Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The 1947 Communal Violence in Lahore

Better Essays
3994 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The 1947 Communal Violence in Lahore
1. The 1947 Communal Violence in Lahore. Today, I am going to talk about the communal violence that erupted in Lahore on the very creation of Pakistan in 1947. Lahore being the 2nd most populous city of today’s Pakistan, is one of the three oldest living cities of the world and had undergone a great deal of violence and forced migration in 1947.

2. Here, you can see the map of Indian sub-continent before its partition into Pakistan and India in August 1947. From early 16th century to 1857, the Indian sub-continent was predominately ruled by Mughals. Gradually, Mughals lost their empire in the hands of British and by 1857, the British have established themselves as the rulers of Indian sub-continent. The Indian sub-continent was divided into two separate nation-states, India and Pakistan, in 1947, with the end of 150 years British rule in the region.

3. But with a huge price, 12 to 15 Million people were forcibly transferred between the newly created states. Somewhere, between 1 to 2 million people were murdered. 75,000 women were raped by men of different religion.

4. The history of partition begins with the formation of Indian National Congress in 1885 with demands of participation of educated Indians in the government. At first, the Congress was not anti-British, however, with the passage of time and increasing popularity, the Indian National Congress became active in independence of India form British rule. Skeptical of the Congress’s ruling elite of majority Hindus, in 1906, All India Muslim League came into being in order to protect and represent the interests of Muslims in India which formed 25-30% of total population. Later, the party demanded a separate homeland for Muslims in name of Pakistan. The basis for such a demand lay in the promulgation of Two-Nation theory which was first echoed in the gathering of Muslim League in 1930 by Allma Muhammad Iqbal, the famous poet, a philosopher and a leader of Muslim League. Iqbal asserted in his ideology of two nations that Muslims and Hindus are two separate nations having different religious philosophies and social customs. On March 23rd, 1940, this ideology of two different nations was transformed into demand for a separate state for Muslims of Indian subcontinent by Muhammad Ali Jinnah in the presidential address of All India Muslim League. And by 1947, the British rule came to an end with the creation of Pakistan and India.

5. From 11th century till 1947, Lahore had been under rule of Afghans, Mughals and Sikh and the capital of Punjab province. Here, you look at the map of Punjab before partition. Punjab was one of the main provinces of British India. The word ‘Punjab’ means ‘Land of five rivers’. Historically, Punjab has been a region within and around these five rivers with its own language, culture and life style. The eastern part of Punjab was populated with Hindus and the western part of Punjab had a majority of Muslims. Lahore was almost at the center of Punjab and continued to serve as its capital under Muslims, Sikh and British regimes.

6. All of whom had contributed to its cultural heritage and social life in their own way. Muslim, Sikh and Hindus all had their historic buildings, religious places, legacies, socio-cultural festivals and a lot more to relate to Lahore. At the beginning of 20th century, the British took a keen interest in its development and built hospitals, colleges, roads, libraries and museum. The political, social, cultural and economic activates happening at Lahore had a meaning and impact all over British India. Lahore, undoubtedly, was one of the principal cities of Indian sub-continent. However, what made Lahore an experience of heart touching life was its inter-communal amity. The three major, religiously based communities - Muslims, Hindus and Sikh were living in a peaceful co-existence for centuries.

7. In Punjab, traditionally, caste and professions were interlinked. The neighborhoods were built around caste or clan and each caste or clan had its community organization in the form of council of elders. For instance, Kocha-e-dardian (Locality of Tailors). While some parts of Lahore were having majority in Hindus like Shaalmi, Dhobi Mandi. Other parts had a majority of Muslims living in it like Kocha-e-darzian itself (Locality of Tailors) had a majority of Muslims living there. A third part of Lahore which was relatively at the outskirt, hosted the elite and rich people from all the three communities who were relatively more mixed.

Although the Muslims were in majority, around 60%, yet they didn’t have a hold of economy. Hindu were the traders and owners of business all around Lahore. They owned most the shops in the famous Anarkali market, held most part of property – only two buildings were owned by the Muslims on the mall of Lahore. The Hindus were also traditionally involved in the business of money lending. As for the Muslims, they were involved in artisan and skilled professions. It is also pertinent to note that the Muslims workers i.e., fruit sellers, milkmen, vegetable sellers supplied most of the daily needs all around Lahore without any discrimination of Hindus or Muslim localities. However, Muslims were often under debt of rich Hindu money lenders.

Despite their defined roles, Muslims, Sikh and Hindus enjoyed a great deal of harmony among themselves. They studies together in the schools and colleges where Muslims were relatively less in proportion of their population, yet these places were example of true inter-communal friendship. Muslims, Hindus and Sikh individuals & families were good friends with each other. They attended and enjoyed each other’s celebrations & festivals and had some common celebrations too. They exercised general respect for all the religious figures. For instance, Hindus would shower flower petals on the religious processions of Muslims to pay respect. Similarly, Muslims would flock to enjoy the Ram Leela Festival held in the famous Minto Park. The mystic poets and saints from all religions had built such an atmosphere that practiced love and peace with each other. Help and charity to poor was given without communal differentiation. They had some limitations and each community was well aware of how to maintain those limits. Muslims knew that orthodox Hindus will not eat with them. Even, trivial matters such as drinking of water had to be done separately. However, it is also relevant to note the Hindus and Muslims who were educated at British colleges were getting mild towards strict observance of religious rituals and practices.

People had also evolved the ways and means of escaping the orthodox religious practices. Various sufi shrines and abodes, training centers of wrestlers, hideouts of opium eaters and the quarters of prostitutes were among such places where beliefs and practices were ignored.

So, the interplay between the communities was complex yet it has existed peacefully for a long time. 8. Here, you can have a look at the ratio of Muslim to non-Muslims population. Clearly, Muslims have been relatively in majority in Lahore.

9. Here, you can see that although the Muslims were large in number, they had less control on the economy of Lahore. Muslims owned half of the land and paid less revenue.

10. Although, largely, the peaceful co-existence remained between Muslim and Hindu communities, on two occasions, it was disturbed. In 1927, Raj Pal, a Hindu publisher based in Lahore published the book ‘Rangeela Rasool’ (The Merry Messenger of God). The book contained some derogatory remarks about the prophet Muhammad. The Muslims were raged. The matter was taken up by the court. Raj Pal was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment and fined Rs. 1000 for provoking animosity between Muslims and Hindus. On April 6, 1929, a Muslim carpenter, named Ghazi Ilam-din-shaheed stabbed him to death. Ghazi was found guilty by the Lahore High Court and sentenced to death in July 1929. During those two years, the relations between Muslims and Hindu were strained.

In 1935, a dispute between Muslims and Sikh erupted on the area of Mosque Shaheed Ganj. The place was religiously important to both the communities and the conflict became bloody with loss of some lives. The threat to law and order remained for some days.

11. The demand of Pakistan in 1940 has increased the flow in movement of Indian Independence. In March 1946, the British Cabinet Mission arrived in India with the objective of discussing and planning the transfer of political power from British to the Indian representatives. After deliberations with Muslim League and Indian National Congress, on May 16, 1946, the British proposed the plan with that a united Domain of India would be given independence with Muslim majority areas grouped together and Hindu majority areas forming another group while a government will be formed at center. The congress rejected the idea of grouping into smaller states seeing it as the division of Dharthi Mata (Mother Land) while Muslim League accepted seeing it as the best possible solution at that time. However, in the following days, Muslim League backed off from its acceptance of the plan based on its fears of ending up in the hands of Hindu majority in the constituent assembly. The cabinet mission failed to reach a conclusion. On July 27, 1946, Muslim League formally reiterated to its demand of Pakistan and also vowed to resort to direct action for the achievement of Pakistan.

Under direct action, the Muslim League planned to held massive rallies and protests throughout India. Muslim League gave the call for observance of widespread general strike on August 16, 1946. The meetings and processions were conducted throughout India with one exception. In Calcutta where 56% Muslims and 42% Hindus were living, the riots broke out and in just 72 hours, 4000 people lost their lives. This was, perhaps, the starting point for the inclusion of violence in politics. Although the residents of Lahore were still living in peaceful co-existence, yet following the incident, the strained relations could be felt among Hindus, Sikh and Muslims. 12. By the start of 1947, it was beginning to clear to the general public that the India is going to have independence yet no one knew the formal arrangements. In the elections of 1945-46, Muslims League took a majority of seats in Punjab winning 75 seats out of 175. However, the government was formed by the pro-British unionist party in collation with Congress and Akali Dal, the representative party of Sikh. Although the communal relations were starting to be tense yet no one knew that a massive violence was just knocking at the door.

The political activism continued to grow; the streets of Lahore were witnessing the day-to-day political rallies by all political parties. However, the RSS (a paramilitary Hindu nationalist organization) and Muslim Guards were marching in the streets and some people could fear from their military style. When the open activities of RSS and Muslims National Guards were curbed under the Public Safety Bill issued in the 3rd week of January, 1947 to maintain peace and order in Lahore, the Muslim League leaders resisted the police search of Muslim National Guards headquarters. However, the police found 2000 steel helmets at the headquarters. Disturbances broke out in the city following the news of the arrests. The next day, police had to use the tear gas for dispersing the angry crowds protesting at the Mochi in the walled city of Lahore. The news and rumors spread all around Lahore, the incident created an atmosphere of mistrust between the communities. The Muslim League decided to launch the aggressive movement to abolish the Unionist party rule in Punjab.

13. In early February 1947, Lord Mountbateen, the last viceroy of British India, arrived with a mandate to transfer power to the India and to get British out of Indian sub-continent within 16 months. The new viceroy opened negotiations with Ghandi, Nehru and Quaid-e-Azam - the leaders of Congress and Muslim League. It soon became clear to him that the dream of united India was not going to be realized.

In such political environment, the creation of Pakistan and India was predictable by many. It was clear that the western parts of Indian sub-continent were having the majority of Muslims and were going to be part of Pakistan whatever the political arrangements could be, the speculations, however, surrounded the questions on which side the Bengal or Punjab would end up. Most importantly, the fate of Lahore became the question of life and death, Lahore being at the heart of Punjab. The eastern Punjab had the majority of Hindus and western Punjab the majority of Muslims. All three major communities had so much to relate to Lahore, their religious places, their businesses, their legacies, their culture, their life – Lahore was their beloved city in every aspect. Muslims claimed Lahore on the basis of their majority, Hindus claimed Lahore on the basis of their role in economy and Sikh valued Lahore as it was the birthplaces of their religious leaders. But, the Sikhs were in minority in Lahore and were scattered all over the Punjab. It was in such fear that Sikh sided with Congress and fiercely argued against the creation of Pakistan.

While the aggressive movement of Muslim League proved successful and Kizar Hayat Tiwana resigned on March 2nd, 1947. On 3rd March, Master Tara Singh, a retired school teacher and the most respected leader of the Sikh community waved his sword at the footsteps of Punjab assembly with the slogan ‘Death to Pakistan’. Later that day, he virtually gave a call for communal war.

14. On the very next day, the clashes broke out in the Lahore city. There are conflicting reports of who attacked first. However, largely, it is maintained that Sikhs were the first to resort to violence.

On 6-7 March, the Muslim raiders descended upon several Sikh and Hindu majority areas in the nearby cities of Rawalpindi and Jehlum. The demobilized Muslim men who had returned from various fronts in the Second World War seemed to have planned the whole operation. Suddenly, the debt burden under which Muslims had been suffering in hands of Hindus converted into the communal wrath and fury. Around 2000 non-Muslims died in the attacks.

On 8th March, the Indian National Congress formally passed a resolution demanding the division of Punjab so that the predominantly Muslim part made separate from the Hindu part. The incidents of communal violence were started to be heard in the Lahore city.

15. Between 10-13 May, the Muslim criminals of Lahore who were mostly residing in the Mazang area received a packet containing churian (glass bangles) and mehndi (henna) from their counterparts in Amritasr. It was a bizzare action to shame them for their unmanliness and not finishing off Hindus and Sikhs. The Muslims goondas were incensed by that insult. Thereafter, they indulged in stabbing and killing.

The incidents of killing, stabbing and looting were becoming a routine matter. The situation was getting uncontrollable.

In the end days of May, although the Lahore city was under curfew, the Muslims set fire to Papri Mandi, a locality of Hindus.

16. On June 3rd, the British government announced the partition plan.

According to the partition plan, the Muslim majority areas had to be included into Pakistan and hindu majority areas had to be formed into India. So, a boundary commission was set up to divide the Punjab into two parts and demarcate the boundary line. Lord Mountbaten stated that the commission will divide the Punjab into two parts on the basis of majority and some ‘other factors’. The inclusion of ‘other factors’ added an ambiguity and opened up the possibility of a whole range of socio-economic and cultural arguments for each community to win the Lahore on their side.

17. The situation in Lahore was getting violent day by day. During early June, the RSS exploded a bomb in the majority area of Muslims in inner part of the city. The Muslims reacted by burning the homes in Hindu majority area of Shalmi. This led to a chain of counter-blasts and counter-burning. Although at first, all the three communities seemed at par in resorting to violence, the element that the division of Punjab was going to be made on the basis of ‘majority’ and the fact the Muslims were majority in numbers, the Muslims became vicious in their attacks on Hindus and Sikhs. Kerosene oil being cheap in price became an important weapon of Muslims. The city of communal love was burning in hatred.

On 8th July, Sir Radcliffe arrived in India to head the boundary commission. He was given only 5 weeks to demarcate the boundary between India and Pakistan. Sir Radcliffe listened to all the three communities and their claims on Lahore. Hindus emphasized on the economic contribution and development of Lahore. Sikh also pleaded on economic grounds and pointed out the religious importance of the city to them. Muslims put forwarded the case saying that Lahore has been under Muslim rule for centuries and they equally have religious places of importance. They demanded that they are in majority and Lahore being the only city with medical and engineering colleges, railway workshops and important infrastructure should go to Pakistan so that It would also serve to adjacent provinces of Pakistan having no such facilities.

On July 15th, the British parliament passed the Indian Independence act. The British declared to transfer the power in one month, around 10 months earlier than the original plan. The feared Hindus and Sikhs started migrating towards the eastern part of Punjab in great majority. Some of them hoped to get back when the things would stabilize. However, other Hindus and Sikh were realizing that Lahore will go to Pakistan but they were not accepting it easily. The confusion to which side the Lahore would lie on the international boarder played an important factor in resistance of Hindus and Sikhs leaving Lahore. Their hopes of winning Lahore on the basis of ‘other factors’ made them stay in Lahore a bit longer and becoming the target of violent Muslims. The result was of course, an increase in loss of lives.

June and July proved to be the worst months. Writ of state was not prevailing. Some of the Muslims dignitaries e.g., Magistrate Cheema was involved and facilitating in the attacks on Hindus in Lahore. The burnings, killings and raping were all happening at all places. Even the elite Hindus and Sikh had started leaving Lahore. While the Hindus and Sikh were leaving Lahore, millions of Muslims were arriving in Lahore. These Muslims were being killed and the women were being raped in the eastern part of Punjab too in the same way as it was happening in Lahore. The trains that were coming to Lahore with Muslim refugees having piles of dead bodies and women with their breasts chopped off, such incidents further added fuel to the fire. The houses were burning and the streets were filled with dead bodies. The air was filled with the smell of blood. The situation has somehow become the same in the whole Punjab. This massacre continued from June till August 1947. Here are some images to show.

24. On 14 and 15th of August, 1947, Pakistan and India were created. Radcliffe award was announced on 17th August with Lahore given to Pakistan. The international boarder was fixed some 20 kilometers east of Lahore.

By that time, a vast majority of Hindus and Sikhs have already migrated from Lahore and a large number of Muslims have arrived in Pakistan entering through Lahore. The brutality and violence continued in following months too and receded when Lahore was empty of Sikhs and Hindus. 25. It is apparent that the British were winding up their empire in sub-continent. As the protests increased in Lahore, the state authority was vanishing especially after the British parliament passed the Indian Independence act and Radcliffe award was made public.
Although Muslims, Sikhs and Hindus have lived together amicably for centuries, yet, once the riots started, the social and cultural differences became prominent in no time. It can be argued that the even they lived together for a long time, there differences run deep down in social-cultural terms.
Economic disparity has also facilitated the communal violence. The Muslims were large in number but having less access to economic resources and being pressed under debts of Hindu money lenders, they found the expulsion of Hindus and Sikhs as an easy solution.
Another important factor was the conviction and confusion by the Sikhs and Hindus that Lahore might end up in India due to the weight of ‘other factors’ – the socio-economic factors had played an important part. This confusion made many some Sikhs and Hindus delay their departure from Lahore and suffer the brutality of Muslims in Lahore.

26. What happened in Lahore and other parts of India during 1947 has made an irreparable loss to the relations of Muslims and Hindus at every level. This massive violence has deeply affected the relations of India and Pakistan after independence. The link between caste and profession was quickly shed by the migrants and the neighborhood in which they settled, for the most part, no longer remained clan or caste based. As a result, their community organizations became ineffective and died over time. A fiercely upward mobile, go-getting culture replaced a society in which social and economic mobility was difficult if not impossible.

The much larger but economically backward Muslim majority was thrown into positions of command at all level. In communal terms, it became more or less a Muslim city. A tiny upper class minority comprising a few hundred hindus stayed in 1947. Most people didn’t know of their existence. In December 1992, the infamous demolition of the Babri mosque at the hands of Hindus fanatic took place in Ayodhya in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. They also killed many Muslims. The reaction in Lahore was fierce. Angry crowds went on a rampage. The old Hindu temples were razed. Some Hindus were reported to use christen names to avoid easy detection.

It is difficult to say that Lahore really became a homogenous society. Although no comparable slaughter of citizens has taken place, but then, collapse of the state and structure of authority comparable to 1947 has not taken place either. In 1953, Anti-Ahmadiyya agitation broke out in Lahore. From the late 1980’s onwards, the sunni and shia communities have been the victims of sectarian violence and terrorism.

The physical impact of migration was considerable. During violence in Lahore, around 4000 houses were shattered and 6000 houses in the walled city were badly damage. The places where Sikhs and Hindus used to reside were taken by the poor refugees. Their densities increased within a few months due to the sub-divisions of large homes and the occupation of open areas for make-shift residential accommodation. The Hindu religious and community buildings were also occupied and turned into residential accommodation. The refugee migration was the starting point of environmental degradation, increased urbanization and creation of slums in Lahore.

The departing Hindus and Sikhs left behind many remnants in Lahore – buildings, residential colonies and charitable institutions are indicative of their once very visible presence here. From time to time official policy has sought to ‘Islamize’ the names of places, localities and buildings bearing non-Muslims names. It is difficult to assess the success rate of such attempts, but it seems that for some time to come the Hindu-Sikh heritage will continue to be echoed in popular usage. Especially places which continue to serve the people of Lahore such as Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Gulab Devi Hospital, Jan ki Devi Hospital, Dayal Singh College and Dayal Singh Library are likely to retain these names.

27. Thank you!

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    2003 Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One inevitable impact the division had on the people was perhaps one of the greatest refugee crises and migration in history. Over 10 million people moved between India and Pakistan. For the most part, the Hindus generally moved into the Indian subcontinent while the Muslims, who feared Hindu domination, migrated to East and West Pakistan. In Document 8 it shows that there were around 8.6 million Muslim refugees that migrated out of India into either East or West Pakistan. In addition to this extraordinary refugee crises, another effect the division of India had was border tensions. The tensions between the borders of India and Pakistan resulted in India being at the “receiving end of Pakistan’s heavy shelling” and “heavy bombing” (Document 9b). This shows that not only was there a large scale migration crises, there was also several attacks and possibly deaths and casualties from bombs. Also, in document 9a it that states that another effect of the division was that there were “two armed conflicts (in 1965 and 1999) and numerous clashes between Indian and Pakistani forces”. This highlights the various facets of the tensions and problems the division of India had on the Hindus and Muslims. It is inevitable that the division of the region greatly affected the people who lived there by causing the largest migration in human history, armed conflicts, and…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The outrageous division of Bengal by Viceroy Lord Curzon was incited such anti-British sentiment. The All-India Muslim League was formed as an advocate of the Muslim minority, and the political landscape of South Asia was forever changed, with Muslims and Hindus mixed up and pitted against each other. They sought, then, to be divided into more than one nation from the colony of India. The population resettlement question following the new independence of India became a huge dispute that cost thousands of lives and remains not totally solved. The colony ultimately became India and Pakistan, but there are still disputes over certain regions and small territories, some based on the population of each community and some of the traditional leadership.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    [ 9 ]. A.H. Sandhu, Reality of ‘Divide and Rule’ in British India, Pakistan Journal of History and Culture, Vol.XXX, No.1, 2009…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though they have been in existence for less than a century, India and Pakistan have enough history between them to fill several books. Tensions between Hindus and Muslims grew rapidly with the split of India and Pakistan in 1947. Before tensions were running high, but now gave way to rioting. It all started when India, then also including what is now present day Pakistan, was under British rule. The British had been ruling for roughly a century and ground the native’s faces in the dirt the entire time they were in power. Naturally, there were dissenters who did not appreciate being told what to do and these voices grew stronger as time went along. Over the time, Britain had given more and more freedom to India until it was almost free. Around the time of World War 2, Britain asked for the assistance of Indians to fight in the war against Japan. India relented but then talks broke down and India demanded it be free. The Muslim faction of British India (or British Raj), which made up a smaller percentage of British India than Hindus did, did not want India to be free, since they felt they would be treated like second class citizens. Under British doctrine, all natives were treated equal and the Muslims thought they would be treated more fairly under British rule. To fully understand the depth of the situation, one would have to go back when the British first staked their claim in India.…

    • 3055 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The partition of India in 1948 led to one of the largest mass migration movements in the world. The successful attainment of independence from colonial rule is also a narrative of religious nationalism, displacement and communal violence between the two nation states of India and Pakistan or more definitively the Muslims and Hindus. In Urvashi Butalia’s (2000, pp.264-300) “The Other Side of Silence” the oral testimony of Maya Rani, a Punjabi woman who was a child living in Pakistan during the Partition is particularly important to the histiography surrounding the event as it is told from a different perspective by a person not directly involved in the conflict that the emergence and independence of the nation caused.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decolonization

    • 1312 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Social influences in India, Africa and Southeast Asia contributed significantly to stability, or lack thereof, in these regions during post-colonial transitions. India and Africa certainly suffered from ethnic tensions after decolonization. Traditionally, India is Hindu, however with the influx of Muslim Arabs during the previous millennium during Arab invasions, this established a significant Muslim minority. The interaction between Indian Hindus and Muslims over the next several hundred years remained strained due to unequal social hierarchy, with the Muslim minority considered oppressed by the Hindus in the 19th and 20th century. As the Indian independence movement pressed forward and culminated in 1947, in contrast to the more populous Hindus who sought a unified India, Muslims petitioned for an independent Muslim state. Muslim and Hindu religions began an almost immediate conflict with each other resulting in the Muslim Pakistan and Hindu India split. This Partition of Bengal resulted in religious hostilities and enormous displacement and migrations of Hindus and Muslims to their newly…

    • 1312 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The partition of India in August 1947 was a highly controversial event and has led to widespread speculation regarding its causes and consequences. Orthodox historians credit the creation of Pakistan to Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the leader of the All India Muslim League, and his determination to create a sovereign state for Indian Muslims. However, this view has been contested by a number of historians, who place responsibility for the partition on the political manoeuvring of the Congress and the constitutional reforms of the British Raj. Existing communal tensions and Hindu-Muslim differences have also been blamed for the split. Revisionist historians question whether Jinnah even wanted partition and have suggested that the 'Pakistan' demand was simply a bargaining counter to gain recognition for Muslims. I am going to analyse each interpretation of the event and question the true causes for partition.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Danish Institute for International Studies.…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the All-India Muslim League came into existence, it was a moderate organization with its basic aim to establish friendly relations with the Crown. However, due to the decision of the British government to annul the partition of Bengal, the Muslim leadership decided to change its stance. In 1913, a new group of Muslim leaders entered the fold of the Muslim League with a much different view than their predecessors. Demand for a separate homeland was included in the objectives of Muslim League of 1913 which brought Muslims and Hindus closer. So, for the first time in history, Muslim League and Indian National Congress worked together to present a set of demands to British which came to be known as the Lucknow Pact.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Communal Voilence in India

    • 34454 Words
    • 138 Pages

    Communalism has always been a problem in India due to the presence of many religious communities. During many periods throughout history, especially after the Delhi Sultanate, there have been clashes between members of different communities. Some have looked upon the failure of the Indian National Congress to form coalition ministries in 1937 as the turning point in relations between Hindus and Muslims in India. Others claim it was 1928, when the all parties’ conference rejected separate electorates whereas still others believe it was the formation of the Muslim league in 1906. However, major communal issues began with the advent of the British Raj in India and the British policy of divide and rule. Also, the uneven economic and cultural development of the different communities was an important factor in the rise of communalism. The foundation of the Muslim league and reactions of Hindu political organizations to their foundation forever cemented communal politics in India. The demand for Pakistan and collapse of the non-cooperation movement etched communalism in India.…

    • 34454 Words
    • 138 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indo-Pak Relations

    • 2558 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Muslims staying on in India in 1947, and, later, Pakistan itself getting divided into two…

    • 2558 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Meaning of Two Nation Theory The Two Nation theory in its simplest way, means the cultural, political, religious, economic and social dissimilarities between the two major communities, Hindus and Muslims of the Sub Continent. These differences of out look, in fact, were greatly instrumental in giving rise to two distinct political ideologies which were responsible for the partition of India into two independent states. Role of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, the pioneer of two nation theory, used the word ‘two nation’ for Hindus and Muslims after being convinced of the Hindus and Congress hatred, hostility and prejudice for the Muslims. The entire freedom movement revolved around the two nation theory which was introduced by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan. He considered all those lived in India as one nation and was a great advocate of HinduMuslim unity. Speaking at the meeting of Indian Association he said: “I look to both Hindus and Muslims with the same eyes and consider them as my own eyes. By the word ‘Nation’ I mean only Hindus and Muslims and nothing else. We, Hindus and Muslims live together on the same soil under the same government. Our interests and problems are common, and therefore, I consider the two factions as one nation.” Sir Syed Ahmed Khan did his best to make the Muslims realize their differences with the Hindus with regard to religions, social and language, rational and international identity and for this purpose he diverted attention of the Indian Muslims towards a new idea of “Two Nation” or “Two entities.” After Hindi-Urdu controversy Sir Syed felt that it was not possible for Hindus and Muslims to progress as a single nation. He said: “I am convinced now that Hindus and Muslims could never become one nation as their religion and way of life was quite distinct from each other.”…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclearization in South Asia

    • 13610 Words
    • 55 Pages

    For a thousand years, the Indus River valley has marked the border between the Hindu and Muslim world. The eastern side of the valley forms much of the India-Pakistan border today. Though Muslim rulers would in time rule more than half of the Indian sub-continent, conversion of the majority of the populace to the House of Islam generally stopped at the Indus valley. In the 20th century, two states were created by the British “Partition” of 1947. India was created as a secular democracy.…

    • 13610 Words
    • 55 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sectarianism in Pakistan

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sectarianism has deteriorated peace of Pakistan and caused hatred in people for each other. Now people of different sects are loosing respect for one another. Careful study reveals that sectarianism has narrowed vision of people. Once they are obsessed with a religious ideology they are not only unwilling to change their ideas but the dilemma is this that they consider it their right to censure other school of thoughts publicly. I am confused to understand that some religious scholars who were supposed to be the preacher of Islam but they are severely damaging religious harmony and brotherhood of Islam. Sometimes their speeches are so bigotry and sectarian as they seem real opponents of Muslim unity. Careful analysis reveals it’s a nuisance which is shattering Umah’s strength in general and Pakistan’s unity as a nation in particular. Now it’s time for government to take stern action against such extremist scholars. Media can be used to as awareness tool for public to view how sectarianism is injected in them which ultimately deteriorates peace of the society. Moderate scholars can serve Umah by harmonizing them. Religion is a sensitive issue no one is ready to put aside his ideology. Being moderate isn’t mean to shun religion it’s simply a realization of respecting others ideas whether you agree or disagree. Its matter of giving space to others which is everybody’s right. Only broadening of mind can overcome such menace. Ultimately it should be public to reject such people who want to dismantle brotherhood. Yes we will have to vow that we belong to all sects but to no one because we are Muslim. Please don’t create hatred in us let us live in peace and harmony and atmosphere of…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kashmir Problem

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kashmir was initially ruled by Muslims, and was an integral part of the Pashtun Durrani Empire, which was primarily a dynasty of Afghan origin. The foundation of the Durrani Empire was laid by an Afghan commander, Ahmed Shah Durrani. When the East India Company started to lay its political foundations in the Indian subcontinent, they started massive annexations of areas that were previously ruled by local princes, nawabs and maharajas. During 1840s Kashmir went under the British control after they signed the Treaty of Lahore with the Sikhs. A few years British rewarded Kashmir to Gulab Singh Dogra, a Hindu general who helped British to annex Punjab. British were always apprehensive of the Russian Expansion in Afghan territory, which is why they had a major interest in installing a pro-British ruler in Kashmir. Ever since Kashmir was awarded to Gulab Singh Dogra, it remained under Hindu rule. On the contrary, Muslims constituted a major proportion of Kashmir’s population. The new rule was much resented by the Muslim population of Kashmir because of the constant religious, cultural, and…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays