Preview

The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
14181 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel
Psychological Bulletin 1998, Vol. 124, No. 2, 262-274

Copyright 1998 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0033-2909/98/S3.00

The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: Practical and Theoretical Implications of 85 Years of Research Findings
Frank L. Schmidt University of Iowa

John E. Hunter Michigan State University

This article summarizes the practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research in personnel selection. On the basis of meta-analytic findings, this article presents the validity of 19 selection procedures for predicting job performance and training performance and the validity of paired combinations of general mental ability (GMA) and Ihe 18 other selection procedures. Overall, the 3 combinations with the highest multivariate validity and utility for job performance were GMA plus a work sample test (mean validity of .63), GMA plus an integrity test (mean validity of .65), and GMA plus a structured interview (mean validity of .63). A further advantage of the latter 2 combinations is that they can be used for both entry level selection and selection of experienced employees. The practical utility implications of these summary findings are substantial. The implications of these research findings for the development of theories of job performance are discussed.

From the point of view of practical value, the most important property of a personnel assessment method is predictive validity: the ability to predict future job performance, job-related learning (such as amount of learning in training and development programs), and other criteria. The predictive validity coefficient is directly proportional to the practical economic value (utility) of the assessment method (Brogden, 1949; Schmidt, Hunter, McKenzie, & Muldrow, 1979). Use of hiring methods with increased predictive validity leads to substantial increases in employee performance as measured in percentage increases in output, increased



References: Baker, T. G. (1996). Practice network. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 34, 44-53. Bar-Hillel, M, & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1986). The a priori case against graphology: Methodological and conceptual issues. In B. Nevo (Ed.), Scientific aspects of graphology (pp. 263-279). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas. Ben-Shakhar, G. (1989). Nonconventional methods in personnel selection. In P. Herriot (Ed.), Handbook of assessment in organizations: Methods and practice for recruitment and appraisal (pp. 469-485). Chichester, England: Wiley. Ben-Shakhar, G., Bar-Hillel, M., Bilu, Y, Ben-Abba, E., & Hug, A. (1986). Can graphology predict occupational success? Two empirical studies and some methodological ruminations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 645-653. Ben-Shakhar, G., Bar-Hillel, M., & Rug, A. (1986). A validation study of graphological evaluations in personnel selection. In B. Nevo (Ed.), Scientific aspects of graphology (pp. 175-191). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas. Borman, W. C., White, L. A., Pulakos, E. D., & Oppler, S. H. (1991). Models evaluating the effects of ratee ability, knowledge, proficiency, temperament, awards, and problem behavior on supervisory ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 863-872. Boudreau, J. W. (1983a). Economic considerations in estimating the utility of human resource productivity improvement programs. Personnel Psychology, 36, 551-576. Boudreau, J. W. (1983b). Effects of employee flows or utility analysis of human resources productivity improvement programs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 396-407. Boudreau, J. W. (1984). Decision theory contributions to human resource management research and practice. Industrial Relations, 23, 198-217. Brogden, H. E. (1949). When testing pays off. Personnel Psychology, 2, 171-183. Carlson, K. D., Scullen, S. E., Schmidt, F. L., Rothstein, H. R., & Erwin, F. W. (1998). Generalizable biographical data: Is multi-organizational development and keying necessary? Manuscript in preparation. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. New Tfork: Cambridge University Press. Cascio, W. F, & Silbey, V. (1979). Utility of the assessment center as a selection device. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 107-118. Collins, J. (1998). Prediction of overall assessment center evaluations from ability, personality, and motivation measures: A meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX. Cronshaw, S. F, & Alexander, R. A. (1985). One answer to the demand for accountability: Selection utility as an investment decision. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 35, 102-118. Dye, D. A., Reck, M., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The validity of job knowledge measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, I, 153-157. Gaugler, B. B., Rosenthal, D. B., Thornton, G. C., & Benson, C. (1987). Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 493-511. Holland, J. (1986). New directions for interest testing. In B. S. Plake & J. C. Witt (Eds.), The future of testing (pp. 245-267). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Hollander, E. P. (1956). The friendship factor in peer nominations. Personnel Psychology, 9, 435-447. Huffcutt, A. I., Roth, P. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). A meta-analytic investigation of cognitive ability in employment interview evaluations: Moderating characteristics and implications for incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 459-473. Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization for 12,000 jobs: An application of synthetic validity and validity generalization to the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATE). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Service. Hunter, J. E. (1986). Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 340362. Hunter, I. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1982a). Fitting people to jobs: Implications of personnel selection for national productivity. In E. A. Fleishman & M. D. Dunnette (Eds.), Human performance and productivity. Volume I: Human capability assessment (pp. 233-284). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1982b). Quantifying the effects of psychological interventions on employee job performance and work force productivity. American Psychologist, 38, 473-478. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Intelligence and job performance: Economic and social implications. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 447-472. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Coggin, T. D. (1988). Problems and pitfalls in using capital budgeting and financial accounting techniques in assessing the utility of personnel programs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 522-528. Hunter, S. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Judiesch, M. K. (1990). Individual differences in output variability as a function of job complexity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 28-42. 274 SCHMIDT AND HUNTER Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1992). Development of causal models of processes determining job performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 89-92. Schmidt, F.L., Hunter, I.E., McKenzie, R. C., & Muldrow, T.W. (1979). The impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 609-626. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Outerbridge, A. N. (1986). The impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 432-439. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Outerbridge, A. N., & Goff, S. (1988). The joint relation of experience and ability with job performance: A test of three hypotheses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 46-57. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Outerbridge, A. M., & Tratrner, M. H. (1986). The economic impact of job selection methods on the size, productivity, and payroll costs of the federal work-force: An empirical demonstration. Personnel Psychology, 39, 1-29. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Pearlman, K. (1980). Task difference and validity of aptitude tests in selection: A red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 166-185. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Pearlman, K. (1982). Assessing the economic impact*of personnel programs on workforce productivity. Personnel Psychology, 35, 333-347. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Pearlman, K., & Shane, G. S. (1979). Further tests of the Schmidt-Hunter Bayesian Validity Generalization Model. Personnel Psychology, 32, 257-281. Schmidt, F. L., Law, K., Hunter, J. E., Rothstein, H. R., Pearlman, K., & McDaniel, M. (1993). Refinements in validity generalization methods: Implications for the situational specificity hypothesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 3-13. Schmidt, F. L., Mack, M. J., & Hunter, J. E. (1984). Selection utility in the occupation of U.S. Park Ranger for three modes of test use. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 490-497. Schmidt, F. L., Ones, D. S., & Hunter, J. E. (1992). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 627-670. Schmidt, F. L., Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1994, June 30-July 3). The personality characteristic of integrity predicts job training success. Presented at the 6th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC. Schmidt, F. L., & Rothstein, H. R. (1994). Application of validity generalization methods of meta-analysis to biographical data scores in employment selection. In G. S. Stokes, M. D. Mumford, & W. A. Owens (Eds.), The biodata handbook: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 237-260). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Steiner, D. D. (1997). International forum. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 34, 51-53. Steiner, D. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (1996). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 134-141. Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557-560. Waters, L. K., & Waters, C. W. (1970). Peer nominations as predictors of short-term role performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 42-44. Wigdor, A. K, & Garner, W. R. (Eds.). (1982). Ability testing: Uses, consequences, and controversies (Report of the National Research Council Committee on Ability Testing). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press. Jansen, A. (1973). Validation of graphological judgments: An experimental study. The Hague, the Netherlands: Monton. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger. Levy, L. (1979). Handwriting and hiring. Dun 's Review, 113, 72-79. McDaniel, M. A., Schmidt, F.L., & Hunter, J. E. (1988a). A metaanalysis of the validity of methods for rating training and experience in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 41, 283-314. McDaniel, M. A., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1988b). Job experience correlates of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 327-330. McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Mauer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599-616. Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources management. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 13, pp. 153-200). JAI Press. Neter, E., & Ben-Shakhar, O. (1989). The predictive validity of graphological inferences: A meta-analytic approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 737-745. Ones, D. S. (1993). The construct validity of integrity tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 78, 679-703. Pearlman, K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training criteria in clerical occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 373-407. Rafaeli, A., & Klimoski, R. J. (1983). Predicting sales success through handwriting analysis: An evaluation of the effects of training and handwriting sample context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 212- 217. Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1992). Intelligence is the best predictor of job performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1,8689. Rothstein, H. R., Schmidt, F. L., Erwin, F. W., Owens, W. A., & Sparks, C. P. (1990). Biographical data in employment selection: Can validities be made generalizable? Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 175-184. Schmidt, F. L. (1988). The problem of group differences in ability scores in employment selection. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 33, 272-292. Schmidt, F. L. (1992). What do data really mean? Research findings, meta analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1173-1181. Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Personnel psychology at the cutting edge. In N. Schmitt & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection (pp. 497-515). San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Schmidt, F. L., Caplan, J. R., Bemis, S. E., Decuir, R., Dinn, L., & Antone, L. (1979). Development and evaluation of behavioral consistency method of unassembled examining (Tech. Rep. No. 79-21). U.S. Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 529-540. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1981). Employment testing: Old theories and new research findings. American Psychologist, 36, 1128-1137. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1983). Individual differences in productivity: An empirical test of estimates derived from studies of selection procedure utility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 407-415. Received April 8, 1997 Revision received February 3, 1998 Accepted April 2, 1998 •

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Capstone

    • 4789 Words
    • 20 Pages

    You will read through a series of resumes, look over reports made during interviews, and investigate the results of several standardized measures of employee suitability. This case thus integrates information from several earlier cases that have involved making an appropriate choice of measures, but now applying it with a specific group of individuals. From these multiple pieces of data, you will develop a recommendation for hiring. You also will develop guidelines for how similar selection decisions could be made for the entire organization.…

    • 4789 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rothstein, M. G. & Goffin, R. D. (2006). The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support?. Human Resource Management Review, 16 (2), pp. 155--180.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Study Module 1 Mgt509

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Selection is the second stage in a normal organization entry scheme and starts at the end of recruitment. It involves identifying candidates who meet key requirements through a battery of tests and purposeful interviews. The selection policy of an organization determines the procedures that should be utilized in picking the right person for available job opening therein. In its absence, selection would depend on the whims and caprices of the managers. This process should be as thorough as the budget allows. A string of interviews that determine the personality, proficiency, and the cognitive abilities of the future employee must be accomplished to ensure the best people are placed in our organization.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personality Test Reaction

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This essay entails arguments presented by two groups in the debate as to whether personal tests should be used as selection tools. A personality test reflects to the employer one’s everyday feelings, behavior and personal work style. Through self- reporting by answering questions, the employer is able to tell how one relates to other people and how they deal with personal emotions and those of others. Answers in personality are neither right or wrong, they are not timed and Personality tests are not timed and the answers are neither right or wrong (Conelly and Ute 3).…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article, The Reemergence of Personality Testing as an Employee Selection Procedure, by Donald L Caruth and Gail D Caruth which was published in the magazine SuperVision, evaluates the relevance of personality testing in the workplace today (Caruth, D & Caruth, G, 2009). According to the article personality testing, once very popular, had been in a slump until recently (Caruth, D & Caruth, G, 2009). The article displays how the popularity of personality testing had decreased and then reemerged as a useful tool in the employee selection process (Caruth, D & Caruth, G, 2009). This article also shows how effective the assessments…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Seeing that there is a relatively strong correlation between job performance and cognitive ability we could assume that there is probable validity in the cognitive ability as a predictor of job performance. This evidence will help the organization decide whether or not to incorporate the use of cognitive ability into the selection process for future job applicants. Since both the original population size and the second population size were significantly small we may need to use caution in the future depending on what we are seeking. If the normal population for this position is relative to the population size in the testing we can assume that the information is valid and usable. However, if we used a small sample population (5-7 people) when the normal population size for the position is…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tanglewood Case Summary

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the selection process predictors are used to help identify a good potential job performer utilizing an interview, standardized knowledge and personality tests and also running job trials. Often there are both practical and statistical significances to the data collected. As part of Tanglewood’s selection process herein the predictive and proposed methods were utilized for the position of Store Associate. For the predictive design only interviews and application blanks were utilized. The proposed design utilized education, work experience, and managerial interviews. It also measured citizenship, absence, performance and promotion potential. The results from the data showed correlations most significant with regard to the education and work performance outcomes as well as negative correlation for citizenship and interview scores. The promotion potential for all areas of education, work experience and interview scores were similar. The numbers were as follows:…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We’ve all had some experience with personality testing in one way or another. Since the beginning of the twentieth century personality testing and psychological assessments have been a staple in the recruitment and selection processes in all manner of position. Be it high level executives down to janitors, no candidate is immune to what has become a trusted and normal practice in recruiting. There is currently a long-standing debate among HR professionals and sociologists alike regarding the effectiveness and relevance of testing and its application in making hiring decisions. In order to understand the effectiveness or lack thereof in regards to personality testing one must take a holistic approach and understand the historic development and application in terms of recruiting.…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Case Studies

    • 2156 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Myers, I. B. (1962). Manual: The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Pittenger, D. J. (1993). Measuring the MBTI…and coming up short. Journal of Career Planning and Employment, 54, 48-52. Quenk, N. L. (2000). Essentials of Myers-Briggs type indicator assessment. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Sharf, R. S. (2006). Applying career development theory to counseling. Belmont, CA: Thomson-Brooks/Cole. Westen, D., Burton, L., & Kowalski, R. (2006). Psychology: Australian and New Zealand edition. Milton, QLD: John Wiley & Sons Australia. Wurster, C. D. (1993). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: A cultural and ethical evaluation. Executive Research Project, National Defense University, Washington D.C. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://www.ndu.edu/library/ic6/93S86.pdf…

    • 2156 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Personality of an individual is closely linked with the process of job or work performance. The relationship between personality and the level of job performance is dependent on the environment in which he/she is working. It is important to note that job or work performance of an individual are related to organizational success or failure. Hence performance should be aligned to achieve organizational goals. According to various researches it is concluded that cognitive ability is a major contributor towards employee’s performance as compared to the five factor model of personality assessment.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HR Policies Practices

    • 1494 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Stage 2: Substantive Selection These devices are the heart of the selection process Written Tests  Testing applicants for: intelligence or cognitive ability, personality, integrity, and interests  Intelligence tests are the best predictor across all jobs Performance-Simulation Tests  Based on job-related performance requirements  Work Sample Tests  Creating a miniature replica of a job to evaluate the performance abilities of job candidates  Assessment Centers  A set of performance-simulation tests designed to evaluate a candidate’s managerial potential 4 © Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Overview – Employee selection is the logical beginning of Employee Relationship Management (ERM). The initial experience of the candidate during the selection process is likely to have a major impact on their view of the organization’s culture, their perception of the value being placed on talent, and their perception of the sophistication of the organization’s business processes. The definition of job specifications necessary for the evaluation and selection of candidates is a critical foundation for other phases of the ERM cycle. Job specifications provide the initial direction for employees during the on-boarding process (e.g., what are the primary responsibilities and expectations concerning job performance) and are the framework for beginning performance management discussions. Selection system performance in competency areas defined in the job specifications helps to establish developmental goals for the employee and provides a framework for ongoing competency assessments. Building a high performance workforce certainly starts with selection. Retention rates, individual productivity, and business competitiveness all begin with doing a superior job of matching individuals to jobs. This white paper provides an overview of what is known about common employee selection procedures, what are considered best practices, and describes future trends that are impacting how employees are selected. It is divided into two parts. Part 1 deals with the early phases of employee selection and focuses on prescreening and testing components. Part 2 deals with latter phases of employee selection and focuses on the employment interview and simulations. What do we know about candidate pre-screening? – Candidate pre-screening refers to the initial evaluation of candidate qualifications at time of…

    • 4056 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Bass, B.M., & Barrett, G.V. (1981). People, work, and organizations. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc. Birch, D.L. (1979). The job generation process. M. I. T. Program on Neighborhood and Regional Change. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Cascio, W.F. (1978). Applied psychology in personnel management. Reston, Virginia: Reston Publishing Company, Inc. Dreher, G. F., & Sackett, P. R. (1981). Some problem with applying content validity evidence to assessment center procedures. Academy of Management Review, 6, p. 551-560. Fear, R.A., & Ross, J.F. (1983). Jobs, Dollars, and EEO: How to Hire More Productive Entry- Level Workers. New York, McGraw-Hill. Harless v. Duck, 14 FEB 1616 (1977). Heneman , H.G., Schwab, D.P., Fossum, J.A., & Dyer, L.D. (1986). Personnel/Human Resource Management. Homewood, Illinois: Irwin. King v. New Hampshire Department of Resources and Economic Development, 15, FEB 669 (1977) Kleiman, L.S., & Faley, R.H. (1978). Assessing content validity: Standards set by the court. Personnel Psychology, 30, 701-713. Landy, F.J., & Trumbo, D.A. (1980). Psychology of Work Behavior. The Dorsey Press, Homewood, Illinois. McCormick, E.J., & Tiffin, B.L. (1974). Jobs and their requirements. Industrial Psychology, (6th ed.). Miner, M.G. & Miner, J.B. (1980). Uniform Guidelines on employee selection Procedures. Washington, D.C., The Bureau of National Affairs. Prehiring Tests. (1986, June). Small Business Report. Business Research and Communications, Monterey, California. Productivity: A Top Concern. (1986, February). Small Business Report, Business Research and Communications, Monterey, California. Robinson, D. D. (1981). Content-oriented personnel selection in a small business setting. Personnel Psychology, 34, pgs. 77-87. Schmidt, F.L., Hunter, J.E., McKenzie, R.C., and Muldrow, T.W. (1979). Impact of valid selection procedures on…

    • 3869 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99-109.…

    • 5908 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cognitive Ability

    • 12537 Words
    • 51 Pages

    Curtis, L. A. (1974). Victim precipitation and violent crimes. Social Problems, 21, 594 – 605. DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880 – 896. Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246 –1256. Dilchert, S., Ones, D. S., Davis, R. D., & Rostow, C. D. (2007). Cognitive ability predicts objectively measured counterproductive workplace behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 616 – 627. Douglas, S. C., Kiewitz, C., Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Kim, Y., & Chun, J. U. (2008). Cognitions, emotions, and evaluations: An elaboration likelihood model for workplace aggression. Academy of Management Review, 33, 425– 451. Duffy, M. K., Shaw, J. D., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2008). Envy in organizational life. In R. Smith (Ed.), Envy: Theory and research (pp. 167– 189). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Dunn, W. S., Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Relative importance of personality and general mental ability in managers’ judgments of applicant qualifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 500 –509. Feather, N. T. (1994). Attitudes towards high achievers and reactions to their fall: Theory and research concerning tall poppies. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 1–73. Fein, S., & Spencer, S. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 31– 44. Feldman, N. S., & Ruble, D. N. (1981).…

    • 12537 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Powerful Essays