Preview

Why The Constitution Is Not A Simple Document

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
542 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why The Constitution Is Not A Simple Document
From reading the document and gathering evidence in my opinion the constitution is not a simple document, it's much more complex. The constitution of the United States was written in 1787, at the Pennsylvania State House which is now known as Independence Hall today. Under the constitution, Congress has the responsibility of balancing power between the Judicial and executive branches, making new justified laws, and the ability to declare war. The Constitution is considered the highest law in the U.S and all past and new laws come from the constitution in a way. The president is allowed to veto specific legislative acts, but Congress has the power to abrogate presidential vetoes by 66% greater parts of both houses. The Constitution likewise …show more content…
Separation of Powers in which power among legislative, executive, and judicial governments is divided. Checks and Balances where a system allows each branch of government to limit the powers of others to keep from abusing it. Individual rights where liberties and rights are guaranteed under the Bill of Rights. And finally Republicanism where a form of government in which people elect representatives to create new laws and enforce them. At the point when the united states won its Independence from England in 1781, Americans felt more devoted to their individual states than to their new nation. A great amount of people did not wish to make a solid national government far from their homes far from their homes, over which they felt they would have next to zero control - they had quite recently battled a long and intense war to free themselves from such an administration. Pioneers composed the new American government as indicated by a record known as the Articles of Confederation. The Articles gave every expression of freedom and spoke to minimal more than a group of companionship between them. The primary reason for the Articles was to build up a framework by which the states could co-work in the event that they expected to protect themselves against their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The thirteen American colonies required a functioning government after the Revolutionary War. The Founding Fathers’ John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and George Washington wrote up the first attempt at a government called The Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation gave majority power to the states, this weakened the newly created government system. The Articles of Confederation replaced the U.S. Constitution because there needed to be a checks and balance system between the U.S. Government and its states by ensuring neither party had majority power.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were also many international and domestic problems involved with the Articles of Confederation. The United States lacked the military power to be able to defend itself against Britain and Spain. The British still occupied their forts near the Great Lakes area, and congress found it very difficult to negotiate territory with Spain. Under the new form of government, we had no judicial system or executive branch, but we did have a legislative branch. Our congress was unicameral, meaning it had one house, which was the senate. Because the states were acting as individual countries, they seldom agreed with…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the Articles of Confederation unified the American colonies for the first time, the individual states had a hard time allowing a central government to solely control their territory. Due to fear of an all powerful monarchy like the one they had experienced in England the colonies were wary of allowing a central government certain powers. These certain powers included control of commerce, ability to tax, and even the ability to act directly upon individual citizens of a state. While the Articles provided a loose confederation to unify the new country, they were only a temporary solution due to their obvious weaknesses in several areas. The Articles of Confederation were essentially ineffective in their ruling over the newly formed 13 states.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation of 1781 produced the first endeavor of government structure. This attempt of forming a national and state government failed. Some of the issues that transpired from the constitution include: Each state only had one vote in Congress, regardless of state size; Congress did not have the powers to tax or regulate foreign or interstate commerce; There was not a recognized national court system or executive branch to enforce acts passed by Congress; While amendments to the Constitution required a unanimous vote, the passing of a law required a 9/13 vote. The lack of involvement of the national government allowed states to become self-governing and sovereign. States printed their own money that only had value within that territory which created a hindrance in trade and in turn produced an unstable economy. The national government having no enforcing authority and the United States of America was in a state of chaos. This generated an out lash from individuals.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States' form of government from 1781-1789, was based on the Articles Of Confederation. The document itself did provide the early establishment with a form of national government, a legislative branch, and expansion of land to the west, but still had more weaknesses than it did strengths. The articles were weak and would not be able to provide the growing nation with an effective government. One of the main reasons being (for the weaknesses), was the States' fear of a strong executive branch, in other words, the monarchial government they fought to be free from during the Revolution. The articles failed to efficiently regulate trade, levy taxes, and predominantly enforce the laws written. As time progressed, rather than revising the articles, a better Constitution was needed to replace this ineffective government.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1781 and 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an ineffective government, Although there were flaws, strong steps were taken in the attempt to try and make the United States a better country. The Articles set up a government that gave individual states the power to make their own laws and enforce them. This was ineffective for the following reasons: 1) The Continental Congress controlled public affairs but there was nothing in the Articles that gave Congress the power to enforce laws or unify the states. 2) There was no solid system of money to ensure that taxes would be paid or protect commerce, both nationally and with foreign trade. 3) The country lacked unity and strength because there was no leadership.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." During those years the United States government was still developing and the Articles of Confederation was not an effective form of government. The states had a strong objection against the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was not a government well suited for this new country. The United States needed power over the states to make it a better place to live and have separate states with different laws.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was such a week form of government that it would never have kept the 13 very different colonies together. The people during this time were very uneasy and scared as to what would happen next and they knew it was time for change. Change was very frightening and new for all people in the United States and no one knew what to expect, not even the men trying to reform the new government. As John Jay wrote to George Washington "…Our affairs seem to lead to some crisis, some revolution – something that I cannot foresee or conjecture."(Document G). It shows that a change was desperately needed but no one knew how to make a change large that would hold this new country together and stand the test of time.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation, at some point, could be considered as a complete form of freedom they deserved although it was failed to clearly demonstrate the nation as a one whole country because it lacks in unifying people in the same society. Although the demanding of creating a new central government was faced greatly oppositions, the Framers had successful promote the idea of centralized…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The weak and reactionary Articles of Confederation failed to adequately address the rights of colonies; each state had diverse needs that were not being represented in the government. The Articles were drafted in fear that a tyrannical government would emerge after the Revolution, but they were too powerless to enforce taxation. These issues were rectified by the Constitution’s strong centralized government.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the heels of the revolutionary war and the failed attempt of a national government (The Articles of Confederation), the leaders of the United States set to make a stronger, centralized government, with dual sovereignty between the national government and the states. The rules of this governing body would be laid out in a document called the Constitution. Although most leaders supported the constitution they did not agree on many aspects of it. Out of the disagreement two groups emerged, the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist supported all aspects of the constitution and a larger national government, while the Anti-Federalist opposed ratifying the constitution and supported a smaller national government and more sovereignty to the states. This disagreement led to a fierce debate between the two groups that still resonates today. This essay will examine the primary…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary purpose of the Articles of Confederation was to create an alliance among the states where each was deemed independent, allowing the federal government to only have power over common defense, security of liberties, and general welfare of citizens. Under the Articles, problems of decentralization developed that separated Congress from the powers that allowed it to govern the states appropriately. Decentralization is the process of redistributing or dispersing functions, powers, or things away from a central location or authority. The United States Constitution was put into place to address the issues of decentralization that the Articles of Confederation had instituted prior to the Revolutionary War that left the national government…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forming a new government comes with challenges and obstacles that the people need to overcome for the greater good of the country. During the time that the Americans formed the government, arguments were placed into the open to be solved. Solutions that were given, many were rejected and caused a lot of disagreement. Creating a government brought the country into disagreement between the anti-federalists and federalists for the concerns of rights of the people and power that was shared among them. Firstly, the anti-federalists disagreed how the rights were to be given to one another as well as the division of power between the states. Secondly, the federalists were satisfied with the conditions that were given to them, including the power they could have and what human rights that would protect them.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even before the creation of America the people living there feared that a strong central government would give the national government too much power and to stop that from happening the people rejected the idea altogether as seen in the Albany Plan, the Articles of Confederation, and the Anti-Federalists. The Albany Plan would have been a strong central government but the people did not want the government to be able to tax them so they rejected it. The Articles of Confederation was an attempt at not having a extremely powerful government but having a strong government and the Anti-Federalists tried to prevent the best, strongest, and longest lasting government from ever from happening. Though they tried their best to stop a powerful government from happening, it still did and it has lasted 227…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The drafters of the Articles of Confederation wanted to make their country strong and independent. The Articles of Confederation created a national government of specific yet sharply circumscribed powers.The government wanted self-controlled states in which each state had one vote. Delegates were selected annually by the individual state legislatures and they could serve no more than three out of the six years in office. A president was elected annually by Congress and could serve no more than one year out of three. Votes were decided by majority of the states, except major questions which required the agreement of nine or more states. This government was “granted national authority in the conduct of foreign affairs, matters of war and peace,…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays