Preview

A Discourse on Inequality(Rico Man)

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1459 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Discourse on Inequality(Rico Man)
Report On "A Discourse On Inequality", By Jean Jacques Rousseau

In Rousseau's book "A Discourse On Inequality", he looks into the question of where the general inequality amongst men came from. Inequality exists economically, structurally, amongst different generations, genders, races, and in almost all other areas of society. However, Rousseau considers that there are really two categories of inequality. The first is called Natural/Physical, it occurs as an affect of nature. It includes inequalities of age,, health, bodily strength, and the qualities of the mind and soul. The second may be called Moral/Political inequality, this basically occurs through the consent of men. This consists of the privileges one group may have over another, such as the rich over the poor. Rousseau came to the conclusion that the best way to examine the inequality in society is to examine the beginning of mankind itself. He tried to imagine the early state of man assuming there was ever actually a state where man existed only with the nature, in a solitary, and primitive lifestyle. He did not however revert as far back to the idea of the Neanderthal man to examine the ideas man held and where they came from. Instead, he looked at a state where man looked, and seemed to have the same physical abilities as he does today. Rousseau also concedes that a time where the ideas of government, ownership, justice, and injustice did not exist may not have ever existed. If what many religions tell us is true, then, in mans beginning, he was from the start, handed down laws from god which would influence his thinking and decisions. Through this, the only way such a period could come about would have to be through some catastrophic event, which would not only be impossible to explain, but consequently, impossible to prove. Therefore, imagining this state could prove not only embarrassing, but would be a contradiction to the Holy Scriptures. In the "natural state", Rousseau suggests that we

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unlike Thomas Hobbes, who believed humans were naturally evil, Jean Rousseau believed that humans are born, neither good nor bad, thus corruption or goodness is taught from the society. For example, when children are born, everything they…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    whether it has low income but still they getting thousands of job applications. Walmart is…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his 1755 discourse on 'The Origins of Inequality', Jean-Jacques Rousseau argues his conception of the natural state of mankind, and its subsequent corruption throughout the progress towards civil society. Whilst Rousseau's idealism can be targeted as unrealistic, and his criticisms of the state potentially destabilising to certain societies, ultimately he makes a valid philosophical argument against tyranny which helps found republican political values.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau concludes that the progression of the sciences and arts are the cause of the corruption of virtue and morality. This discourse won Rousseau fame and recognition, and it laid much of the philosophical groundwork for a second, longer work, The Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Rousseau’s praise of nature is a theme that continues throughout his writing career.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau developed a definition for the state of nature by using his knowledge of humans and animals, which he gathered from observations and experiences. He did not base his ideas of the state of nature on religious beliefs. Rather, he worked backwards; he used what he knew about contemporary man to guess how man was in the beginning (i.e. in the state of nature). Locke begins to explore the state of nature on the premise that the savage man had natural rights in the state of nature. Both philosophers followed the same train of thought: the state of nature, the development of property, the need for the social contract, the civil society that was created, and the governments that formed in those societies. They differ in that Rousseau believed that people left the state of nature when they discovered the benefits of relying on each other for resources. The idea of property caused labor to become necessary; this created a need for a social contract, which formed civil society. Since civil society formed on communal values, it should come before the individual. The individual does not sustain the social contract, the group of individuals does. In…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Madison asserts that the State has no say over a person’s relationship with the Creator, Rousseau only rejects certain State religions on technical grounds and eventually concludes that society should demand a significant religious test. It is surprising that given Madison and Rousseau’s uniform goal, a stable society, they should come up with such widely varying methods for achieving it. One may be tempted to suggest that, unlike Rousseau, Madison considers individual rights to be more important than the proper functioning of society. Upon closer examination, however, it becomes clear that Madison and Rousseau's general disagreement on State power stems from a more fundamental dispute over how society works. According to Madison, society exists with a certain power and then instills this power in the government, while Rousseau argues that it is the creation of a government which makes society materialize. These disparate views on the directionality of government and society directly lead to Madison and Rousseau’s other…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rousseau Vs Hobbes

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page

    In favor of Hobbes, he does make several valid points. His theory in regards to constant competition applies to this day, as people constantly find themselves in situations where they meet others that are of equal physical strengths and could be faced with a conflict as a result. Despite the points that Hobbes makes, his theory is overall negative, as living in a constant state of fear and paranoia is absolutely no way to live one’s life. Rousseau is very pertinent to remind others of how life was before society and technology took over. Life was extremely simple, and everyone was fairly alright with living alone and focusing on themselves and their life. If today’s society was the same as it was over a thousand years ago, almost no one would…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machismo Rico Essay

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For many years throughout Hispanic/Latino culture it has been the duty of the patriarch in the family to be the primary breadwinner in the family. In both Puerto Rico and Colombia it is the duties of the male not only to provide but to serve as a disciplinarian of the children and also maintain a sense of order in the household as well as the community. There was segregation amongst men and women in society based on their career choices, Machismo is ones sense of being manly and in many households in Colombia. Many women were busy raising the children and tending to the household, while also considering their husbands wellbeing more than their own. Many prominent roles in society and the workforce were held by men, but as time went on and more and more women were entered into the workforce this idea of machismo has dwindled.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    TMA01 part 2 3

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Differences, whether real or perceived, have a direct effect on inequality. Inequality in society can be seen as a lack of balance between people in the form of wealth distribution, opportunities available and other resources which are shared within a society. You can also find inequalities for the disabled in gaining access to public transport, shops doors and pavements/sidewalks.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cc Exam Study Guide

    • 17156 Words
    • 69 Pages

    -Rousseau next claims that he perceives two basic principles that exist "prior to reason"—that is, before man is deformed by society and rationality.…

    • 17156 Words
    • 69 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Essay Outlines

    • 3139 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau stated that men were all equal causing the French to question the King and the slaves of their owners…

    • 3139 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Homework

    • 882 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau of France believed that in the state of nature, people would get along and work with each other. However, Rousseau thought that by interacting with each other, people would eventually become corrupt and…

    • 882 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gender inequality and class inequality are two of the most contemplated inequality issues from the time. Although most of each issue have been resolved, their essence still lingers in modern-day society. Why they were created is beyond the known as of now, but they, along with other inequalities, subconsciously define how societies ensue, even today. Clearly, political organization, the Agricultural Revolution, and inequalities have had an impact on human societies from an early…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Inequality is socially created by matching two different kinds of processes. “The social roles in society are first matched to ‘reward packages’ of unequal value and individual members of society are then allocated to the positions so defined and rewarded” Social inequality is different from economic inequality but the two inequalities are linked. Economic inequality refers to disparities in the distribution of economic assets and income. While economic inequality is caused by the unequal distribution of wealth, social inequality exists because the lack of wealth in certain areas prohibits these people from obtaining the same housing, health care, etc. as the wealthy in societies where access to these social goods depends on wealth. “The degree of inequality in a given reward or asset depends, of course, on its dispersion or concentration across the individuals in the population”. (Dictionary.com) I also feel economic inequalities goes well with these examples before I go further…… Economic inequality refers to disparities in the distribution of economic assets and income. The term typically refers to…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Pour sa part, Rousseau envisage aussi un moment initial de la production humaine n'impliquant pas encore de séparation entre catégories. Mais cet âge d'or ne dure pas : la mise en place des premières sociétés, heureuses, est perturbée par une inégalité physique qui aboutit à une inégalité de la production, des échanges, des propriétés et des richesses. Une fois encore les hommes se divisent (en riches…

    • 835 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays