Preview

Right To Bear Arms Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
739 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Right To Bear Arms Research Paper
Every Time there is a violent crime involving guns the media and public leaders blame guns and not the person accused of committing the crime FBI conducted an experiment and people were likely to be killed by a handheld object five times more than a rifle. Banning guns will affect only the law abiding citizens not criminals. Criminals don't follow the law that's why they are called criminals. If you're going to outlaw guns then might as well ban everything on market that can potentially hurt people. Gun laws in the U.S. should not be restricted because of criminals and murders, people have the right to protect their families and themselves.
The right to bear arms is the the Second Amendment in the United States constitution. What says a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The right to bear arms has been around this country long then it's been a country. Putting more restrictions on guns just goes against what our founding fathers intend the nation to be like and infringes against the right to bear arms.The second amendment supports my claim which is anti-gun control laws and how putting restrictions on gun makes it
…show more content…
Companies like triggersmart are making guns that only the person that it is registered to can shoot it by using radio frequency interferons. This new technology will help stop school shooting and random act of crime cause now kids won't be able to take the parents gun and go shoot up schools and stuff like that.Taking away the right to own a gun is just not bad but it goes against the second amendment and goes against all what the founding fathers wanted for this great nation the only thing taking away gun will do is affect the law abiding citizens not the criminals the not called criminals for no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This is also supported by the U.S. Supreme Court which said, “The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.” This quote shows how altering the laws would be the opposite of what the Second Amendment states. Also according to the Declaration of Independence, our unalienable rights are, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and, “that whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these ends it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it... it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” This means that whenever we are in perilous situation we can defend ourselves to secure our right of life. Also, “banning guns will take away yet another piece of our liberty,” according to balancedpolitics.org. Eventually this will lead to having more of our rights taken away and result in tyranny. This is why we must not alter the gun laws we have…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    fahrenheit 451essay

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the book Farenheit 451 we saw that strict rules made people do illegal things. People were not allowed to own books but they still did read and own them. People were even willing to die for that cause. Even the people who were supposed to enforce those rules broke them. If guns or assault rifles are banned people will not quit owning or using them. Also if guns or assault rifles are banned sales of ammo, magazines, reloading supplies and the guns themselves will skyrocket. Within the last year sales of assault rifles, ammo, and magazines have soared so much the manufacturers can’t keep up and have created waiting lists.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does the government have the right to regulate guns? According to former Chief Justice Warren E. Burger it does. In his article, published in the January 14, 1990, issue of Parade, titled The Right to Bear Arms, Warren feels that changes need to be made to the second amendment of our constitution in order to save peoples lives. He opens the essay with a statistic that states that many of the United State’s major centers have up to ten times the murder rate of all of Western Europe.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Right To Bear Arms Thesis

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    My thesis statement is the right to bear arms and I feel that the second amendment to the constitution is very important to the health of all people. I realize that most people do not like to have firearms but this should not apply to all people. If we look at the bird flu that happened, the reason why everyone got sick is due to over population of Canadian geese. We have hunters out there that enjoy hunting and just to go for the sport thus making sure that the species are not over crowding which will cause diseases to mankind.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Bear Arms

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It's a great thing that we have gun rights. What if someone broke into your house with a weapon and you were in the same situation as my neighbor, but there were no gun rights and because of that you didn't have a gun to protect yourself? It's a scary thought. The importance of allowing citizens access to guns as a life-saving measure is even more evident as it comes to instances of multiple-victim public shootings at school. There…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Thesis

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gun control won't stop crimes or shootings.‘’It is important for some to realize that infringing on the people's right to bear arms will not deter or stop crimes.’’ ‘’Guns are only a tool used in killing people and assisting in crimes. The real issue comes down to individuals that have guns should not. Criminals and their actions are responsible for crimes that involve guns’’ (online) www.arc.national.edu(Dustin M.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Banning guns would reduce the number of gun related deaths, a lot of the people would not listen but it would defiantly lower the number of gun related activity. Guns were made to kill they are one of most dangerous weapons out there, of course it should be illegal to have one. It may not decrease violent crime but it would decrease gun crime and that could save lives of many people.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guns do a lot of bad, but do a lot more good for society. Banning guns will not stop the problem, but will just make it worse. Guns are apart of our society as Americans they have been around since colonial years, and are not leaving anytime soon. “The number of guns in America has increased by more than 50 percent since 1993, and in that same period the gun homicide rate in the United States has dropped by half. (Kristof, The Times).” Guns offer protection for individuals. One day you could be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and a shooting breaks out, you will pray there is someone else there with a concealed firearm to help control the situation while waiting for police to arrive. They can’t do that if guns are banned. “We need to understand that we cannot stop crimes and murders. And banning guns would be a step, or two, backwards instead of moving forward in the right direction (The Times News).” The research conducted to produce this paper was drawn from a multitude of sources all with different…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that control on firearms will reduce crime. But I don't believe in taking away firearms from law abiding citizens is the answer to gun control. We need more regulations put into place on who, when, how and where guns can be purchased. I don't believe you should be able to go to a weekend rinky dink gun show and be able to walk out with a weapon regardless of make or caliber. I think that you should not be allowed to legally buy a firearm, or any accessory for said firearm until the age of 21. Pawn shops and places like Walmart should not be allowed to sell firearms above a certain caliber, or semi autos. Bolt action rifles, shot guns and revolvers would be fine at sporting good stores and such. Specialized weapons such as semi autos like the Ak-47 or Ar-15 should only be sold by authorized stores and retailers.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control is a huge issue in the United States. It was declared in our constitution in the 2nd amendment that we have the right to bear arms. Every person is entitled through the second amendment to legally own and use fire arms. There are many issues that have come up with gun control: conceal and carry, semi-automatic weapons, and gang violence. Many people in this beautiful country we call the United States, feel like they need to take away the right to bear arms. To me I believe this is wrong. I believe you should be able to legally own and operate a weapon in a safe and secure manner. Anyone that is a law abiding citizen should be able to own a firearm.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As said in “Pro/Con: Gun Legislation”, “‘With just one exception, every public mass shooting in the USA since, at least 1950 has taken place where citizens are banned from carrying guns’” (Bito, Dana, Elisa Juliano). Even if one does not feel as safe with many people carrying firearms, they truly are safer. If gun laws are added, it will make it harder for law abiding citizens to obtain guns where as it will be just as easy as it had always been for the criminals to obtain guns illegally. As gun laws are tightened, less people that truly use a weapon for protection will be able to carry a pistol. When this happens, crooks will still be obtaining weapons through illegal ways such as the black market. The criminals would be more feared in the communities and would not be as afraid as before when committing a crime because the threat of anyone carrying a gun would no longer be…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The gun control laws do not solve the real problem which is the gun owner. Even if we have strict gun control laws that doesn’t mean the crime rates will go down or the school shooting will stop. If a criminal wants to kill someone they don’t have to have a gun to go through with it. It is just as easy to grab a knife or make a small bomb. Most criminals that want to shoot and murder people already have lengthy records and wouldn’t be able to pass a background check if they tried to purchase a gun legally. And even if the criminal does have a clean enough back ground to purchase a gun, one study reveals that most of them fear purchasing a gun legally because they know that it could be easily traced back to them. Instead the people we should be trying to stop are buying their guns on the black market. Most of the criminals that were interviewed during the study even distrusted so called internet sales on guns because they feared they were sting operations and they’d wind up trying to buy one from and ATF…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Trotter Gayle said “Anti-gun legislation keeps guns away from the sane and the law-abiding – but it does not keep guns out of the hands of criminals (27).” That means, whether firearms restriction increases or not criminals will get firearms somehow legally or illegally and will commit crimes. But on other hand, nice citizens who do not have firearms, due to so much restriction they wouldn’t have one to protect themselves from those of criminals who want their goods. Some and reasonable gun control laws will be…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Anti Gun Control

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should the mere fact that criminals committing crimes with the use of guns infringe the national right of the innocent to possess guns. This is a question that arouses everywhere and no matter which way it is viewed the controversy will always go on. "A gun is a mere tool that can be used for good or evil. Our country is based on the belief that man is good until he or she is proven to be otherwise."(Harris p.2) This means that only a few people are committing crimes with uses of guns and why completely remove them from society. Therefore, we should strenuously protect the rights of free men and likewise prosecute and punish the criminals who abuse the rights of others. The problem with gun violence is associated with the child's atmosphere. Moreover, we need to educate young children about responsibly handling guns and educate them to respect life and the life's of others. The movement of gun control exploits every celebrated act violence and offsetting the hundreds of thousands of cases in which guns are used as defensive weapons to save live and property of the innocent. Moreover, guns do more good that bad. This issue completely contradicts the Second Amendment which states: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem being crimes committed using fire arms. What the Government fails to recognize is that criminals do not abide by the laws, taking weapons away from law abiding citizen will only give the criminals more means to do harm. There is a law against braking and entering but criminals still do it. There is a Law against stealing, yet criminals still continue to steal. So what will taking guns away from Law abiding citizens do? Absolutely nothing other than make citizens more vulnerable to the criminals. While a study was found between 1980 and 2009, shows the States with restrictions on carrying concealed fire arms had higher gun-related murders(ProCon #2). This will also be the first and only Law that amplifies the problem rather than helping. If criminals want to have guns they will find a way to get them. Taking away legally owned guns does not get rid of the illegally owned guns. The Gun Control Law will give criminals the upper hand, they will be more likely to shoot innocent people to get why they want, expectably know there will not be bullet fired back at them. The reason Gun control has not affect on murders is because the killing is not being done people with legally owned…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays