Preview

South Had The Rights To Secede US Hist

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
685 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
South Had The Rights To Secede US Hist
Lawrence Lo
D channel Did the South have the right to secede?

South Carolina seceded on December 20,1860,after that,six other states followed.They formed the Confederacy or Confederate States of America.So here is the question.Did the South have the right to secede?

At the declaration of independence.The government is formed by people and also people have the right to choose the president of government,to alter of to abolish it,and to institute a new government.Because of the Northerners opposed slavery,so the Southerners rights have been threaten by the North.So they have the right to decide whether to stay in the Union.

In 1846,Congress debated the Wilmot Proviso.Its proposal followed the war in Mexico as many Americans wondered whether the territory would be free or slave.This was a bill that would ban slavery in the new territories acquired from Mexico.The Southerners opposed that because they think they had a right to slaves in the new territories because slaves were property.And if they can’t slaves in the new territories, this will affected their economic increasing.

In 1849, California asked to enter the Union as a free state. But Southerners think that
California should be a slave state because California lay south of the Missouri
Compromise line. Which means the states that above compromise line will become free states, this issue affect the Southerner’s expanding of slavery. So thats why the
Southerners opposed the Proviso. After the Missouri compromise, Senator Henry Clay presented the Compromise of
1850. Northerners like this compromise because this provision gave popular sovereignty to the territories, which means people have the right to choose whether they are a free or a slave.Compromise of 1850 prevent South to expand further because nobody wants to become a slave. After the Compromise of 1850 became law. The Southeners made the Fugitive Slave
Act much stricter.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    "That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends it is the Right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Southerners justified the act, because of their belief that slaves were property, and even captured some free African-Americans. However, the act meant Northerners had to go against their beliefs, and help capture runaway slaves due to the consequences of not cooperating.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Southern states listened, but once Congress was back in session they refused to seat southerners.…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1949 Californians drafted a constitution of their own that banned slavery in their new state. President Taylor supported the admission of California as a free state. This upset Southern Radicals and they met in Nashville in 1950 to talk about Secession.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the first person uttered publicly their opposition to slavery, it was a heated issue between the states. Daniel Webster stated, “Sir, there are those abolition societies, of which I am unwilling to speak, but in regard to which I have very clear notions and opinions. I do not think them useful” (Doc B). The Southern economy, as well as the Northern, depended so greatly on slaves, and they refused to abolish slavery. The South claimed that anyone anti-slavery was against their way of life. However, the North did not agree with the capturing, selling, and treating humans…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    GOV 2305

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government……

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cmc 240 Final Project

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “To secure these inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, governments are instituted among men, deriving their powers from the consent of the governed…Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their safety and happiness.” - Thomas Jefferson, Declaration of Independence, 1776.…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pre Civil War Opposition

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since 1776 American settlers owned African slaves for economic advancement, but by the mid 1800’s slavery became a custom of the past, and change was necessary for further American prosperity. Southerners were highly dependent, and supportive of slavery, however many moral arguments and political actions went toward the opposition to the spread of slavery including the Missouri compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Slave Dbq

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Those who supported slavery were for the most part southerners. Senator John C. Calhoun states that slavery is a “positive good”. He says that through slavery, the conditions of the races improved physically, morally, and intellectually and the two races of black and white were brought together. Calhoun also says that the living conditions for the slaves were good and they were taken care of. But in reality, the slaves were living in shacks fearing for their lives and hoping not to get beaten by their slave owner after a long hard day of working in the blistering sun on the plantations (document 2). Another man against the abolition of slavery is Chancellor Harper. According to Harper, the emancipated slaves would harm the economy of the United States and Europe. This is because he believed that the free laborers would strike against working for higher pays and they wouldn’t do their jobs, thus affecting the trade. The slaves did get paid but very low amounts compared to the hard work that they put into their jobs (document 3). Those were some arguments of people who supported slavery and believed that it should be continued.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They showed their interest by writing in the document that slave trade would become illegal. This gave me and other slaves hope. For once, things seems to be progressing, maybe this was the beginning of something even better for the slaves. It gave us hope to keep going, because we now had the chance to be free. One major argument against the ratification that I would support as a South Carolina Slave would be because they protected the rights of slave owners. Even if slaves escaped, owners had the right to take them back, after all they were considered property. I never understood why they protected the people that treated us bad, humiliated us, and took our freedom. The states supported the idea that everyone is equal and therefore we all deserved the same rights, yet this all changed when slaves were…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In reality, southern slaves were often treated better than some northern factory workers. Because of the movement to stop slavery (the abolitionist movement) southerners concluded that all or most northerners were against them and wanted to destroy their way of life. Southerners developed the illusion that all northerners were against them and it united the southern states. For about 245 years, slaves had been used in America as free labor. Some slaves tried to escape to freedom, and some accomplished this goal. Once an escape was discovered, usually a man hunt followed. If caught, slaves were usually beaten or whipped. The basis of the southern economy was cotton, so slaves were a very important to southern life. Lincoln had said that he would end slavery so the southern population saw him as a threat to their…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This should never have been the case because like the forefathers always said that ‘al men are created equal’. Slaves were never free even when they were born in America. “All children borne in this country shall be held bond or free only according to the condition of the mother” (Casper and Davis 26). This was a big controversy at the time because all the southerners wanted slavery and many of the northerners wanted it to be ended immediately. It was very harsh that they wouldn’t let the African Americans, who were born in the United States, to become freemen because they wanted to have laborers for everything. I think that this is not right because many women at this time died during childbirth. Slave owners were the worst to their slaves and made their lives a struggle.” It shall not be lawful for any negro or other slave… to go or depart from his master’s ground without a certification from his master, mistress, or overseer, and such permission not to be granted… shall be sent to the next constable, who is hereby enjoined and required to give said negro twenty lashes on his bare back well laid on”(Casper and Davis 27). This brought on a lot of debate at the time to end slavery all together and was splitting our nation in half. This issue would not go away and the north was ready to go to war to end this problem. Slavery was one of the main causes of the…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution republic that was envisioned by the Founding Fathers became a place of liberty and opportunity for countless millions of people from all over the world (Our Ageless Constitution, 1987). Their ideas worked whereas others failed because they were based on enduring principles which recognized human imperfection and the need to structure a limited government of laws, dependent upon the consent of a people who, themselves, understood the principles (Our Ageless Constitution, 1987). The principals acknowledged that individual rights are derived from a Creator. The principals were largely based on the enduring principals compatible with “the laws of nature and of nature’s God. The principals also recognized human imperfection and that a tendency to abuse power is ever present in the human heart (Our Ageless Constitution, 1987). These principals also restrained those in power through a written Constitution which carefully divided, balanced, and separated the powers of government and then intricately knitted them back together again through a system of checks and balances. They also left all powers with the people, except those which, by their consent, the people delegated…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages

    "That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their safety and happiness.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    civil disobedience

    • 2324 Words
    • 10 Pages

    “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed individuals can change the world. Indeed, it 's the only thing that ever has."2 History has shown us through the likes of Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr. who went against the greater power of their time to fight for injustice. These few respectable men made that difference that the world needed at that time and upheld the very principle of democracy to its roots. It goes without saying that citizen participation to make a country’s democracy as legitimate and true is of paramount importance. With reference to United States’ Bill of Rights, it asserts that the government derives authority from the consent of its people, and with the dysfunctionality of the government, it falls upon the people as their right and duty to change the government,3 as it is believed that with the dysfunctionality, the government has failed its fundamental duties to its people.4 When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty, 5and our duty as people leads us to civil disobedience.…

    • 2324 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays