Was Alexander the great "great"?
Was Alexander the Great “great”?
The evidence suggests that Alexander the Great was legitimately great because he conquered many countries and he was inspirational. Alexander was great because he conquered a country in the years 333BC, 332BC, 331BC, 331BC, 330BC, 327BC, 324BC and 323BC. This demonstrates that he was great because he used tactics that would defeat enemies. An example of a tactic he used is phalanx. Phalanx means “a body of Macedonian infantry drawn up in close order with shields touching and long spears overlapping”. This was good because he could easily besiege cities which helped him take over the Mediterranean. My own research shows that Alexander the Great took power over the countries Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Palestine, Egypt, northern Afghanistan and Iraq. This shows how Alexander the Great was so prodigious.
Alexander the great was also great because he was inspirational. My own research shows that “he was an inspiration for later conquerors such as Hannibal the Carthaginian, the Romans Pompey and Caesar, and Napoleon.”. This shows he was great because he inspired others. He is so inspirational Oliver Stone has directed a film about him – http://www.alexander-the-great.co.uk/index.htm . He became inspirational by being determined yet patient at the same time. This demonstrates that he was great because no other military leader in his time was so inspirational. There are schools and roads named after him. This shows he inspires/inspired citizens from both past and present. This shows why he was so great.
On the other hand Alexander the Great was not so great because many tactics where inherited from his father,Philip II. Alexander's father had many tactics such as the phalanx, however Alexander decided to improve on his father's idea and make it better and stronger so he could defeat more enemies. The phalanx was his fathers idea but improving on the idea shows that he was intelligent and skilful. This shows that
The evidence suggests that Alexander the Great was legitimately great because he conquered many countries and he was inspirational. Alexander was great because he conquered a country in the years 333BC, 332BC, 331BC, 331BC, 330BC, 327BC, 324BC and 323BC. This demonstrates that he was great because he used tactics that would defeat enemies. An example of a tactic he used is phalanx. Phalanx means “a body of Macedonian infantry drawn up in close order with shields touching and long spears overlapping”. This was good because he could easily besiege cities which helped him take over the Mediterranean. My own research shows that Alexander the Great took power over the countries Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Palestine, Egypt, northern Afghanistan and Iraq. This shows how Alexander the Great was so prodigious.
Alexander the great was also great because he was inspirational. My own research shows that “he was an inspiration for later conquerors such as Hannibal the Carthaginian, the Romans Pompey and Caesar, and Napoleon.”. This shows he was great because he inspired others. He is so inspirational Oliver Stone has directed a film about him – http://www.alexander-the-great.co.uk/index.htm . He became inspirational by being determined yet patient at the same time. This demonstrates that he was great because no other military leader in his time was so inspirational. There are schools and roads named after him. This shows he inspires/inspired citizens from both past and present. This shows why he was so great.
On the other hand Alexander the Great was not so great because many tactics where inherited from his father,Philip II. Alexander's father had many tactics such as the phalanx, however Alexander decided to improve on his father's idea and make it better and stronger so he could defeat more enemies. The phalanx was his fathers idea but improving on the idea shows that he was intelligent and skilful. This shows that