Subjective Ethical Relativism Essay

Throughout life, most people try to find the reason behind things, others are more adventurous and try to find the reason for our life. When might come across a point in our development when we asked ourselves, where do we come from, where are we going and why are we here. But do we really want to know our life purpose?
In this chapter, we discussed subjective ethical relativism, but what exactly does this mean? the authors defined subjective ethical relativism as the belief that an action is morally correct or not if it is accepted by the individual’s society.
From the beginning, the authors reject this position.
We will take a closer look at what they believe is wrong with this theory, alongside my personal opinions
Women who were raised in the Middle East are
Aristoteles and Pythagoras agreed that philosophy is questioning about where we come from, where do we go and how we should live our lives. As mentioned before, ethics is the search of the way in which we should our lives as a society
I firmly believe Pojman and Fieser reject this way of thought thoroughly. They cannot seem to grasp the idea of being completely morally subjective. They stated, there is no existing argument that could be said about Hemingway’s feelings toward a bull fight if he, Hemingway, completely identifies himself with a society that sees bull fights as morally correct. According to Pojman, there is no argument that can counteract the idea that his feelings and belief are morally not permissible or incorrect. The authors further stated that if we embrace this theory then we must say that Bundy's actions are as morally permissible as Mother Teresa’s