Preview

What Are The Causes Of World War 1 Vocab

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1105 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Causes Of World War 1 Vocab
Causes of World War 1 Vocab

Term
Definition
Significance
1.
Kaiser William II
He was the emperor of Germany. He became emperor after his father died in March 1880, dismissing Bismarck from being chancellor of Germany.
Kaiser William II is significant because he played a big role in the causes of WW1. He was very into making Germany powerful and to have Germany in “its rightful place in the sun”. Because of his very pro-Germany actions, it caused the other European powers to worry that Germany will be too powerful in Europe. That’s what made them make alliances to be prepared for war.
2.
Tsar Nicolas
He became the Tsar of Russia because of his father’s death in 1894. He was a very weak Tsar; most people didn’t like him because he didn’t really know how to run the country.
…show more content…
The reason why Russia had problems is because he had very little experience with government. Since he was a very weak Tsar he took, really, any advice; weather it’d be bad or good. Which brings up a man named Grigori Rasputin. He was a man who helped the Tsar’s son, Alexei, get better from a disease called hemophilia. The Tsarina, Alexandra, thought he was a miracle and welcomed him to the royal family. That’s when he started giving bad advice to Tsar Nicolas.
3.
Militarism
Militarism is the belief that a country should have a strong military and to be prepared to use it whenever the country needs protection.
Militarism is significant because this is part of the main causes of WW1. All the powers wanted to have a good military to be prepared for war. Because of being prepared all the time, WW1 was quick to happen; because of just one event.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II succeeded in making a bad situation in Russia even worse. He became a leader at a difficult time, and could never stop the process of revolution. The Tsar was not a good leader, and was out of touch with the Russian people. He was also weak and indecisive, and extremely stubborn. Nicholas II was not equipped to effectively rule a country the size of Russia, and with a vast variety of people with different language, religion, race and culture. Additionally, Nicholas II was mainly concerned with family issues, instead of being concerned with political issues. It was these traits in Nicholas II?s personality that hindered him in being able to attempt to steer Russia away from revolution.…

    • 1455 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: Romanov Dynasty

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Nicholas II, the last tsar of Russia, had neither the qualities nor the desire to rule imperial Russia. Born in Tsarskoye Selo in 1868, Nicholas was the eldest son of Alexander III, the fearsome tsar who had reimposed autocracy and oppression on the Russian empire after the murder of Alexander II. Those who met the young tsarevich, described him as pleasant and likeable, but otherwise unremarkable – hardly the traits of a man ordained by God to rule Russia. Nicholas famously expressed reluctance about taking the throne, declaring that he “never wanted to rule”. But tradition…

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    War broke out in 1914, with Tsar Nicholas becoming commander-in-chief in 1915, meaning he was away from Petrograd. Not only was this poorly thought out by Nicholas because it gave the people an opportunity to plot against him, but as he was away he left Tsarina (also a German princess), Alexandra, in charge during his absence. Due to the war being against Germany, this made the Russian people nervous and skeptical towards the extreme power she had over them during such a crucial time. Not only were they disgruntled by this, but also Alexandra’s close friendship to Rasputin, a Serbian peasant. This particularly angered the aristocracy and middle classes as they believed they were being led by someone of lower demeanor than that of themselves. This weakened support for the autocratic rule and lost the Tsar many of his supporters, which put him in a vulnerable position in the case of revolutionary upturn. This also could have inspired the peasantry to discover greater aspirations and encourage their belief that they could have greater status which in turn could trigger new revolutionary ideas amongst the lower classes. This demonstrates a link between Nicholas being away in order to commandeer army movement for the war, however it is arguable that it was a lack of authority and respect for the Tsarist regime that caused the change of opinions towards the Tsar amongst all classes, lessening his support and leaving him far more vulnerable in the case of a revolution.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    World War 1 had a major impact on the world and everyone in it. There were 4 main problems that could’ve cause WW1. Militarism, Alliances, Imperialism, and Nationalism. The most important one was Militarism. It made people think about the “importance” of their navy/military. By other countries having better navy/military that could cause problems between countries. It could make them jealous of each other, and make them want to go to war.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    causes of WW1 dbq

    • 692 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One underlying cause of World War I was militarism. Militarism is when nations invested heavily in their armed forces in order to remain stronger than one’s enemies. Well first Great Britain spent the most money on its navy so it could have a very strong military. Also Germany spent the most money on its army, to also have a very strong military. This evidence supports the claim that militarism was an underlying cause of the war because Germany had the strongest power on the continent. But the British navy was the strongest in the world. So obviously both countries, Germany and Great Britain, began to battle to see who had the strongest and most powerful military in the world.…

    • 692 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Alexander III became the tsar, Russia was in a crisis following the assassination of Alexander II. The problems that Tsar was facing were that many different groups wanted to change the political system, as not everyone agreed with the autocracy system of government in Russia. To solve this he had to get rid of all political parties and political opposition. Also he had to get rid of anyone who had or wanted political control. Alexander II’s liberals ministers, M,T. Loris-Melikov and N.P. Lgnatiev left the office, and were replaced with Alexandra III own mistiers, Pobedonostsev, chief procurator of the Holy Synod of the Russia Orthodox Church. Also he had to make sure that all power was given only to the Tsar, so he had to restrict the Zemstvas power, because the Zemstva meant that all power of the tsar was spread out to cities and towns. Furthermore, the organisation, the ‘Peoples Will’ needed to be destroyed as it was a threat to Tsar’s power, so immediately he destroyed the ‘Peoples Will’. He then introduced the Statute of State Security. This allowed the government to arrest and trial any political opponent without a jury. This gave the Tsar complete power. In addition, Russia was a huge multi-racial empire with 55% Russian and the rest Ukrainians, Polish, Jews and more. Because of these races Alexander III wanted to make sure that Russia remained Russian. He did this by a policy of ‘Russification’. This policy made Russian the official language. This meant all documents were in Russia. However this policy affected many people including the Jews. Finally, Russia’s main problem was financially. Russia was physically the largest in size and population, but was almost the most economically underdeveloped. Alexandra III had to increase its economic wealth in order to maintain its armed forces and to maintain its position as a Great Power. He did this by his finance…

    • 2108 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Militarism is the establishment of military forces. Many European nations took part in militarism before the beginning of World war I. Countries did not want other countries to surpass them in their level of weaponry and military advancements. Some nations like Great Britain wanted to maintain armies that were stronger than two countries combined. Germany also became threatening as their military strength grew. The competiveness of these countries’ militaries made war something that could not be avoided.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kaiser Wilhelm II came to power in 1888 after Wilhelm I died and a brief reign from Frederick III, his behaviour could be unpredictable and although he was the grandson of Queen Victoria he was anti-British, however he admired them at the same time. He believed in the divine right of kings, the theory claimed that, kings were only answerable to God, and it was sinful for their subjects to resist them. Wilhelm II was determined to exercise much more direct control over government than his grandfather, this was apparent in 1890 when Wilhelm disagreed with Bismarck’s anti-socialist policies, colonial expansion and relations with Russia, consequently Bismarck retired ‘because of his health’. Wilhelm II was determined to reinstate the importance of the imperial throne, as opposed to the country being run by parliament, he wanted to demonstrate how important an all-powerful monarch was. This can be seen by Germany having 4 chancellors under Wilhelm II and each for less than ten years; Wilhelm II wished to have weak chancellors that he could easily control.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Militarism was a cause of WWI because it glorified the army, making war seem like it was ideal. For example, in document 1 it says, "war is life itself". This is basically saying war is a part of life and should be accepted. Another example would be document 2. The British philosopher named, Bertrand Russell, said, "During this and the following days I discovered to my amazement that the average man and women were delighted at the prospect of war." He is saying that many people are ready for war and want it to happen. Militarism is like social Darwinism, or survival of the fittest. An example of this would be in document 8, which said, "the German nation will either be the hammer or the anvil." This is the German Chancellor giving a speech to the Reichstag and he is saying that we need to attack or be attacked. Another example of militarism being like social Darwinism is in document 7. Document 7 is a graph showing the growth in armaments in 1890 to 1914. The graph showed how when one nation's army grew, the other nation's armies would do the same. This is like social Darwinism because the countries are competing for military dominance.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Underlying Causes of Ww1

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Imperialization by European powers in the early 20th century was an underlying cause of World War 1. In 1913 England held 12,740,000 square miles of colonies. France held 4,440,000 and Germany held 1,139,000 square miles of colonial land. (Document F) Yet, none of these counties were satisfied with what the already controlled. Germany came to call Great Britain the bloodsuckers of the world because of their massive naval expansion into every corner of the globe. (Document E) This caused tension between European powers because each and every one of them was building up their military to either claim more territory or defend against others. When people get greedy others have to decide whether to be the hammer or the anvil. When everyone chooses to be the hammer, they were pushed one step closer to the brink of war.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World History: Key Terms

    • 749 Words
    • 2 Pages

    militarism: the belief or desire of a government or people that a country should maintain a strong military capability and be prepared to use it aggressively to defend or promote national interests.…

    • 749 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Last of the Romanovs

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The first person to impact the fall of Imperial Russia was Nicholas II, the last Russian Emperor. In particular, Nicholas’ coronation marked the beginning of a downward spiral for the Romanov family. Tsar Nicholas II was born on May 6, 1868 and was the eldest son of Alexander III (Levykin, 1999). Nicholas II had to assume the throne earlier than the Russian population would have liked. Nicholas’ father fell ill in the spring of 1894 and his health never fully recovered. On October 20th, 1894, Alexander III died of nephritis, forcing Nicholas to become the next Tsar of Russia at a young age (Lincoln, 1976). After the untimely death of his father, Nicholas was in dismay about becoming Tsar of Russia, a position he never really wanted. This is exemplified when Nicholas II refers to being the Tsar as, “the awful job I have feared all my life” (Massie, 1967, p. 59). To further Nicholas’ fears, the Russian people and government believed he didn’t have enough political training to rule Russia effectively (Harcave, 1968).…

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Militarism is a mindset that a country's government must possess an extensive army that is on the offensive and capable of vigorously defending oneself at any given moment. Militarism played such a huge role in beginning World War I because it caused everyone to feel threatened and resulted in…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Militarism was very popular in Germany because children and adults were told and believed their military was much better and far more superior than anyone elses military. Military parades and teachers teaching about how superior they are, would motivate children to join the military and led them to believe with a powerful military anything is possible. Children loved the thought of joining. Other nations would be scared that they were so focused on improving and being able to have the greatest military. They needed to protect themselves from such militarism, and confident nations.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 1 Dbq Essay

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Militarism is the act of building one’s military force. This build in military led surrounding nations to become uneasy of their own interests and start to build up their forces as well to defend their interests in case of other nations attacks. This build up in military force showed just how strong certain nations could become no matter how small. Great Britain was just an island, yet they had such a strong military; Although, their military was mostly made up of a strong Navy. Germany had to build up its military as well because of the allied nations surrounding Germany. Germany was afraid of an attack on both sides so they had to build a very strong Army to be able to defend their country. The term “The Hammer or The Anvil” in Doc D, was how the Germans felt. They thought that if they didn’t build up their forces and attack then they would become the Anvil, being hammered on without…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays