Preview

Scramble For Africa Dbq Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
841 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Scramble For Africa Dbq Analysis
Francisco Osornio
Scramble for Africa
During the Berlin Conference from 1884-1885 the European powers divided up the continent of Africa in order to avoid wars amongst the European powers. However, not a single African leader was invited to the Berlin Conference. The leaders of the native African kingdoms reacted to European imperialism by clearly expressing their opposition to the European officials, highlighting how strange and hypocritical European culture was, and implementing any means available to fight the Europeans. The African leaders elucidated that they would never give in to European imperialism. Prempeh I, an Ashanti leader, clearly stated that he would never allow Britain to conquer the Ashanti kingdom (Doc. 2). Prempeh
…show more content…
Menelik II, emperor of Ethiopia, appealed to the great powers of Europe to have mercy on Ethiopia in sight of their common faith (Doc. 3). He believed that his appeal to their shared faith would cause the Europeans to rethink their actions, but Menelik II did not understand that the Europeans regarded material wealth as more important than their faith. Ndansi Kumalo described how the British treated the Africans like animals, and they had superior weapons (Doc. 4). Ndansi Kumalo and his people did not understand that the British had superior weapons, so they were defeated and bewildered by the horrendous treatment they received from the British. Mojimba, an African chief recounted a battle against the British and African mercenaries, and he described how the Europeans had rifles (Doc. 9). Mojimba believed that the Europeans were more evil than the Africans were, and he realized that the Europeans were more evil than the Africans were, and he realized that the Europeans were hypocritical in the Christian faith with their malevolent actions. Menelik II’s option that the European powers would not attack his country because they shared the same faith was influenced by his faith as a fellow Christian and his understanding of Christianity that Christian powers should be friendly toward one another. The African leaders had a difficult time understanding the European culture and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At no point before 1957 were the citizens of the Sub-Saharan Africa region considered to be equal to their supreme Caucasian counterparts. It was especially hard because there was a strong British and French influence and most of the colonies were controlled by one of the two. The attitudes of the citizens began to change when Ghana received its independence from British rule in 1857. The first example of this new found equality came when Queen Elizabeth II came to visit Ghana. “The citizens erected huge side-by-side posters of the queen and their new leader, Nkrumah. This public exposure showed the new beginnings that were starting to transform the region. Kwame Nkrumah became the poster child for this new move of independence and he is responsible for inspiring other prominent leaders to lead their countries into independence in a peaceful way. However, all the countries in the region did not follow his peaceful ways specifically Kenya. They were not able to experience the new found equality because they were occupied by the constant friction between the white settlers and these settlers saw the Africans that lived there “traitorous”.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    abundance of copper, rubber and ivory were appealing to him. He initially pledged to promote…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three decades following the Berlin conference were chaotic as European powers competed to occupy and colonize Africa. Europe would be profiting off the resources that they collected from their reaction to far much weaker subordinate African colonies. As Europe’s wealth amassed, Africa’s wealth approached its end. It was soon Eu European intruders as a much stronger force than themselves and lost all their ties to older tradition through fear. In 1886, the British government commissioned and administered the development of the which was signed by many African rulers (doc.1). These Africans gave in but the document does not specify if they gave in because they lost sights of the nation they were once before. Another document of the reason…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of the Berlin Conference in Europe, the scramble for African land ended up colonizing inhabited areas in Africa, destroying native nations and their traditional culture. During this time, African natives had many different reactions. Some wanted to cooperate peacefully, others wanted to withstand European pressure, but most of all, most Africans wanted to react violently and rebel against the Europeans.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scramble Dbq Analysis

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1884, the European government colonized areas in Africa which was known as the European Scramble for Africa. There are various ways of actions and reactions of the Africans in response to the European Scramble for Africa. Some are Peaceful Cooperation, some are violent, some are based on increased religion, and some are total rejection. These reactions are shown in Documents one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, and nine. Each document has a person’s point of view and a date (1800’s-1907).…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Essay

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Berlin Conference of 1986-1985 was Africa's undoing in many ways. During the conference, European Nations decided which lands in Africa they would take over. However, this was done without the presence of an African representative. The race of these European powers to colonize and occupy Africa is termed, the “Scramble for Africa”. Africa’s inhabitants responded with anger and violence as is shown in the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and ninth document. On the other hand, some tried to come to an agreement or to keep peace with the Europeans, which is seen in the second and third document; and the first document shows the Europeans attempted to gain control without conflict. Due to the Africans lack of modern weapons, they were often defeated.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    b) The purpose of the Berlin Conference was to lay rules to divide Africa without going to war for it. It divided Africa and African leaders weren't allowed to make decision for Africa’s outcome.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    in 1880, Europeans controlled 10% of Africa; by 1914, controlled all except Liberia & Ethiopia; the Berlin Conference established the rules among European powers for carving up Africa…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Belgian set off a scramble among other European powers to get their presence on the continent. In 1887, to avoid conflict, Europeans leaders met in Berlin, Germany, to set up rules for colonizing Africa and divided Africa with little regard. In 1850, most of Africa had been free. Seventy years later, most of the continent was under European rule. Africa has loss their independence…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In regards to the European Scramble for Africa, there were a variety of actions and reactions from the African people. Some wanted to befriend the Europeans while others wanted nothing to do with them. The Europeans used deceptive and strategic means to try and win the Africans over, which the Africans responded to in a multitude of ways. The Africans responded either peacefully, out of anger, or out of pride for their land and tribes.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1884, to avoid having conflict between themselves, European leaders met at the Berlin Conference to create and discuss rules involving the colonization of Africa. Africans were not invited. The leaders agreed that before claiming their territory they would have to build many outposts. It was first come first serve, whoever was first to build an outpost on the land was…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly, the imperialistic ambitions of major powers stirred up jealousy and tension. European imperialism in Africa created tensions in that Germany felt left out of territory in the region. For example, in “1884, German leader Otto von Bismarck called the Berlin Conference, which had the European powers meet to discuss the division of Africa” (Beck, 2017). The scramble for Africa kindled a sense of rivalry and resentment among nations. All the powers wanted to own more territories than the others.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ Scramble For Africa

    • 712 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Document 1 (The Standard form signed by many African Rulers by The Royal Niger Company) and Document 2 (Ashanti Leader's response to a British Official) discuss how the British give the illusion that African Nations have a choice in this matter. After all, the British offer a contract to be signed by African Leaders which implies that Leaders may choose to accept or decline. After being presented with this dilemma, most African Nations such as the Ashanti wished to remain independent and to preserve their relations with Europe. The African's felt like they were in control of their own fate due to the false illusion of free choice. The British obviously anticipated this resistance as they later used warfare to control Africa by force.…

    • 712 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In one case specifically, Ethiopia had been hoarding European weapons for decades and were well supplied enough so that they could reppel Europe’s advances, for a short time. Document five shows one of the only equal battled between Europeans and Africans; however, most other African nations were not as well supplied and had never encountered Europe’s newest military machinery (Doc 5). After the failure of the Ndebele rebellion, Kumalo recounts that they would have been successful if it had not been for the “White man’s machine guns” (Doc 4). Because he was then forced into slave like conditions afterwards, Kumalo will always react to Europeans with violence. Many Africans also shared Kumalo’s reaction to European advancement into Africa. There were several rebellions and battles against European control. Survivors were not treated well under Europeans, who took African land, possessions, and plundered villages (Doc 9). Many Europeans were not expecting such resentment from Africans. They truly believed they were superior to Africans and were helping civilise them, also know as the White man’s burden. A German military officer recounts that a African chief had to deceive his troops with a magical medical solution that made them impervious to bullets (Doc 8). The Europeans reacted to the mass of charging African warriors by shooting…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the themes the documentary covers was the false pretenses that Europeans claimed to justify the Colonization of Africa. During the early 20th century (1900’s), Northern and Eastern Africa still had a pervasive slave culture. In the North, the remnants of the Ottoman Empire still practiced slavery, while the Muslims were the responsible figureheads in the East. Following the centuries of trans-Atlantic slave trade between Europe, Africa, and the “New World”, Europe had abolished the practicing of slavery. In 1884, the European powers that be called for the “Berlin Conference’’. Part of the conference was to organize “The Scramble for Africa”. The term was used to describe the West’s desire to introduce themselves as administrators of the African continent. One of the justifications for the conference/European’s colonialism, was that the West had “a duty” to end the barbarism of slavery still existing on the continent through the West’s new found morality. Part of the European’s plan for administration was also the fragmenting of Africa with artificial political boundaries. While this “organized” Africa in a convenient matter for the Europeans, it led to ethnic divisions/rivalries that are still in existence today. One of the…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays