Preview

Why We Dont Complain

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1898 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why We Dont Complain
Sarah Joshway
Mr. Fields
English Composition 101-30
21 October 2013
“Why Don’t We Complain” Analysis We don’t complain enough. Is the simply and unique argument that Buckley is presenting in his essay. The purpose of this essay is to convince Americans that it’s time to start complaining. Instead of simply pushing aside the issues that are present to us on a daily bases Buckley wants us to confront them head on and to simply speak up. Instead of dealing with hot trains, an unfocused movie screen and long line that is caused from a supposedly lazy worker, we should speak up because we have the power to change the little problems. Buckley is afraid that if we continue to show apathy towards small problems then we will continue this trend when faced with much larger conflicts that can be found in things such as our government. Buckley’s thesis is that we should speak up when we aren’t satisfied, or don’t agree with something, essentially complain more often, because if we don’t complain it can lead to us entering an apathy coma that will cause the American to blindly accept an issue because we choose not to exert the will power to fix it. Some of his suggestion as to why we don’t complain is include: we assume someone will, we don’t know why its wasn’t done in the first place so we don’t question it, we just don’t want to cause a fuss, we think our opinion doesn’t matter, or we receive peer pressure from others not to complain. To understand Buckley’s essay I used the stasis theory questions to help me identify which one that author is trying to present. The Stasis questions are meant to help the readers determine the question at issue so that you can get to the heart of argument and distinguish major claims from minor elements of support. Buckley’s central question is stated clearly in the title of the essay “Why Don’t We Complain?” I started to search for the author’s main question by trying to apply all of the six stasis questions and choosing the one

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau takes the motto "A government that governs least governs best" (1) to heart in his essay "Civil Disobedience". Throughout his controversial masterpiece, Thoreau criticizes the government for having too much power and interfering with the American population, but he also blames the governed for mindlessly obeying any law that is passed. Thoreau uses countless literary devices in order to make the touchy opinions presented in "Civil Disobedience" easier to understand and more convincing. Through use of innumerable similes and metaphors, Thoreau makes his arguments and ideas easier to understand, and effectively convinces anyone who reads his essay that the government is "each instant losing some of its integrity" (1), and that it should be done away with immediately.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Jemméz, Gloria. “Against the Odds, and Against the Common Good.” Current Issues and Enduring Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Arguments, with Readings, 9th edition. Boston, MA: Bedford/St Martins, 2011: 116-119. Print.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    World War 2

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first essay G.I Joe: Fighting for Home by John Morton Blum and the second essay American Liberals: Fighting for a Better World by Alan Brinkley both 'look at the experience of the war from different vantage points: that of the soldier fighting for his own elemental survival as well as for his country, and that of the society back home.”…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Published in the New York Times, Murray is addressing a primarily liberal audience. However, it is read by a general audience both liberals and conservatives between the ages of twenty and sixty because it is circulated nationwide and internationally. This newspaper reaches the educated upper, middle, and lower classes. Murray includes himself in the same category as the reader, however his tone and word choice suggest that he sides with Summer's radical comments and this in turn weakens his argument as a whole.…

    • 2015 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dahl starts by asking what he believes to be a simple question, “Why should we Americans uphold our Constitution?” p.1 this is not as simple it could be argued as what Dahl would have us believe. However, it is the question that needs to stay in the mind of the reader when you discover the arguments of this text. In that the Constitution is undemocratic and outdated and that has worked in manners to which people like Madison did not intend, for instance political parties and the election of president by electoral college to which Dahl…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Lewis proclaims that the new voting bill will not cause the change yearned for since not all African Americans have the right to vote. For instance, in the text, Lewis states “the voting section of the bill will not help the thousands of black people who want to vote” (para 3). In other words, Lewis would like to bring to attention unequal the voting system is. The uses this evidence to suggest that if the voting system is unequal, then how can the bills in favor of those who cannot vote be put in place? He reminds the audience that together they stand and cry “One man. One vote.” (para 3). In making this comment, Lewis urges the crowd to remember what they are fighting for and that no one is alone in the fight for civil rights. Lewis’…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Quintilian Rhetoric

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Through the emotional and ideological power of his rhetoric, Lincoln’s speech not only inspires Union soldiers to create a free and just world, but also reinvigorates this intrinsically human struggle for moral progress within responders from any context. The allusions to the Declaration of Independence at the onset of the speech, with the direct quote of the iconic line “all men are created equal”, immediately appeals to the human desire for Liberty, and a yearning for the values of freedom and equality to emerge in the world is immediately felt by both Union troops and future responders. Lincoln further utilises the anti-thesis, “The world will little note, nor long remember, what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here”, to raise permanent and everlasting images of sacrifice for the ideals which his symbolic nation represents- freedom and equality- inspiring all audiences to similarly fight for moral progress. The epistrophe of ‘people’ in “that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth” re-enforces the image of human liberation. Combined with the juxtaposition of the moralistic ‘perish’ with the idea of ‘birth’, Lincoln simultaneously inspires and burdens Union troops to persevere in defending the nation- a living, evolving and ever-changing…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government was charging a poll-tax on the citizens in Massachusetts. A poll-tax was a “per head” tax imposed on all citizens to help support the war in Mexico (Jacobus, 302). Because Thoreau did not agree with the war, he did not feel it necessary to pay the poll-tax. Thoreau contends, “I have paid no poll-tax in six years. I was put into a jail once on this account, for one night; and as I stood considering the walls of solid stone, two or three feet thick, the door of wood and iron, a foot thick, and the iron grating which strained the light, I could not help being struck by the foolishness of that institution which treated me as I were mere flesh and blood and bones, to be locked up” (316). He continued, “I did not for a moment feel confined, and the walls seemed a great waist of stone and mortar” (316). Thoreau stood up for what he thought to be morally correct, and being put in the county jail was not going to stop him. He was considered the minority but he was not concerned with that. He knew that in order to make a change, you had to be a part of it. Thoreau used his words to convince his audience that it was their ethical responsibility to stand up against the immoral…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Is it not possible to take a step further towards recognizing and organizing the rights of man?” By this, we all know Thoreau is accentuating his own needs, rather than those of the majority, because as he has already stated, “A majority are permitted.” Instead of distinguishing the fact that the “majority” of people are satisfied with the government formation, he insists on irritating them and trying to change their motives, in reproofing the fulfilled ambitions they have accomplished, and hopes for tomorrow. His unawareness in this and other perspectives are clearly visible.…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Papers

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “…that our governments are too unstable, that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.”…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau spoke in an emotional tone in his essay “Civil Disobedience.” The emotional part of his essay of Civil Disobedience is that he wants the people to speak up about what type of government they would want to have. Another emotional part was when he started to tell the people to stop paying their taxes so that if the government doesn’t get what they want then maybe they will reform and change their ways. Most of the people are afraid of the government and what the government will do to them and their property if someone disobeys their orders. The government has the right to take their property away from them. The government lets them keep their property if the people listen and obey what they say. The people feel that the government is protecting their rights. Thoreau want the people to rebel against the government and revolutionize together because they are treated like slaves and subjected to military law. People want a better government but they won’t do anything to correct the situation. They always think someone else will do something but no one ever does so nothing ever changes. It is very hard to change the minds of people who support the government the way it is. Men are afraid it will make things much worse for them if they go against the government even if they know they are right and the government is wrong. Thoreau says, “If you think you are right in your opinion then you are the majority and stand up for your rights against the government. Stop giving the government what it wants and maybe the government will reform to what the people want.” He wants people…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Taxation without representation!” This James Otis saying had been running through my family's head all day long. The speech was so inspiring, so fascinating, it is like a bell after it has been rung. The sound continues out into the open, leaving the colonist in despair. “This tax is outrages!” I look into my fathers fire lit eyes as he screams this over and over, each time with a different tone. “Honey please calm down. Come sit, we will have a family discussion.” “Julia! We do not need to have a discussion. We need to fight!” I hate hearing mom and dad fight. It doesn't usually happen, but when it does, it's bad.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The author then gives the following hypothetical: “A student named Christina attends a public high school in small town West Virginia. She practices atheism as her belief system along with both students and adults. Never afraid to assert her First Amendment rights in any given context, Christina actively participates in local organizations that share her views and she writes for an online journal concerning the lifestyles of teenage atheists. One day in school, her history teacher gives an assignment asking the students to write an essay about what they would do to change the current landscape of American government. Although the teacher does not give any specific instructions about writing the paper, the general consensus is that the students must implement governmental theories learned in class within their respective essays. The best essays will be presented at a school-sponsored function to students and various faculty…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why is everyone got to be mad about what they don't have, and be mad for something they have that isn't good enough. Why can't americans be thankful for what they have in life? Back in the 1900's they didn't have what we have now these days, and they lived a happy loving life with no problem. So why these days does everyone have to hate what they have, or be mad because something good…

    • 76 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout once in your life, you may have been confronted with a situation where you accept inconveniences instead of taking action. According to William F. Buckley, American people everywhere have refrained from “trying to rectify irrational vexations”. In Buckley’s essay, “Why Don’t We Complain?” he explains some situations that he was involved in where no one would complain to repair an uncomfortable situation. Throughout the essay, Buckley uses his experiences and strong reasoning to show why he believes that the American people do not complain. Buckley attempts to support that the apathy that Americans would accept inconveniences instead of taking action is the cause of many Americans’ apathy toward huge political and social issues, creating a vicious circle of indifference and sheer laziness. After reading Buckley’s essay, I support Buckley’s ideas about assertiveness and helplessness due to three reasons.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays