Preview

Tanglewood Case 6

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
548 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tanglewood Case 6
Ryan Schmidt
MGT 451
Dr. Scroggins
Tanglewood Case #6

Major KSAO Category Necessary for selection (Y/N) Method of Assessment Exp. Educ. MAE RKT
Skills in personnel resource management Y x x
Communication/Speaking skills Y x x
Knowledge of customer service principles Y x
Knowledge of organization policies/procedures N x
Ability to analyze financial and operational data Y x x
Problem solving skills/ability to resolve conflict Y x x x
Skill in judgment and decision making Y x x

Exp. = experience, Educ. = education, MAE = Marshfield Applicant Examination, RKT = Retail Knowledge Test

Interview Questions:

Behavioral Questions:
Tell me about a time that you made a decision which impacted a group of people?
KSAO Measurement: Skills in personnel resource management
Scoring Key: 1: Applicant indicates that they made a decision without consideration for the impact on others. 2: Applicant indicates that they were aware of the potential impact and attempted to reduce the negative impacts of their decision, but did not communicate feedback. 3: Applicant identified members, sought input, actively listened, and integrated their feedback into the decision making process.

Tell me about a time where you went above and beyond what was expected of you?
KSAO Measurement: Knowledge of customer service principles

Scoring Key: 1: Applicant provides an answer indicating an unwillingness to work outside of their formal responsibilities. 2: Applicant provides an example, but does not describe their reasoning. 3: Applicant provides an example and shows the motivation to achieve organizational goals.

Tell me about a time when you disagreed with a boss or colleague?
KSAO Measurement: Communication/Speaking skills
Scoring Key: 1: Applicant indicates they reacted with defensiveness, hostility, or a general unwillingness to listen and, if appropriate, compromise. 2: Applicant provides a story telling about the disagreement, and describes their thought

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Tanglewood Case 2

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages

    3. Based on your analysis and the affirmative action plan, do you think the company should engage in a specific strategy to change their recruiting and promotion practices? Do…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Scoring - The interview is designed to assess a number of different aspects of your candidature, with independent interviewers awarding scores for different areas before these are compiled subsequently.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Operations, we use Scoring rubrics for calibrating calls and performance reports to gage an employee’s progress.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    LET1

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The most commonly used sets of criteria for evaluation in the business world today are Task Outcomes, Behaviors, and Traits. These three criteria can generally cover those qualities in a worker that lead to a productive member of the company. Task Outcomes are usually defined by preset goals at the beginning of the appraisal period. This way you can quantitatively measure the workers ability to do their job. Not all outcomes though are easily defined and can be much harder to rate. These generally are how the worker interacts with…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The evaluation by the supervisor of the staffs strengths and weaknesses must remain bias free in order to work properly. Supervisors must evaluate the areas of performance that needs improvement and discuss how to improve the areas. Certain criteria within the ratings have to be established in order to reward performance effectively. Rating multiple traits make up a good performance appraisal system. The key element in the rating system consists of remaining honest through the entire performance…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fred Maiorino Case

    • 7906 Words
    • 32 Pages

    Interactional justice is the degree in which the people affected by decision are treated by dignity and respect (Harvey & Haines). Interactional justics focuses on the interpersonal treatment that people receive when procedures are implemented (Harvey & Haines). This concept relates to how Reed handled the decision to change the evaluation process and how the changes were communicated to those who would be monitored by the new system. The manner in which Reed behaved when discussing the new evaluation process and how well Fred had performed under its guidelines demonstrate that Reed’s opinion of Fred was someone who was unworthy of the smallest considerations. All employee evaluations should be conducted respectfully and should be opportunities for employees to ask questions of their bosses that can give them an advantage between now and their next evaluation period. Reed’s feedback of Fred seemed to focus on the negative and gave little to no advice on how he could have performed as well as the younger new hires that Reed had hired. After the unsubstantiated plea for help from Reed, the flawed evaluation system Reed implemented continued to do damage to the idea that Reed could manage and motivate his employees. Caruth and Humphries listed characteristics that effectively evaluate employees, which include formalization, job…

    • 7906 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jouranl Artice Review

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    important feature of assessment, and this includes consideration of beliefs and values and the ability to remain non-judgmental and professional”. Frequently…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    WRITE EXPERIENCE

    • 836 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first category that I evaluated was contributions. Kyle devoted his enthusiasm and passion to his work and is really responsible to it. His score in the contributions category is 2.83 out of 3, with highest score at 3 and lowest at 2 points. From these evaluations, we can find that Kyle is willing to express and provide his opinion and meet with the deadlines and attend all the meetings perfectly. However, his contributions were only shown from these aspects. When talking about the “real” contributions, Kyle seems not to provide much. He did express his own opinions during the meeting, he did really have lots of ideas, but these opinions and ideas seem to lack consideration and have low quality. In addition, Kyle is not good at dealing with difficulties. His usually fell behind while his team members tried to sole the problems. From my observation, perfect attendance rate is good, but if the person only does well in this part but don’t provide the…

    • 836 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Analysis Coach

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ask to look at all that is relevant, good, bad or in-between and evaluate those outcomes to provide a clear assessment…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Performance ratings. A track record of performance of potential employees must be considered to determine the right person who would replace a manager/supervisor. These must include both quantitative and qualitative (attitude,…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first assessment taken was, how satisfied am I with my job? This basically is your general attitude about the job. The higher the score the more satisfied the employee. Amber scored the highest at 73 points. Amber is a highly motivated employee, but complains very openly when she is upset. Chris scored a 62 on the assessment. He is a positive employee but could be more flexible on his working habits. Last is Taylor, who scored a 58. She is motivated but likes to go out of her way to help others. This has caused a few problems in branch she works in.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peer Evaluation Form

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Please review the following criteria and assign a grade to each of your peers within your group. There are 5 criteria worth a maximum of one mark each. This peer evaluation is confidential AND must be submitted to the instructor on the date of your presentation.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Smoking

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ASSESSED |UNSATISFACTORY |LIMITED |SATISFACTORY |HIGH |VERY HIGH |WEIGHT |MARK | | Grade |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 | | | |Opinion |Describes the way people view the issue rather than exploring how he/she views the issue |Demonstrates evidence of a developing opinion |Identifies the bias evident in the texts to which they are responding |Explores the bias evident in the texts to which they are responding, and demonstrates a developing opinion of their own |Analyses the bias, and techniques evident in the texts to which they are responding, and demonstrates a clear opinion of their own |2 | | |Language Accuracy |Uses incorrect grammar and syntax consistently |Demonstrates some evidence of correct spelling, grammar and punctuation etc. |Demonstrates few errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation etc. |Has a good command of Standard English |Has a very good command of Standard English and writes with some flair…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On the whole, this question was fairly well done. Most candidates scored over 10 marks on this question by citing three well-known measures that can be taken to…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LEVELS OF RESPONSE The statements which follow should be used to determine the appropriate level of response for each objective. They should be applied as appropriate to the question and as the assessment of the work of an average 16 year old. The guiding principle for Examiners in applying the Mark Scheme to answers is to remember the concept of Positive Awarding. Therefore, marks should be awarded for appropriate responses to reasonable interpretations of the question. In the Mark Scheme there are no instances where answers are specifically excluded or required. What is included is information for Examiners, provided as guidance for what one might reasonably expect to find on a script. All appropriate answers therefore have the potential to be credited. It is perfectly possible for a candidate to achieve the highest level of response using a different…

    • 3018 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays