Preview

The Investiture Controversy

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2185 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Investiture Controversy
The Investiture Controversy is seen often times as a significant conflict between Church and State in medieval Europe. However, it was really a conflict over two radically different views of whether the secular authorities such as kings or dukes, had any legitimate role in appointments of spiritual offices such as bishoprics. In the eleventh and twelfth centuries the control of appointments or investitures of church officials such as bishops and abbots became a conflict between Pope Gregory VII and Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor. This reveals that medieval society had to decide which authority figure to support, either the secular or spiritual authority, because each one believed that the other was entitled to more authority than the other.
The Investiture Controversy was significant in medieval history because though Henry IV and Gregory VII had very different opinions of what the spiritual and secular authorities duties were they both wished to preserve the Catholic faith against corruption. The Middle Ages began after the fall of the Roman Empire. Significant changes began to occur in every part of the continent due to the lack of an absolute ruler, which was Rome. The churches around Rome looked to the Pope for guidance but seeing that their needs were not being met, nobles and especially kings assumed numerous Christian duties, including the protection and foundation of churches and abbeys. Although canon law, which is the body of laws and regulations made for the government of the Christian organization and its members, declared that bishops were to be elected by the clergy and the people but the rulers ignored it. Secular authority slowly started to become more dominant than spiritual authority being that weak church authorities were monitoring their powers. During the eighth and ninth centuries, the Roman aristocracy dominated the election of the papacy due to no Carolingian powers to control them. The aristocratic family with the most power would have



Bibliography: Geary, Patrick J. “Cluniac Charters”, in Readings in Medieval History , 315-321. Toronto: University of Toronto Press Incorporated, 2010 [ 3 ]. Patrick J. Geary, “Cluniac Charters”, in Readings in Medieval History (Toronto: University of Toronto Press Incorporated, 2010), 316. [ 4 ]. Patrick J. Geary, “Pope Gregory VII and King Henry IV”, in Readings in Medieval History (Toronto: University of Toronto Press Incorporated, 2010), 580.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    5. Investiture Controversy- the medieval struggle between the church and the lay lords to control clergy-involved appointments…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The rise of the papacy came at a time when the Roman Empire collapsed and there was chaos as it related to the bishops who held office in Rome and what religion would be at the forefront of the representation of the west or east of Rome since its demise. The term “papacy” (papatus), meant to distinguish the Roman bishop’s office from all bishoprics (episcopatus), and The Head of the Roman Catholic Church the pope is considered the successor of Peter and the vicar of Christ (Elwell, p. 888). The “pope” is a terms of endearment which means “father” and this was the title of the most important and influential bishops in the early church. The church at Rome nevertheless enjoyed and wanted to preserve the original apostolic faith and the prominence, and they as bishops also owned its apostolic “founders” and to its political setting, and this led to the inspiration of these bishops to exercise greater leadership in Rome and abroad (Elwell, p. 888). Most emperors and patriarchs of Constantinople, challenged the bishops and their beliefs by saying that the church in Rome is new and improved but that they are still believe in the old Roman church. The popes or bishops were not moved by their words and they knew that they were not living up to the apostolic ways of the founding fathers who came before them and that their primacy was derived from Peter and not from their political setting which in turn made their claim to fame to be truly based upon the “apostolic”(Elwell, p. 888). The Apostle Peter was sent to Rome by Jesus to build God’s Church. In Matthew 16:18, NLT, says 18 Now I say to you that you are Peter (which means ‘rock’),[a] and upon this rock I will build my church, and all the powers of hell[b]…

    • 1506 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The extent to which the papacy asserted dominance over the Western Church has been greatly disputed amongst historians. Certain historians would argue that there is little to suggest that the pope had control from inside other than papal reform to prevent unrest and, would argue that in fact the real conflict was between him and individual states and that he had to deal with multiple reforms and claims that failed. However, there are Historians who would suggest that, in fact, the papacy was successful in asserting its authority over the Western Church due to the religious significance of the Pope’s position which on occasions caused individual kings to submit to his power. Furthermore, it can be argued that although the Pope was the figure head of the Church and had power, he had to rely on the support and co-operation of Kings if he was to be able to keep control over the Western Church and therefore it could be said that he was not as dominant as one would think.…

    • 2243 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fighting between Henry and Gregory intensified after the pope formally proposed the investiture at the council of November 1078. Investiture was the customary ceremony in which the emperor or king bestowed upon the bishops the ring and staff, the symbols of their office as well as of royal authority in and protection of the church. This event would lead to what is known as the investiture controversy. Pope Gregory would go on to excommunicate Henry IV again but with little effect this time. It was widely felt to be an injustice, and people began to ask whether an excommunication pronounced on frivolous grounds was entitled to respect. These actions led to a civil war between Henry and Pope Gregory in which the pope would call for his Norman allies. After successfully repelling the invasion at first, the Normans would stay in Rome and go on to pillage the city. The city would go on to be taken back by Henry’s army in 1084 and many blamed the pope for the situation. Which ultimately resulted in Pope Gregory VII’s exile in 1085, he would die that same…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Middle Ages the struggle of power between the monarchy and the church was an ongoing battle from the time of Charlemagne until the time of the Renaissance. I believe the Pope or high up church officials had more power over the king and in the eyes of the people.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 3 ]. 1 Barbara Rosenwein, A Short History of the Middle Ages, (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009), 263-267…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    HST 171 Paper 1

    • 1364 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After the split of the empire in the 4th century, the Western empire began facing many attacks by barbarians invading the country. During this time of great confusion, bishops helped stabilize Rome against the barbarian invasions. “Some bishops of the church compromised with the barbarians in hope of achieving an ultimate good”.2 Also because some feared that if they tried to tax the church, God would punish them severely by taking away their kingdom.3 This shows the influential power of the church by using religion and God to scare some of the barbarians. Because of the lack of power of the state at this time, the bishops also became the protectors somewhat.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This rebirth came after being embarrassed and humiliated by his marriages to Cleves and Howard. It is also important to recognise as Richardson does, that the reason the peace after 1545 is so uneasy is because of Henry’s achievements in war. No longer was there a balance in honour, therefore Francis was stuck in a peace he wanted to resolve - hence the continued sour relations that weren’t seen after the Field of the Cloth of Gold, which was otherwise similar in circumstances. The reason Henry VIII acted in such a reserved, and what has been interpreted as fearful way in 1539, was because of extent of the threat - the potential for a Catholic Crusade from a Habsburg-Valois alliance had a significant potential, in the wake of the Papal Bull of Excommunication against Henry VIII. Had the Treaty of Toledo been followed through it would have presented an existential crisis to the throne. However other explanations for his alliance seeking have been uncovered by McEntegart. He argues that, whilst security still remained a top priority, the king also had theological reasons for discussing with the Schmalkaldic League, exemplified by his considerations, at least on aspects of the Augsburg confession, in order to assist in creating uniformity in the Church. Furthermore he reveals the great plays of Cromwell’s faction in this period against the conservatives in order to further his heretical cause. This in turn led to Henry more closely seeking relations with the Schmalkalden as well as withdrawing from mainstream European politics. Security was secondary to honour, partially due to honour producing a security in its own right, at least in the eyes of Henry, but crucially due to the great focus that was still placed on the role of a chivalric and Godly…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After the fall of Rome, no single state or government united the people who lived on the European continent. Instead, the Catholic Church became the most powerful influence of the medieval period. Kings, queens…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (18) P. Boissonnade, Life and Work in Medieval Europe (Fifth to Fifteenth Centuries), London: Routledge & Kegan, 1937. p.317…

    • 2490 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Investiture Controversy

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    World famous French Enlightenment writer once said, “The Holy Roman Empire is neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire.” Many historians have contested each other over any of these three attributes of the empire. Was it truly a “holy”, “roman”, or even an “empire”?…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Two years later, in 1078, Gregory VII responds to Henry’s letter with a short decree. Gregory proceeds to explain the investiture of the church when he says that it is, “in many places, performed by lay persons, and that from this cause many disturbances arise in the church by which the Christian religion is degraded, we decree that no one of the clergy shall receive the investiture of a bishopric, abbey, or church from the hand of an emperor, or king, or of any lay person, male or female” (250). The pope is here challenging Henry back over control of appointments of…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Purser, T. (2009). The First Crusade and the Crusader States 1073-1192. 1st ed. Oxford: Heinemann…

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Church was extremely respected making them more powerful than the kings. The Pope and bishops were thought to be close to…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Northern Humanist

    • 1163 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thompson, Karl F. Classics of Western Thought and Middle Ages, Renaissance and Reformation 4th ed pgs. 263-277…

    • 1163 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics