Preview

Using the Material from Item a and Elsewhere Asses the Usefulness of Subcultural Theories in Explaining Subcultural Crime and Deviance in Society.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
922 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Using the Material from Item a and Elsewhere Asses the Usefulness of Subcultural Theories in Explaining Subcultural Crime and Deviance in Society.
Using the material from item A and elsewhere asses the usefulness of subcultural theories in explaining subcultural crime and deviance in society. Durkheim argued that a certain amount of crime was ‘healthy’ for society and that it is deviant behaviour that provided a catalyst for social change. He said that crime and deviance are functional because the ritual of punishment is an expressive experience that serves to bind together members of a social group and establishment a sense of community; also known as re-affirming boundaries as the resulting media coverage publicly reaffirms the existing values. They are useful in introducing necessary changes and preparing people for change – as Durkheim argues all social change begins with some form of deviance; certain crimes when prosecuted illicit public sympathy and affect change in legislation policies – Kiranjit Ahluwalia, Rosa Parks. Durkheim also put forward social cohesion, this is when certain horrific crimes are committed the entire community are drawn together in shared outrage, such as September 11th Twin Towers, often resulting in public accepting legislative changes which severely impact upon out civil liberties. However Durkheim also seen negatives aspects of Crime and Deviance named ‘Anomie’ the point when crimes becomes dysfunctional. This is a condition characterized by the breakdown of norms governing social interaction. Durkheim argues that people can only be happy when their wants are commensurate to their means. He thought that humans are basically selfish in nature and if left to their own devices would in order to satisfy their own needs, commit crime if they could get away with it. A state of anomie would therefore occur where there are insufficient social controls to ensure conformity from individuals. He argued that this would normally occur in periods of great social change or stress, where the collective conscience may be weakened. However, Merton believes that deviance occurs as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Durkheim looks at how crime and deviance is inevitable and needed in society as it performs two important positive functions: boundary maintenance and adaptation and change, he says that boundary maintenance is when society reacts to crime and there is social cohesion, and this leads to society condemning the criminal and the punishment given by the social agencies is a way of reaffirming societies shared rules and reinforce social solidarity. The media portrays the court case and the punishment; this acts a way of informing members of society and discourages others from rule breaking. Adaptation and change for Durkheim is when an individual has an idea or belief which is seen to be deviant by rest of the members of society, they fight and challenge the existing norms and values, in time there values may give way to a new culture and morality and not seen as deviant anymore such as cohabiting couples would be seen as deviant due to the couples not been married but in current times it is not deviant as it is more popular in society. These changes in values and in society allow society to progress and evolve. Furthermore Durkheim acknowledges that crime and deviance are inevitable because not everyone is socialized in the same way with the same norms and values. Functionalism is useful as it…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem with Durkheim’s theory of social deviance is that his idea that a society needs deviancy to change is only looking at the “good” sort of deviant behaviour which leads to a more desirable type of social change. This leaves out the kinds of deviancy such as murder, theft, rape and other sorts of deviancy which damages society. With Durkheim leaving out the sort of deviancy that would cause damage to society he has left himself open to criticism.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalist approach towards crime & deviance is seen as a top down approach as it looks at society as a whole, stating that criminal behaviour is caused by society itself except from being caused through an individual’s biology & psychology. Durkheim sees deviance as inevitable also being necessary for our society, however other perspectives such as Marxist & Feminist may state otherwise.…

    • 550 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crime occurs when society does not provide its members with equal opportunities in society. The individuals are not given equal opportunity in society will not have the same investment in their community as members of society that are afforded job and educational opportunities. When social functions are not equal the members of society are not recognized by society, he or she will develop their own unique subculture is more accepting of crime (Rock, 2012). This type of subculture appears in lower income and poverty…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority of Functionalist's ideas on crime derive from the work of Durkheim. Durkheim believes that crime in inevitable because not every member of society shares the same values and norms; every society has crime, particularly the most advanced industrial societies. Crime is seen as not only inevitable, but functional to society because it allows for change, which is vital for society to function. Durkheim argues that crime brings society together, as in the case of the Soham murders. From this point of view it can be questioned what the function of punishment is, Durkheim believes punishment is a form of social control and act as a signal to people. A.K Cohen developed Durkheim's ideas further, providing further possible functions of deviance. Firstly deviance can act as a safety valve providing an expression of discontent. Cohen uses the example of prostitution, he believes this protects the institution of the family and provides a release from the stress of family life without undermining family stability because the relationship between prostitute and client has no emotional attachments. In other words it is fine for a man to use a prostitute, but not to have an affair because that would jeopardise the family! Cohen believes that deviance acts as a warning device too indicate that an aspect of society is malfunctioning, thus drawing attention to it and allowing the problem to be resolved. An example of…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In assessing the usefulness of subcultural theories it is first important to understand what subcultural theories are. They are an explanation of deviance in terms of the subculture of a social group arguing that certain groups develop norms and values which are to some extent different from those held by other members of society. There are a number of sociological theories, which strive to understand a cause for crime and deviance. Subcultural theorists posit the idea that there is nothing “wrong” with criminals and those who commit deviant acts. Instead, they advocate an alternative set of values or a “subculture”.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This theory meshes some aspects from both the social disorganization theory and the strain theory. The main premise of the cultural deviance theory is that conformity to the prevailing cultural norms of lower class society causes crime. The lower class subculture has its own set of values, rules, and beliefs that clash with the mainstream values of the middle-class and wealthy. Criminality is a manifestation of conformity to lower class subculture values. Members of the working and lower class commit crimes of different variations as they respond to the cultural norms of their own class in an effort to deal with adjustments of the socioeconomic classes.…

    • 2400 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most prominent functionalists to have lived, Durkheim, explained crime as a problem of modernity associated with the decline of mechanic solidarity, a society that is homogenous and in cohesion. In times of social change people may lose sight of the shared norms and values they’ve become accustomed too, creating a weaker collective conscience. Durkheim describes this state of ‘normlessness’ as anomie which is expressed not just through crime but, also by suicide, marital breakdown and industrial disputes. Anomie is used to describe why some people become dysfunctional in society and turn to crime. According to Durkheim, society becomes more individualistic because of anomie as people resort to what they do know, themselves, therefore not looking out for their community which would have once been the norm. However, Durkheim doesn’t acknowledge that anomie may not always result in individualism and can lead to the exact opposite. For instance, some people have formed stronger ties to their religious group in reaction to the emergence of the new media, which has caused wide scale social change.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Durkheim acknowledges that crime is essential in society. The aberration of a crime helps to define mora boundaries as well as serves as a reminder to obey social norms (RULES OF SOCIOLOGY METHOD). The Hisbah patrol cities to enforce the rules, and citizens find comfort in this dominating regulation (Vice News 2014). Criminals are shown to be grateful for their incarceration and whippings because it brings them closer to god, or as Durkheim would say, social norms. The punishment of criminals also brings communities togethers. They join to discipline deviances, creating a strong collective conscious with the desire to set social facts back in place. In one instance of many, a man convicted of murder was crucified and displayed in the public…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The norms become blurred and individuals become unaware of what is right or wrong in society (Lilly, J. Robert et al. 2007). An example of anomie in society is the summer riots of 2011, making news headlines across England. Durkheim would argue that this incident is a lack of norms; offenders being unaware of the adequate norms in society. The article (The Telegraph. 2011) called it a ‘crumbling nation’, supporting Durkheim’s theory of anomie, as individuals in the riot may have been unsure of the norms in society and as a result showed acts of rioting. This suggests that the functionalist theory can yet be applied to society today and explain why people commit acts of crime and…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Constructionism

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This essay will begin by defining key terms Jewkes (2012) defines Crime as the violation of law, however it has been extended to include social harm, which is culturally relative and ultimately depends on theoretical position of those defining it. Jewkes also defines Deviance, as a social and usually moral (as opposed to legal) concept to describe rule breaking behaviour.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the usefulness of subcultural theories in explaining ‘subcultural crime and deviance’ in society today. (21 marks) – Jan 2011…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assess the usefulness of subcultural theories in explaining ‘subcultural crime and deviance’ in society today.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Using material from Item B and elsewhere, assess explanations for apparent ethnic differences in involvement in crime (21 Marks)…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deviance In Sociology

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Durkheim explains that crime in society display to people the difference between right and wrong, and what acts are breaking social-norms. Durkheim also stated that crime encourage group against group, in other words, the good against the bad. As an example in terrorist attacks, the crime of terrorism separates society from the good individuals against the bad people (terrorists) which also has an effect in having them punished and looked down upon. Another theory Durkheim has explained is the fact of being deviant and going against society to reach out for a change, this may be things such as protests. Durkheim has also said that minor law breaking and being deviant every now and then in our lives reduces stress and anger and helps us to lead better and healthier lives. Durkheim is not saying that crime is good, but rather that is serves good in society. Durkheim’s theory is somewhat about a normative theory but mainly it comes from the labeling perspective. The normative theory applies in the way that the social norms provide a guide for what is normal in society and how individuals should act, and why they get broken in society. The labeling perspective is what helps the society regarding crime; the labeling perspective focuses on the social audience and how they react to the crime. Many of Durkheim’s theories relate exactly to this, how crime shows…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics