Preview

Roger Rosenblatte On Freedom Of Speech

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1325 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roger Rosenblatte On Freedom Of Speech
We the people, may speak in any manner appearing satisfactory to needs and wants due to our possession of the freedom of speech. Although this statement may portray itself as accurate and truthful; in fact, the entire idea feeds from common misconceptions. A vast measure of Americans hold dearly to a distant from reality view on the rights and freedoms delivered to new generations as an invaluable heirloom. The uninhibited freedom to speak falls prey to limitations bound by diction chosen to define its mechanics encompassing intended capabilities. Therefore, when Americans begin ranting with ideas ranging from brilliant philosophies to lunatic conspiracies through the facade of entirely free speech, numerous times the results prove unbecoming …show more content…
Therefore, not only would one right be constrained but also multitudes of additional rights would be subjugated. Forms of language and communication assume quintessential roles in nearly all functionings underwent in the country including protecting other rights. When Roger Rosenblatt commenced composing his essay he traveled abroad to find legitimization for his reasonings, recalling that, “it has been instructive for me to spend time in places where freedom was limited” (502).He unearthed the tragic implications of relations lacking free speech and the real terrors that can commence when he attempted to evacuate a hotel in Tbilisi. The clerk told him, “that another, more fluent, clerk would be along shortly… “Would you mind coming back in fifteen years?”” (Rosenblatt 503). The sheer atrocity of this innocently disguised question comes from the honesty in which it was spoken, Mr. Rosenblatt very probably could have been held in the hotel for fifteen years because when his ability to correspond disappeared so did his ability to protect himself. How could Americans defend and preserve the liberties promised if they lose one of the most significant weapons of defense they possess? In recent years, citizens have experienced such difficulties; one business fighting a case of eminent …show more content…
As Roger Rosenblatt endured in countries of constrained inhabitants, “the secret publication of books, the pirated music, the tricky subversive lines of poetry read at vast gatherings of tens of thousands. And the below the surface comedy” (503) will continuously arise no matter the discouragement present. In a country founded on its freedoms, the retraction of any of those privileges will be met with extreme adversity. Moreover, “since free is the way people's minds were made to be” (Rosenblatt 502) the restriction of verbal expression will only cause riots and outrage. Currently, various universities and colleges have faced the backlash of unjust speech limitations on their campuses. One student attending a college in Arizona prepares to sue the school for, “her school’s so-called “speech zone,” arguing the policy “severely limited” her right to free speech and due process” (Harkness). Reactions to a decrease in the liberty to speak freely induces immediate retaliation and hardship, in addition, to being entirely unnecessary. To keep the peace and stability, the United States must keep the freedom of speech as it was intended to be used, freely. Overall, as Roger Rosenblatt stated and explained in his article defending the freedom of speech, the United States must not procreate censorship of any greater extent on its citizen’s voices. In fact, “The Founding Fathers

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    For anyone to place a limit on an American's right to express or suspend one's right's, is to be very dubious in being an American themselves! "Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties." (John Milton, 1644) in that quote, Senator Robert M. La Follette uses it to defend his right to speak out against the war. Furthermore, for the right for the citizens of this country to discuss issues without fear.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Silvergate notes that limiting free speech would fall to the responsibility of college administrators who will undoubtedly over censor due to the broad harassment regulations the proposed bill contains. He supports this point by adding that the Individual Rights Foundation, FIRE already claims harassment as “the most abused tool to limit free speech.”…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Beginning in the 1980's and going strong into the early 90's, speech codes on college campuses restricted the radical words that initiated protests by students, faculty, and staff members. Limitations defined by college administrators controlled the context and content of what its affiliates could say freely in the jurisdiction of the campus. In spite of this, outraged students demanded that their First Amendment rights be protected and took their colleges' speech codes to the court room. Although Federal Courts felt that speech codes were based on good intentions, the plaintiff's always brought home the gold. Speech codes were deemed unconstitutional under the ordinance that they were either "vague" or "overbroad" (as cited in Hudson Jr., 2005). Speech codes were quick fixes to a deeper problem; college administrators were putting a band-aid on a wound that needed stitches.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Women, sexual assault victims, people of color, transgender students. College campuses have created “safe spaces” for all sorts of marginalized groups. But in the process, one member of the campus community has lost precious real estate. Free speech” (1). This quote from the article “Free Speech is Flunking Out on College Campuses” by Catherine Rampell introduces the idea that the right to freedom of speech is being squashed. All over the country, colleges are taking away this right from their students in order to protect others, but in reality, they are only stripping them of what is protected under the Constitution. Censorship has spread to social media apps causing students to be in constant danger of being accused of harassment. Claims…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jon Katz, an American journalist and author, also argued: “Institutions that are supposed to be breeding grounds for original and innovative thought have embraced the forced re-ordering of moral conscience” (Katz). However, speech codes do not stifle freedom of speech. It merely adds to the exclusions of the first amendment in order to create a safe learning environment and equal opportunities for all. Speech codes, in no way, limit learning, in fact, they enhance learning…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr Mike

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “ Throughout our history ,we [Americans] have been willing to trade freedom for safety during wartime”(St Luis Post Dispatch Editorial,11 October 2001).This essay will argue that a responsible government has to protect its citizens and this protection will include the use of censorship but it should not resemble an authoritarian country otherwise freedom of speech and free exercise of religion will be lost. An examination will be made about the positive aspects of censorship and why censorship is so vital to our culture,there will also be an examination about the negative impacts of censorship and how some governments try to use it to manipulate its citizens and lastly there will be emphasis to how censorship should and can be used in a democratic society.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Freedom in America

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Abrams, Floyd. Speaking Freely: Trials of the First Amendments. New York, NY: The Penguin Group, 2005.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Here, I will introduce the main points of three different articles about the freedom of speech and expression called “What ‘Snowflakes’ Get Right About Free Speech” by Ulrich Baer, Guo Jian’s report “California, A University Student Sued the School Violated the Freedom of Speech”, and “Global Press Freedoms Weakening, Group Warns” written by Kevin Drew. Each of these sources make it obvious that freedom of speech is something being violated in everyday life, and we need to fight for the right to express our words, and not allow anyone to shut us down.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federal government, as an institution that serves to protect not only its citizens but the rights of its citizens, cannot limit free speech. Especially free speech in the media. Putting a restriction on what people can and cannot say directly puts a restriction on their liberty. By telling high school students to censor themselves in order to ensure that they do not offend anyone, high school administrations inadvertently communicate to students that every disagreement they encounter is a personal assault. By prohibiting me from publishing a story out of fear that it may hurt someone’s feelings or make a student uncomfortable, my high school principal explicated to me that I should revere the comfort of others over the precedence of the…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill Citizenship

    • 2362 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In most democratic countries, the freedom of saying what you like, of criticizing the authorities, and of discussing ideas without fear, is a basic importance. Within a sense of this matter, John Stuart Mill devoted most of his acclaimed portrayal in his book On Liberty (1985). This essay aims to outline the scope and limitations of free speech. Therefore, with reference to Mill’s ideas, the essay will explain why free speech is…

    • 2362 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Though these advocates were exceptional, the man the most influential in defining free speech and its importance is John Stuart Mill and his essay “On Liberty”. “On Liberty” proposes that for freedom to properly flourish, it must be free in all aspects, with almost no limitations from any source, either government or individuals. Although written in 1859, Mill’s opinion is still relevant and can be applied to current political controversies and events in Canada such as the infamous Human Rights Complaints against Maclean’s Magazine. Thus, “On Liberty”, a treatise that espoused a doctrine of almost unrestricted speech and action, is still applicable to modern political events. Furthermore, it provides an almost perfect analysis of free speech and the proper limits on…

    • 2604 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free speech is also necessary for dissenting voices to illuminate the truth. Mill points out that "the majority of the eminent men of every past generation held many opinions now known to be erroneous, and did or approved numerous things which no one will now justify." (1978, 19) It follows then that there must be eminent men in contemporary times that hold opinions that future generations will view as erroneous. Thus, we must not suppress dissenting voices because their views may actually be…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, I explain what I believe "freedom of speech" should mean. "Freedom of speech" is guaranteed in the United States Constitution, but is also a principle generally accepted by democracies. However, I'm explaining my views on what it should mean, not how it is understood by courts or other bodies.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    whats wrong with box colorwhats wrong with box colorwhats wrong with box color this is stupid I just want to look at something for one second so I can finish my homework ugh “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Many Americans rely on the First Amendment to protect their freedom of speech, but that doesn’t mean that we can just go saying whatever we want whenever we want. Certain situations restrict what, when, and how you can say something, for example, if it puts anyone in immediate danger, is obscene in an inappropriate time or place, provokes someone, etc. Others still believe that they can and should be able to say anything they want at anytime that they want, but the question is: Should there be restrictions on speech in our democracy?…

    • 655 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Man as rational being desires to do many things, but in a civil society his desires have to be controlled, regulated and reconciled with the exercise of similar desires by other individuals. The guarantee of each of the above right is, therefore, restricted by the Constitution in the larger interest of the community. The right to freedom of speech and expression is subject to limitations imposed under Article 19(2).…

    • 2633 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays