Robert Peel's Model Of Policing Essay
What is the difference between the military bureaucratic model implemented by Peel and the military-style model implemented by MacDonald?
While both, Sir Robert Peel, and John A. MacDonald’s policing styles have a very militaristic background that follow distinct organizational characteristics, they differ in terms of how their jobs got done. While I read from the article “Rethinking Police Governance, Culture, and Management”, it seemed to me that Robert Peel’s style of policing was an organization that got its power from cooperation with the community, police being accountable for their actions, and public consent. I feel that the statement "The police are the public and the public are the police." Explains fairly well what Robert Peel intended …show more content…
What were the policing needs at the time?
At the time, I think that the John A. MacDonald model, which was based off of the Irish constabulary, was used mainly to impose control over various regions to further colonial growth. This included the construction of our cross-country railroad system, stopping whiskey traders from crossing into our boarders, promote greater agricultural settlements and to aid in the process of settling the Natives on the reserve. All of this required security & stability that the early paramilitary RCMP could offer.
In terms of Sir Robert Peel and his model, it was implemented to offer the police administration in England things such as stability through creating a centralized, specialized organization. The police or “Bobbies” gained power, or respect in the community, because there was doubt and suspicion towards the police prior to this model.
To whom does each of the models suggest police should be held accountable?
With the Early RCMP, the model suggests that police are held accountable by the RCMP. Due to the many levels of rank within the organization, internal discipline is something that can be associated with a paramilitary operation. Internal discipline, and sophisticated civil service organization proved to be a well sought after model, and allowed for organizational growth throughout
While both, Sir Robert Peel, and John A. MacDonald’s policing styles have a very militaristic background that follow distinct organizational characteristics, they differ in terms of how their jobs got done. While I read from the article “Rethinking Police Governance, Culture, and Management”, it seemed to me that Robert Peel’s style of policing was an organization that got its power from cooperation with the community, police being accountable for their actions, and public consent. I feel that the statement "The police are the public and the public are the police." Explains fairly well what Robert Peel intended …show more content…
What were the policing needs at the time?
At the time, I think that the John A. MacDonald model, which was based off of the Irish constabulary, was used mainly to impose control over various regions to further colonial growth. This included the construction of our cross-country railroad system, stopping whiskey traders from crossing into our boarders, promote greater agricultural settlements and to aid in the process of settling the Natives on the reserve. All of this required security & stability that the early paramilitary RCMP could offer.
In terms of Sir Robert Peel and his model, it was implemented to offer the police administration in England things such as stability through creating a centralized, specialized organization. The police or “Bobbies” gained power, or respect in the community, because there was doubt and suspicion towards the police prior to this model.
To whom does each of the models suggest police should be held accountable?
With the Early RCMP, the model suggests that police are held accountable by the RCMP. Due to the many levels of rank within the organization, internal discipline is something that can be associated with a paramilitary operation. Internal discipline, and sophisticated civil service organization proved to be a well sought after model, and allowed for organizational growth throughout