Preview

The Scam in Mercy Killing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
933 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Scam in Mercy Killing
The Scam in Mercy Killing Imagine one of your family members is terminally ill and presumed she will die very shortly. This is a controversial topic where some people want to die with dignity. So many people can choose Euthanasia to assist them in dying peacefully. So many of these people approximately 3,147 cases are put under this pressure to end their lives and say god-bye. Euthanasia is the putting to death by painless means or in Greek language it means a good death. Either you can do this by a family member or even by the doctor. Terminally ill people and other sick people are being deprived and depressed and have these feeling to end their lives. In the process of Euthanasia a lethal dose of medicine can be given or feeding tubes and medicines can be stopped. Many people say that we have the right to die, but I say we cannot play God and Euthanasia breaks the Hippocratic Oath. I think that all types of Euthanasia should be illegal including non voluntary, voluntary and assisted. In the case of Euthanasia a common oath is being broken and this is the Hippocratic Oath which is an oath stated when a doctor completes his courses. In this oath it basically stated that we shall do no harm. The oath also states that they shall give no lethal medication or suggest any. Counter arguments state that the Hippocratic Oath has changed over time and the meaning of no harm is let life go its natural way or by killing them mercifully they die with dignity and it is their freedom of choice. This clearly violates the oath because by killing by an outside force is a homicide, by killing is bringing harm, and by prescribing a lethal dose is clearly against the oath. So they counter act that by saying it is our right to choose. The counter argument to this is that it is not in our laws of the Due Processes we are allowed to not request life saving equipment, but not the process of assisting in suicide is illegal. So in turn Euthanasia is illegal and my point still stands.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Over the years, there has been much debate within the United States as to whether or not assisted suicide should be allowed. This battle has been long fought, those who support the practice of physician-assisted suicide state that those who are terminally ill should have the right to die with dignity. Those against the practice of physician-assisted suicide state it is not only morally wrong but the same as murder. The classical ethics theory of virtue ethics has been utilized to argue against physician assisted suicide since first instances of the issue. Arguments against legalizing the practice of physician-assisted suicide include arguments that doctors take the Hippocratic Oath, which many argue is in favor of preserving life, rather than help take it. (Cite Hippocratic oath debate here)…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia means gentle or easy death for those who are incurably ill and in pain. So should a person have the right to take another person 's life or his own when he or she is incurably ill and in pain? That is Australia is trying to decide. The N.T already has passed a law that legalizes euthanasia in that state. Now other government leaders and members are in support of this are pushing for an Australian euthanasia law. Christian Groups and Anti-Euthanasia have seen euthanasia as a sin and a choice that no-body should make. Some doctors have taken ill patients life 's as a request from the patient should this now be openly done. Would you want to be kept alive, with little hope ahead, when you were in pain? Some might answer no, and those people should deserve the choice to end it when that pain becomes unbearable.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Research Paper on Euthanasia

    • 2719 Words
    • 11 Pages

    One of the most hotly debated ethical issue of our time is one of Euthanasia. Euthanasia comes from the Greek words “Eu”, meaning well or easy, and “Thanatos”, meaning death. In modern terms it is the intentional premature termination of another’s life by direct intervention or by withholding care.[1] Within that it can be either voluntary (expressed or implied consent), or involuntary. The two sides of this debate are the rights of an individual to decide when he or she is to die, or the sanctity of life and the states responsibility to protect people.…

    • 2719 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease which is cutting a person’s life too short. The concept of physician assisted suicide always provokes a moral predicament for many people all over the world, mostly because it gives someone the freedom to choose whether to live or die. Euthanasia has been debated for many years, on one hand people believe euthanasia is a negative action because suicide is not a way out, but on the other hand people also believe assisted suicide is the only option for a patient who suffers from great pain that will only get worse. Euthanasia or physician assisted suicide should be legalized and people shouldn’t worry about whether or not if they feel it’s immoral or not.…

    • 2132 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia is another term for mercy killing. It is said to be the act of putting to death painlessly a person suffering from such incurable or painful disease. Meanwhile, in the 21st century it has been argued that euthanasia is one of the famous social concerns nowadays. Moreover, it is usually done by doctors to their patients who are terminally ill. Although euthanasia ends the suffering of the patients, it can damage the teachings of some religions, principle of medical ethics, and the patients trust.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people would agree that the right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid any unnecessary excruciating pain seems as though it should be a basic human right. To have someone go through more suffering than absolutely necessary seems as though it would fall under the description of an inhumane act, and frankly an injustice against the basic human right of bodily autonomy and integrity. Due to these almost undeniable arguments, physician assisted suicide, in many cases, is seen as a basic human right that we need to be granted access to. Activists argue that it is simply an additional choice that we will be able to make, and that it will surely never be pushed onto anybody or used sinisterly (Maynard 2014). Although this claim is something that we cannot be entirely sure of, as I have continued to research the pros and cons behind physician assisted suicide, I have come to the conclusion that in many cases it truly does seem that the legalization of physician assisted suicide is the best option for everyone involved. It is a means to cease any unnecessary suffering that a person may be going though, and provides a sense of comfort for them during a time in their lives where they are not given many choices besides to deal with what they are going through and try to survive. Additionally, with many of the extreme medical advancements of the 20t century, our goals have been clouded by the quest to…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The term euthanasia originated from the Greek word for "good death." It is the act or practice of ending the life of a person either by lethal injection or the deferment of medical treatment (Munson, 2012, p. 578). Many view euthanasia as simply bringing relief by alleviating pain and suffering. Euthanasia has been a long-standing ethical debate for decades in the United States. Active euthanasia is only legal in the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. Assisted suicide is legal in Switzerland and in the United States in the states of Washington, Oregon and Montana (Angell). Several surveys indicate that roughly two thirds of the American public now support physician-assisted suicide, and more than half the doctors in the United States do too (Angell). Active voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia matter because they allow the patient or family to relieve them of pain and suffering, and to die with dignity and respect. In this paper I will argue that it is immoral and unethical to deny a patient the right to die and that active voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia should be a legal practice in the United States.…

    • 2255 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Euthanasia is a social issue in today’s world because not only does it affect the lives of those who are terminally ill and/or comatose, and the physicians who have been entrusted with their care, but it also affects the patient’s ability to have control over their own life, whether they are aware of this decision or not, which is one of the reasons why euthanasia has become such a controversial issue around the globe. Caddell and Newton (1995) define euthanasia as “any treatment initiated by a physician with the intent of hastening the death of another human being who is terminally ill and in severe pain or distress with the motive of relieving that person from great suffering” (p. 1,672). Even though the concept of great…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the many reasons people oppose physician assisted suicide is because it violates the doctor’s Hippocratic oath. Yet, the Hippocratic oath has no legal binding and is based off of centuries’ old logic. It is not practical in today’s society and in the case of physician assisted suicide. Another reason people argue against it is that the doctors and families may give…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Most individuals, especially those fond of medical dramas, know of the Hippocratic Oath and its primary obligation of doing no harm; however, the vow physicians take before graduating medical school is being challenged by physician assisted suicide, also known as PAS. Individuals diagnosed with a terminal illness that causes pain and suffering towards the end of life will pick a date to painlessly die before their disease progresses too far. As this practice becomes more widespread, arguments over the ethics of medical doctors aiding in the suicide of their ill patients have erupted. Some argue that in doing so, doctors violate the Hippocratic Oath while stripping the patient of their personal autonomy. Those who support the decision to commit…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthanasia should be legalized to allow terminally ill patients the opportunity to prepare for their deaths, avoid unnecessary pain and die with dignity. Euthanasia is “the act or practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, as by lethal injection or the suspension of extraordinary medical treatment.” (Am. Heritage) The literal meaning of the word euthanasia, "‘an easy or happy death,’ from the Greek word eu- ‘good’, and thanatos ‘death’"(Harper), is proof in itself that the whole idea is to help people and not to belittle the value of life. The fact that suffering animals can be put out of their misery, but suffering people are forced to stay alive and endure the pain, is inhumane. Legalizing euthanasia would be no more than an act of mercy allowing medical personnel to bring slow, painful deaths to a halt.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people believe that euthanasia is a patient’s right. According to ProCon.org, “… a terminally ill person has a protected liberty interest in choosing to end intolerable suffering by bringing about his or her own death” (ProCon.org, “Top 10 Pros and Cons”). Claiming that everyone has the right to choose their death. The website also went deeper into the matter by bringing the Hippocratic Oath, “do no harm” (ProCon.org, “Top 10 Pros and Cons”). It…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to relieve suffering for those with terminal illness, physician assisted suicide should be legalized for competent persons to allow for autonomy in making end of life decisions. In order to reduce or relieve suffering of animals, medically assisted death is a perfectly acceptable practice today. But when it comes to people diagnosed with untreatable and deadly diseases, they are not afforded the same painless luxury. They are at the mercy of their disease and a medical community that fails to recognize a life without dignity is no life at all.…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Antigone

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthanasia is a topic that is rarely covered in the news. The moral ramifications of killing someone, even for the sake of mercy, seems too heavy of a topic for in depth discussion. No one wants to think about the day they will die, however when someone becomes terminally ill it can soon become their only thought. When pain and suffering enter this scenario, the option of ending a life more quickly may also enter the thought process. According to Life and Hope Network “9% of all deaths in America are caused by Euthanasia” 1 We are given the gift of life at birth. I believe Euthanasia is a violation of the most precious gift we are given… life…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Murder. Killing someone unlawfully with forethought. A doctor prescribes a patient with medicine strong enough to kill them and they die, but they still had life. The doctor’s signature signed on the most important oath a physician can take, but they violate and fracture their own agreement. Loved ones die, the family only shocked to hear of the alternate choice that was available, treatment. Physician assisted suicide may take the suffering away, but perhaps the suffering was going to get better. Physician assisted suicide should be banned because it violates the hippocratic oath, treatment is accessible, and life may still be available.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays