Preview

What Is The Case Of Sopov V Kane Construction Pty Ltd

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
255 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Case Of Sopov V Kane Construction Pty Ltd
For the case of Sopov v Kane Constructions Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009], the appellant engaged the respondent as contractor in a construction project. The appellant repudiated the contract by wrongly calling on the respondent's bank guarantee, in response to which the respondent terminated the contract and claimed damages for quantum meruit. The Court of Appeal applied the NSW Court of Appeal decision in Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234 which provided that an innocent party who accepts a defaulting party's repudiation has the option of claiming either damages for breach of contract, or a quantum meruit for the fair value of work done.
The initial contract price was held to be only evidentiary for the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Memorandum and Objective: The purpose of the memorandum is to provide a detailed review and analysis of the legal situation considering “Paslay, Bryan & Brooks, Barristers & Solicitors**” and…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In contractual law, a mutual mistake is: “Where a mistake of both parties at the time of contract was made as to a basic assumption on which the contract was made has a material effect on the agreed exchange of performances, the contract is voidable by the adversely affected party unless he bears the risk of the mistake under the rule stated in 154.” (Rasmusen, 1993)…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are some similarities when it comes to UCC and Common Law contracts. But UCC is for goods and tangible items whereas Common Law Contract is for the intangible items like services. UCC is use to eliminate the technical requirements of contract law. UCC relies on the merchants acting on good faith and reasonable contracts. Part of the UCC is in most contracts between merchants. Common Law contracts are normally made between two individual parties.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Seah, W. ‘Unfulfilled Promissory Contractual Terms and Section 52 of the Australian Trade Practices Act’ (2000) 7(3) Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contract Law: Case Summary

    • 1728 Words
    • 5 Pages

    CASE SUMMARYPROCEDURAL POSTURE: Plaintiff filed suit against defendants alleging that the contract for the construction and sale of a home that was at issue in this case was void, invalid, and unenforceable. Plaintiff also alleged that he was entitled to rescission and cancellation of the same contract. Defendants filed a counterclaim for specific performance of the contract of sale. Plaintiff moved for partial summary judgment and demurred to defendants ' counterclaim.…

    • 1728 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • LG Thorne & Co Pty Ltd v Thomas Borthwick & Sons (Australasia) Ltd (p220)…

    • 4832 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    This project bears on imprint of many peoples. I sincerely thank to Sir Puranjoy Ghosh and Ma 'am Jinia Kundu, faculty members of KIIT School of Law, KIIT University for providing me an opportunity to do my project work on “ENFORCEABILITY OF CONTRACTS AND BENEFITS OF THIRD PARTY”. Also, I wish to avail myself of this opportunity, express a sense of gratitude and love to my friends and my beloved parents for their manual support, strength, help and for everything .…

    • 2704 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although discussion of the implication of a contractual duty of good faith is often sourced to the judgment of Priestley JA in Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234, it is clear that closely related doctrines have formed part of English and Australian law for well over 100 years. Speaking today, it is possible to say that the debate centers not so much on the existence of a duty of good faith in the performance of contractual obligations, but on a number of ancillary, although nonetheless important, questions. These include:…

    • 9037 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Immigration Reform

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages

    implications and solutions." Public Contract Law Journal 36.2 (Wntr 2007): 263(14). Retrieved May 11, 2009 from General OneFile Database…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Contractual remedies are awards made by the courts to a victim of a breach of a contract. It is known that a contract is an undertaking whereby two or more parties make promises to each other that one party will perform a specific act for the other party in exchange of the other performing a specified act in return. This enterprise thus brings about a state of reliance by the parties involved to such an extent that if one party to the contract fails to perform as promised, for whatever reason, the non performance will lead to the other party suffering a loss. Contractual remedies therefore aim at ensuring that the parties to the…

    • 2707 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business Law Contracts Essay

    • 2310 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Harry (H) who is the father of James (J) is attempting to sue J for a breach in contract and is seeking damages of $30,000 which he believes is the outstanding amount that is owed to him by J. This case touches on the fundamental concepts of contract law where H can only claim damages if the formation of a valid contract between the two parties is evident via the elements of a contract, including intention, agreement, consideration, legal capacity, genuine consent and legality of objects must be established. Once these elements are satisfied, the terms of the contract need to be evaluated to deem whether the contract between H and J is enforceable. Once it has been established that the contract is valid, the relevant facts should be analysed in regard to any breach in the contract, and if there is a breach, the extent of the damages which should be awarded to H should be outlined.…

    • 2310 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    H G Beale, WD Bishop & M P Furmston, Contract Cases and Materials, 4th ed. (Oxford 2005)…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the past fifteen years the concept of unconscionablitity has become a significant theme in the Australian law of contract. Liberal theories, which locate freedom of contract as central, have been tempered by an increasing emphasis on justice and conscionable conduct in contractual relations. Virginia courts have defined an unconscionable contract to be "one that no man in his senses and not under a delusion would make, on the one hand, and as no fair man would accept, on the other." In other words, the inequality present in the contract must be so gross as to "shock the conscience." The landscape for business in Australia has been dramatically altered in recent years by the legislative prohibitions of misrepresentation, undue…

    • 4422 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parol Evidence Rule

    • 1829 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nowadays contracts are the best way of making agreements. As said in Parker and Box, a contract may be defined as ‘’an agreement which the law will enforce’’1. It is clearly shown that contracts are much more than agreements as they are enforced by courts. They generally involve two or more parties and for a contract to exist, agreement is essential. If there is no agreement or ‘’meeting of the minds’’ of the parties, then it is considered that there is no contract. To see whether an agreement exists or not, the court usually sees if an offer has been made by one party and accepted by the other. If it happens that there is a mistake in the subject matter, price agreed or that one party has been forced upon, the court will certify that no contract exists. However, some people can try to breach contracts by altering afterwards what they stated in the contract. If the contract is in writing, an important rule called the parol evidence rule exists. This rule states that if the contract is entirely in writing, no other evidence which would add to, alter or contradict the contract is accepted. This essay will deal with analyzing the application of parol evidence rule and whether Australian courts should or should not provide remedies for breach of contract where the promise concerned was not included in the written contract.…

    • 1829 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    This paper concludes with a description of what remedies are available to the non-breaching party when a contract has been breached. It describes the types of remedies at law (monetary damages) and remedies in equity that may be awarded in a breach of contract case.…

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays