There is no right way of doing a wrong thing
It depends on the perception of different individuals what is right or wrong. The first thing that comes to the mind when thinking about right and wrong is the very basic question as to how we decide what is right and what is wrong?
Generally the answer is got from the societal laws or the prevalent practices or thought process. Even if the issue is resolved the fact remains that to do a wrong thing the ways and means that have to be adopted invariably start falling into the category of what we will call wrong from the societal framework. But still if we do decide that the end result that we willingly want is wrong there can be a systematic way of getting it executed and hence now we have a right way in which we finally did a wrong thing! So, in the end the question rounds up to what is right and what is wrong?
If the means that we used to do a wrong thing are right to our mind then we very well have a right way to do a wrong thing.Lot of time people justify violent act or behavior by attaching a back story to it. For example, Naxalite movement in India. Human right people clamor of state wrong doing and justify in some way the violent means employed by Naxalites to fight for their right. Like Mahatma Gandhi said, "An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind." A wrong done to somebody does not justify the violence and hooliganism of the victim. Another example would be - A guy, who has molested a girl, reasons for his act that the girl by her revealing clothes and promiscuous expressions were leading him on to do exactly like what he did but it will not justify his own weakness in character and moral degradation. This reason stated by the guy can never be the plausible explanation of his act.
For whatever reason, people and corporations continue not to “do the right thing.” The allegations against Enron, WorldCom, Adelphi, and other corporations have shaken the very foundation of our financial institutions, eroded investor confidence, and
Generally the answer is got from the societal laws or the prevalent practices or thought process. Even if the issue is resolved the fact remains that to do a wrong thing the ways and means that have to be adopted invariably start falling into the category of what we will call wrong from the societal framework. But still if we do decide that the end result that we willingly want is wrong there can be a systematic way of getting it executed and hence now we have a right way in which we finally did a wrong thing! So, in the end the question rounds up to what is right and what is wrong?
If the means that we used to do a wrong thing are right to our mind then we very well have a right way to do a wrong thing.Lot of time people justify violent act or behavior by attaching a back story to it. For example, Naxalite movement in India. Human right people clamor of state wrong doing and justify in some way the violent means employed by Naxalites to fight for their right. Like Mahatma Gandhi said, "An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind." A wrong done to somebody does not justify the violence and hooliganism of the victim. Another example would be - A guy, who has molested a girl, reasons for his act that the girl by her revealing clothes and promiscuous expressions were leading him on to do exactly like what he did but it will not justify his own weakness in character and moral degradation. This reason stated by the guy can never be the plausible explanation of his act.
For whatever reason, people and corporations continue not to “do the right thing.” The allegations against Enron, WorldCom, Adelphi, and other corporations have shaken the very foundation of our financial institutions, eroded investor confidence, and