Preview

Why Is The Ycja Important To The Criminal Justice System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
928 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is The Ycja Important To The Criminal Justice System
Imagine one day a 12 years old girl in your community killed her whole family, would you feel safe? And three 17 years old boys set your house on fire what would you want to do with those boys? The entire point of the Youth Criminal Justice Act is to make sure that if those kind of things happen to you or your community, the youth would get punished for what they have done. The YCJA became a law in 2003, under the Liberal Justice Minister Anne Mclellan. Since then less youth had gone through jail. The YCJA applies to youth from 12 to 17 years old. For teen under 14 they get less serious punishment, and for older teens they get more punishment. YCJA is extremely important to our justice system; it protects the right of the youth offender while …show more content…
But they are wrong. The YCJA allow young offender an alternate punishment that is fair and equitable for their age. The YCJA decreased the amount of teen that was sent to jail, this help the teen to learn what they have done wrong. Going to jail does not make you a better person when you come out, but by sending the teen to go do community service and let them apologize to the victim and the their family. This helps the teen to learn. What is right and what is wrong, most likely the teen would not commit crime ever again. The YCJA also give extrajudicial measure instead of going to jail. This allows the teen to contribute to the community and payback for what they have done. They are provided special programs that help them to learn important information about what they have done wrong. The YCJA is a really influential law, it helps the teenagers to learn what is good and bad for both the society and themselves, and what to improve in order to develop into a better …show more content…
It also allows teenagers to have a second chance to reintegrate into the society. YCJA allow teenagers who committed a crime to not have their name published in the media. This is referred to as the media ban. It allows young offenders to still be a part of society and not get discriminated by the others. It also supports them have a better chance to find a job later on their life. YCJA also do not give the offenders permanent records. This permits teenagers who committed a crime to have a better life. Having a record when they grow up is not good. Lots of company do not want people with a record in. Also, have a record mean you cannot go out of the country. This affects the youth’s freedom. Having no permanent record means that you will only have your record until you are 18. And all your information about will get deleted. This can really help the teen because they will be dealt with the same as others when they grow up. Over all the YCJA make life for the teenagers who committed crime better, it helps to learn what they did wrong, and also give them a second chance in order to be successful later on in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile Justice

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In recent discussion of Juvenile Justice, a controversial issue has been whether juveniles should be tried as adults in adult courts for heinous crimes they have committed. On one hand, some argue that they should not be tried as adults and do not deserve harsh sentences but as children seeking help. On the other hand, however, others argue that those who commit such heinous crimes ought to be punished no matter the age. The juvenile court was created to handle juvenile offenders on the basis of their youth rather than their crimes. The purpose of juvenile court is treatment and guidance rather than punishment. Juveniles don't have the knowledgeable or moral capacity to understand the consequences of their actions; similarly, they lack the same capacity to be trial defendants. Juveniles today are more knowledgeable and cultured at a younger age; they understand the implications of violence and how violent weapons are used. It is irrational to argue that a juvenile, who sees the effect of violence around him in the news every day, does not understand what killing really is. The fact that “adolescent killers” know how to load and shoot a gun or use a knife to kill is an indicator that they understand exactly what they're doing.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, crime is an almost impossible thing to get rid of in our society. Every week we turn the TV on and see on the news of someone getting murdered, robbed, or hurt. But the way we punish these “criminals” depends on the circumstances of the offender. For example the way we punish adult criminals is not same way we punish youth criminals. Adults will always get punished harshly compared to youth when accused of a crime and the reason why is because of the youth criminal justice act (YCJA). The YCJA are the law that governs Canada 's youth criminals. It applies to youth who are at least 12 but fewer than 18 years old and the objectives of the youth justice system are crime prevention, rehabilitation and reintegration, and meaningful consequences. I think that the YCJA is fair and equitable in addressing youth crime in Canada because they give kids second chances and rehabilitate them so they can get back into society.…

    • 943 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The YCJA is a federal law that came into force on April 1st, 2003. It applies to all Canadian youths from ages 12 to 17. The YCJA is an ineffective law as, between Young offender rights and Public safety, Public safety is more significant by a huge margin. For instance, let's look at the “Media Ban” policy and how it doesn’t do enough to ensure public safety. The Media Ban policy “protects” young offenders names, preventing it to be released to the public unless one receives an adult sentence or is a “high” risk to the public. The “Stettler” case is a good example why this policy is inadequate. Three teenagers were charged with sexual assault and confinement of two girls, ages 12 and 13. Even the Principal, of the School those teenagers…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Justin System Case Study

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Under the YCJA, a person of 14 years of age or older may choose to be tried by a judge and jury for certain serious offences, such as assault or murder.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Young Offenders Act obeys both the judicial responsibilities and the moral entitlements of society's needs. Due to the influence of Doli Incapax, the YOA ensures that Young Offenders are not charged with an adult-grade punishment, as they are under the 'blanket' that they have no moral compass or understanding of right and wrong. The Young Offenders Act provides punitive measures for offenders yet meets the needs for both the victim and the…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The juvenile justice sector applies to individual under the age of 18 that are unable to be tried in the adult court system. Juvenile accused of committing crimes could face a transfer to the adult court system in conformance with some state laws and the specific crime that was committed. Juveniles later found guilty are not convicted of committing crimes, but rather delinquencies. Enforced by the state, in most cases, juvenile justice focuses on lower the recidivism rate by rehabilitating offenders. Rehabilitation, rather than imposing punishment on juveniles eliminates the hardening of the juveniles. Confined juveniles often learn the ways of more violent juveniles that they would not learn if they were sentenced to rehabilitation instead. With newly acquired skills from other jailhouse inmates, juveniles are more likely to go on to commit more serious crimes. As for adults, the technique is often punishment and then rehabilitation due to the fact that society views children as more likely to change rather than adult…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    <br>There have been many suggested amendments, replacements and fixes proposed for the current YOA. Some suggest that we lower the age for trial under the YOA to a maximum age of 15 and a minimum, age of 10 (OCCC 1999). This is in response to the increase in crimes outside the current limits – making those kids feel harsher punishments. Another suggestion that has many people in agreement is to publish the names of serious, violent or repeat offenders to make them responsible for their actions (OCCC 1999). As well there is a proposal up for a ‘Safe Schools Act' that would promise zero violence tolerance among other increased and visibly harsh punishments. Bill Good, a news commentator for BCTV has often considered youth justice in our country and come to the following conclusions: "Many people think that if we just get tough with these young people the world will be…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ycja Essay

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Youth Criminal Justice Act is represented in all of the following sources, but only 2 of them agree with and support the YCJA. The other one does support them to a point, but are saying that the punishments are not harsh enough for youth. Going back to the sources, in the first one Graham Long is stating that the law is already hard enough on young people. In his case he has been to many court hearings and almost all the young offenders that he sees are not the first priority to the judge, the victim is. I don’t blame the judge for this, but if you are going to be dealing with a child that’s 12 – 14 or so, I think that you should have some feeling for them. An example that he describes is in Drayton Valley, Alberta where a youth offender was ordered to pay the victim $25,000. This is a bit too much for a teenager to be paying; most of them don’t even make that much in a couple years even if they have a job. The second source that I am looking at has a complete opposite view. They think that a lot of the young offenders that do go to prison get off to easy, with not enough punishment and that they will probably be a repeat offender. The third and last source is a line graph that shows the number of youths charged with crimes. This graph is showing that in the early 1990’s youth that were charged with offences went up from 8000 to 9000 in as little as 2 years. These numbers start to drop after 2003 when the YCJA was first introduced. It is proven by statistics that about 80% of first time youth offenders will not break the law again. These 3 sources of information are just a few of the many examples of the different views and opinions of the Youth Criminal Justice Act. In my opinion I agree with the YCJA, in that youth should get punished for their actions depending on the age of the person. For example going back to source one, Graham Long is saying that kids don’t get off easy and that some punishments are a bit harsh. Giving a teenager a fine of…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It will allow juveniles to transition back into society without having the urge to be involved in delinquent behaviors. It will help them identify problem and how to handle them. It will focus on peer pressure which is a primary reason why most juveniles get arrested. Though the program will be for post adjudication it will also include parenting skills for those parents who have to continue to raise a child post adjudication. Being incarcerated can be a traumatizing event for anyone; which is why Mental Health services will be included in the post adjudication program. The program will not only help recidivism rates go down but will also help juvenile offender become law abiding…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) is an act in respect of criminal justice for young persons and to amend and repeal other acts. It is made up of communities, lawyers, business people, families, parents and so many more. Canada is a party to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and recognizes that young persons have rights and freedoms, including those stated in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Canadian Bill of Rights, and have special guarantees of their rights and freedoms. There are certain requirements for an adult sentence that this case upholds. Their motive, planning and age show that these two sisters have a right to be sentenced as a adult, generally having a length of 25 years to life.…

    • 768 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Nate Balis the director of juvenile’s justice strategy group he stated that “ incarceration of juveniles is not helping the community stop a person to stop committing crime it persuades them to keep doing what they’re doing and don’t care about life at all.” (Balis)…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Persuasive Paper Part 1

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    From the 1980s to the 1990s there has been a surge in minors who commit violent crimes as shown in a research study conducted by the Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch Currently. The information was based on federal and state correctional data related to race, history and nature of crimes committed by minors. The study showed inmates under the age of 18 in state prisons has more than doubled from 1985-1997. The study also shows that 61% of those minors admitted were convicted of violent offenses1. The Juvenile Court Act was founded in 18992 when the idea of reforming minors took place and the majority of crimes committed by minors were of minor misconduct. The justice systems were separated because adults were treated as criminals and minors were treated for rehabilitation. , created to rehabilitate and protect minors. The courts intended the system to be more informal and treat the juveniles rather than punish them. This system was not developed to undertake the current rise of…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Young Offenders Act (YCJA)

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    With holding youths accountable in a fair manner, it could make a great contribution to the protection of not only to the youths within society but also the adult citizens. The article youth criminal justice act: new directions and implementation issues (2004) explained that "it can make a contribution to the protection of the public in the long-term. Parliaments references to protection of the public indicate that such protection is a desired long-term outcome or result of the activities of the youth justice system". The article goes on further to explain that the emphasis of protection of youth crime can protect the citizens within society at a greater…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Despite the fact that in America we incarcerate more juveniles for life terms than in any other country in the world, that truth is that the vast majority of youth offenders will one day be released. The question is simple and stark. Do we want to help them change or do we want to help them become even more violent and dangerous?” by Ayelet Waldman. The quote points out that the U.S. punishing juveniles by putting them in jail for lifetime more than any other countries around the world can be harmful and also helpful as the same time. Many states have also tried the method in a purpose of decreasing the crimes rate and as it has worked in some places, there are also some unexpected results over some places. A punishment of life without parole for juvenile criminals has become a big matter between people. Proponents argue that the plan is helpful and it has decreased the crimes rate over some places while opponents argue that punishments do only little change to behavior.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several broad observations and trends in Australian juvenile justice can be identified at the national level. Over the last ten years, there has been a decrease in the number of cases heard in Australian children’s courts due to the increasing trend of diverting juveniles during the early stages of processing. Such diversionary measures typically include conferencing, drug and alcohol courts and programs, juvenile justice teams and special courts and programs for young people. The most common types of offences for which juveniles are adjudicated in children’s courts include burglary or theft, assault and dangerous or negligent driving. Of all juvenile defendants who appeared in Australian children’s courts during the 2006-07 financial year, ninety-two percent received a criminal conviction and eighty-two percent pleaded guilty. Ninety-two percent of convicted juvenile offenders received non-custodial penalties such as fines, good behaviour bonds or community supervision orders. ‘How effective is the juvenile justice system?’ is a very difficult question to answer and will vary from person to person as some will be looking at the reduction in the crime rate will others will look at victim satisfaction. In Australia the Juvenile system I believe is quite effective as each state have their own specific way in tackling young offenders , that are relevant specifically to that state. The AIC has monitored juveniles in detention in Australia since 1981. It has found that the number of juvenile detainees per 100,000 head of population dropped from 64.9 in 1981 to 37 in…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays