Preview

Propaganda Of Forensics Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
225 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Propaganda Of Forensics Case Study
In the year of 2004 on the fourth day of February, The state of Texas executed Cameron Todd Willingham for allegedly burning all three of his children alive. However, the only evidence to validate the allegation was a fingerprint plastered with ash upon his gas canister. With vigorous research Cameron Todd's peers raised some brows all over the nation concerning his innocence. Coupled with the sickening lack of investigation his supporters found his punishment to be downright ludicrous, exclaiming that "prosecutors just murdered an innocent man!" This is one of many cases in which forensics have failed the justice system due to insufficient forensic process. Forensic scientist have inflated the propaganda of forensics' legitimacy via T.V shows

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Search and Seizure

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The search of the crime scene is the most important phase of any investigation. Decisions of the courts restricting admissibility of testimonial evidence have significantly increased the value of physical evidence in homicide investigations. Therefore, law enforcement personnel involved in the crime scene search must arrange for the proper and effective collection of evidence at the scene.The arguments the lawyer’s will make in the William’s case is: once an item is recognized as evidence it must be properly collected and preserved for laboratory examination. However, in order for physical evidence to be admissible, it must have been legally obtained. The courts have severely restricted the right of the police to search certain homicide crime scenes without a search warrant, (Mincey v. Arizona 437 US 385, 1978).…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the year of 2011, Casey Anthony pleads not guilty for the charges put on her for the murder of her 2-year-old daughter Caylee Anthony’s (Casey Anthony Trial, 2011). It all started when Casey’s grandmother had called 911 reporting that her granddaughter was missing and that her daughter’s truck smelled like a dead body (Casey Anthony Trial, 2011). In a long story short Caylee’s skeletal remains were found near Casey’s house and throughout the time Anthony lied repeatedly regarding Caylee’s whereabouts (Casey Anthony Trial, 2011). The truck was found in an abandoned parking lot and towed two weeks earlier and George Anthony which is Casey’s father had said it still smelled like a dead body as well (Casey Anthony Trial, 2011). As the trial went on there were statements made back and forth about who did what and some very detailed observations had begun to rise. Ultimately Casey Anthony was free to go and all the charges had dropped because of lack of evidence. There were many aspects in the computer forensic side of this trial.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ashely Mervyn Coulston is known as the ‘Burwood triple murderer’ he murdered three innocent victims in cold blood on 29 July 19921. Coulston had gone to a Burwood house under the guise of renting a room in the house that had been ‘advertised in the Herald Sun’2. Coulston had a bag that contained a .22 rifle, ammunition, a homemade silencer and plastic cable ties. Coulston bound, gagged and covered the victim’s heads (using a towel or dressing gown) and shot each in the back of the head at point blank range3.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Herbert Landry Case Study

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Cory Talbot: The science that was presented to the jury about arson was not factual. It was circumstantial, and if experts had been brought in, it would have all been disproven.…

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pam Fodrill Case Study

    • 1890 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The popular television show, CSI: Crime Scene Investigations has been on the air for 12 years, and it has brought forth the behind-the-scenes actions of criminal investigations, even if its portrayals are not always scientifically accurate. This has caused an interest in the forensic sciences that has led most people to a skewed view of how a criminal investigation actually works. The reality of a criminal investigation is that it is generally more tedious and difficult than the theory of criminal investigation would have you believe. By examining the forensic and investigative procedures of the case of Pamela Foddrill, it is apparent that the theory of criminal investigation was not representative of the procedures concerning examination of the body, but that it was demonstrative of much of the investigatory steps taken by police, like search warrants. On August 18th, 1995, 44-year-old Pamela Foddrill disappeared from the town of Linton, Indiana. Pamela went to buy some groceries at the local IGA and was abducted: her body was found wrapped in a sleeping bag near Russellville, Illinois four months later. Roughly four years later, five individuals were held responsible for their part in the abduction, rape, and murder of Pamela Foddrill: Roger Long, John Redman, Jerry Russell Sr., Wanda Hubbell, and Plynia Fowler. Long, Redman, and Russell are serving life sentences, while Fowler pled out to 14 years and Hubbell pled out to 20 years of incarceration.…

    • 1890 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial By Fire Case Study

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The collection and application of evidence have become essential to criminal investigations and prosecutions. Clear and convincing evidence could prove a crime that has been committed, establish key elements of a crime, target a suspect and someone associated with a crime, exonerate the innocent, corroborate a victim’s testimony, and assist in establishing the facts of what occurred (McEwen). Although evidence plays a significant role in prosecutions, there are still many cases involving misuse of evidence, which results in the conviction of an innocent person. In the case of “Trial by Fire,” due to the misuse of evidence by the fire investigators, the State of Texas wrongfully executed Cameron Todd Willingham who was convicted of murdering…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case above has no actual scientific evidence but in the eyes of the law, it is able to sustain a reasonable conviction, even if they only had the tools and an eye witness. Another case in Peoria Illinois was of a gang member being prosecuted for raping a teenage girl in a local part. The evidence that came up in that case was his saliva on her breast as well as a gripping testimony from the victim, the emergency room nurse, and the police. You would think with this evidence, especially the DNA from the defendant, the saliva on the breast, was enough evidence, but when the time came for the jurors to convict whether he was guilty or not, they shocked the courtroom by claiming the defendant was not guilty. Jurors claimed the investigators should have gotten a soil sample and should have seen if it matched from the park’s soil.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The collection and analysis of the evidence was straightforward and reliable. Although there was a difference in opinion of the bloodstain patterns and the seriousness of MacDonald’s injuries, they did not determine the case. Rather, it was the deficiencies in the investigation and the defense that lost Jeffrey MacDonald his freedom. A visual documentation of MacDonald’s wounds would have reinforced the extent of his injuries and could have convinced the jury of a different opinion. Additionally, if admissible, the suppressed hair and fiber evidence would have been damning to the prosecution’s case. And if the convincing testimonies of Heather Stoeckley and her friend were allowed and investigated, the jury may have viewed the entire case thru a different lens. Ultimately, America is still divided on this case. There are still those that believe justice was served, while others assert that the plethora of evidence was not given the proper light of day and that reasonable doubt should be a serious…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.06 Review

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Why do you think it is so important to use proper methods when collecting evidence from a crime scene?…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    annotated bibliography

    • 1044 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this article, “ ‘CSI Effect’ Hinted by Blake Jurors,” Andrew Blankstein and Jean Guccione talk about Robert Blake’s murder case. He was accused for ambushing his wife, Bonny Lee Bakley on May 4, 2011. This article is really interesting, because it is confusing at first. It points out arguments that will both support and not support the opinion that “CSI effect” should be blamed in courtrooms. Lorie Moore, one of the jurors, was swayed by the testimony of Rebecca Markham and her husband, Andrew Percival who said they saw Blake walking along from the direction of the restaurant in the minutes before 911 call was made reporting that Bakley was injured. The failure to link Blake with the murder weapon also proves that Moore had a reasonable doubt. There was no enough evidence to prove Blake guilty. Moore and other jurors expect much more than just testimonies, such as DNA fingerprints or gun residue. Barry Scheck, president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and a member of the O.J. Simpson defense team, said that, “There is an expectation that people from the crime labs will have super technology to resolve a case.” However, at the end, he said that “CSI effect” was not a factor of Blake’s case, but the absence of evidence.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The innocence project and forensic science are two forms that can help determine who the actual preparatory was and can help people who have been wrongly convicted in a crime he/she did not commit. In many cases the forensic such as DNA, blood sample, or semen and other evidence that have been lost or even wrongly tested can end up becoming a big mistake that can send someone to jail that did not commit the crime. In the article, Forensic Problems and Wrongfully Convictions (2009) states that, the most wrongful convictions involve more than one contributing cases, for example, if an eyewitness may have wrongly identified an innocent person, and in the same case a forensic analyst may have testified that hairs from the crime scene match the defendant’s hair. In the jury’s eyes, the eyewitness testimony is strengthened by the forensic evidence (Forensic Problems and Wrongfully Convictions, 2009). Not always the eye witnesses are right with what they say so having the right forensic evidence can help with determine who is actually the perpetrator. Such as this case were the eyewitness was not so good and also a lot of the evidence was miss communicated.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    These wrongful convictions played a major role in more than 75% of wrongful convictions overturned by DNA testing (The Innocence Project, 2010). Although eyewitness testimony can be critical evidence before a judge or jury; 30 years of strong social science research has proven that eyewitness identification is often unreliable. The research which was conducted by the Innocence Project revealed that the human mind is not like a tape recorder or video camera; we neither record events exactly as we see them, nor recall the instance exactly how it occurred. Nevertheless, witness memory is like any other evidence at a crime scene, it must be documented carefully and retrieved methodically and quickly, or it can be contaminated (The Innocence project 2010). We as people can carry fibers, through our clothing, skin and hair that can cause the contamination of a crime scene just by not following proper procedure. Furthermore, in these types of cases, DNA has proven what scientists already know, that eyewitness identification is frequently…

    • 2876 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eyewitness Identification

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "Mistakes eyewitness identification has gone for 30 years now Identifying the innocent man up to life in prison, while the real perpetrator gets away like in U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Neil v. Bigger and Manson v. Brathwaite" (Criminal Evidence Thomas J. Gardner pg. 319)…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unjust Conviction

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The most disturbing fact individuals are faced with today, is that innocent people have been sentenced to death, and lots of them. Statistics show that one hundred thirty people, wrongfully convicted people, were sentenced to death and were lucky to, eventually be exonerated and released. It is also said that DNA, can’t guarantee the court system won’t execute innocent people(Schabas23). Obviously, if someone is convicted and later found innocent a judge can release him/ her from prison, but unfortunately not from the grave. Twenty-one inmates have been released since 1993, including seven from the state of Illinois alone(Banner7). Many of these cases were discovered not because of the normal appeals process, but as a result of many new scientific techniques, investigations, and the dedicated work of multiple attorneys. In 1993, the Death Penalty Information Center was asked by…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cupp Versus Murphy Brief

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Merits: The respondent, Daniel Murphy, was convicted by a jury in an Oregon court of the second-degree murder of his wife. The victim died by strangulation in her home in the city of Portland, and abrasions and lacerations were found on her throat. There was no sign of a break-in or robbery. Word of the murder was sent to the estranged husband, Daniel Murphy. Upon receiving the message, Murphy promptly telephoned the Portland police and voluntarily came into Portland for questioning. Shortly after the respondent’s arrival at the station house, where he was met by retained counsel, the police noticed a dark spot on the respondent’s finger. Suspecting that the spot might be dried blood and knowing that evidence of strangulation is often found under the assailant’s fingernails, the police asked Murphy if they could take a sample of scrapings from his fingernails. He refused. Under protest and without a warrant, the police proceeded to take the samples. After this evidence was collected, Murphy was released and was not formally “arrested” until approximately one month later. The samples turned out to contain traces of skin and blood cells, and fabric from the victim’s nightgown. This incriminating evidence was admitted at the trial over defense objections.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays