Preview

Irony of Democracy, Ch1-5 Study Guide

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3542 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Irony of Democracy, Ch1-5 Study Guide
POLITICAL SCIENCE EXAM #1 STUDY GUIDE
TEST: 3/6/14
Based on Chapters 1-5 in “Irony of Democracy”
Chapter 1- The Irony of Democracy

Elites, and not the masses, govern the United States: all major decisions are made by the elite minority….they have power. Elite members are anyone who participates in decisions that allocate resources for society
Masses are the people that do not have power compared to elites. They usually are very uninformed, and many don’t even vote in the national election. Their lives are shaped by the institutions that the elites create
Elite theory is an approach to describing society, focusing on the few with power, their values, their behavior, and their demographics
In a democracy, elites have to take control and they have power over the resources. Despite the differences in political parties, elites generally have consensus over the broader issues (limiting government, individual liberties, and sanctity of private property)
Iron Law of Oligarchy: theory in political science stating that an elite is inevitable in any social organization, of any size, whether family, club, union, business, or society as a whole (there must be elites in any style of government or society…there needs to be control and we can’t have all the millions of people deciding what laws are good for us) Upward mobility is common in our country. People wouldn’t put in so much effort in their lives if they knew they were going to stay in the same social class. Thus, a circulation of elites occurs, where there is a movement of talented and ambitious individuals from the lower strata into the elite Democracy: where there is a participation in government, where people are highly involved and the country forms its own identity. “Let the people rule” (“majority rule, minority rights”) The United States took much of its work from John Locke, who was in favor of “natural rights to life, liberty, and property” Public policy reflects

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap World History Summary

    • 2652 Words
    • 11 Pages

    31. Oligarchy: Form of power structure in which power effectively rests with a small segment of society distinguished by royalty, wealth, family ties, corporate, or military…

    • 2652 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an elitist government it is believed that only a select few of people should hold political power. People who are maybe from a higher class or wealthier than the others form the group of elites. Elitist point of views are taking much more serious and carefully than those who are outsiders to this group.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chavez Ravine Theory

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to C. Wright Mills, in the modern societies of the world, there is almost always a power elite, an elite collective of high ranking individuals, who are non-explicitly in charge of commanding and manipulating the finances, resources of the bureaucratic organizations and foundations, and the economy, therefore they are basically the rulers of the said modern society (Form and Mills, 2001) .…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sociology Questions

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Ruling class are Domhoff’s description of which group? (Ruling class) What are their characteristics?…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plutocracy In America

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Americans are conditioned to see our present form of government as a representative democracy where power is in the hands of all the people. Until this assignment I realize did not understand plutocracy or the fact that we may already be living in a plutocracy. A plutocracy is defined as "government by the wealthy." A political system where power is concentrated in the hands of a small number of wealthy people, usually those with inherited wealth and wealthy families. At the top of every society an ironic mixture of those who are there by merit and capability and those who merely grab, hoard, and wield power and wealth. Every nation has its many, the general populace, and its few, the elite who dominate, rule, and favor themselves with wealth and privilege. It is and always has been the way of the world. It is not difficult to understand why this is so, why every society and nation forms itself into the many and the dominant few.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cameras in Court

    • 2506 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Cummings, M. C., JR., & Wise, D. (2001). Democracy under pressure (9th ed.). New York: Harcourt College Publishers.…

    • 2506 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This majority would consist of the greater number which is the people but power turns those few individuals into a majority. That majority of few individuals use the masses, the people, as instruments because people follow laws with undue respect. These laws are created and put to practice by the majority as a way to control the people. The people follow and respect the laws because following the law is doing right, but the laws themselves are sometimes not what an individual may believe is right or just. The people follow these laws because of their undue respect for laws. Following the laws because they are laws and not because of the justice they promote makes the people the instrument of the government or the majority. The government can pass any law, and the minority, the people, will follow like puppets. Thoreau says "Law never made men a whit more just; and, by means of their respect for it, even the well-disposed are daily made the agents of injustice" (2). Laws in some cases can be unjust but are still followed by the people because of the respect they have for it. People follow military law even if the law is not correct and just in their perception. When people follow these laws mindlessly they are not doing what is right and following personal beliefs but instead following the beliefs of the majority, the few powerful…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oligarchy: A country that is controlled by a small group of people. The definition of democracy has been forgotten when it comes to the election process. Some people even sum up the election process as a way of oligarchy government would do it. This isn't the way our government worked before and it shouldn't work like that ever. We have been bought up from our forefathers as a country where everyone's voices should be heard but apparently it isn't how we imagined it to be today.…

    • 2203 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A pluralist approach to the U.S. political system suggests that: power is widely dispersed throughout society. power is widely dispersed throughout society.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ruling class

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In practical life we all recognize the existence of this ruling class (or political class, as we have elsewhere chosen to define it). We all know that, in our own country, whichever it may be, the management of public affairs is in the hands of a minority of influential persons, to which management, willingly or unwillingly, the majority defer. We know that the same thing goes on in neighboring countries, and in fact we should be put to it to conceive of a real world otherwise organized—a world in which all men would be directly subject to a single person without relationships of superiority or subordination, or in which all men would share equally in the direction of political affairs. If we reason otherwise in theory, that is due partly to inveterate habits that we follow in our thinking and partly to the exaggerated importance that we attach to two political facts that loom far larger in appearance than they are in reality.…

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The importance of elites in high governmental positions- there has to be centralisation in a government, because according to… the majority are disorganised etc, and therefore wouldn’t be able to handle governmental policies. Also been said that the elites have more to lose if everything was to fail, and therefore their best interests are with the people. ‘the mass, who lack both the will and the capacity for political leadership’. P72…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The iron law of oligarchy is a political theory, first developed by the German syndicalist sociologist Robert Michels. It states that all forms of organization, regardless of how democratic or autocratic they may be at the start, will eventually and inevitably develop into oligarchies. The reasons for this are the technical indispensability of leadership, the tendency of the leaders to organize themselves and to consolidate their interests; the gratitude of the led towards the leaders, and the general immobility and passivity of the masses.” - From Wikipedia…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Power Elite

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the modern world, most of the countries have democratic government, which means that decisions are made by the people, who rule and govern the state. However, there is not a single state that practices perfect democracy due to different reasons. Governments are too big, which makes it very complex for every citizen to have a voice in decisions. Or, governments are claimed to be democratic, but in practice they can be close to authoritarian or even totalitarian regimes where one person has a power to make and enforce laws. Political power is not allocated evenly among all members of society, so, in this or that way, governments tend to fall in the hands of the few, whom we can call the elite or the power elite. Power can be defined as the ability to effect and control the behavior of others. Elite, is a relatively small dominant group in a big society that usually made up from the upper class members of society.[1] The theory of power elite claims that power is concentrated in the hands of a few and composed of people who occupy the top positions in society and have access to political power. In other words this theory claims that a single elite group decides “who gets what and how”.[2] I will try to argue that political power belongs to a single elite group and show that the principle of power elite theory exists and works in many societies and try to contrast it to the pluralist view.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    10. Pluralist Theory - An analysis of politics emphasizing the role of diverse and competing interest groups in preventing too much power being accumulated in the hands of political and economic elites.…

    • 5943 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Steve Jobs Amazes Me

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A corollary to this requirement is that the nation's "elites" must also be wise and benign since they will often be the ones who lead the nation. Just as Plato concluded 2000 years ago, the elites must place the interests of the people and state first, or you slide down a path of tyranny and social unrest. Mexico is a good example of a state where the elites (descendants of an exploitive colonial class) are out for their own interests at the expense of the "swinish masses," to quote Jefferson. This leads to revolution and economic chaos which is becoming apparent in the poor state of Chiapas.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays