There were a lot of questions rising about not being able to carry 10 bullets in their guns reducing it to…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bryant's Mass Killing

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On April 28th, 1996, Ian Kingston, a security guard stood in the doorway of the Broad Arrow cafe at the historic site of Port Arthur in southern Tasmania. He stared at the body of a man lying on the floor, then looked up into the barrel of a semi-automatic rifle. He dived back out the door as Martin Bryant pulled the trigger. Bryant killed 12 people in 15 seconds. Bryant moved towards the gift shop in the next 75 seconds, killing another eight people. In little over half an hour the 35 were killed and, 23 wounded. This became the worst single-person mass shooting in Australia’s history; and is still the third worst recorded worldwide. Bryant’s gun was an AR-15 rifle with a 30-shot magazine. Bryant exchanged it for a semi-automatic .308 FN…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lives of many were to change on the day of April 20th, 1999, at Columbine High School. With the death of twelve students and one teacher, it was to be the deadliest mass murder committed on an American high school campus. The massacre, committed by senior students Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, sparked debate over gun control laws; whether the availability of guns across the United States, especially to young people such as these, was socially acceptable. This event is what sparked Moore to create his documentary, ‘Bowling for Columbine’.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He exposes past historians for ignoring violence, such as one who claimed ‘Australia was the only country which had been acquired by peaceful occupation’. Reynolds argues that this ignorance prevents Australians from coming to terms with their past, and his criticism is conveyed by his metaphoric classification of the omission as the ‘Great Australian Silence’. He holds that colonisation involved constant violent conflict between settlers and indigenous tribes. To support his view, Reynolds highlights the openness with which violence was admitted and discussed in the colonial era. In Chapter 9 he includes the account of a settler who wrote, ‘our best shots are after them…there will be weeping and wailing shortly’. The writer’s callous attitude to brutality reflects the ubiquitous presence of violence Reynolds wishes to portray. Consequently, he concludes in Chapter 14 that the conflict was part of an invasion process intended to ‘terrorise the indigenous peoples into acquiescence’. Reynolds links this past mistreatment of indigenous Australians to the present day social injustice they face, recalling one lawyer’s statement that ‘he could not bring himself to believe that killing a black man was as serious a matter as killing a white one’. The confession illustrates the way…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control in Canada

    • 2692 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In Re Firearms Act (2000), a challenge was raised to Canada’s gun-control legislation, which is part of the Criminal Code…

    • 2692 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kent State Massacre

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Kent State shooting or May 4th Massacre was a very significant and controversial event in the 1970. This involved armed guardsmen firing 67 rounds in 13 seconds into a crowd of protesting students. This resulted in nine wounded students and four shot dead. This was a significant event as it began the nation-wide anti-war movement, opposing the war in Vietnam.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firearm injuries are one of the top ten causes of death in the United States (“Statistics”). Firearms are the second leading cause of traumatic death related to consumer product in the U.S. and are the second most frequent cause of death overall for Americans ages 15 to 25 (Violence Policy Center para.4). Every two years more Americans die from firearm injuries than the total number of American soldiers killed during the eight year Vietnam War (Violence Prevention Institute). In 2005, 11,346 people were killed by firearm violence and 477,040 were victims of a crime involving a firearm. In 2006, firearms were used in 68 percent of murders, 42 percent of robbery offenses and 22 percent of aggravated assaults nationwide (National Institute of Justice). “Homicides committed with firearms peaked in 1993 at 17,075, after which the figure steadily fell, leveling off in 1999 at 10, 11. Gun-related homicides have increased each year since 2002”(National Institute of Justice). The federal government needs to take action to prevent similar tragedies from happening in the future. In an effort to stabilize and decrease firearm related injuries and deaths in the U.S. a strong federal law to control guns is…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was on the twenty-eighth of April, 1996 when a fellow Aussie, Martin Bryant went on a killing spree in the former prison colony and tourist draw in Tasmania. Bryant killed thirty-five masses and injured twenty-three. This has since been knowns as the Port Arthur massacre. It is also this case in which caused the gun laws in Australia to modify. Since the stricter gun laws have been enforced there has been a decrease in the amount of firearm related deaths. In 1996, the deaths caused by firearms were at a high five hundred and sixteen. In 1998, three hundred and twelve and in 2011 there was only one hundred and eighty-eight. In America, many of the gun advocates, believe that ownership of a gun is their birthright and an essential part of…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    More Gun Control or Less?

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There have been a few gun control fights throughout history, none of which being very effective. The problems with firearms that we face today are in fact tragic, and this gun control fight is indeed the largest the country has ever had. But looking back, there have been multiple murders and crimes committed every day since the dawn of America. And this fight for gun control, is it really the answer we seek? Or are we heading in the opposite direction? The problems with gun violence and controlling it are indeed very thoughtful subjects, and we all wish to end these tragedies and the problems that create them. Here, I am about to present two articles with two opposite perspectives on this subject.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gary Younge’s article “Gun Ownership is a Dangerous Part of the American Identity”, states that the main source of the country’s gun complications stem from our unbelievable sense of pride, of self-power, freedom, and masculinity. Gun-related deaths are on the rise because of suicide, mass shootings involving drug and gang violence on the streets or in schools, accidental shootings caused by ignorant young children with irresponsible parents in charge, along with various other situations that result in death by a gun. Lowering the death rate caused by firearms is a simple but onerous task that we can accomplish if only we were to drop the mindset that ‘guns don’t kill people, people…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major issues that Canada faces each and every day is the danger of gun control and ownership. Although Canada has enforced strict laws concerning the use of guns, this issue is still very prominent to this date. The current gun control laws are highly controversial due to the easy access of guns to the general public. Some people would debate that the use of firearms is unnecessary and that Canada would benefit without these kinds of weaponry that cause major preventable fatalities every year. Individuals on the opposite side of the spectrum would argue that guns are essential for the country, as the military and the police rely on these weapons to protect themselves and others. Gun laws should increase the appropriate age limit…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control

    • 2539 Words
    • 11 Pages

    life . Is it our right to bear arms as North Americans ? Or is it privilege? And…

    • 2539 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each year, a number of people die from guns. The popular saying is “guns do not kill people, people kill people” which is true; however, guns are used to aid in violence and many would argue that eliminating guns through stricter laws would decrease violence. As the number of gun owners in the world increases the government and its citizens would benefit from implementing stricter regulations regarding the safe keeping of guns in the home. The lack of gun safety results in the ability to access these guns with distressing outcomes. While many individuals argue that guns need to be restricted within the United States, the real argument is for allowing the Constitutional right to bear arms while implementing stricter laws to ensure these firearms do not fall within the wrong hands.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays