Preview

Theories of Karl Marx

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1417 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theories of Karl Marx
INTRODUCTION
Karl Marx, also a philosopher was popularly known for his theories that best explained society, its social structure, as well as the social relationships. Karl Marx placed so much emphasis on the economic structure and how it influenced the rest of the social structure from a materialistic point of view. Human societies progress through a dialectic of class struggle, this means that the three aspects that make up the dialectic come into play, which are the thesis, antithesis and the synthesis (Avineri, 1980: 66-69). As a result of these, Marx suggests that in order for change to come about, a class struggle has to first take place. That is, the struggle between the proletariat and the capitalist class, the class that controls the means of production. Karl Marx also believed that this king of class stratification would be replaced by a more equal society known as communism. Therefore this theory rests on the premise that says, “the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.”
CRITICALLY ANALYSE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUMAN ACTION AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE IN MARX’S WORK.
As has been mentioned earlier in the introduction, Marx was a materialist. Materialism means believing in the objective realities and not the subjective that idealists believe in (Roodt, 2013: lecture notes). Marx therefore believed that social structures as well as social relationships restricted or enhanced one’s life chances. Materialism provides a simple and economic perspective, which appears most compatible with our experience and observations. Moreover, materialism seems, and this may be its most attractive element, the only metaphysics most consistent with scientific knowledge and attitude.
Materialists include social structures such as norms, schooling systems, class, physical conditions or ones environment etc. Thus coming to the conclusion that human action is shaped and determined by the social structures available, for example class



Bibliography: Avineri, S. 1980. The social and political thought of Karl Marx.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Carver, T. 1992. The Cambridge companion of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Connix, S. 1992. Daens. Belgium: Universal Pictures Benelux. Johnson, D.P. 1971. Sociology Theory: classical founders and contemporary perspectives. New York: J.Wiley and Sons. Roodt, M.J. 2013. Industrial and Economic Sociology 2. Grahamstown: lecture slides.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to him matter determines everything. Alongside this, author claims, means of production and relation between productive forces constitutes economic structure of society, and this is the real foundation on which superstructure rise. Superstructure includes law, morality, philosophy, political theories, forms of government, religion, art and culture. Marx asserts, it is the social being which determines consciousness. He further says legal and political superstructure (and corresponding forms of social consciousness) arises out of the economic structure of society; that mode of production of material life conditions social, political and intellectual life; and the consciousness does not define the way we work together socially, but rather the…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Marx’s class conflict theory states that the bourgeoisie (or the capitalists) are locked in conflict with the proletariat (the exploited workers). Marx believed that this conflict could only end when the working class united and violently broke free of the “bondage”. Once this happens, society will be classless and people will work according to their abilities, while receiving goods and services according to their needs. Although Marxism does propose revolution, it should not be confused with communism.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Karl Marx, the struggle between the upper class, the bourgeoisie and the lower class, the proletariat, has always been a constant conflict throughout history. The bourgeoisie controlled all means of production and continuously oppressed the proletariat, which was unfair because the proletariats were the ones doing hard labor, yet the bourgeoisie gained all of the benefits. Marx believed that in order to end this class struggle, class distinctions would need to be eliminated. In order for everybody in society to be considered equal, there could be no private ownership of materials. If private ownership of materials were allowed, then some people would have more things than other people which would create another class and thus another conflict. Therefore, an equalized society would get rid of all conflict. Marxism has been…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Marx, Karl, Engels, Friedrich edited by McLellan, David. The Communist Manifesto. New York, United States: Oxford University Press, 1992. Print.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The most fundamental assumption of Marx's moral system is a kind of moral materialism; he asserts that "the nature of individuals ... depends on the material conditions determining their production" (Marx, 2001c : 176) He thus frames any consideration of individuals in terms of their economic and productive circumstances, a move not foreign to many of his critics, but one that would conflict with many of the more idealistic notions entertained by many liberals. In his early writings, Marx…

    • 3140 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    His famous works include three significant theories that shaped a world period’s economy, that many spectators of the time eventually pondered the on the economic systems as how Marx did. These three theories will be discussed in this paper one by one; Dialectical Materialism, The Communist Manifesto and the Labor Theory of Value.…

    • 12474 Words
    • 50 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx and Exploitation

    • 7976 Words
    • 32 Pages

    Marx and Exploitation Author(s): Jonathan Wolff Source: The Journal of Ethics, Vol. 3, No. 2, Marx and Marxism (1999), pp. 105-120 Published by: Springer Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25115607 . Accessed: 13/05/2011 03:20…

    • 7976 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    karl marx note

    • 565 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It has become fashionable to think that Karl Marx was not mainly an economist but instead integrated various disciplines—economics, sociology, political science, history, and so on—into his philosophy. But Mark Blaug, a noted historian of economic thought, points out that Marx wrote “no more than a dozen pages on the concept of social class, the theory of the state, and the materialist…

    • 565 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marxism

    • 2391 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Historical materialism is a theory regarding society, economics, and history that was first theorized by Karl Marx, in what can be described as a materialist conception of history. The theory is based around the idea that socioeconomic development occurs depending upon the changes in material conditions, like technology and production capacity, and these factors are the primary influence on how society and the economy are capable of being organized. According to the Marxist website, In Defence of Marxism, “historical materialism is the part of Karl Marx’s theory maintaining that social structures derive from economic structures and that these are transformed as a result of class struggles, each ruling class producing another, which will overcome and destroy it, the final phase being the emergence of a communist society.” (Marxist.com)…

    • 2391 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx put forward his conception of historical materialism for the first time in German Ideology in 1845-6. He believed that it was the material world or the mode of production which determines the consciousness of men & the ‘social, political, and spiritual processes of life'. According to him, the mode of production, which refers to the productive forces of society as well as the relations of production; is not simply the reproduction of physical existence, but a definite mode of life. What individuals are, ‘coincides with their production, with what they produce and with how they produce it.' The economic structure is the real foundation on which the ideological superstructures of law, politics, religion & philosophy arise. Marx argued that changes in the mode of production correspond to the different stages of history. According to him, "History is nothing but the activity of men in pursuit of their ends", and labour forms the basis of human society. Thus, he held that the foundations of reality lay in the material base of economics rather than in the abstract thought of idealistic philosophy. While Durkheim praised the ‘idea that social life should be explained, not by the notions of those who participate in it, but by more profound causes...', he noted the inadequacy of this conception was evident in the study of the family.…

    • 2283 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sociology is the study of people within a society. Three important Modernist Thinkers; Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber are the three important figures in sociology. During the time of the modernist thinkers, they played a role in sociology thinking. This paper will explore the importance on why these three figures are considered modernist thinkers. What there main focus was and how they are considered a modernist thinker.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [23] Mclellan, D. 1973. Karl Marx: His life and thought. New York: Harper and Row.…

    • 7303 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    marx

    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Marxist theory of historical materialism claims society as fundamentally determined by the material conditions at any given time - this means the relationships which people enter into with one another in order to fulfill their basic needs, for instance to feed and clothe themselves and their families.[1] In general Marx and Engels claimed to have identified five successive stages of the development of these material conditions in Western Europe.[2]…

    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays