Preview

Was World War Ii a Legitimate War? in the Context of Just War Theory.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3976 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was World War Ii a Legitimate War? in the Context of Just War Theory.
Was World War II a legitimate war? in the context of just war theory.

'In war some sorts of restraint, both on what we can legitimately fight for (jus ad bellum) and on how we may legitimately fight (jus in bello), are morally required'.1 However, recent theorists also add the responsibility and accountability of warring parties after the war (jus post bellum) to the main two categories of just war theory. From Christian perspective the function of the JWT was simply an excuse of making war morally and religiously possible writes Michael Walzer. He also agrees with its defendants, that it made war possible in a world where war was, sometimes, necessary. JWT is therefore to be used as a sort of moral rule-book from which legitimate instances of the use of force can be read off whenever needed.2 That said this essay aims to investigate and legitimate World War II by examining jus ad bellum's predominant principles – just cause, rightful authority and right intention, further by examining jus in bello's essential principle of non-combatant immunity and discrimination, and finally, looking closely at two peculiar moral events of closing days of World War II.

The jus ad bellum consisting of six principles: (i) the just cause, (ii) rightful authority to wage war, (iii) right intention, (iv) exhausting all other reasonable resolutions before waging war as last resort, (v) reasonable hope of state to win else they should not opt to wage war and (vi) proportional means of military force to objectives sought; of which first three are predominant both in the development of the theory and in its historical application as stated by Johnson.3 First, just cause evaluates the use of force as means of self-defence or defence of third party against wrongful attack and punishment of the acts against humanity. Second, rightful authority legitimises only states as rightful to wage wars not criminals, corporations or individuals who are deemed/seen illegitimate states Shapcott. And



References: Bibliography: 'annonymous ' (2001) 'ICISS ', The responsibility to protect, http://www.iciss.ca/report-en.asp Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens P. (eds) (2008), Shapcott, R.in 'The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Butler, M. J.(2003) 'U.S. Military Intervention in Crisis, 1945 ', The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47(2): 226-248. Daddow, O. (2009) International Relations Theory, London: Sage. Hoekema, D. A. (2008) There Are No Just Wars, Ars Disputandi, 8: 126-145. Marlowe,M. D.(2001-2010) 'Sir Arthur Harris ', Bible Research (2001-2010) http://www.bible-researcher.com/dresden/harris.html Moseley, A Orend, B. (2005) 'War ' Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://www.seop.leeds.ac.uk/entries/war Orend, B Prazmowska, A. (1987) Britain, Poland and the Eastern Front, 1939 Cambridge University Press. Rengger, N. (2002) 'On the just war tradition in the twenty-first century ', International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), 78(2): 353-363. Rodin, D. (2002) War and Self-defense, Oxford University Press. Walzer, M. (2004) ‘The Triumph of Just War Theory (and the Dangers of Success)’ and 'Emergency Ethics ', Arguing About War, Yale University Press. Walzer, M. (2000) from 'Supreme Emergency ', Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument With Historical Illustrations http://www.windsofchange.net/archives/supreme_emergency_and_the_doctrine_of_just_warfare.html Williams Jr., R Bibliography: ‚annonymous‘ (2001) ‚ICISS‘, The responsibility to protect, http://www.iciss.ca/report-en.asp Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens P. (eds) (2008), Shapcott, R.in The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations, 4th edn Butler, M. J.(2003) ‚U.S. Military Intervention in Crisis, 1945‘, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47(2): 226-248. Daddow, O. (2009) International Relations Theory, London: Sage. Hoekema, D. A. (2008) There Are No Just Wars, Ars Disputandi, 8: 126-145. Marlowe,M. D.(2001-2010) ‚Sir Arthur Harris‘, Bible Research (2001-2010) http://www.bible-researcher.com/dresden/harris.html Moseley, A Orend, B. (2005) ‚War‘ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://www.seop.leeds.ac.uk/entries/war Orend, B Prazmowska, A. (1987) Britain, Poland and the Eastern Front, 1939, Cambridge University Press. Rengger, N. (2002) ‚On the just war tradition in the twenty-first century‘, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), 78(2): 353-363. Rodin, D. (2002) War and Self-defense, Oxford University Press. Walzer, M. (2004) ‘The Triumph of Just War Theory (and the Dangers of Success)’ and ‚Emergency Ethics‘, Arguing About War, Yale University Press. Walzer, M. (2000) ‚Supreme Emergency‘, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument With Historical Illustrations, http://www.windsofchange.net/archives/supreme_emergency_and_the_doctrine_of_just_warfare.html Williams Jr., R. E. (2009) book review of Fiala, A.’s The Just War Myth: The Moral Illusions of War, Springer Science + Business Media B

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The essays by Ambrose, Broyles, Hedges, Kudo, and Styron collectively discuss War in varying contexts, highlighting the effects both before and after war. Some articles intersect on the supporting the idea of another, while others clearly hold opposing views.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz, C. On War. Michael Howard and Peter Paret, eds. and trans. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.…

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Just War In Vietnam

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The focus of this investigation is the theory or concept of just war, and what makes a just war “Just.” This investigation will explore the question: To what extent can the Vietnam War be justified as a just war? Throughout this investigation, the philosophy of a just war will be broken down into its fundamental components. The purpose of this is to identify the extent of which…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Just war theory maintains that war may be justified if fought only in certain circumstances, and only if certain restrictions are applied to the way in which war is fought. The theory that was first propounded by St Augustine of Hippo and St Ambrose of Milan ( 4th and 5th centuries AD) attempts to clarify two fundamental questions: ‘when is it right to fight?’ and ‘How should war be fought?’. Whereas Pacifists are people mainly Christians who reject the use of violence and the deliberate killing of civilians but claims that peace is intrinsically good and ought to be upheld either as a duty and that war can never be justifiable. However, Realists agree that, due to the nature of humans, force is a necessary action to be used to maintain a just and ordered society. Therefore, since the Second World War, people have turned their attention to Just War again establishing rules that can serve as guidelines to a just war- the Hague and Geneva conventions.…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Just War theory tries to judge whether it is ‘just’ to go to war and how the war should be fought. It tries to reconcile three things; taking a human life is seriously wrong. That states have a duty to defend their citizens and defend justice and thirdly protecting innocent human life and defending important moral values.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A review of chapter 2, 'The Crime of War' in Michael Walzer's book, "Just and Unjust Wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations." Allen Lane 1997.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compared to the early 20th century, the wars of today are vastly different. The reasons for fighting, the styles of fighting, and who is fighting are all very different. However, in an age that is far removed from the past, a few things regarding war have remained the unchanged. One of the ideas that has remained unchanged in a time that is every changing, are the rules of war, as described by Michael Walzer in his book, Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally, in a time where so much has changed, there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past, the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Thackrah, John Richard. The Routledge companion to military conflict since 1945. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2008. Print.…

    • 4761 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Just War Theory In Vietnam

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The part of the just war theory is called jus ad bellum. There must be a just cause, right authority, proportionality, the goal of peace, with war as a last resort. A country cannot attack another country for more wealth or for more respect. They must attack on behalf of an innocent third country or group. Right authority means that war must be declared by the proper authorities and not by private companies. Proportionality means that the potential war must be assessed regarding the cost of the war and the benefits from the war. The country must also decide whether or not the potential gains outweigh the loss of human lives and the cost of the war. Next, “will the destructiveness of the proposed conflict outweigh any enhancement of other human values?” That means will the war any enhance aspects of the human life more than the violence that will occur during the war. The purpose of the war must be for peace, not solely to win glory. Finally, the war must be a last resort, meaning that all other methods for peace must be attempted before resorting to…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As reader leader, I decided to do my summary on “What Is a Just War?” by Jean Bethke Elshtain. Elshtain opens by discussing the main priority of any government: providing security, thus ensuring tranquility. Elshtain makes the point that civic peace and security are the foundations for all the other human rights. For example, for someone to exercise their right of freedom of speech, that person should be able to exercise their right without fear of consequence. A flaw, as Elshtain points out, in the overall tranquility of the ‘kingdom’ is that not everyone is ruled under the same law. Even though guns are allowed in the United States, other places like Australia prohibits them, the different laws between countries can cause tensions. These…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article “Just War Tradition” also refer to as Just War Theory is related to war because it explains the principles and morals behind on taking war as a last resort solution only if the options don't meet the requirements. Also, in the case of war was to happen they discussed on when and where warfare is appropriate to be taken place. Including that, the Just War Tradition was originally discovered by the Christians and their based it on their philosophy. Then theorist Saint Augustine made who made other factions to their philosophy for a better outcome. As years passed another theorist named Michael Walzer stepped in but this time around modernize the principles. The government must apply two principles the first principle is Jus ad Bellum…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Just War Theory

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What justifies war? Who justifies it? Why as human beings do we feel the need to fight, harm, and kill others to achieve certain goals? These questions have been pertinent to our society since the beginning of time and continue to challenge us to better understand the human psyche, and code of ethics that give Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Coast Guardsmen, and Marines credence to kill in the name of the United States of America. These ethics of war lay the foundation for that code of understanding and righteousness for when it is justifiable to pull the trigger and take the life of another, or commit an act of war.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Iraq War in 2003 and the concept of jus ad bellum by Michael Walzer…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 4 ]. Childress, James F. (1978). "Just-War Theories: The Bases, Interrelations, Priorities, and Functions of Their Criteria".…

    • 4382 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before 1945, the relation of war to the international system was stated by W.W. Hall in a well-known passage which stated “International law has no alternative but to accept war, independently of the justice of its origin, as a relation which the parties to it may set up if they choose, and to busy itself only in regulating the effects of the relation.” (Hall 1924, 82)…

    • 4349 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics