Preview

The Armenian Genocide

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1126 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Armenian Genocide
“The Armenian Genocide”
In 1948, the United Nations adopted the Genocide Convention, and in doing so defined the term “genocide” as “acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole, or in part, a national, ethical, racial, or religious group” (Totten and Parsons 4). Indeed by many scholars, this is thought to be the case as to what happened to the Armenian population within the Ottoman Empire in 1915. Rouben Paul Adalian, author of the critical essay “The Armenian Genocide” published within the book Century of Genocide: Critical Essays and Eyewitness Accounts edited by Samuel Totten and William S. Parsons, claims this belief to be true. In his essay, Adalian describes what life was like before 1915, reasons why the genocide happened, how the genocide was committed, and the impact the genocide left on society.
Before 1915 the Armenian people had lived freely in the region of Asia Minor for around 3000 years. However, around the 11th century Turkish tribes invaded the Armenians and took over the area while settling down permanently there. Because the Ottoman Empire eventually expanded their territory to Eastern Europe, Western Asia, and North Africa, they needed an improved political system in order to govern everyone effectively (Adalian 55). As a result, Adalian notes that the Ottomans “imposed a strictly hierarchical social system that subordinated non-Muslims as second-class subjects deprived of basic rights” (55). In spite of the Armenians being deemed second-class citizens socially, they were actually a middle-class group economically, leaving jealousy amongst the Muslims. Even though life for Armenians was serviceable, it would soon take a turn for the worst.
There are a few reasons as to why the Armenian genocide became certain by 1915. The first reason was because of the decline of power in the Ottoman government. Because the Armenians could see that the government could not guarantee the protection of their property and life, the Armenians looked for



Cited: Adailian, Rouben Paul. “The Armenian Genocide”. Century of Genocide: Critical Essays and Eye Witness Accounts. Ed. Samuel Totten and William Parsons. 3rd ed. New York Routledge, 2009. 55-92. Print. Totten, Samuel, and William S. Parsons. “Introductions”. Century of Genocide: Critical Essays and Eye Witness Accounts. Ed. Samuel Totten and William Parsons. 3rd ed. New York Routledge, 2009. 1-14. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Widely praised history of World War I and its aftermath, “A Peace to End All Peace Rape and beating were a common place”. Those who were not killed at once were driven through mountains and deserts without food, drink or shelter. Hundreds of thousands of Armenians eventually died or were killed on there way to a place they were never supposed to make…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When talking about genocide the topic may be difficult to explain or reason yet every person has there own opinion about it. Ward Churchill has a strong belief and how America still faces genocide even today. The thesis of this article is that genocide is practiced world wide and it needs to stop being denied by the people that it is happening all over.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lucas,Avila Ms.Muscat ENG2D 30 May, 2017 Armenian Genocide Changes Boy's Life Forever The Armenian genocide changed one boy's life forever, Vahan Kenderian, a 12 year old boy who was the black sheep of his family soon realises the good times have run out.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    An American first coined the word genocide in 1944 for all the Jewish that were killed in World War Two. A similar type of killing occurred in April of 1915 during World War One. The Armenians were victims of genocide during the 1st world war by the Turks. Turkey did not always deny about the killings of Armenians, but it has changed its stance on what happened during World War One. Is it right for Turkey to deny what happened to the Armenians during World War One since they were part of the Ottoman Empire at the time or wrong since it is denying a part of their history? I believe that it is wrong for Turkey to deny the genocides of…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From Graffam’s letter, it can be deduced that the people who attacked the Armenians had all bad motives, based on hate and discrimination. They wanted to send them away to be executed and taken to prisons or other locations. The attackers also wanted to steal the belongings of the Armenians and convinced the people that since they were going to die anyway, it was best if they just gave away all their belongings. The attackers stole everything from cattle to blankets and permitted local bandits to steal from the Armenians too. The main motive of the attackers was to execute the Armenians and hurt them physically. Clearly, all the attackers motives were negative.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thet Sambath

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    History has been no stranger to the multitude of genocides and mass killings in countries all over the world and for various reasons. There are infinite ways to narrate the occurrence of these atrocities; however, they are most frequently characterized as either purposive or illness narratives determined by the culture that is creating the retelling of these experiences. Genocide can be defined as "the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation;" therefore to neglect the impact of culture in the created narrative depicting these atrocities would be deemed ignorant, primarily due to the fact that genocide and mass killings…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Armenian Genocide is a genocide that happened amid and soon after the First World War, from 1914 to 1918, which brought on the passing of 1,5 million Armenians in the Ottoman Empire as an immediate result from the Young Turks' administration's arrangements to free the Turkish grounds of Christian populace to accomplish their container Turkic dreams.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “We are few, but we are called Armenians”, is a quote from Paruyr Sevag’s poem. Who are the Armenians? They are an ancient people, who inhabited the highland region between the Black, Caspian, and Mediterranean Seas for nearly 3,000 years. Is it absolutely necessary to eliminate the Armenian people in it’s entirely, so that there is no further Armenian on this earth? When people think of genocide why do they only think of the Jewish Holocaust? In recent decades, The Armenian Genocide has often been referred to as the forgotten or unremembered genocide. It is one of the most exterminating, brutal, and traumatizing genocide that is virtue of our attention. What were…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term genocide was not coined until 1943 when Raphael Lamkin used it to describe the Nazi reign in Europe (ROD notes). Genocide refers to the systematic destruction of a racial or cultural group. Two examples of this are the Holocaust and the Rape of Nanking. The Holocaust deals with the Nazi’s takeover of Europe during World War II, and the Rape of Nanking is the Japanese invasion of China in the late 1930’s. These events in history serve a painful reminder of the cruelest depths of human nature, but also of the possibilities that lie within every catastrophe.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Armenian genocide was one of the most deadly genocides in history. In 1915, The Turkish government started a several year massacre that claimed the lives of nearly 1.5 million Armenians. The Armenians were viewed as infidels in the eyes of the Ottoman rulers. Different Armenian leaders were gathered and executed, which was the beginning of the massacre. Although some countries and people do not view this as a genocide, it should not have happened because the Armenians were only scapegoats to the problems occurring in the Ottoman Empire, in result 1.5 million lives were taken, and it was a crime against mankind.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mass Killing Summary

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Shaw argues that studies on genocide have concentrated too heavily on the specific perpetrators and victims with regard to intentions and identities respectively. Instead, he wants to propose that the crime of genocide should be understood within the structure of conflict situations. The most important aspect of genocide studies from the point of view of politics is that the concept of genocide must be clarified, Shaw believes that scholarship should provide this elucidation. By returning to the original definition proposed by Lemkin, the focus is more generally on attacks by the armed against the unarmed. Shaw states that “Lemkin invented ‘genocide’ because he wanted to describe – and highlight for countervailing action – a general class of violent actions.” Taking lessons from one of the most influential studies on war by Carl von Clausewitz, Shaw sees genocide as a form of war directed against civilians. Debates about genocide have certainly advanced since the introduction of the term, yet, Shaw feels these debates from the 1940s onwards have lost two very key aspects of the original concept. In agreement with Lemkin the omission of cultural genocide or social destruction meaning not just physically but a way of life and how genocide relates to war are vital in understanding the nature of the crime. He argues that “Genocide always involves physical violence but it involves many other things as well. Defining genocide by killing misses the social aims that lie behind it. Genocide involves mass killing but it is much more than mass killing.” Similar to some of the arguments made by Claudia Card in relation to the inclusion of cultural genocide, Shaw’s assertion that genocide must be viewed in the context of war provides a valuable framework for understanding the particular violence against civilians. The use of word civilians here is important for Shaw, rather than the UN Genocide…

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Armenian population inhabited the region of the Middle East (Asia Minor) that bordered the Black, Caspian, and Mediterranean Seas for many years. The Armenian land was invaded multiple times but remained strong in their pride and identity as Armenians. Armenia also became the first nation to name Christianity as its state religion, and experienced an era of peace and prosperity. But the Armenian lifestyle changed when the Turkish attacked Armenia in the eleventh century and began the Turkish rule. By the sixteenth century, Armenia had become one of the many nations absorbed into the growing Ottoman Empire. The Ottomans established a large empire that spanned from Eastern Europe to Western Asia and North Africa, but to govern this vast nation…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On April 24, 1915, the Ottoman government started its systematic decimation of its Armenian population. With the decline of power in the Ottoman Empire and military losses experience at the beginning of World War I, the Ottoman government used the Armenians as a way to blame their problems on someone else, thus began the Armenian Genocide. The Ottoman government confiscated Armenian possessions, deported them to different countries, and massacred large numbers of Armenian people. Many of the deported people died of starvation, and for the Armenians who did live, they witnessed brutalities that we could not imagine. By the time these horrible events did stop in 1918, around 1.5 million Armenians had died. The Turkish government, which was part…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Armenian Genocide was one of the most violent historical moments that deprived homelands from 1.5 million Armenians through forced deportations and massacres during 1915 and 1923. As the turmoil between the allies and central powers escalated into WWI, under the guise of military tactics the Turkish government deported and exterminated the Armenian population. ” By the early 1920s, when the massacres and deportations finally ended, between 600,000 and 1.5 million Armenians were dead, with many more forcibly removed from the country.” (Gale). The Armenians were subjected to deportation, abduction, torture and systematic murder.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Armenian Genocide

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages

    From 1915 to 1918, the Turkish leaders of the Ottoman Empire carried out the killings of 1.5 million Armenians living there at the time. Over the course of those terrible 3 years, innocent people were murdered with death marches, execution, drowning, burning and other inhumane ways. Turkey has refused to take blame, and even denied the genocide’s existence and occurrence. There has been much dispute about whether or not countries outside of Armenia and Turkey should recognize these mass killings of Armenians in 1915-16 as a genocide or something else. The Ottoman Empire was multinational, but had always favored Muslims to Jews and Christians, so when World War I started and a substantial group of Christian Armenians were still in Turkey and…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays