Preview

Locke vs. Rousseau Essay Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
412 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Locke vs. Rousseau Essay Example
• According to Rousseau, the original condition of mankind was a peaceful and quixotic time in which people lived solitary, uncomplicated lives. This differs from Locke's concept of the state of nature in that, his natural condition of mankind was a state liberty in which one was able to conduct one's life as they saw fit. Like Rousseau's, it was a time of peace between the people, but Locke's was not necessarily a solitary life.
• The state of nature for Locke was a state wherein there were no civil authorities or governments to punish people for transgressions against laws, but was not a state without morality. It was pre-political, but was not pre-moral. In it, persons were assumed to be equal to one another, and therefore equally capable of realizing and being obliged by the law of nature. (The law of nature being one internal, which commanded that no one should harm another as concerning their "life, health, liberty, or possessions" [p.4]). In Locke's pre-contract condition, one was not at absolute liberty to do whatever one chose to do; they were inherently bound by the law of nature.
• Rousseau's state of nature had no private property. Private property was something which arose from the stages leading up to the need for authority. Where Locke saw property as something which was naturally protected in the state of nature, Rousseau conceived of property –the result of greed, competition and vanity- as humanities reason for abandoning such a time and entering into the contract.
• For Rousseau, the few needs of the people in the pre-contract condition were easily satisfied by nature. Because of the abundance of nature and the small size of the population, competition was non-existent, and persons rarely even saw one another, much less had reason for conflict or fear.
• Moreover, for Rousseau, the simple and morally pure persons in the pre-contract condition were naturally endowed with the capacity for pity, and therefore were not inclined to bring harm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unlike Thomas Hobbes, who believed humans were naturally evil, Jean Rousseau believed that humans are born, neither good nor bad, thus corruption or goodness is taught from the society. For example, when children are born, everything they…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau depicts man in his natural state as innocent and good, blaming the invention of property as the root of societal inequalities and lamenting the sacrifice of liberty required of members of a state. Rousseau's early man is deemed non-confrontational, concerned only with 'self-preservation'…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau made a distinction of natural liberty, civil liberty, and moral liberty. This is basically his classification of various categories of freedom. Natural liberty is the most basic and thrives in the state of nature, in natural liberty, man has unlimited freedom and right to anything he/she desires and is capable of attaining. Civil liberty is gained upon entry into a civil society through a social contract. Men give up the natural liberty which is less secure in exchange for civil liberty which is secured collectively. Rousseau, however, believes that the loss of natural liberty is a fundamental loss…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In everyday life, we see many examples of the flaws of humans and narrators. For example, CNN and Fox News are both news channels who usually have the same stories that they report on. CNN could report on the story from a more Liberal standpoint but Fox News could report on the same story but from a more Conservative standpoint. Whose story would you trust? That is the main flaw about our society and about people in general, is that we lie or re-write a story to fit what we believe or what we want to hear, instead of telling the full truth. Sometimes, these traits are similar even in fictional stories, when they involve the narrator. Narrators expose flaws when they introduce themselves in their conversations and actions. In the short story…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After explaining how the state of nature evolved into civil society when people began to rely on each other for resources, Rousseau concluded that the social contact that made civil society possible is more important that the individuals who created it. Although civil society created inequality, it also created freedom, morality, and rationality, which make people human. On the other hand, Locke explained that the state of nature evolved into civil society because people wanted to protect their property and liberties. He concluded that civil society exists to benefit the people; if the present government fails to do so it should be overthrown.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Locke’s’ piece, Of the State of Nature Chapter II, he emphasizes the positive views of human nature. Locke supports a no-government form of rule. He believes that man can rise above injustice and keep a fully functioning society without rule or as he puts it they can have “A State of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit…..” (Locke). If you give man the freedom to make his own decisions and choices he will make the correct ones. Freedom of choice is what is needed to keep a society intact and functioning, individuals in a society need to feel as if they are in charge of their own destiny. The natural rights of life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness are backed up by the notion of freedom and choice of…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Locke believes that before we form civil society by consenting to establish government, we live in a State of Nature. He describes this pre-political state as,...a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending on the will of any other man. (Locke, 1980, p.81)The State of Nature is ruled essentially by human nature. Liberty, equality, self preservation, reason, and property are the most prominent principles that Locke feels are innate to humans. Locke explains how nature intended for all men to be equal,...creatures of the same species and rank, promiscuously born to all the same advantages of nature, and the use of the same facilities should be equal amongst another... (Locke, 1980, p.8)Locke comes to the conclusion that humans are self preserving in the State of…

    • 4014 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When it comes to State of Nature, Locke writes in his Two Treatises of Government,“...a state of perfect freedom of acting and disposing of their own possessions and persons as they think fit within the bounds of the law of nature...The natural state is also one of equality in which all power and jurisdiction is reciprocal...” (Lonang Institute; State of Nature §4). Men are freely allowed to do whatever is necessary as long as there are justifications for their actions and to see that everyone around them is just as equal as themselves. Along with his State of Nature is Locke’s belief of Social Contact: “individuals in a state of nature would be bound morally, by the Law of Nature, not to harm each other in their lives or possession… individuals would agree to form a state that would provide a "neutral judge"...an impartial, objective agent of that self-defense, rather than each man acting as his own judge, jury, and executioner...”(Social Contract-Wikipedia). In other terms, man must form a government that they entrust their lives with by giving them support and power, and in return, the government must protect the people from hurting one another by being the objective factor in the justice system. Finally, in the State of Man, Locke claims that “at birth, the mind was a blank slate or “tabula rasa”... born without innate ideas, and that…

    • 1757 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In John Locke’s time of influence, he made a strong impact on many people’s idea of life. He was a strong advocate for the idea that each human had a purpose and they are given many rights from their first breath. In the eyes of Locke, the Natural Rights Philosophy was that all living things should have laws pertaining to their own lives and these laws serve for the preservation of their existence and that no one should stand in the way of any human achieving these rights. In correspondence with him establishing these ideas, many people agreed with this theory and expanded upon it. The Declaration of Independence and the foundation of our Government had many strong connections with the ideas that Locke established in his Natural Rights Philosophy. With his views being exhibited to many, it was clear that he was very impactful to the Declaration of the Independence. Many topics stated in the Preamble were supportive and in favor of the viewpoints of Locke’s Natural Rights Philosophy.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke was an English philosopher and is believed to be one of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers. 17th-century Locke introduced the philosophy that humans agree to a social contract that allows the government to efficiently conduct society in harmony with natural law. He believes that without the control of the government, people would not behave in an acceptable manner and corrupt society. On contrary to the government, he felt the people should have the right to remove the government if they felt their natural rights were being threatened. Under natural law are natural rights. “Natural rights hold that because individuals are human beings capable of rational thinking and moral behavior, they are due all the rights one would have in the natural state.” Therefore Locke believed that all individuals are inherently good and created equally. This means individuals should innately be given natural rights which include: life, liberty, and property.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Rousseau a Philosophe?

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Self preservation is the other key principle which Rousseau attributes to his idea of Natural Right. The desire to preserve oneself is the only thing that can drive one being to harm another, but only in extreme circumstances. Through the evolution of man and the occurrence of village festivals, ideas such as…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Rousseau, in the state of nature, people tended to be isolated, war was absent, and their desires were minimal and circumscribed (i.e., commensurate with their basic survival needs). People did not have the drive to acquire more possessions. There was plenty to go around, an absence of reliance on others, and no real need for extensive social interaction. However, there did exist an unreflective sympathy and general compassion toward others that was indiscriminate and not based on merits.…

    • 2956 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Chapter 5 of John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government, Locke justifies the existence to private property. Locke starts the chapter off with a big picture. He introduces the idea that earth and everything on it belongs to all men, and God hand it to us in hopes that we use “reason to make use of it to the best advantage of life, and convenience” (§26 pp.18). With our given ability to reason and our right to preserve ourselves, God trust that we can utilize the common stock and make the world a better place. This brings us to the main question of the essay, if “nobody had originally a private dominion, exclusive of the rest of mankind” (§26, pp.18-19) over anything in nature, then how does Locke explain the existence of property?…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A state of nature; a life where no governable state exists and no one possesses political power. ‘Why do we not live in a state of nature?’ some may ask. Why must we be under the government’s power? The first step in understanding why we have something, like the government, is to consider what life would be like without it. There has been many different concepts over time as to what a ‘state of nature’ really is and if life really would be awful without it. Initially, Hobbes believed that in a state of nature, all men would turn ‘nasty and brutish’ and life would turn into a never-ending cycle of crime and war as there would be no one there to stop us. On the contrary, Locke believed that man would be content in a state of nature, that life would be the opposite of awful and we would act morally towards each other due to the social contract. Thirdly, Rousseau thought that if we ever found ourselves in a state of nature, men would turn to savages, but would be happy with it.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    State of Nature In the state of nature, Locke speaks of the natural instincts of human beings as a way of defining political power. He describes the state of nature…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays