Preview

A Solution to Factory Farming Ethics

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1640 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Solution to Factory Farming Ethics
God gave man dominion over the land and the animals so that he could take care of them and prosper with them Genesis 1:24-31. Since the human race was created in God's image, humans should exercise that dominion with wisdom and mercy like God does upon man. Yet man has perverted this duty by taking too much from the land and animals, and not fulfilling the original contract to take care of them. This has become evident in factory farming because man is mistreating the animals in order to produce the cheapest and most productive system for vast amounts of meat no matter the moral standing to animals and the land. This has to be changed to keep the contract intact, which Peter Singer and Jim Mason are trying to do in The Ethics of Eating Meat. They are trying to convert as many people as possible to vegetarianism and veganism to stop factory farming and what it is doing to the world as it is known. Yet one must argue if that is ever possible, so a better solution must be sought for all the omnivores, vegetarians, and vegans out there may have an alternative that best suits everyone's wishes and the best interests of the contract. One must first look at the issues at hand before seeking the solution that best fits everyone's and everything's best interests. First off, humans have developed something called "speciesism" (Singer And Mason 777), which is a prejudice against anything that is not a part of the dominant human race. Man has denied reasonable rights to animals and plants to prosper in a way that allows them to live their lives not as an object, but as a living thing. Such as it is in factory farming, animals are placed into cramped shelves and confined spaces with unhealthy environmental elements. This is not truly living by any means known to man. Humans know and understand this because they have the same interests as the animals do when it comes to living standards. Singer and Mason state, "If an animal feels pain, the pain matters as much as it does


Cited: Singer and Mason. A World of Ideas: Essential Readings For College Writers Eighth Edition. Boston New York: Bedford/St. Martin 's, 2010. Print

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    MGT 455

    • 895 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The issue at hand is the ethical treatment of animals. Since animals are gods creatures don’t they deserve to live a respectable life, even if they are being used as a food source?…

    • 895 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jonathan Safran Foer is a vegetaria. He employs strong voice to advocate that people should be vegetaria. Eating meat will make the ecosystem breakdown.For example, he talked about salmon farming destroyed the system of wild salmon, and human’s eating habits are contagious,when you see your friends eating salmon you will eat it. The mammal shouldn’t be eaten by huaman. And now there are eighteen percent students are vegetaria in the college, and there will be more.If it is possible for people to see where does the food come from, they will say we’re buying the wrong thing. Therefore Jonathan Safran Foer believes that he is right to believe and there will be more people say “I am not going to eat that.”…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We are using animals in such a horrific way that causes negative changes to the environment.We should always think what this world be if we didn’t have the things we have. We would be miserable and everything would be a competition. There’s lots of people out there working to try to make a difference in this world, but also need people to get involved. It fitted into our course goals and objective because it made me realize how much our world is so corrupt. The only thing we could do is change our ways of thinking, so we can actually live in a peaceful and stable society. Not to think, that we could lose everything in an…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    These issues are seemingly disparate; how can I protect plants and animals while providing equitable living conditions for all human beings and planning cities? The truth of the matter is that these subjects are interconnected. Leopold recognizes this in his essay, “Prairie Birthday.” One line that spoke the most to me was, “…we are confronted by the two alternatives already mentioned: either insure the continued blindness of the populace, or examine the question whether we cannot have both progress and plants” (Leopold, 1966). I believe that yes, we can have…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history, human beings have grouped themselves together in communities. The concept of communities offered two major benefits; first, defense against enemies that might threaten the community. And second, the ability to sustain a constant food source to subsist on year-round. The need for a constant food supply became a major factor in early farming practices (Pollan, 2006) through animal husbandry. The waste from the livestock was used as fertilizer for the other crops that were raised on the farm. These crops were utilized to feed the farmers, sell at market, as well as feed the livestock through the next winter. In this manner, there is a continuous lifecycle on the homestead. The overall mindset is different, first, I will feed my family, second try to make a profit, and third, I will try to keep livestock for the next year in order to grow my farm. When the production of beef became more about profit the respect and love for the land fell catastrophically to the wayside. Modern feedlot operations are creating environmental problems that will affect our country in the future, as well as health issues for consumers, which would to corrected by implementing strong regulations in the handling of feedlot waste and a mandated correction in the diet of the cattle.…

    • 2210 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I will write my essay on Factory Farming. I chose this topic because I believe that the…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Too much of a good thing can be bad for us as human beings and the environment. We like to buy the biggest and best of everything. This has turned from buying big cars and big stereos to buying larger hamburgers and steaks. We as a nation have gone from having meat as a delicacy and eating it on occasion to most people eating only meat during every meal. We need to go back to eating more fruits and vegetables and less meat. We also need to find different ways to produce meat in ways that are safer for the animals and the environment.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil. outline

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    IV. Singer gives three ways which a utilitarian condemnation of the treatment of farm animals falls short when entitling we should switch to a vegetarian diet.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No one likes to suffer. None of us like to feel pain, but factory farmed animals such as cows, pigs, and chickens experience great pain in their short-lived lives. The website factoryfarming.com, states, “a standard beef slaughter house kills 250 cattle every hour.” The method used is “stunning” this is done by using a catapult gun and giving the cows a mechanical blow to the head. It is to render them unconscious, but this procedure is terribly imprecise: “as a result, conscious animals are often hung upside down, kicking and struggling, while a slaughterhouse worker makes another attempt to render them unconscious. Eventually the animals will be ‘stuck’ in the throat with a knife, and blood will gush from their bodies whether or not they are conscious” (factoryfarming.com). An animal has an intrinsic value, and to dismiss that, is morally wrong. How do we kill others that value their life? People may say it’s the cow’s…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Letter to the Editor

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I don’t think we can change the way we treat animals. We should just let them be open and free. All the things that are happening now, will never change. Including hunting, killing, and eating animals. If we keep eating animals, then there won’t be any animals left in the world. Then what will people eat after that? Themselves? People should stop eating animals and save them instead. Otherwise, there will be nothing left.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Benedict Summary

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cited: Benedict, Ruth. "The Individual and the Pattern of Culture." A World of Ideas: Essential Readings for College Writers. 8th ed. Ed. Lee A. Jacobus. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin 's, 2010. 301-324. Print.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    not the best or the safest solution for animals. Animals also are a living beings and feel the same…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals Vs Vegetarianism

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Vegetarians do not eat any meat but still consume egg and dairy products. However, the egg and dairy industry may also raise their animals in poor conditions, even organic, free-range, or “certified humane” farms. The male infant laying hens “are invariably killed as soon as they have been sexed” because they have “no commercial value” (Mason and Singer 279). Price could still arise as an issue for many because similar to the free-range and certified humane meat, these types of eggs and dairy products are also generally more expensive. “Veganism is a sure way of completely avoiding participation in the abuse of farm animals” which is what Singer believes is the only sure way of avoiding the unethical implications of eating factory farmed food (Mason 279). Singer gives compelling evidence and asserts that going vegan, despite the other alternatives, is the only sure way to avoid taking part in the abuse of animals. Since vegans do not consume any animal based products at all, they completely ensure that they are not promoting the abuse of farm animals anywhere in the production process. He further maintains that no matter how drastic the change away from supporting the factory farming industry could be on the individual at first, not doing so simply because it is difficult is an unsound moral…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People have to water the animal clean the stall give it space to roam and people have to feed it. Over one point three billion tons of are consumed by farm animals(walsh). In poverty stricken areas cows eat up to ten times the feed of richer areas(walsh) which takes even more land. Two thirds of all farmland is being used to feed livestock(brooks). Which to give people an idea is forty percent of the world’s land surface(walsh). Not to mention the the deforestation that goes on from the country the food is from(brooks). Not to mention that meat production is projected to double by two thousand and twenty(brooks). Live stock is estimated to use thirty percent of land space(matthews). Almost thirty three percent of arable land is used for livestock feed(matthews). On top of that twenty percent of pastures are considered lessened because of overgrazing(matthews). Animal agriculture also creates ocean dead zones(brooks). Animal agriculture overall is a bad thing because of land useage. Plus there are not enough people with animal agriculture degrees to put in good environmental legislature(grandin). In animal agriculture the government does very little practical research(grandin). So even though it’s estimated that eighty percent of tax revenue comes from exported grain(grandin) which is one of the main ingredients in animal feed. So even though that it provides that much tax revenue. It is not worth it. Our…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the article was ending he began to try too hard to convince the reader and ended up losing the interest. He seemed to be blaming the entire world's problems on meat consumption. The problem is not eating the meat; it is how the meat is processed. Pace stated “Most of today's modernized farms have long, windowless sheds in which animals live like prisoners their entire lives” (Pace 355) He is saying that the way farms are being run now a days are destroying the environment and that is why eating meat is bad. Think back hundreds of years ago when the Native Americans used to roam North America. The animals were free, then hunted down and eaten. No one seemed to have a problem with animal consumption back then. The way to improve farms and the environment is not by not eating them, it is by changing they way they are processed. Even if most of the world decides to become a vegetarian the processing process will remain the same and the overpopulated animals will be killed the same, but this time it will go to waste because no one will eat it.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays