Preview

Supreme Court Major Cases

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4278 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court Major Cases
John Scarr
Mr. Louis
Ap. Us pd. 7
10/30/12
Supreme Court
Marbury vs. Madison (1803):
On the final of his presidency, John Adams named forty-two justices of the peace and sixteen new circuit court justices for the District of Columbia with the “Midnight Appointments”. “The Midnight Appointments” were an attempt by the Federalists to take control of the federal judiciary prior to Thomas Jefferson taking office.
The commissions were signed by President Adams and sealed by acting Secretary of State John Marshall (who later became Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and author of this opinion), but they were not delivered before the termination of Adams’s presidency. Thomas Jefferson refused to honor the commissions, claiming that they were invalid because they had not been delivered by the end of Adams’s term.
In the case of Marbury v Madison, the actual suit was William Marbury applying to the Supreme Court of the United States to compel James Madison, Jefferson’s Secretary of State, to deliver the commissions.
The constitutional issue present in the case was whether or not the Supreme Court had the authority to review acts of Congress and determine whether or not they are unconstitutional, making them void. The other Constitutional issue in the case was whether or not Congress can expand the scope the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction beyond that which is defined in Article III of the Constitution.
The court’s Ruling was actually somewhat mixed. The court ruled that Marbury did have right to the commissions because the order would go into effect when Adams signed the papers. This was so because he was still in power when he signed them. The also ruled that Congress did not have the power to expand the original jurisdiction of Supreme Court beyond that which is specified in Article III of the Constitution. Their reasoning behind this was that the Constitution states “the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    What was the case: Marbury was a soon-to-be appointed justice of the peace when Adam’s presidency came to an end, resulting in his successor, Thomas Jefferson denying credibility of the appointments because they were not completed during the time of Adam’s presidency. Jefferson’s Secretary of State, James Madison, was asked to allow the commissions.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Marbury V. US

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 1 Cranch 137, 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803)). Marbury has a right to this commission due to it being the last act and sealed by the Secretary of State. The Judiciary department job is to say what law is. In this case they have to interpret whether President Jefferson is breaking a law by not allowing Marbury to assume his duties as the Justice of Peace. The Judiciary department will ensure that two laws do not conflict if it does the court will decide the operations of each law. “If courts are to regard the Constitution, and the Constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature, the Constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.” (See, e.g. Cheney v. United States Dist. Court For D.C. (03-475) 542 U.S. 367 (2004) 334 F.3d…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison:(1803) Judicial review In 1801, Justice William Marbury was to have received a commission from President Adams, but Secretary of State James Madison refused to issue the commission. Chief Justice Marshall stated that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was the basis for Marbury's claim, conflicted with Article III of the Constitution. Marbury did not receive the commission. This case determined that the Supreme Court and not the states would have the ultimate word on whether an issue was in violation of the Constitution. The ruling, based on judicial review, made the Judicial Branch equal to the other two branches of government.…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs. Madison Case

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case I briefed was the Marbury vs Madison case. The issue prosecuted was does Marbury have a right to the commission? Does the law grant Marbury a remedy? Does the Supreme Court have the authority to review acts of congress and determine whether they are unconstitutional and therefore void? Can congress expand the scope of the supreme courts original jurisdiction beyond what is specified in article III of the constitution, and lastly does the Supreme Court have original jurisdiction to issue units of mandamus. .…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Con Law Outline

    • 5129 Words
    • 28 Pages

    Congress acted unconstitutionally by giving the Sup Ct jurisdiction under the Judiciary Act of 1789.…

    • 5129 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    was drawn in a unanimous decision, but the Supreme Court held that Congress had the power to…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He sought to introduce into the judicial system “an executive principle to secure effective team work.” To accomplish this goal, Taft proposed annual meetings of the Chief Justice and the Senior Circuit Judges. The conference would make “a yearly plan for the massing of the new and old judicial force of the United States in those districts all over the country where the arrears” were, “threatening to interfere with the usefulness of courts.” Taft spoke passionately about the need for annual meetings and lobbied various interest groups from Congress to the American Bar Association. The Conference of Senior Circuit Judges, composed of the Chief Justice and nine Circuit Senior Judges, was established by the Act of September 14, 1922, to meet annually upon the summons of the Chief Justice. The Conference was to make a comprehensive survey of the condition of the business in the courts, prepare plans for the assignment of judges, and submit suggestions to the courts in the interest of uniformity and expedition of business. Taft proudly presided over the Conference, voted as a member, and appointed its committees, all the while serving as its staff and animating…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written by Chief Justice John Marshall, the majority ruled that while Marbury was entitled to receive his commission and that courts are able to grant remedies, the Supreme Court did not have the right to grant the plaintiff his legal order. The reasoning behind this was that Marbury’s request was based on a law passed by Congress that the Court deemed unconstitutional (Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789). The Court then stated that when the Constitution and the law conflict, it is the Supreme Court’s duty to uphold the law of the land and rule in unity with the Constitution.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was his job to the commsions to the new appointees. Many of them were delivered while some were not, including William Marbury’s. When the new President, Thomas Jefferson was sworn in, he told James Madison, who was the new Secretary of Sate, to not deliver the commissions to the other judge appointees. Marbury and many others brought a lawsuit to make Madison deliver the commissions. They then asked the Supreme Court, in its original juristdiction, to issue a writ of “Mandamus”, a court order directing Madison to carry out his duty to deliver the commissions. This leads us to the case of William Marbury, v. James Madison in front of the Supreme Court, with ex-Secretary of State John Marshall as Chief Justice.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is because the act was passed just before the end of his presidency, and it is said that Adams appointed many of the judges at midnight before Jefferson’s inauguration. Along with choosing the new judges, Adams made another move so that Federalists could further control the Judicial system. He appointed his Secretary of State, John Marshall, to serve as the next Chief Justice. Doing this further shut Jefferson out from the Judiciary system, leaving all of the power in the hands of the Federalists. Adams specifically felt that it was necessary because Marshall told him that by controlling the Judiciary system, the Federalists would upset Jefferson’s plans as that was the only branch of government that he wouldn’t have access to. Adams didn’t initially want to choose Marshall as the Chief Justice. However, after John Jay declined the position, Adams turned to Marshall who…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The night before John Adams left the presidential office he appointed various men to be Justices of the Piece. All of these men were Federalist like himself. One of which was William Marbury. However, when Thomas Jefferson came into office he refused to give the men that had been appointed last minute by Adams their federal commission. Jefferson used his secretary of state, James Madison, to be his voice about the situation. Enraged William Marbury and others sued the government and the case went to the Supreme Court. One of the members of the Supreme Court was the recently appointed Chief Justice John Marshall.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Supreme Court has been in place ever since the Judiciary Act of 1789. Since then, a number of important precedential cases have been tackled by the judges of the court. One of these aforementioned cases is that of 1807’s United State v. Aaron Burr, in which the fledgling court prosecuted Aaron Burr on account of treason.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)FactsMarbury was commissioned to serve as a judge by former president John Adam. The former Secretary of State and the present Chief Justice John Marshall failed to deliver the commission before President Thomas Jefferson started his term. The current Secretary of State, James Madison, under Jeffersons orders, did not deliver the commission. Marbury applied for a writ of mandamus to force Madison to deliver said commission. HoldingMarburys application for a writ of mandamus was rejected because the Judiciary Act of 1789, the law on which his application was based, was found by the Marshall Court to be unconstitutional.…

    • 776 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The constitution as a written document is very simple and vague, making it fundamentally political and thus requiring those who interpret it to take into account the present state of the country and the effects that their decision will have on the current populous. The founding fathers, like our politicians today, had conflicting ideas on how the country should be run, hence the length and vagueness of the document. Among these debates was the issue of the judiciary branch. Many believed that a branch whose members were not publicly elected, and thus not representing the will of the people, garnered more authority and power than the others. In response to such criticism, Alexander Hamilton wrote the Federalist 78, in which he said the courts as outlined by the constitution are the weakest branch of government because, "It [Judiciary Branch] may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments."(1) Hamilton, along with many others, believes that the constitution implies that the courts have the power to judge issues brought to the Supreme Court. The courts ability to rule on the constitutionality of issues is not specifically mentioned the constitution but was reaffirmed in the landmark Supreme Court decision, Marbury vs. Madison in 1803. In declaring that the courts have the ability to determine a laws constitutionality, chief justice John Marshall established a policy of judicial review. Marshall's decision gave the courts inherent powers the constitution didn't specifically mention but also created a new dilemma for the courts: how to go about interpreting laws.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Marbury and three others were denied their commissions and therefore went directly to the Supreme Court and asked it to issue a writ of mandamus. Marbury thought he could take his case directly to the court because section 13 of the 1789 Judiciary Act gave the Court the power to issue writs of mandamus to anyone holding federal office.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays