Preview

The Struggle Of Sectional Tensions Between Northern And Southern States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
755 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Struggle Of Sectional Tensions Between Northern And Southern States
The collapse of the Union was a result of the schism separating northern and southern states, originating from differing opinions on slavery which ultimately incited the South’s secession.

As the election of 1860 drew near, hopeful democratic and republican candidates emerged despite the already turbulent condition of the nation over the issue of slavery. The Democratic ballot was split between the northern representative Stephen Douglas and southern representative John Breckinridge, while alone on the Republican ballot was Abraham Lincoln. Prior to the election, Lincoln and Douglas became engaged in a series of debates, most of which focused on slavery. Douglas expressed, in his opinion, that African Americans should not be allowed to gain
…show more content…
However the election of Abraham Lincoln was not the only reason for secession, but a rather a series of rooted problems. Sectional tensions between northern and southern states arose as early as the 1840s when America first began its westward expansion into new territories. Every new territory added raised the question of its position on slavery, as the balance between free and slave states was fragile. In an attempt to gain supporters and appeal to both citizens from the north and south, Douglas introduced the idea of popular sovereignty i n which the citizens of the territory would choose whether it entered the Union pro-slavery or anti-slavery. While this may have seemed like a good idea at the time, it did not prove to be so good in Kansas. In Kansas, people migrated from both the north and the south in an attempt to sway the vote on the issue of slavery in their favor. Unable to reach a peaceful decision, Kansas was soon known as “Bleeding Kansas” when a few small scale fights broke out between the two sides. The news of this violence proved that the sectional conflict would be much harder to mend than it originally …show more content…
The earliest of these efforts can be traced back to the Compromise of 1850, when California was admitted as a free state and let the other territories decide for themselves. This lead to the next attempted temporary solution which was the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Nebraska was split into two territories, one which turned into Kansas, with the thought that Nebraska would become a free state and Kansas a slave. Although this was ultimately achieved, the conflict over Kansas sparked more hostility between the divided United States. The last major attempt at compromise was the Crittenden Compromise which occurred right before the bombardment of Fort Sumter. This compromise proposed that slavery would be allowed to exist in slave states and other laws would be adjusted to make the south content; however these changes would upset the north. Like the other attempts, this compromise also was rejected, and there was now nothing preventing the impending

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Political Disputes use to be handled out calmly, but as the years went by, people from both the North and the South had political disputes as well as personal disputes (physical arguments). In the time period of the Missouri Compromise, (In 1820), political and personal disputes began to rise in both the North and South. Disagreements use to be settled out very calmly, but soon disagreements became out of hand. The North and South had personal disputes. In the Compromise of 1850, the North and South had a stand-off between the free states and the slave states. This argument concerned or worried the North and the South. In 1860, Southern states had begun to secede from the Union. The states seceded…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People, who think that the South broke away from the Union in the late 1860s because of slavery, should read this book. The reason is, Dew gives a dark and factual view of how much racist fears and slavery propaganda in leading up to the secession of the South’s states by speeches and writings of the secessionist commissioners appointed by South Carolina, Alabama, Georgia, and Mississippi. This opened my mind as to why, how, and what caused the secession?…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The election of Abraham Lincoln terrified the southern states. Southerners new that Lincoln favored abolition and he desired to rule against slavery in the western territories. There was a fear that Lincoln would eventually outlaw slavery for good. Therefore, the southern way of life would forever be changed. The southern states came together and decided the best solution would be to secede from the union.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economic and social differences between the North and the South were two main factors that caused tensions that contributed to the breakup of the Union. As stated earlier the South was dominated by a settled plantation system based on slavery. Unlike the North in which slavery was frown upon. The North´s economy was based in small farms, and industrial labor in the urban populated cities. As for the North that socially was shaped by European immigration, the South was very much isolated. The North was progressing as labor united various kinds of cultures…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    South Carolina voted to secede from the United States as a result of Abraham Lincoln's election to the Presidency. Lincoln had, over time, voiced strong objections to slavery, and his incoming administration was viewed as a threat to the right of the states to keep their institutions, particularly that of slavery, the business of the states. More states seceded, eleven in all, forming the Confederate States of America. The secession movement led to the Civil War.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decade of Crisis 1850

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    2. The Compromise of 1850 was a response to the issues with slavery and the proposed succession of many southern states. Henry Clay was the head of this compromise and believed it had to resolve all the issues or the compromise would not survive. So in an effort to do this, he combined all the proposals into one proposal and sent it to the legislature. It covered, California’s admission as a free state, territorial governments in lands from Mexico with no slavery restrictions, and slave trade was obliterated, but not slavery in the District of Columbia. There were…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act created two new states, but they were voted upon using popular sovereignty. Rather than having them be free state and slave state by the Missouri Compromise, it was decided that the citizens would vote on it. This was known as popular sovereignty (voting on whether or not the state would be free or slave state), and people from the north and south came up to…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those who disagree with him and his point of view, joined the seceding states. Those who disagreed were the South. The south were devastated that Lincoln was the new president. They thought that the south had no voice in the national government (textbook). They were convinced that Lincoln and the congress are agreed on the topic of slavery ( textbook). Therefore, southern states came into conclusion that they didn't want to stay with a Republican president that is an abolitionist. However, Lincoln never stated that he didn't support slavery. People assumed that because of what he says in his speeches. Soon enough, southern states started seceding. South Carolina was the first to secede from the Union ( Packet Document 5). Later on, 7 other states such as Florida, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas has seceded (Packet Document 5). Although, the national government state that all states are independent ( Packet Document 5). So all those states have the full right to secede and no one can tell them…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 between the pro-slavery and anti-slavery state representatives. The compromise involved the regulation of slavery in the western territories. It prohibited slavery north of the parallel 36°30′ north except within the boundaries of the proposed state boundaries of the Missouri territory. In return for Missouri being a freed state, Maine was allowed to become a state separate from Massachusetts. The Events that led up to the compromise are not nearly as important as what the compromise represented; a deep rooted division of doctrine.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1820, the United States Congress passed the Missouri Compromise. Before it was passed the Northern states and Southern states had different ideas of the states. The North wanted to limit slavery, while the Southern states wanted more slavery. Missouri wanted to become a slave state in 1820, but the Northern states wouldn’t allow it. As a compromise, Missouri could be a slave state as long as Maine was added as its own free state, thus the Missouri Compromise. Along with these factors a rule of 36⁰30N was applied saying that in the Louisiana Territory, the states above the latitude line 36⁰ and 30 minutes North was admitted as a free state; the states below the same line were slave states. Historians say that the Missouri Compromise caused a national crisis, others question why both sides agreed to the compromise. Both Northern and Southern states both agreed to the Missouri Compromise in thought of their own benefits, but it cause a major national crisis instead.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 was a series of measures proposed by Henry Clay. It was passed by Congress in an effort to settle outstanding issues with slavery and to avert the threat of dissolution of the Union. The crisis arose from the request of California admitted to the Union as a free state. The problem was complicated by the unresolved question of slavery’s extension into other areas ceded by Mexico the preceding year. Clay’s purpose was to maintain a balance between free and slave states and to satisfy both proslavery and antislavery forces. The plan involved California's admission as a free state, upsetting the balance of free and slave states that the Senate was concerned about; the Texas boundary was finalized on its current lines and,…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First thing first, what is the compromise of 1850? The compromise of1850 was a set of five bills that eventually lead to the civil war. Its purpose was to keep away confrontation between the northern free slave states and the southern slave states and keep the nation united. The first bill consist of California being admitted to the union as a free state. The second bill allowed New Mexico and Utah settlers to vote on an issue. The third bill relied on Texas loosing New Mexico territory, but $10 million was received from the government for the loss. The slave trade in the district of Colombia was abolished which created the fourth bill. Last but not least the fifth bill passed a new Fugitive slave act.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 called for the admission of California as a free state as well as the organization of the ceded southwestern land into the territories of New Mexico and Utah, without mention of slavery. It stated that, when the territories became states, voting citizens living in those territories could then decide on their slavery status, a solution known as popular sovereignty. The compromise also settled the boundary dispute between Texas and New Mexico and called for prohibition of slavery in the District of…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the expansion westward of United States, controversy between the Northern and the Southern States quickly arose. This was primarily due to the disagreement of what these new western territories would become- free or slave states. The Southern States wanted these new territories to support slavery so they could send more pro-slavery senators/ representatives to Congress, which was the opposite for the Northern States. Many important events from 1845-1861 quickly led to the start of the Civil War due to these Northern and Southern disputes.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The race for the U.S. senate began between Democrat Stephen Douglas and Republican Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln believed that the "government cannot endure permanently half slave, half free" while Douglas believed in popular sovereignty. Both Lincoln and Douglas agreed to stop slavery but they disagreed on how to keep it out. There were…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays