To begin, Document F states, “The population of Rome decreased from a milion people, to 250,000.” How did this happen? It was no other than a case of the measles, which is classified as a natural disaster. Natural disasters were the most harmful casualty to occur in Rome because no one in that time could prediction when they …show more content…
This claim is reasonably untrue. Document F says, “In 336 CE, the Roman world was shaken by a violent earthquake.” Even if the Roman government was strong and fair, no one in that time period could predict, or stop, a natural disaster. For example, an earthquake. There is still no way science can predict when an earthquake will surface, leaving no doubt that Rome couldn’t either. A government could agree on anything, but if there is no way of telling the devastating future, no matter how powerful they are, the natural force can’t be stopped. Critics will argue that the government became weaken by natural disasters, but think. If the disasters never occurred, neither would the arguing government.
In conclusion, the fall of Rome should be thanked to weak militaries and unpredictable occurrences in nature. To recall, natural disasters had no warning signs, killing thousands of unknowing people, and reducing resources. In addition to an arrogant army that soon grew lazy, leading to loss of land, and spirit. From the start of Rome to its end, over a million people were killed because of these issues. No people means no