Preview

Big Time Toy Essay Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
420 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Big Time Toy Essay Example
Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker

Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker
1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract?
While both parties did have an oral agreement they did not have a contract in place. In the case scenario they also agreed to have Chou memorialize their agreement. In the original negotiating contract it stated that a distribution agreement or contract must be in writing. Although Chou received an email from a BTT manager he assumed that BTT wanted to draft the agreement. Chou waited too long to follow up with BTT and exceeded the 90 day time frame.

2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? - Even though there were terms and agreements reached and an agreement was drafted there was never anything signed. As stated in the original negotiating terms a distribution agreement must be in writing. If Choa would have replied back to the email and agreed to the terms in writing that could possibly work against him.

3. Does the fact that the parties were communicating by e-mail have any impact on your analysis in Questions 1 and 2 (above)? – No because the negotiating agreement precedes the email and Choa never responded to the email agreeing to it.

4. What role does the statute of frauds play in this contract? – The statute of frauds is a legal requirement that certain contracts be in writing. The email sent by BTT would be a common law contract but it was not signed by both parties. If Choa would have signed it then the contract could have possibly been enforced.

5. Could BTT avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake? Explain. Would either party have any other defenses that would allow the contract to be avoided? - No the doctrine of mistake would not help BTT because this was never a contract. If this was a contract there are statutes that impose strict liability.

6. Assuming, arguendo, that this e-mail does constitute an agreement, what consideration

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    law421 week 3

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Chou believed that this e-mail was meant to replace the earlier notion that he should draft a contract, and one month passed. BTT then sent Chou a fax requesting that he send a draft for a distribution agreement contract. Despite the fact that Chou did so immediately after receiving the BTT fax, several more months passed without response from BTT.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chou and BTT reach the point of having a contract when they agree to all terms. In the email send by BTT covering the obligations of the parties and the terms of the agreement, BTT showed objective intent. According to Melvin,” Objective intent Requirement for an offer to have legal effect necessitating that generally, the offer or must have a serious intention to become bound by the offer and the terms of the offer must be reasonably certain” (Melvin, 2011, pa 724). Because the contract did not involve the sale of goods, land, or lease of goods or land a written contract was not necessary. In the case of Chou and BTT contract, this situation deals with services for the distribution of the game, and not a production contract or a sales contract.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 421 Week 4

    • 636 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In regards to contracts, the statutes of fraud are pertinent when a statute of frauds absolutely asks for written evidence. The mailbox rule came into effect when Chou had received the contract made by BTT and sent via email as Chou did not reject it. However, in this situation Chou never replied to BTT’s e-mail, thus the contract agreement was established…

    • 636 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LAW 421 WEEK 4

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. Could BTT avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake? Explain. Would either party have any other defenses that would allow the contract to be avoided?…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 421

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By studying the situation, I don't believe the 2 sides concerned ever had a deal. In the situation, the sides reached a deal just 3 days ahead of the conclusion of a 90-day time frame set in the initial negotiation deal. In the initial negotiation deal, it says that there would be no distribution agreement until it was on paper. As soon as the BTT manager posted the e-mail to Chou, he described the conditions of a distribution contract; however it doesn't make the email an agreement as neither side inked it. Just a verbal deal was reached. With no legally binding draft and the signature of both sides present, no agreement existed.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Big Time Toymaker

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This scenario deals with Big Time Toymaker and a contract they were negotiating with Chou, the inventor of a new strategy game that BTT wanted exclusive negotiation rights for a 90-day period. When Chou received an email with the details of what they were going to agree upon, he thought that was the contract and did not proceed in drawing up a contract himself. Months passed and when BTT changed management, they informed Chou that they were not interested in distributing his new strategy game, Strat.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Additionally, Chou and BTT reached an oral agreement for distribution on day 87 of the 90-day exclusive negotiation agreement with an understanding that Chou would generate a written contract to memorialize the agreement. Prior to generating the contract, Chou received an email from a BTT manager titled “Strat Deal.” This email served the purpose of memorializing the agreement because it detailed the terms that Chou and BTT reached. This caused Chou to reasonably believe that the email constituted the agreement in writing, regardless of the use of the word “contract” in the communication.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the theory practice, the contract between Big Time Toymaker (BTT) and Chou was a verbal contract. While there was an email confirming the terms of agreement, this contract was never finalized. While they both verbally agreed to the terms, it was never formally written. The email provided to Chou was intended to solidify the contract, even though no use of the word “contract” was ever used. In regards to Chou, he could easily fight the case that it was to review the verbal agreement, even though no physical agreement was signed.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Could BTT avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake? Explain. Would either party have any other defenses that would allow the contract to be avoided?…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issue: The issue is whether the objective circumstances indicate that the parties intended to form a contract…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Big Time Toy Maker

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The facts that may weigh in favor of Chow are the exclusive negotiation rights for a 90-day period, the oral agreement that was reached at the meeting and the email he received from Big Time Toy. The facts against Chou would be that there is never an actual written agreement drafted by Chou. In addition, the exclusive negotiation rights agreement stipulated that no distribution contract existed unless it was in writing. Finally, no written agreement was turned in within the original 90-day period stipulated in the exclusive negotiation right agreement.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Big Time Toymaker

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “5. Could BTT avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake?” Explain. Would either party have any other defenses that would allow the contract to be avoided?” (Sean P. Melvin, 2011, p.155). No because a signed contract did not exist. Based on the e-mail, Chou could claim a mistake because he considered the email as a contract. BTT could say the timeframe had passed, and they came under new management.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theory to practice

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The point where parties entered a contract was when the BTT manager sent Chou an email subject “Strat Deal”. This was the point where a contract was mad because BTT had received an exclusive 90day negotiating period, and distribution agreement wasn’t going to be in effect until received in writing. This email also included terms discussed during the oral agreement and pricing. The agreement of a contract was that it had to be in writing in order to exist. Never did BTT stress the form of writing. An email consist of written words, therefore it was a written agreement. A contract is an agreement with specific terms between two or more people or entities in which there is a promise to do something in return for something else. When the email was sent that was the completion of the exchange and fulfilled contract requirements. The oral agreement that both parties had before the email was sent was establishing objective intent to contract. BTT also sent a fax to Chou a month after the 90day period passed requesting the draft to be sent. This action also showed intent to contract. What weighs in Chous favor in terms of parties…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The statute of fraud is defined as, “a law that requires that certain contracts be in writing, and that those contracts be signed by the parties who are to be bound by the contract”. [1] The policy that underpins the Statue of Frauds was established during the reign of King Charles II through a statutory enactment requiring a written record for specified types of contracts. [2] These specified types of contracts could not be enforced unless a memorandum of it is written and signed by the party to be charged. [3] The basic rules include: 1. the stature does not require the entire contract to be written, but only a memorandum of it, 2. only the party who is to be charged, that is, against whom enforcement is sought, need to have signed it, and 3. The consequence of noncompliance is usually unenforceability, not invalidity. [4] This was to ensure that a person could not seek to enforce an obligation of the kind covered by the statute purely on the basis of unreliable and possibly perjured oral testimony, but would have to produce some adequate written record of the contract. [5] The writing can also help reduce the chance of any future litigation by giving the parties the opportunity to take a second look at the terms and conditions of their agreement before it becomes final. [6] Because of the advancement of communication through technology the adaptation of “writing” and “signature” has been required to take account of communication by other forms, particularly including electronic and media. [7]…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Consequences of either party not upholding the agreement and how unforeseen complications will be handled…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays