Preview

What Are Ernest Van Den Haag's Arguments Against The Death Penalty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1062 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are Ernest Van Den Haag's Arguments Against The Death Penalty
Capital Punishment: A senseless Polemic
Capital Punishment is regarded as one of the United States' hottest topics. Those for and against it constantly debate over the various issues that capital punishment brings forth. This essay explains just a few of these topics and my view on the death penalty.
Many argue that Capital Punishment should be abolished since there are many miscarriages of justice. In his essay "The Ultimate Punishment: A Defense," Ernest Van den Haag uses a survey that indicates that out of the thousands on Death Row, 35 were innocent of capital crimes; even though there may be some miscarriages of justice, we continue to use the Death Penalty because the good greatly outweighs the bad. To add against the unjustices, "Criminal Justice in America," reports from the Death Penalty information Center that 80 have been released from death row due to their innocence. That is 80 unjust lives given the sentence, but how many more lives were saved from the rest given the sentence if the death penalty was abolished? This is how I view those
…show more content…
The reason being is because it would be very difficult to ask every individual in our whole country whether or not they have decided not to carry out a murder since there may be a chance of paying with death. However, deterrence may be used to its full potential if every state had Capital Punishment laws; "Capital Punishment: Give it a Chance," makes a great point of this. If consistency were established through our whole country, many would fear the punishment and not commit murder, but the inconsistency as it is right now, many commit a murder since there may be a chance of not getting the sentence, due to its inconsistency of the states. Also, the likelihood of deterrence could be boosted if the lengthy process were shortened, so that possible murderers of the time may witness how executions are a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Topic: Capital Punishment General Purpose: To argue Specific Purpose: To argue that the United States should outlaw capital punishment in all fifty states. Thesis Statement: Capital Punishment should be outlawed in all fifty states because: (1) capital punishment once executed cannot be undone, and (2) the cost process of capital punishment isn’t worth the expense. Introduction I. [Attention Getter] Imagine being sentenced to die. A.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay Death and Justice, Edward Koch argues in support of capital punishment, he believes it is just and it saves lives. He successfully delivers an argument laced with true and vivid examples of unforgettable murderous events. His intended audience consists of the opposing voters and readers of the New Republic, the political magazine that published his essay. Prior to reading Edward Koch’s essay I was sure that I would disagree but it became clear to me that he is right. There are seven commonly held views against the death penalty that Koch argues against in his essay. In what follows I discuss a few of his arguments and show that the death penalty is the most viable approach to deal with convicted murderers.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we were to get rid of the death penalty, we would be making all criminal acts proportionate to their convictions, except for murder, which would never allow for equal justice. So, the real question is what the judicial system will do to prevent these incorrect convictions in future? The death penalty is the top tier of capital punishment and is reserved for the darkest of crimes. If convicted murderers get less than they deserve, what message does that send to other criminals who might commit the same act? This argument fails for the same reasons that discrimination fails and that is that getting rid of the death penalty contradicts with getting rid of…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cost of the Death Penalty

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Costs and Consequences of the Death Penalty, written by Mark Costanzo, neatly lists reasons for opposition, and abolishment of, the death penalty. Costanzo provides a review of the history of the death penalty, a review of how the death penalty process is working today, questions on whether or not if the death penalty is inhumane and cheaper than life imprisonment. He also questions if the death penalty is fairly applied and the impact, if any, that it has on deterrence. He closely examines the public's support of the death penalty and questions the morality of the death penalty. Finally, Costanzo provides his own resolution and alternative to the death penalty. Each of these items allows the reader an easy, and once again, neat view of how the death penalty can work against out society rather than for it.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How can we expect killing to stop when we kill in response to a crime? The death penalty has been giving out to criminals all around the world for a variety of crimes but it never seems to solve any problems or make anything better. The death penalty should not be allowed because it proves to be unsubstantial and has not shown or made any improvements is criminal activity.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely controversial topic in America, and people usually shy away from it, but speaking about controversial topics can help us come close to actually find solutions. This exercise was conducted in my survey of law class in which, we had gone over several homicide cases in which the criminal received the death penalty. In the end of the lesson, our teacher asked a simple question “raise your hand if you believe in the death penalty”. I was appalled to see that more than half believed it was worth it. In my mind it was clear that even though that person could have murdered another human being, we have no jurisdiction to kill them, and we would be no better as civilized being if we killed him.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Debating the Death Penalty is authored by Hugo Adam Bedau and Paul G. Cassell. Hugo Adam Bedau is a retired professor of philosophy at Tufts University. Bedau has more than two awards and wrote for many newspapers as well as academic presses. He was an editor of the standard work on capital punishment “The Death Penalty in America” and several other books. Bedau also published three volumes of his own essays. Paul G. Cassell was a court Judge of Salt Lake City. Cassell was a professor of Law at the University of Utah. Cassell had over nine honors and awards. He joined the faculty at the college of law in 1992 where he taught, wrote, and litigated on issues relating to crime victims’ rights and criminal justice reform. He has published many law review articles on criminal justice issues in journals. The viewpoints of experts who face questions about capital punishment is expressed clearly in Debating the Death Penalty, showing the moral and legal problems behind it all. I think the death penalty should be allowed as long as there is full evidence that the criminal on trial is quilty.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Thesis: Capital punishment is useless as a deterrent, morally indefensible, discriminatory in practice, and prone to errors that may have led to the execution of wrongfully convicted people. Its continuing legality in the United States is critically undermining American moral stature around the world. The Supreme Court should bring the United States in line with the rest of the civilized world and hold that death is a cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. Summary: The death penalty process consumes tremendous amounts of money and resources and fails to deter criminal activity. It is not uniformly applied geographically, and where it is allowed, it is used in an often arbitrary and racist manner. As a result, states have been curtailing the use of the death penalty, the Supreme Court has limited its application, and both death sentences and executions are down sharply. This is at odds with the recent efforts of some states to expand the range of capital crimes, and with national polls which still reflect a clear majority of Americans favor capital punishment. Meanwhile, momentum has been accelerating in the international community to abolish the death penalty, and the United States is increasingly criticized for failing to keep in step with other civilized nations in this area. Capital Punishment in the United States Since the 1977 resumption of capital punishment in the United States, nearly 1,100 convicted prisoners have been put to death in the thirty-eight US states where the practice remains legal. As of the beginning of 2007, approximately 3,350 people remain on death row in American prisons. In recent years, the evidence has shown that the death penalty process consumes tremendous amounts of money and resources and fails to deter criminals. FBI Uniform Crime…

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, there has been talk amongst many Americans about whether or not the “death penalty” should be outlawed in the United States. Although the crime may be unforgivable, no one should have the right to decide whether or not a person’s life should be stripped away, because nothing is more important than a person’s life. There are many reasons why the death penalty should be outlawed, one reason is that many criminals put on trial may face discrimination, and receive a bias punishment. Another reason is that the death penalty is very costly and that the alternative, life without parole, is a much cheaper and easier solution. The death penalty also reflects the moral standing of today's society. Nobody can justify taking another person’s…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment has been a topic that has been talked about for ages. It has been an issue in the adjudication process since the first execution took place in the United States of America in 1608 (Schneider & Smykia, 1991). Today, cases are being brought before the courts constantly, and they are forced to decide what exactly is “cruel and unusual punishment” in accordance with the eighth amendment. This paper will be looking at how the death penalty has evolved and developed in the United States. It will also be evaluating the effects of the death penalty and looking at the issues that are being faced today in regards to capital punishment. Also, does the death penalty have a place in the future for America?…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty In Prisons

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These obstacles make it almost impossible for the death penalty to ever be carried out. Typically, death row inmates end up dying due to other factors such as health complications rather than being put to death (Petersen & Lynch, 2012, p. 1270). Essentially sentencing someone to death, and placing them on death row is basically the same as a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. The difference, however is that the sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole carries a significantly smaller price tag for tax payers. Furthermore, with violence rampant in prisons across the nation life in prison without the possibility of parole is not exactly living a comfortable life.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment is embedded on an offender in case or a murder, drug trafficking, rape of a minor, treason, espionage, and few others. There are many questions that can be asked concerning this issue. Some are: Does it affect your religion? Do you believe it deters crime? Is the cost of the death penalty worth it? Is it humane? Noted in interviewing on these questions, most of the people say that the death penalty does not deter crime, that it is against their religion, it is a humane way to kill people, and that the cost is not worth it. For the most part the people whom were interviewed believe that the offenders who have committed capital crimes should just be put in jail for life instead of being put on the death…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti-Death Penalty

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The number stands at over 142, and still counting, of wrongly convicted people sentenced to death by the government. Even DNA evidence can’t guarantee we won’t execute innocent people. If someone is convicted and later found innocent, you can release them from prison, but not from the grave. We have an imperfect justice system where innocent defendants are given minimal legal attention by often lesser qualified individuals. Some would blame the court system, not the death penalty itself for the problems but we can’t risk mistakes. The death penalty does not prevent others from committing murder. No reliable study shows the death penalty prevents crimes. Homicide rates are higher in states and regions that have the death penalty than in those that do not.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays