Preview

Sociology: Outline and assess left and right realist explanations of crime deviance.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
701 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sociology: Outline and assess left and right realist explanations of crime deviance.
The right realist perspective on crime is mainly associated with the American sociologist W.J Wilson. This perspective became very influential on home office policy-making during the conservatives period in office.

The right realist approach assumes that human beings are naturally selfish, individualistic and greedy. Therefore ther are 'naturally inclined' to further their interest, even if this means comitting crime. They also believe the origins of crime are misunderstood, that is policies aimed at tackling crime by removing social and economic inequalities. Wilson noted that the Great Depression in the USA did not result in a rise in crime. Another right realist explanation is that the welfare state has undermined our sense of obligation to support each other, andthat community controls, i.e. informal controls imposed by neighbours, family and peer groups are breaking down.

Right realists stress that attempts to explain the causes of crime should be abandoned and that sociologists should instead focus on finding practical solutions to slow the growth of crime. This developed the control theory.

Hirschi argues that crime is opportunistic and anyone would commit crime if the situation was right and there was little chance of being caught. He says that sociologists should not focus on whypeople commit crime but why more people do not. He maintains that most people are rational in their choices and that there are controls that operate to make most people keep their actions within the bounds of the law. They are, Attachment- commitment to family relationships which could be threatened by criminal acts, Commitment- years of education, building a career, buying a home and aquiring a good reputation, all this could be lost by commiting crime, Involvement- some people are activley involved in community life as volunteers, parentgovernors for schools etc. all this would be jepordized by criminal behaviour.

Right realists believe the way to control crime is to take

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ron Clark describes situational crime prevention as ‘a pre-emptive approach that relies, not on improving society or its institutions, but simple on reducing opportunities for crime’. He identifies three features of measures aimed at situational crime prevention, firstly that they are directed at specific crimes, that they involve managing or altering the immediate environment of the crime and lastly that they aim at increasing the effort and risks of committing crime and reducing the rewards. For example, ‘target hardening’ measures such as increased surveillance in shops via CCTV or security guards increases the effort a shoplifter needs to make. Underlying situation crime prevention approaches is an rational choice theory. This is the view that criminals act rationally, weighing up the costs and benefits of a crime opportunity before deciding whether to commit it. This contrasts with theories that stress ‘root causes’ such as capitalist exploitation. Clarke argues that most theories offer no realistic solutions to crime. The most obvious things to do, he argues, is to focus on the immediate crime situation, since this is where possibility for prevention is greatest. Most crime is opportunistic, so we need to reduce the opportunities.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Left and right realism; Left realism demonstrated by Lea and Young who have a marxist approach suggesting crime is a result of a capitalist society and criminals should be seen as a victim of crime they have three main points to explain this view, relative deprivation where people look at people who lead more affluent life styles and compare themselves to making them feel poor when they are not. Marginalisation which suggests that certain areas of the population are more likely to suffer from economic, social and political deprivation. Finally is subcultures which are formed by people suffering from relative deprivation and marginal. Whereas right realism suggests that if one member of a subculture show signs as deviant behaviour then it is likely that you will find others who also act deviantly because the right realism theorists believe that no one is born with deviant behaviour but learns in through primary socialisation with people who share their…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Left Realist Criminology are from Critical Criminology as a reaction against perceived to be the Left's failure in everyday crime. The central tenet of lest reaslim is to reflect the reality of crime, that is in its origins, its nature and its impact Left Realism argues that crime affects working class people, but that solutions that only increase repression to make the crime problem worse. However they argue that the causes of crime in relative deprivation, although preventative measures and policing are necessary, but these should be democratically controlled. As the left realism have two view on crime in theoretical and political which are: Theoretical: 'The basic triangle of relations which is the proper subject-matter of criminology are…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crime occurs when society does not provide its members with equal opportunities in society. The individuals are not given equal opportunity in society will not have the same investment in their community as members of society that are afforded job and educational opportunities. When social functions are not equal the members of society are not recognized by society, he or she will develop their own unique subculture is more accepting of crime (Rock, 2012). This type of subculture appears in lower income and poverty…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hirschi's Control Theory

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The thoughts and ideas of this theory were put together in ‘A General theory of crime’ (Michael Gotfredson and Travis Hirschi 1990). This theory is more of a refined control theory than originally presented over 20 years earlier by Hirschi. Within this theory it is stated that crime was claimed to have flowed from low self control. ‘It can be enjoyable because it involves the exercise of agility, deception or power, and it also requires a lack of sympathy for the victim’. But it does not provide long or medium term benefits. In short, it is, they say, likely to be committed by those who are ‘impulsive, insensitive, physical, risk taking, short sighted and non verbal’ (1990:90). Gottfredson and Hirschi argued that the types of people that who become involved in crime also engage in such behaviours that provide ‘short term gratification’…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminologists seek to understand the commission of crime in a given society, attempting to figure out why certain crimes occur, and then to study how these can be prevented, and deterred by individuals. The two key approaches I will examine in this assignment is that of the early 'Classicalist' approach, and the opposing 'Positivist' approach, each of which are crucial for understanding modern criminology today.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Marxists crime is bound to happen in a capitalist society, and the reason behind this is because capitalism is ‘criminogenic’, meaning capitalism itself causes crime. Marxists explain that capitalism is based on the oppression of the working class; they argue that the ruling class use them as a way to make profit which is damaging on the working class. Marxists explain this causes crime as poverty may mean crime is the only way the working class can survive and crime may also be the only way they can obtain the consumer goods encouraged by capitalist advertising, resulting in theft and other utilitarian crimes. However Marxists note that not only working class people commit crime, Gordon (1976) argues that crime is a rational response to capitalism found in all social classes Capitalism is a ‘dog-eat-dog’ system of fierce competition among capitalist competing with each other for profit, encouraging them to commit white-collar crime and corporate crimes such as tax evasion. However the usefulness of this Marxist explanation of crime has been criticised as not all capitalist societies have high crime rates, for example Japan & Switzerland have a much lower crime level than the USA.…

    • 673 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the reasons for the differences in crime statistics is put forward but left realists Lea and Young, they argue that the statistics do, in fact, reflect real life differences. Left realists see crime as the product of relative deprivation, subcultures and marginalisation. They argue that racism has led to the marginalisation and economic exclusion of ethnic minorities, who face higher levels of unemployment, poverty and poor housing. This means that these minorities then get things they cannot usually get by illegitimate means. Delinquent subcultures are made especially by young unemployed black males; this produces higher levels of utilitarian crime, such as theft and robbery, as a means of coping with relative deprivation. Furthermore, because these groups are marginalised and have no organisations to represent their interests, their frustration is liable to produce non-utilitarian crime, such as violence and rioting. Lea and Young also acknowledge that the police often act in racist ways and that this results in the unjustified criminalisation of some members of minority groups. However, 90% of crimes are reported by the public, not police, therefore it is unlikely that the police do not act in discriminatory ways under these circumstances, it is unlikely that this can adequately account for ethnic differences in the statistics. They then conclude that the statistic’s represent real differences in levels of offending between ethnic groups and that these are caused by real differences in levels of relative deprivation and marginalisation. However,…

    • 804 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From 1964 to 1983, the country had two Democrat and three Republican Presidents and crime rose steadily every year until 1983-1984, when it dropped during a Republican’s administration, then rose again and continued until 1993. In 1993, during a Democrat’s administration, crime began to fall and has continued to present year - spanning two Democrats and one Republican (Dept. of Justice, 2010). Since Packer’s models are based on values of the current administration and public opinion, the argument as to which is more effective could be made in either case. The ebb and flow of crime can be likened to the…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The aim of this essay is to compare, contrast and evaluate two sociological theories of crime causation and two psychological theories of crime causation.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miss

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Traditional Marxists explain crime as inevitable in capitalism, because capitalism is criminogenic and its very nature causes crime. They argue that crime is mostly found in working-classes because of capitalism and how it exploits people; for many people living in poverty crime is the only way for them to survive, crime for some could be the only way for them to acquire consumer goods, which capitalism advertises as essentials and alienation is often a result of capitalism, which often leads to frustration and aggression, consequently causing non-utilitarian crimes, such as violence. However traditional Marxists ignore the fact that not all capitalist societies have a high crime rate, for example Japan has much less crime than America.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal statistics are usually quoted as 'hard facts'; are often used to support the view that there is a rapidly increasing rate of serious crime in modern society. It is on the basis of these statistics that important decisions are made by governments in relation to their policies towards crime and its treatment. However the positivistic reliance on such statistics as the basis of their sociology has been brought into question by constructivist approaches - interpretive sociology and critical sociology both of which refuse to take the statistics at face value. The former raised questions about the scientific claims of positivism; demonstrated that the…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    New Right Criminology

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rising as a response to New Right criminology, Left Realism sought more progressive reform, acknowledging that those in the working class are also victims of crime (White et al., 2017). The perspective…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Social Controls

    • 2967 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This essay will thoroughly examine and evaluate the claim that it is social controls that prevent us from committing crimes by looking at different social control theories. Firstly we must determine what a social control theory consists of, according to Hopkins (2009) ‘social control theory is fundamentally derived from a conception of human nature that proposes that there are no natural limits on elementary human needs and desires. People will always want and seek further economic reward and it is thus not necessary to look for special motives for engaging in criminal activity. Human beings are born free to break the law and will only refrain from doing so under particular circumstances. It is these fundamental assumptions that form the basis of social control theories’ (Hopkins 2009, p.246). Therefore controls set in society are the reason humans do not commit crime, if these controls were to be removed humans would naturally due to their nature commit crime. This also shows that social control theories try and solve the question of ‘why do people not commit crime?’ rather than ‘what causes people to commit crime?’ The reason behind solving the first question rather than the second is because social control theorists believe committing crime is the default position of every human therefore the second question has already been solved.…

    • 2967 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many different perspectives and schools of thought when it comes to the study of crime. One such theoretical perspective is known as classical criminology, which can be traced back to the early 18th Century. Ideas of the Enlightenment which took place around this time, contributed to foundation philosophies of classicism (Carrabine et al., 2014). The notions of reason and science were beginning to take hold across areas such as political and social spheres of society, so unsurprisingly influenced the way people thought about crime (Bradley & Walters, 2005). Classicism reflected the fundamental aspects of the Enlightenment (science, reason, practicality) in the way it approached dealing with the problem of crime (Taylor, Walton, & Young, 2013). The methods of dealing with crime before the introduction of classical thought were harsh and unjust (Bradley & Walters, 2005).…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays