2. Briefly explain the “pros and cons” of the electoral system. Why do we have the electoral system? What are some arguments against it?
3. In a few sentences, explain what you think. Should the U.S. maintain the current Electoral College system, move toward a national popular vote system, or use the “proportional voting” system for the Electoral College used by Maine and Nebraska?
Electoral College consists of 538 electors chosen by the candidates political party. Electoral voters are decided by the equal number of members in its Congressional Representatives plus two for your senators. There are 16 electoral votes in the state of Georgia which is the state I am from. Mitt Romney won my states electoral votes. We have the electoral system because with popular votes it would be unfair to the smaller populated states if the larger populated states voted more to one way than their state. Also if a candidate was from the south he or she would be more likely to campaign in those states and not in the northern states. Then those states may feel like they wouldn't be “their” president. It is also good because there is less likely to be a dispute over the outcome of an Electoral College vote than a popular vote. Some cons are that is may turn off some voters if their state isn't voting for the political party they are wanting to vote for. The arguments against it are that it is undemocratic that the people should decide who their president is not congress.
In my opinion I agree with the Electoral voting, at first before I read more about how it works I did not agree. Now that I have read about it I believe it is really the only way that smaller states have any say in who the president is. Also I believe its a good idea to keep the candidates from campaigning more in one part of the country than the other are only the larger states with a larger population. The only thing I can see that would be bad would be if your state is not voting for the political party you would vote for. http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/map/historic.html http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/faq.html#whyec http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/about.html http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/view_from_chicago/2012/11/defending_the_electoral_college.html http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2012/12/23/voter-turnout-swing-states/1787693/
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
While there are some distinct advantages, there are also some negative aspects to the Electoral College. What could possibly be considered the biggest detriment to the Electoral College is that a president can be elected to office without winning the majority vote. (As George Bush proved in most recent memory.) This is significant because it is indicative of the fact that certain states get more “votes per person” than other states. Also, in theory, the Electoral College forces candidates to spread their campaigns more equally in terms of geography. However, in reality this issue can become moot if some states are traditionally “red” or “blue”, and the focus of the campaigns then turns to the “swing states”. Additionally, the Electoral College provides the opportunity for an election to end in a tie. Many political…
- 579 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Electoral College, established by the founding fathers in the United States Constitution, is a process whereby a body of electors chosen by voters in each state cast a formal vote to elect the president and vice president. Among many other things established within the Constitution, the Electoral College requires extensive reform. The Constitution itself was merely a framework for the United States government and did not take into account the extent to which society would change between 1787 and 2015. Amidst the several problems constituted by the Electoral College, the four most threatening complications consist of the possibility for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote, the inequality among the distribution of votes according to population, the exclusion of third party victors, and the consequences that arise in case of a tie.…
- 651 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Over the years the Electoral College has been proven to be outdated. People wonder constantly if their vote counts anymore or, if this method is affective any longer. There are three main reasons why the Electoral College is outdated and should be abolished. The presidential candidates only pay attention to the states with the most Electoral votes, we also have a larger and more educated population then when this was originally set up, lastly it does not seem as if your vote really counts since there have been at least four occurrences where the president with the popular vote has lost the election.…
- 1099 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In the founding of the Constitution, it was assumed the general population would be far too uneducated to properly elect their representatives. From this unfortunately accurate presumption, came the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a gift from the founding fathers that has, in turn, counteracted the impact of low voter turnout.…
- 715 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The system of electing our president has been fairly consistent throughout the past 50 years and one thing that has not changed since our constitution was written is the use of an electoral college to elect the president. By using an Electoral College voters do not directly vote for their next president, instead they submit a vote that is then tallied by the electors and whichever party has the most votes at the end gets all of the Electoral College votes from that state. The use of an Electoral College has been the topic of a lot of debate in recent years, especially after the election in the year 2000 in which Al Gore won the popular vote, but failed to become president because George W. Bush won the electoral votes. There are people whom favor the use of an electoral college and there are people who think that it should be abolished and that voters should be able to directly vote for their president. For my paper I want to present both arguments, each side’s pros and cons, and ultimately whether or not I think we should or should not change the use of an electoral college.…
- 680 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are many arguments against the Electoral College. The most common attack on the system is that it enables a president to lose the election when they have won the majority of the popular votes (Polsby and Wildavsky 171).…
- 1219 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The election process for the president has many pros and cons attributed to it, though it remains the proven method for selecting who should wield the powers of the Executive Branch. While many may not agree, especially in the current election cycle, the election presents the candidates with the highest percentage of the country backing them. The downside to the election system in the United States…
- 458 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Talks of a reform of the College has also been discussed, instead of a complete termination of the system. The critics of the Electoral College certainly have rational reasoning and do not come off as absurd. One point often brought up is the system being outdated and how it is no longer a good fit for how our political system is run today (Rich). Part of the reason people want to keep the system is the small states that don't want to see their political influence lost into the popular vote, which would most likely happen if the College was abolished (Ballaro). Supporters of the system also believe that the Electoral College helps to preserve the nation as a…
- 920 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Although the electoral college has both bad and good parts about it like every state gets more votes depending on population.Conclusion for this is that the reasons for abolishing the electoral college and replace it with another system.As for the reason for the abolishment is for the electoral college for it being undemocratic, the small state over presents and hurts third…
- 483 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The founding fathers established it in the Constitution as a compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens. The Electoral College process consists of the selection of the electors, the meeting of the electors where they vote for President and Vice President, and the counting of the electoral votes by Congress. The Electoral College consists of 538 electors. A majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the President. Your state’s entitled allotment of electors equals the number of members in its Congressional delegation: one for each member in the House of Representatives plus two for your Senators. There have been four presidents to win the presidency without actually winning the popular vote of the nation. The most recent incident of this was the 2000 election of President George W. Bush, and this sparked a new interest in changing the system. There are two states, Nebraska and Maine that currently use their electoral votes a little differently than the other 48 states. They allot two electoral votes to the statewide winner and the rest according to the winner in each congressional district. This is one change to the system that is currently being presented by legislators in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Another possible change is the “Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote”, or the NPV compact. It would require electors to vote for the candidate who wins the most votes nationwide. An issue with this change is that the president would most likely be elected from votes of more populated areas like big cities that have similar beliefs and the smaller states and rural areas voices’ would be lost due to them being so spread out. One major concern for the NPV compact is that it could lead to corruption of the voting process by candidates being blackmailed with the threat of losing votes if the blackmailer’s demands weren’t met. Also…
- 533 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Electoral College is a process that began as part of the original design, of the U.S. Constitution and was established by the founding fathers as a compromise between the election of the president by Congress and election by popular vote. As we all know, Americans were given a serious reminder in 2000 that the president is not elected by nationwide popular vote, but by a majority of the electoral votes. It’s an example of indirect election as opposed to direct election by U.S. citizens, (i.e. the members of the U.S. House of Representatives.) Should the Electoral College be reformed or done away with altogether, has been a hotly debated subject since one of the first ever public polls, on the subject matter, was given in 1944? According to a Gallop Poll taken on November 11-12, 2000, sixty-one percent of Americans supported a constitutional amendment to allow the national popular vote winner to assume the presidency, (http://www.galluppoll.com). Critics of the Electoral College argue, among many things, that it is at its very core undemocratic because only 538 people are responsible for the election of our president and vice president while proponents argue that it protects the rights of smaller states. It is my desire, through this discussion, to highlight the arguments for and against the Electoral College, bringing about dialogue on this controversial subject.…
- 2179 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Electoral College is a group of people who elect a president and vice president. It is described in Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution. The electors are not required to follow popular vote, so, candidates can win electoral vote and presidency and not win popular vote. It would be more politically and economically beneficial to the USA to keep the Electoral College and not let the public take full advantage of the votes because the public will most likely vote for materialistic reasons and not political reasons.…
- 424 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Let’s take a half step into the past and learn how we got the Electoral College in the first place. 1787 was the year of the constitutional convention. I won’t walk through history too much here other than to say that the men who gathered were representing both large and small states and not looking to diminish their individual state powers. These men were also a little hit-shy from the fight for independence. Monarchs were bad, so giving too much power to anyone or any one state seemed like a bad idea. The country looked much different then. We had fewer American citizens at the time than currently live in New York City. Elections, well government as a whole, were for the wealthy land owning white men of the country.…
- 2721 Words
- 11 Pages
Better Essays -
The legitimacy of its factions on the political system in the United States has exceedingly worked well for more than 200 years. Since it apportions larger voting strength to the smaller states, it doesn’t appear that any amendments will be made to abolish the process. While the founding fathers may have thought the Electoral College to be imperfect, it just may be the only way the United States will be electing the…
- 1215 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
One of the Pros is that the National Popular Vote wins the Electoral College majority, which proves the peoples voice and cote is heard and is being represented by the Electoral College. Another pro is that the Electoral College has been there are a small number of votes that needs to be counted. This minimizes fraud and paper trail. The Electoral College created a foundation for America to elect its president, but there are still flaws to the Electoral College. One of the cons is people have the idea of why vote if the President can still lose the National Popular Vote and still end up winning the Electoral Majority. This ends up invalidating the Democratic election and lowering voter turnout. Another Con is with only 270 Electors from the Electoral College they can veto the national popular vote majority. It violates the principle of popularly elected presidents. For the Third Parties, they have no chance in winning win-take-all elections. There is no point for voting for Third Parties with the Electoral College. Since America is basically a Third Party system country (Democrats and Republicans). There are some historical examples of pros of the Electoral College. For example, a 20th Century Presidents won both the Electoral College majority and National Popular Vote. One of the drawbacks from the Electoral College is if a candidate wins the popular vote it does not guarantee the Presidency, which has happened several times in history with Hayes in 1876, Harrison in 1888 and Bush in 2000. The 2000 election proved to be a con for the Electoral College. George W. Bush lost the National Popular Vote and Electoral College Majority and still became President. It went against the Democratic Values especially due to the Supreme Court deciding the…
- 1093 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays