Preview

Response to Dawkins Ironic Hypocrisy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
313 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Response to Dawkins Ironic Hypocrisy
Response to “Dawkins’ ironic Hypocrisy”
James Patrick Holding’s article talks about how “demagogues” like Dawkins find it hard to believe that creationists’ views are accepted and the double standard shown by them in accepting a thesis. The author seems to be offended as indicated by how he can mention “a lengthy list of the insulting rhetoric Dawkins has heaped upon the creationists”. Holding questions the credibility of the beliefs supported by Dawkins, who seems to be raising doubts on the view point of the creationists because the view belongs to a minority alone. Holding believes that people like Dawkins rarely put an effort in researching a particular idea, but they add those beliefs in their “agenda” only if it proves to be beneficial for them. The readers get the hint of irony that Holding tries to convey through his article that even though Dawkins supports the ‘Christ myth’ through his actions, he happens to give a statement of how there is a possibility of the existence of Jesus. The mockery in the article is pretty obvious as first Dawkins is said to have worked in a film called “The God Who Wasn’t There” – a film that supports the idea of how Jesus did not even exist at all. The author further mentions how the “Christ Myth” remains unsupported by any of the historians and the “leading proponent of Christ myth over the past century – is not a historian, but a professor of German”. The readers begin to doubt the credibility of Dawkins after reading this article and whether he and his “ideological cohorts” actually care to research a prevalent idea before they declare their endorsement of it. Even though people like Dawkins make sure their beliefs are free from any kind of doubts, most of the readers would definitely become cautious in believing the claims of these people after reading this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    While reading Darwin’s Black Box, I felt a little like cheering on the home team for a high school or college basketball team. Like going to the home town game out of a felt obligation, reading Behe’s book would not have been my first choice, but after the first quarter…er chapters I was glad I was reading it. This book sort of plays out like a basketball game, as Behe takes the time to not only support Intelligent design (Offence) but answers the critics of I.D. (Defense) in a very open way, if not always a friendly rivalry. At times I cheered on the rhetoric of I.D. and at other times I was “yelling” at the home town coach, but either way the result will be the same,…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Clarence was born into a family with different views than society making him a freethinker willing to fight the hard cases.…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “One Side Can Be Wrong,” Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne argue that teaching creationism along side evolution does not make sense, and that creationism has no business being in the science classes. Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne are evolutionary biologists at Oxford University and the University of Chicago. They published this essay in the Guardian in September 2005, seeking to appeal to middle-aged parents. They argue that creationism cannot provide any positive evidence to create a controversy and therefore should not be taught in schools to children and teenagers. On the other hand, there is a substantial amount of evidence for evolution where debate and conversation can arise.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    God and science, as Keller points out later in his book, are not in conflict, showing why many evolutionists are Christians. These insights give Keller’s readers a reason to believe, and through this he helps them realize all the evidence they never knew was right in front of…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To deny the conclusion of the Cosmological argument is to accept the truth of a number of seemingly controversial empirical claims. The sceptic’s forced acceptance of these empirical claims imposes upon them a smaller set of possible worlds which are consistent with the non-existence of a God. Thus, in this regard the Cosmological argument remains firmly ‘alive’ as what Swinburne calls a ‘correct C-Inductive argument’, as it succeeds in adding to the probability of the theistic conclusion . Peterson defines a ‘proof’ as a sound argument that the person for whom it is a proof knows to be sound and whose premises that person knows as true without inferring them from the conclusion. In his discussion of what constitutes a good argument, but which…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Crucible ,by Arthur Miller, is a play filled with multiple real world issues. Religion stands out the most dramatically and is woven throughout with hypocrisy as a front runner of concerns. The characters use religion as a means to justify their behaviors and choose to use it to their advantage. Whether it was deciding to attend church, have an affair or claim to see dead people in order to get those that they hate killed, religion can be seen as a tool for selfish motives. Oh, the hypocrisy! Even at a young age the girls were wise beyond their years about how to “play the system’ in a world that was controlled by the men. These ‘God Fearing Men’ claimed to be doing the Lord’s work, yet they too, were living a life based on selfish…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gen 1: 4 Analysis

    • 4872 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Christians to deny the reality of evolution would “make us a cult, some odd group that’s not really…

    • 4872 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the first few paragraphs of his article, McCloskey does a little sleight of hand with his readers. He overstates the Theist’s case by referring to the proofs of God’s existence, and then feigns amazement at the fact that they actually don’t “prove” God’s existence. This sort of trick ought to be recognized by people familiar with philosophy of religion. The most common way Christian Apologists make the case for…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is this widespread contemporary response to Christian discourse – that Christianity is implausible – that is the primary obstacle to apologetics. This is because implausible explanations are simply laughable, not just difficult to believe. It’s the biggest obstacle because you can’t have a serious conversation with someone about the Gospel when they think it’s impossible.…

    • 2357 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Note in my book, Chap. 29, ‘What’s God got to do…’ there is a comprehensive critique of Dawkins’ position. I suggest that you take a look at that section of my book to help you to write a more potent reaction to his video.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has always been a fascination with finding the answers to all of the ultimate questions, whether it is the origin or the purpose and destiny of an individual. However, majority of religious and non-religious groups believe that they hold the answers to such questions. But sometimes the answers given are not enough and the individual will turn to other beliefs until they are satisfied with the given answer. Some Catholics convert to a cult and turn to Science or Atheism for their answers to the ultimate questions when they do not accept the answer to the questions or when their faith has been questioned due to a negative event: death of a loved one, natural disasters or an unfair event, in their life while fundamental Muslims do not convert…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anti-Whaling

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fragile footing on which much opposition is founded is then shored up by misleading journalism. In an age when we are inclined to revere the printed word as gospel truth, it is little wonder that an already complex scientific dispute has become further clouded by emotions fueled by inaccurate insinuation.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The crucible

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why are Danforth, Hathorne, and the other authorities so resistant to believing the claim that…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the first chapter of The Greatest Show On Earth, Dawkins discusses the acceptance of evolution as fact. He says that even with the insurmountable evidence to prove that it is a fact, evolution is still considered to some degree to be just a theory. In a survey of Americans, 40% of people oppose the idea of evolution. They instead believe that humans were created independently from all other living organisms. The percentage is only slightly lower in Britain. He argues that many of those who do not believe evolution to be a fact are uninformed. He states that his purpose for writing this book is to educate these people so that they may realize the truth and change their minds.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book ‘Mere Apologetics’ McGrath writes, ‘the best defence of Christianity is its explanation’ (McGrath, 2012, p.130). If a Christian theist is to defend or commend Christianity to the Naturalist it is best to establish the basic tenets of Christianity, for many people have misconceptions of Christianity. Once this has been achieved and there is still confusion or disregard about Christianity, presenting an argument of the inadequacies of naturalism provides a significant platform that might introduce one to Christianity. Scientific Inconsistency…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays