The point of view of the narrator impacted the experience of the reader with this passage extremely because it made the truths that she was uncovering that much more personal and significant. This was strategically done by the author in order to make for a different reading experience. It was discovered that the narrator was a Cranfordian when it was said, “ We none of us spoke of money, because that subject savoured of commerce and trade, and though some might be …show more content…
In the second paragraph of the passage it was said,” For instance, the inhabitants of Cranford kept early hours, and clattered home in their pattens, under the guidance of lantern-bearer, about nine o'clock at night; and the whole town was abed and asleep by half-past ten.” By revealing this fact to the reader the author gives us the opportunity to determine the fact that if these people were so aristocratic then why would they have a curfew. In context, why was this a consequence of “general but unacknowledged poverty”? The reader can then proceed to reveal that as a consequence to being poor, the Cranfordians have a curfew in order so they wouldn’t spend. This revealment fed to the overall purpose of the text by uncovering the delusion that the Cranfordians are not, infact, aristocratic, but merely poor.
Great authors enact great messages and themes through significant techniques that create a unique and riveting reading experience. Elizabeth Gaskell does this in her 1853 novel, Cranford. The novel manipulates the use of perspective by creating a narrator who is also part of the large group she is narrating; a narrator with the same humanely defects as the people she is describing. Gaskell uses wordplay, sarcasm, and truth in order to convey the theme of this novel: Societies