Preview

The Stranger, By Albert Camus

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
959 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Stranger, By Albert Camus
“Maman died today. Or yesterday maybe, I don’t know.” (Camus, 3). These opening lines of The Stranger by Albert Camus gives a feeling for how the rest of the novel will continue to go. The reader’s initial reaction may be shocked. How does someone not know when their mother died and why do they not care? Albert Camus was an existentialist and wrote in such a way. Existentialism is a philosophy that focuses on the ideas of existence and not believing in a God, the freedom of choice and responsibility for those choices, and the feeling of nothing matters in the world. In The Stranger, Camus gives the philosophical ideas of existentialism shown symbolically through Meursault’s view of the world, feelings, and beliefs.

When Meursault’s
…show more content…
He thought his case was simple because he had confessed to killing the Arab and was ready to pay for what he had done. Existentialists say that one should take responsibility for their actions. His lawyer then begins to ask him personal questions about Maman which he finds unnecessary. Everyone is forced to choose how to live their lives. Existential philosophy focuses heavily on that, how you decide to live your life. Like the band Rush said “if you choose not to decide, you still have made a …show more content…
They say that their is no God and they are on their own. While in jail Meursault is taken to see the examining magistrate. While in there the magistrate pulls out a crucifix and asks him if he believes in God. “I said no...He said it was impossible; all men believed in God, even those who turn their backs on him.” (Camus, 69). Throughout the rest of the investigation the magistrate calls Meursault “Monsieur Antichrist” (Camus, 71) which he hates. After the trial he is found guilty of premeditated murder and sentenced to death. The chaplain visits Meursault even though he has refused many times. “I said that I didn’t believe in God… I didn’t want anybody’s help, and I just didn’t have the time to interest myself in what didn’t interest me.” (Camus, 116-117). Being an existentialist Meursault says he has no time to waste on God. The chaplain told him that he would pray for him and this enraged Meursault. He told the chaplain not to waste his prayers. Some existentialists such as Søren Kierkegaard believed in a religion. Kierkegaard was a christian existentialist who said you have to take a leap of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Robert Camus is a famous French author who was awarded the Nobel Prize for literature in 1957. Camus has many famous novels including Le Mythe de Sisyphe, La Peste, La Chute, L’Exil et La Royaume, and L’Etrange or The Stranger. The Stranger is a short novel written in 1942 that details the life of a man named Meursault. The novel follows Meursault as he develops and changes according to dramatic events in his life. The novel shows the changes in his characteristics before any events, after he kills a man and is put in jail, and after he is sentenced to death.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people when trying to understand why things happen, ask the question: why? And most of time the answer to this question never ceases to include an individual's viewpoints, beliefs and feelings. For it is these very things that shape how others see the world. He lives an emotionless, removed man in a world filled of people who value the very things he deems unimportant. The culture of people around him, are ones who need explanations for why things happen or why things don’t happen. However, the main character of Albert Camus’s The Stranger, Monsieur Meursault sees no purpose in the…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The opening of “The Stranger” Meursault is informed of his mother’s death. Meursault tells us: “I got a telegram from the home: “Mother deceased. Funeral tomorrow. Faithfully yours.” That doesn't mean anything.” (page 3); a very strong statement to set the mood of this chapter. When he finished reading the telegram his first thought is: “That doesn't mean anything.” this can give the reader the idea that Meursault is disconnected, cold, and perhaps that he may have never been very close to his mother. Throughout the first chapter Meursault appears cold, and disconnected, perhaps because of his neutrality in his approach to his mother’s death. Another good example of this disconnection that Camus establishes is when Meursault's boss is displeased with him for taking time off “I even said “It's not my fault.” He didn't say anything. Then I thought I shouldn't have said that. After all, I didn't have anything to apologize for." (p.3)…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Meursault is sentenced to death by guillotine. He awaits everyday waiting for the footsteps of the men to come and execute him. During this time Meursault has done much thinking and begins to think to himself that death is inevitable. This realization of death’s inevitability constitutes Meursault’s triumph over society. Expressing remorse over his crime would implicitly acknowledge the murder as wrong, and Meursault’s punishment as justified. The chaplain tries to come to him and speak to him about God, but he still is unwillingly to accept that there is a God.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This story further adds to the theme of absurdism throughout the novel because there was no reason for the son to die such as there was no reason for the Arab to die. During Meursault’s trial, there is an attempt to create a reason for his crime despite there not being one. Unlike the philosophy of absurdism, the court believes in reason and order which leads to the establishment of a cause for Meursault’s crime even if it is false. Once Meursault is sentenced to death, he realizes that he no longer has the choice between life and death that all humans are given in life. He instead has death as his only “choice”. Through this, he sees that there is no difference between dying from execution and dying in the future from a different cause. Meursault then accepts that the world is as indifferent as he is to people and finds peace in this realization.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lawyer then goes on about how the next case for the jury to debate upon involves the murder of a relative and that since Meursault feels nothing for anything in this world, he should receive the death penalty. The lawyer feels that Meursault has no place in a world where he cannot follow the moral rules, “He stated that I had no place in a society whose fundamental rules I ignored and that I could not appeal to the same human heart whose elementary response I knew nothing of” (2.4.5).…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Both Keating and Meursault distinguish themselves from the masses that seek to chain their spirit. Meursault is an outsider who feels very removed from his surroundings. His reactions are very different from the conventional norms and society judges him negatively. The prosecutor describes him as a man “whose heart is so empty that it forms a chasm which threatens to engulf society” (The Outsider, 98). Meursault shows no emotion at his mother’s funeral. He is indifferent to the idea of marriage to Marie, to the possibility of a job position in Paris, as well as to his verdict of the death penalty. Meursault is judged to be an anti-Christ because he chooses not to believe in God. He refuses to lie or pretend to be something that he is not, simply to please others and to conform.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To the reader it seems only natural that one should be put on trial, not for their personality, but for the harmful acts that one may commit to another person. Therefore, the idea is strongly implanted in the novel, as well as the mind of the reader, that Meursault was put on trial for murder. Nevertheless, throughout the course of the novel, it becomes apparent that he was, as a matter of fact, not put on trial for the murder of the Arab, but instead, for acting in such a stoic manner. Being the honest, straightforward man he was, he answered all questions in that same conduct. Once Meursault had been appointed a lawyer, his lawyer inquired over the events of Maman 's funeral. Meursault responded rather coldly when his lawyer had asked him if he had felt any sadness that day, saying that he "probably did love Maman, but that didn 't mean anything. At one time or another all normal people have wished their loved ones dead." (p. 65) This quotation only demonstrates that he was unemotional. Now, one must ask the following question: how does this relate to the murder of the Arab? The answer is simple: it does not relate to the murder of the Arab. Being the representative of society, the jury opposes Meursault and accuses him of not conforming to society 's natural…

    • 875 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meursault knows that death is the ultimate consequence to murdering the Arab; he has no personal, or emotional ties with the dead man; he accepts this truth; his insensitivity actually provides a means for him to accept the idea of existentialism. This gives the impression that Meursault sees the murder as a consequence and the cause of his current problems.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meursault’s reactions are rarely what the reader envisions as appropriate. People feel disconnected-- disheartened and confused-- when Meursault claims his Maman’s death “doesn’t mean anything” (3). The level of indifference he feels and the actions he performs: making excuses to his boss, having lunch at Celeste’s, going to swim and a movie with Marie, all have the readers questioning Meursault’s character. This displeased feeling continues through the first half of the novel with Meursault’s uncaring and robotic behaviors of watching “families out for a walk… the local boys [going] by… the shopkeepers and the cats” (21-22). One then starts to wonder. One…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Existentialism greatly supports free will, the idea that we are responsible in ourselves for our moral behaviour and it is our choices and actions that give us purpose. “It is only in our decisions that we are important.” Jean-Paul Sartre was a great believer in this: that everything depends on the individual and the meaning he gives to his life. He argued that all physical objects have an essence that…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Final essay proposal

    • 832 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Existentialism dwells on the concept of absurdity in life. It focuses on the conflict between the constant and intense search for meaning and the inability to find it. Existentialism also admits that the world is dominated by pain, frustration, sickness, contempt, malaise and death. (Barnes 1962) This is the main ideology behind Jean-Paul Sartre’s work, “Existentialist Ethics”. The existentialist ideology began to flourish during the Second World War. However, the existential system of thought can be traced back to earlier thinkers such as Friedrich Nietzsche. Who is a German philosopher and considered as one of the most provocative and influential thinkers of the late nineteenth century who challenged the foundations of Christianity. (Robert Wicks, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Nietzsche 's philosophy is that ' 'God is dead ' ' and he calls for a ' 'revaluation of all values ' ' in his book Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Both Nietzsche and Sartre are atheistic existentialists and agree that “God is dead”, and that human beings must take responsibility for their own actions. The philosophers have a lot of parallels between their thought, and also many differences. The purpose of the final essay is to show that although Nietzsche and Sartre are atheist philosophers, they have different interpretations of the death of God. The paper will also examine how both thinkers share a similar understanding of human freedom and the meaning of life.…

    • 832 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the magistrate keeps on trying to force Meursault to go back to God and start believing in christianity and the existence of God. Refusing salvation, Meursault is somehow rejecting any system that is forced upon humanbeings. To Meursault, by accepting christianity, he is adapting to the idea that the universe is rational and meaningful. Another scene explaining the idea of the denial of God is through the encounter amongst Meursault and the chaplain happens. Meursault refuses the idea of someone lecturing him towards christianity or God. Though the chaplain tries to force Meursault into christianity, he tries talking to him in a soft tone by mentioning how Meursault has goodness in him but he does not know. However, Meursault becomes very angry with the chaplain and refuses to see him for the third…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stranger Essay

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Another way to look at it is that, throughout the book, Meursault would express his hatred for humanity’s culture of mourning and think of it as crazy. He is adverse towards people who torture themselves over someone else’s death.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Stranger

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The novel immediately starts off with Meursault receiving word that his mother died. He seems pretty indifferent as he goes through asking off work and attending the funeral. When he returns home from the funeral, he pretty much goes straight back into normal life as if nothing was different. He enters a relationship with Marie and befriends his neighborhood pimp, Raymond. Throughout, he remains detached from reality around him, being indifferent to the fact that his girlfriend is in love with him. His apathy (somehow) results in his engagement to Marie and they (along with Raymond) go on vacation to the beach. While at the beach, Meursault shoots and killed an Arab man who was the brother of Raymond's mistress. After his arrest, Meursault's attorney seems disgusted at his detachment and indifferentness to the murder in addition to his mother's death. When Meursault meets with the magistrate, the magistrate claims that Meursault is the antichrist. Meursault easily adapts to life in prison, hardly even noticing what he was missing from before. Eventually, he is sentenced to death. He freaks out on the chaplain and finally accepts that he will die and life holds no greater meaning. He finally feels happy (which is something)…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays