Preview

Victor Is The Real Monster In Frankenstein

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
568 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Victor Is The Real Monster In Frankenstein
When the word monster comes to mind, especially when compared to Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, one would think of a creature that is ugly, different, violent, and an outcast much like the monster in Frankenstein. In this novel, Victor Frankenstein, a scientist who extremely interested in alchemy, creates a creature that is considered to be the monster of the story. Looking deeper in the novel, Victor is the true monster because of the scary traits of his personality. Things are not always what they seem, it is easy to be mesmerized in this story by the big ugly monster and miss that the real monster lies in the creator. The “monster” in Frankenstein is misunderstood. Monstrous acts happen because one does not completely take into consideration the backlash of their actions. In the case of this story, all of the more innocent were murdered because of the actions of the …show more content…
Victor only has but one friend and a hard time acquainting himself with new people. He marries his cousin, “Elizabeth was only to be mine" (Shelley 44). The unusual part is that the relationship is about the possession of her rather than a usual relationship that is based on love. He saw her as something he owned, someone he could use for social status. “I promised myself that from my detested toils it was the prospect of that day when I might claim Elizabeth,” (Shelley P70). He does not see their relationship as a relationship that goes both ways, rather it’s one that only goes his way. Victor is also unusual because he is trying to be like a god. Victor is extremely motivated in creating people, and figuring out immortality. He thinks that “Life and death appeared to me ideal bounds, which I should first break through, and pour a torrent of light into our dark world” (Shelley P55). Along with being unusual, he has other traits that make the creator of this unprecedented being a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The monster, although it has acquired the name Frankenstein in popular culture, remains nameless throughout the novel, signifying its lack of acceptance in a human society. The monster’s rejection stems significantly from its appearance, ranging from its "yellow skin" (Shelley 42) and "dim-white sockets" (42) to its "straight black lips” (42) and a "shriveled complexion” (42). Shelley has clearly distinguished the monster, marking the first divide between monster and human. She has also established the initial trickling of the monster’s inability to associate with humans. In fact, the monster’s own creator, Victor Frankenstein, rejects it due to its appearance and refuses to interact with the hideous beast. The monster’s appearance prevents other characters from seriously interacting with the monster, as they form a prejudice against a non-human being. The fear of that which is non-human lingers throughout Shelley’s…

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein presents that Victor’s creation is a monster and that is not true. The true monster in this story is Dr. Victor Frankenstein. Victor had one goal in creating his creature and that was to gain fame and to gain praise from his creation. The one difference that separates Victor and the Creature apart is that Victor thought that the creature was still evil in the end, but the creature realized that what he had done was…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As ironic as it seems, and for the many differences shown between Victor and the Monster in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, there are also various similarities between these two characters. The way they want to learn, they way they used to love but now hate the world, and the great sense of remorse they feel at the end. Both, Victor and the Monster, had a great desire for learning. For Victor it was more about studying and becoming fully educated in the sciences. As for the monster however: he was more interested in learning about human life, “but how was this possible when [the monster] did not even understand the sounds for which they stood as signs?” (p. 98) He learned to speak from listening and learning from humans talk. For Victor “natural philosophy, and particularly chemistry… became nearly his sole occupation.” They are both extremely fast learners and were able to learn the things they studied very quickly.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The text finally uses the interaction between Victor and the Monster to display the similarities of their misfortunes, but then completely contrasts the two characters, leading readers to create a larger conclusion about the text. At the end of the Monster’s life story he demands a companion emphasizing Victor’s role in his misfortunes: “Instead of threatening, I am contest to reason with you. I am malicious because I am miserable. Am I not shunned and hated by all mankind? You, my creator, would tear me to pieces, and triumph… and would not call it murder” (104). The texts ironically portrays the Monster as the responsible figure attempting to change his future contrasting him to the human who refuses to participate in a self-determined change of fate. Due to the fact that the Monster is dependent on a human creator, no decision he makes can ultimately change the fate of his misfortune. Victor on the other hand not only has the choice of the Monster’s happiness in his hands, but also his own fate. By displaying the Monsters inability to change his destiny, the text emphasizes the…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main character trait between Victor and the creature is their love of nature. For example, “My country, my beloved country! Who but a native can tell the delight I took in again beholding thy streams, thy mountains, and, more than all, thy lovely lake” (Shelley 52). Even though Victor is grieving over William’s death, he still finds peace and tranquility through nature. The creature also indulges in the beauty of nature and he also finds peace. “Soon a gentle light stole over the heavens, and gave me a sensation on pleasure” (Shelly 75). When Victor left the creature right after he created him, the creature had no one to care for him so he fled to woods and found that nature enlightens him just as it does for his creator. “The sky became clouded; but the air was pure, although chilled by the north-east breeze that was then rising. But it refreshed me, and filled me with such agreeable sensations…” (Shelly 134). When Victor through the female creature in…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frankenstein creating the monster starts off bad and it only goes even further downhill from there. What the monster does throughout the story is very unethical and not very moral, but its actions can be explained by learning about what Victor did to create the mess. When he created the monster and then left it, he put everyone who was close to him in danger and never owned up to the fact that it was his fault. He let innocent people die because of this and when he could have explained that he created the monster, he decided to stay silent. The bad ethics are even further displayed through secondary characters who judge the monster based on social norms and its looks. In a book of unethical and unmoral events, Shelley decided to place in an ethical and moral character: Robert Walton. He is the epitome of a great man based on his actions. This book was filled with unethical decisions that could have been prevented if the monster was never…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley makes us question the idea and the definition of a monster. We have a picture painted in our heads of something that would hide under a bed or some spooky creature that resides deep in the woods or swamps. Mary Shelley makes us question ourselves and popular beliefs.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One approach to this question would be to say that the creature in 'Frankentein' was himself the only monster. However, as we soon realise, the creature is benevolent at heart and only becomes monstrous due to the unjust way in which society treats him. The bleak, miserable world which Shelley portrays, full of hypocrisy, oppression and prejudice gains exposure through the depiction of the monsters 'fall from grace'. It is through the monsters suffering that he becomes truly monstrous. Shelley is suggesting that the creature's misdeeds are caused by the enormity of his suffering; at heart, he is essentially good. And, more importantly, essentially human. If he is monstrous, no one but Frankenstein is to blame. When the outraged creature demands of his creator, 'How dare you sport thus with life?' the question succinctly represents the sentiments of the reader, and perhaps even of the author as well. Frankenstein, in his hypocrisy, longs to murder a being who owes its life to him. If the creature is, paradoxically, both inherently good and capable of evil, then his creator is as well. The main cause of the monster's suffering rests with none other than Victor Frankenstein himself, whose actions at the monster's birth were surely monstrous also. To desert a newborn child is to defy one of the most fundamental elements of human nature. This shows Victor to be inhumane, and hence, monstrous. It is this inner monstrosity that is reflected in the creature's hideous visage. This exposes one of the novels key themes; Frankenstein is the monster's double. It becomes clear at this point that Shelley is making use both meanings of the word monster. In modern usage, the term 'monster' has come to mean 'something frighteningly unnatural of huge dimensions'. However at the time of 'Frankenstein's' writing its meaning was quite different. In earlier usage a monster is 'someone or something to be shown' Shelley uses both definitions in order to blur the fine line between what is…

    • 3698 Words
    • 106 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book Frankenstein, the Monster adopted a crime and hate filled life mainly because of his interactions with humans. This is a reflection of Mary Shelley's views on human nature. While Mary Shelley was writing the book, she believed that humans are mutable, and that what they become is based off of events that occur in their lives, and decisions they make during their lifetime, and the Monster is a perfect example of this; he starts out innocent, but the abandonment from Victor Frankenstein, and the harsh treatment from people turned the Monster into an angry being.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    frankenstein essay

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Frankenstein's Monster is a tangible representation of evil being created. Humans are solely responsible for the evidence of evil, primarily based off how they treat each other. Originally, the Monster embodies a childlike naivety which causes him to be completely unaware of his status as "an abhorred monster" (Shelley 92). Completely isolated from society, the Monster still develops a sense of self awareness which leads to the revelation of his loneliness. Desperate to cure his emotional pain, the Monster observes a family from afar and envies their happiness and connectedness. Eventually, he "hoped to meet the beings who, pardoning my outward form, would love me for the excellent qualities which I was capable of unfolding" (Shelley 196), and receive companionship and love from his ideal future friends. At this point, the Monster is clearly not evil, rather just an innocent being seeking the same validation that most humans strive to find.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Monsters are imaginary creatures that humans created. People’s fears, worries, or anxieties have been used to create the fictional monsters. Monsters have features that society deem to be scary or bad. The novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley and the novella The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka follow the story of a 'monster'. Pushed away from society, and labeled as an outcast, the monster is often hurt by the people around it. However, the monsters in these stories were not always monsters. They were once simple creatures, loving and kind, who were pushed away by society, turned into outcasts and deemed unfit to live among the rest of society. Once deemed unfit for society, both Frankenstein's monster and Gregor turned towards monstrosity. Both…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Isolation In Frankenstein

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout the novel Frankenstein, many people view the creation as the monster, which on the surface is what we are seeing by reading this text. However, as pointed out by writer Josh Traynelis, by reading into the text and digging out the small details provided in the reading, people begin to believe that maybe the creator is in fact the one that deserves to be called the monster. As pointed out in “Who’s the Real Monster?” by Traynelis, “Instead it was the extreme misconceptions of humans, resulting in extreme isolation of the creature, that caused him to become a monster,” where the isolation of the creature mainly draws back to the rejection of the creator and mankind (Traynelis, 1). The creator seemed to be disappointed with his creation,…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The creature created by Victor Frankenstein was very vicious and evil as described in the story. The book creates an image of the creature as a monster that murders people close to Victor. The monster is actually a victim of an injustice taking place. The creature understands that in his life there is no justice, he tries to make himself perfect in order to change his injustice, and the willingness of searching for fairness gives the story a sense of inspiration and life lessons.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book Frankenstein by Mary Shelley both Victor Frankenstein and his creature have monstrous characteristics. They both fit under the definition of monster. The creature is a person of unnatural or extreme ugliness, deformity, wickedness, or cruelty. Victor is one who deviates from normal or acceptable behavior or character. In society a monster could be a person who does awful things. They both do awful things all throughout the book. The creature murdered people, but Victor could have stopped him from doing that. The creature was mean, sad, and lonely because of the way Victor and other people treated him. Victor left his family and didn’t talk to them for two years to create a monster that he did not like. Victor and the creature…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Green, Tall, and Scary are just a few of the words associated with the monster Frankenstein, however, this association is wrong. In today’s culture the monster from the story is often called Frankenstein, which may have a lot do with the title of the book, and the fact that the monster is never named. However, Frankenstein is the man who created the monster. Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelley, explains the events in which took place regrading Victor Frankenstein’s monster. Mary Shelley’s monster is a somewhat intellectual being, with a broken heart. However, that doesn’t make him any less horrific. Because of the monster’s horrifying physic, the monster struggles with being accepted by others, including his own creator Victor Frankenstein.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays