Preview

Why the North Won the Civil War by David Donald: Reflection on the economic, military, diplomatic, political, and social reasons the South lost.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1300 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why the North Won the Civil War by David Donald: Reflection on the economic, military, diplomatic, political, and social reasons the South lost.
Why the North Won the Civil War

Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.

The essay entitled "The Military Leadership of the North and South" by Harry Willams points out the military leadership weaknesses displayed by Union and Confederate forces. Williams opens his essay by stressing and explaining the importance of leaders during a time of war. He states that "...it is the general who is the decisive factor in battle." (p.39). This is an accepted belief among many great leaders of the past. A successful leader must be able to demonstrate confidence and morale even in times of weakness, as well as capable of being wary and level-headed in times of strength. Marshal Saxe entertains the interesting fact that the North 's commanders were considerably younger than those of the South. However, age cannot be unquestionably attributed to Union victory. Generals of both sides, despite age or experience, displayed similar faults. The Confederate leaders were unexperienced in commanding and administering large armies. Nevertheless, the West Pointers had received military education that had emphasized administration and technique. As for strategy, many adopted the beliefs of Antoine Henri Jomini. His theories and beliefs formed a basis for military
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chapter Summary: The Road To Disunion
    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page

    Chapter Summary: The Road To Disunion

    This book focuses on the of number southern black and white who opposed the confedecy. He documented in The Road to Disunion, that anti-Confederates got strength from the weakness of slavery in the Border South, while slavery stunted population growth. The author argues that the varying support of the upper and lower South contributed to the fall of the Confederacy placing most of the blame on anti confederalist. He states that anti-Confederate whites undermined the Confederacy by remaining outside the nation while slaves unified form within and enlisted into the Union Army. Both groups guaranteed that the Union would have more men for the army which cause the Confederacy to lose because anti-Confederates waged war against Confederate southerners. That author also discusses the neutrality of the border slave states that made the Confederate war effort vulnerable. Losing nearly half of the slave states neutrality and the support for the Union army's invasion damaged the geography and population that the Confederacy could use for its defense.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    General Winfield Scott's Anaconda Report
    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    General Winfield Scott's Anaconda Report

    Theories abound to explain the Union government’s victory over the Confederate government. These usually focus on the idea that the Union defeated the Confederates because the North was large in population and was more industrial than the South. The naval aspect is often ignored though it represented a significant part of the war involving rivers, coastal blockades, and sea engagements.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis: Why The North Won The Civil War
    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page

    Analysis: Why The North Won The Civil War

    In Why the North Won the Civil War, Henry Steele Commager believed that there were multiple causes that led the confederacy to their defeat and that it was “an inevitability in history.” While many historians believed the North won due to their economic, military, diplomatic, and social aspects, Richard N. Current stated that the Union won the Civil War due to their “fundamental economic superiority.” He believed the North sustained a vast and overwhelming economic superiority in men and materials, giving them “an advantage of almost five to two” in everything. The Union succeeded because they were productive with their economy, unlike the Confederates.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    DBQ Causes of civil war: "Civil war was not inevitable; It was caused by extremists and failures in leadreships on both sides". Support or refute this argument.
    • 920 Words
    • 3 Pages

    DBQ Causes of civil war: "Civil war was not inevitable; It was caused by extremists and failures in leadreships on both sides". Support or refute this argument.

    Firstly, The war was based on age-old prejudice and extremism. The South used to think of the North as money-grabbing "yellow bellies" while the Northerners thought of the south as hillbillies and oppressors of the weak and disadvantaged, namely the blacks. The South did a lot of things that severely angered the North. One such thing was the Fugitive Slave Act. This Act made it possible for representatives of slave owners to capture back slave and prosecute anyone that had helped the slaves. Many Northerners were abolitionists and this made them angry as they themselves had helped many slaves escape through the Underground Railroad. Another issue that angered the North was the Brooks vs. Sumner clash. This event could have largely been avoided if Brooks had kept a cooler head. But this event drew a large number of Republican votes, which in turn would help jump-start the civil war.…

    • 920 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analyze The Consequences Of The North And South After The Civil War
    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page

    Analyze The Consequences Of The North And South After The Civil War

    The Civil War ended in April of 1865, and it left many things behind to be dealt with. There were many issues, and in a lot of them the North and South had different point of views. Although the North was very rich, the South was tremendously poor. Despite the result of the Civil War, the Union acted like they were in control, and the South couldn’t do anything about it. One controversy that the North had was if they should allow the Southern states govern themselves. The North should not let the states in the South lead their own government. It would be too dangerous and would be a major setback toward the North.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why The South Lost the Civil War
    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why The South Lost the Civil War

    The loss of the South in the Civil War was the result of various contributions. First of all, they were underequipped in artillery and production factories. The South’s population was about one fourth of the North’s excluding slaves. They were not united and lost because their own philosophical beliefs that destroyed them. Further, the South was underequipped and outclassed in everything industrially. They’re only hope of taking a military advantage was support from European countries. However, those connections were cut when the North blockaded the South and when the North incited the European public to support the North’s effort preventing European interference. Although there was a high morale to serving the Confederacy and to destroying the Union cause, they didn’t have the materials to do so. Many would just fight with stones or any primitive makeshift weapon they could use when they were depleted of bullets because of their low artillery production. The South also had much less supply lines. Their railroads were half that of the North’s and became less as the North decimated the South’s rail lines. The North figured that it would be wiser to destroy their supply lines and weaken the troops. However destroying food lines wouldn’t be a problem because the South couldn’t even supply food because as men were drafted into the army, the agricultural farms withered away due to lack of maintenance. Another disadvantage would be the size of the South. The ratio of people of South to North was about 3 to 7. However 3.5 million of those Southern people were slaves, so the actual ratio would be about 1 to 4. Considering the North’s territorial advantage over the South, it is impressive to see that the South could sustain such a defense over the four years of the war. The reason could be that the South had better trained generals such as…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why the South Could Not Win the Civil War
    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why the South Could Not Win the Civil War

    Ever since the day the South surrendered to the North in May of 1865, Americans have argued on why the South lost. Others argued that the South never had chance to win the war, yet more than half a million people were killed, homes were lost and destroyed and families were torn apart. There are many theories to explain this, many arguing that the South never had a chance to win the Civil War to begin with, for the North out numbered and had better resources than the South at almost every point, militarily.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Why The Although The South Won The Civil War
    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain Why The Although The South Won The Civil War

    This observation although valid in some respects, is also a very broad generalization and is by no means without its flaws. This paper will examine not only the validity of this observation, but also its errors. There is no debate that militarily the Northern states won the civil war, however an argument can be made that the south did “win” the peace. Immediately following Lincolns assassination Andrew Johnson would announce his plan to “pardon most, but not all former rebels…return all confiscated and abandoned land to ex confederates, even if it were in the hands of freedmen.”…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    South vs. South
    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages

    South vs. South

    Bibliography: Freehling, William W. The South vs. the South: How Anti-Confederate Southerners Shaped the Course of the Civil War. New York: Oxford UP, 2001. Print.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why the South Lost the Civil War
    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why the South Lost the Civil War

    When the Confederate Army General Robert E. Lee surrendered to the Union Army General, Ulysses S. Grant at the Appomattox Courthouse on April 9, 1865, many considered the Civil War to be over. The fact that the North was victorious over the South was accepted and the process of reconstruction began in America. It was never openly discussed on why the North defeated the South. However, the question began to slowly arise over time on why the South lost the Civil War. Many historians have become interested in this question and many reasons have been given on why the South lost the Civil War. Lack of manpower, shortages of supplies, and inferior leadership and government were the three main reasons on why the South was defeated in the Civil War.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    If The South Won The Civil War Essay
    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If The South Won The Civil War Essay

    In the war, Ernest was an ambulance driver. If the South had won the American Civil War, all Northern innovations would have been repressed and shut down. One important system of the North was the transportation of the injured on trains and eventually in large vehicles. If this system was restrained, it would not have been so widespread and it would not have traveled to other countries or they would have developed the system much later. Even if the two nations, the North and the South, partook in the war, but the ambulance system was stifled, Ernest Hemingway would have no place because he failed his sight test.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Does Food Affect The Civil War
    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Does Food Affect The Civil War

    In the end the south actually had several and harsh problems with their food supply. As recorded it cites,”Without Civil War food and water an army soon disintegrates into nothing more than a lot of starving people with no energy or will to fight.” and described in my first paragraph no man will survive on that field not being fed. “Confederate soldiers usually didn’t receive much food at all especially as the war dragged on.” showing that these men were dieing of starvation and at the point of surrendering. Now food isn't the exact way to win a war, but it may be the way the confederates lost. The Confederates completely forgot one thing they sent so many men to war that none were home to fix the garden/ plantation. Remember this and if they had been home 6 percent owned slaves at the time and what was their cash crop at that time? Their cash crop was cotton which tore the soil into crap(idk what to say besides that). So if they had to change they would have to first relocate their field, plant the seeds, wait for it to grow and not much men where there to do this labor because both the union and the south resorted to a draft for more men to battle for their side. The South not only were stuck inside there territory…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did The Confederate Win The Civil War Essay
    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Did The Confederate Win The Civil War Essay

    The United States Civil War was a challenging time for the American people. Numerous factors led the Southern states to secede from the United States and form the Confederate States of America. More than a century after Robert E. Lee surrendered his soldiers to the Union, people continue to argue about how the Confederacy was defeated. In the past thirty years, historians have examined the most popular believed explanations for Southern demise (Beringer). Of course, there is no established belief to why the Confederacy lost, but by studying previous wars, these historians have speculated the most rational reasons behind the CSA’s defeat.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Disadvantages Of The Union And Confederacy
    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Disadvantages Of The Union And Confederacy

    The Union and Confederacy both had advantages and disadvantages. The North had better advantages because they had a higher populace, more industry, and better assets than the South. It had a better banking system that they could rely upon to help them raise money for the fight. Furthermore, the North had more ships and a had a proficient and larger railroad framework. On the other hand, the South had the benefit of fighting in a familiar region protecting their property, homes, and families. Another favorable position that the South had was having that military training background on the battle field. The disadvantage that happened in the North were attempting to take the Southerners back to the Union, and by doing that they would need to attack and hold the South in their intimidating populace. The South faced material disadvantages. They had a smaller population of free man to manufacture an armed force. It had a couple of facilities to help distribute weapons, food, and other supplies. The South experienced issues conveying food, weapons, and supplies to…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Fate of Their Country
    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Fate of Their Country

    "To locate the most direct causes of the American Civil War," he contends in the preface, "one must look at the actions of governmental officeholders in the decades before that horrific conflict." Professor Michael F Holt needs no introduction among historians. He is single handedly regarded as one of the scholars who is most responsible for the emergence of what some call a neo-revisionist interpretation and outlook about the origins and circumstances that resulted in the Civil War. His ideas which are reflected throughout his books especially “The Fate of their country” emphasize that the reasons which caused The Civil War could have been and should have been averted. Defending this ideology Holt criticizes historians who stand by their argument of “Sectional conflict over slavery and slavery extension caused the Civil War”. Instead he preaches throughout his works that include many influential books including “The Fate of their Country” that, contingent political factors played a very huge and predominant role is stimulations factors causing disunion among the states.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics