Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Weapon Control

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1633 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Weapon Control
Americans that support strict weapon control have achieved the conclusion that this change guarantees the benefit of the states to claim guns. Firearm control laws specifically damage this privilege and accordingly should not be under thought. Regardless of the possibility that the issue is ignored, weapon control advocates express that with a specific end goal to diminish gun related viciousness, firearm control laws must be executed to expel the savagery created by guns. In spite of the fact that this may appear to be sensible, the outcomes of such laws are unexpectedly counterproductive; they worsen the issue as opposed to settling it. Other than the way that the Constitution ensures its residents the privilege to remain battle ready, possibly …show more content…
Among every one of them, in any case, wrangle over weapon control has been common for so long, it is something numerous individuals can without much of a stretch set their sights on. It is an issue everyone should have a feeling on, as it is immeasurably essential, possibly debilitating, and very present in advanced society. Numerous locate the insignificant idea of weapon control intrusive to their sacred rights while others see an absence of firearm control to be astonishingly unsafe. An author describes, “Organizations like Gun Owners of America and Guns Save Lives also subscribe to the belief (a gun lobby article of faith) that society would benefit if every American carried a concealed handgun all the time” (Greif par. 4). Assurance of oneself and their rights could conceivably be more critical than many lives lost possibly because of genuinely unhindered firearm possession. The simple inquiry would convey numerous to ear-shattering open deliberation, and all things considered. Shouts of sacred disregard and of humanistic laziness would likely be heard miles away. This open deliberation would be particularly on target, however, as there are numerous substantial focuses from either side or it is a subject that must be thoroughly considered …show more content…
New media are reporting a shooting some place. Whether the shootings are coincidental or deliberate; they are occurring over the United States. In today's times, firearm viciousness is starting a civil argument and discussion on the best way to control weapon brutality. All through the nation, a great many laws and directions have been made to help in the control of weapons. Through much study, the firearm laws and controls set up have almost no impact on the quantity of weapon related wounds and deaths. All the more should be done to build up a successful approach to control weapon brutality. An author claims, “At the federal level, one of the measures that was considered in the post-Newtown era was a revival of the 1994 federal ban on assault weapons. This law expired in 2004” (Gius 7). Shootings in the United States have turned into an immoderate illicit relationship. The assessed expense could be in the billions every year. There has been an expansion in burglaries in numerous areas, school shootings, and even suicide that includes the utilization of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2 Our founding father understood that “Guns in the possession of citizens are an added protection against government tyranny” (Messerli) and the second amendment was written for this reason and is a driving factor to the creation and beliefs of American government. 3 Throughout history dictators and totalitarian regimes have taken away their citizens right to bear arms. 4 Mao Tse Tung said “political power grows out of the barrel of a gun” (Mao Tse Tung) and China’s history is an example given where guns were used to change China’s government and now private citizen gun ownership is illegal. 5 In addition to politics, the deterrent effect on criminals by allowing private gun ownership is often argued as a form of protection for the individual. 6 Only a small percentage of law abiding citizens actually use guns “but the few are enough to change the odds against predatory criminals” (Cox). 7 Because criminals are less likely to perform a crime if it endangers their life or harm them, the potential of facing a gun themselves deters the would-be criminal. 8 Gun control laws are seen as the loss of an individual’s ability to protect themselves against political tyranny or…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government assumes that if society confines gun control that criminal activity will be reduced, however, offenders generally aim for victims who are unarmed. This would make it effortless for the criminal to assault a bystander while it leaves the victim vulnerable.Controlling weapons will not keep them out of felon’s hands. Each individual has the entitlement to protect themselves against unjustified acts. Righteous residents would have a sense of security knowing that firearms could be carried legally for his or her own protection and safety. A decrease in rifle sales, along with ammunition, will damage a state’s economy. Aside from criminal abuse, firearms are valued for friendly competitions and hunting purposes. Individuals who possess guns are put to a challenge to see if they can handle true responsibility. Besides regulating firearms completely, there are other alternatives to resolve gun…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The right to bear arms has a long history in American tradition. From the time colonists settled the North American soil, Americans have held weapons to protect themselves. Armed citizen-soldiers won America 's freedom from English rule more than two centuries ago. Partly because of this long-standing tradition, attempts to restrict a citizen 's right to own a gun evoke strong emotions. When the Mayflower landed on American continent, the first group of immigrants faced the deserted soil and various beasts, weapons helped them survive. (Sandra M. 2009, p.1)Then, weapons played an important role in open up virgin soil in the west. Americans regard guns as their lives because they believe the guns can against to tyranny. The War of Independence is an example. At that time, American people realized that guns were the last shelter of protecting the rights of people. People have their freedom to overthrow the tyranny, but they could not do it without guns. So the gun ownership is an individual right guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the Constitution. Although the Constitution confirms all the freedom of citizens, they are still afraid if the government goes to the bad. So people rely on the guns. Times have passed and circumstances, the government of the USA stays away from the danger of tyranny, the purpose of gun ownership has changed. People use guns to protect themselves and their family. There used to be an eighty-year-old lady…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Four out of every 10 Americans own a gun. And nearly 3 out 4 believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual the right to have a firearm.” (Schwartz 2011 n.p.) Many Americans believe that concealed weapons are the main cause of violence. There have been many controversial, religious and political issues addressing gun control, concealed weapons and banning fire-arms in the U.S. that have been going on for many years. Gun Control is an action of the government that is suppose to reduce crime. The right to bear arms is Americans constitutional right; this right is ensured by the 2nd Amendment. Others believe that concealed weapons make life safer. After the massacres at Columbine High School and Virginia Tech University, the question is always the same: How could this tragedy have been prevented?…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Essay Example

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There is a major debate going on in the U.S. on gun control. Should people have the right to carry a concealed weapon or should they only be allowed to have a gun in their home? Another question is if the government were to ban guns would that be doing us law-abiding citizens more harm then good? Or maybe they should only allow guns in the hands of people that have had background checks and our licensed to handle them. [C]itizens in Missouri, North Carolina, and Texas are asking their state legislatures for the ability to defend themselves against violent criminal attack regardless of where the attack takes place”(Swasey 175).…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some Americans are convinced that more federal regulation of firearms is necessary to reduce the number of murders that are committed with guns and to ensure a safer, more civilized society. Others who support private ownership of guns insist that the right to bear arms is guaranteed by longstanding custom and by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and that no cyclical increase in crime, no mass killing, nor any political murders should lead the nation to violate the Constitution and the individual rights it guarantees. What's more, they say, knives and other instruments are used to kill people, and there is no talk of regulating or banning them.…

    • 2686 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Gun control has been a very controversial issue in American history in part, because America is the most armed nation in the world, with American citizens owning about 300 million fire arms. In fact, this is even more than a quarter of the whole world’s firearms. Besides, Guns have always been a hobby of Americans because of the gun culture that is unlike other states. American gun culture has survived since the earliest days of the republic because hunting has been a popular pastime, and also because guns were a means of protecting its citizens from tyrannical government. In addition, various militias have also played a major role in gun culture in terms of defending citizens from criminals. Therefore, gun…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gun Control is one of the most controversial issues in the world today. Although gun control has always been a sensitive topic, the recent uprisings in gun related crimes have made it a nearly impossible issue for citizens to agree on. Over the past decade, crimes involving the use of firearms have been very erratic. Only recently have the crimes become more severe and consistent. Guns instill fear in people everywhere because of how powerful they can truly be. Whether a gun is used to take down a criminal on the loose, or to kill an ex-boyfriend, they can cause great harm to many with just the pull of a trigger. Safety, self-defense, and fear are the main reasons that gun control is still being disputed today.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States of America, is admittedly going through many low points and difficulties with the infrastructure of the government. One of the most prevalent controversial issues among the government and its citizens is where the hypothetical “line” is drawn with gun control. Gun control presents itself as a point of valuable authority in the government to some, and also continues to be an enormous problem to others. This argument between the government and its people clash over the matters of possession and confiscation of firearms, the Constitution’s content and the position it takes to back up the issue, what the future holds for gun owners, and if the stricter control of firearms by the government actually reduces the amount of crime…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Gun control has been an issue in the United States of America since it's founding in 1776. After all, the first shots that were fired in the Revolutionary War at Lexington and Concord were an effort by the American colonists to keep the British army from taking the guns from the colonial armory. Even after gaining freedom from British control, the American people were obviously still concerned about their rights to own guns. This can be seen in the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution which says “...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Owning guns has been a staple of the conservative portion of America. More recently however, many have been clamoring for more restrictive gun laws. These calls for increased regulation on guns have been from those who perceive guns and gun-owners as potential threats to peace. The pro-gun crowd responds by emphatically stating that they have a right to own guns. With every mass shooting and tragedy that occurs both sides get louder and louder. The debate rages on and on.…

    • 3500 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Gun Debate Essay

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the history of the United States, gun ownership is considered one of the most important rights of individual liberty. But today, there are frequent shootings in the United States, from civilians to the president, from children to the elderly, they are likely to become victims of gun violence. Whenever there is such a massacre occurred in the United States, there is a heated debate about gun control in the United States, but it is not so easy to make progress on legislation. Some people believe that justice is maintained by the people who have the weapon with a kind heart, so government should not ban the gun, it can help the people have a weapon can protect themselves. But people also think gun control can reduce the crime rate. In the United…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History of Violence

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many different feelings and emotions surround the American right to bare arms, but what is looked at in the larger scheme of things is how having guns can increase or decrease violence with gun control over “a heated debate between those who view gun ownership as constitutional right and those who see it as responsible for the high U.S homicide rate”. As Hagan (2013) stated, “with opponents of gun control arguing that regulation would hurt only the law-abiding, who would be unable to protect themselves from the criminal would also themselves be of concern. That the very weapon purchased to protect the family against outside intruders all…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gun control laws have been surrounded by controversy since The Bill of Rights, including the Second amendment was passed in the congress. "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed," the founders wrote. Until recently there was considerable argument over just what the founders intended by their words. Did they mean to provide only for armed units to protect us from invasion, or did they mean that each individual has a right to a gun? However, in the District of Columbia v. Heller case, the Supreme Court made a landmark ruling upholding the right of individuals to bear arms for hunting and for self-defense. In the light of the Supreme Court’s hearing, the recent mass shooting incidents and growing gun related deaths across the country have called for changes and introduction of new gun related laws i.e. gun control laws to curb gun violence. In this paper I will review five main positions on the issue of gun violence in United States. First, there are those who argue that the only way to reduce gun related deaths is by making stricter gun control laws and enforcing new ones. These people believe gun related deaths can be reduced significantly by reducing the number of guns in the hands of the citizens. Second, this group argues that gun control laws are not effective means to curb gun related deaths. They argue that focus must increase crime control rather than gun control. They say less guns will not help bring the gun violence figures down. They argue for different laws to curb gun violence such as gun trafficking law. Third, this group argues that more guns will reduce gun violence. They say as gun ownership increases, criminals will be more cautious to attack and hence reducing gun related deaths. Forth, theses are the people who argue that instead of proposing new laws, whether it is to increase or to…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    discrimnation

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Discussions of the topic tend to revolve around three major talking points: A sociological, an ethical and a legal dimension. From the point of view of social science, the arguments concern the efficacy of gun control laws in relation to reducing violent crime. The ethical point of view pits the right to bear arms against the protection of citizens and prevention of crime. The legal question is the interpretation of the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution on the issue of whether or not the right to bear arms extends to private citizens or applies only to a so-called "well-regulated militia.” Some of the restrictions that have been proposed or enacted into law include background checks and waiting periods for individuals who want to purchase a firearm, regulation of secondary market sales, concealment laws, bans on small and lightweight guns, and a controversial ban on assault weapons.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Debate on Gun Control

    • 660 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In chapter three, restrictions, possible effects of the restrictions, and laws in favor of gun control are examined. The two most common approaches to restricting gun control are a discretionary licensing and a non-discretionary system. Under the discretionary, or “may issue,” licensing, people who wish to own a gun must show a legitimate need. On the other hand, under the non-discretionary, or “shall issue,” system, if specific criteria is met by the applicant, a license to own a gun must be given. Since 1985, after the National Rifle Association announced that it would be in favor of the “shall issue” system, Florida, Mississippi, Oregon, and more have made the switch from may issue licensing. Florida passed its “shall issue” law on October 1, 1987, requiring that any person who was qualified—meaning they had taken a firearm safety course, no history of drug or alcohol problems, have not been convicted of a felony, had no history of mental illness, had no physical disabilities, and were residents of the state—had to be issued a license to carry a concealed weapon. Oregon passed its own “shall issue” law on January 1, 1990 and Mississippi passed a “shall issue” law similar to Florida’s on July 1, 1990.…

    • 660 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays