seemed to come into contact with but did not discuss is a primacy effect. Primacy effect can be be described as a lasting effect on impression by a first encounter. Alternatively, there also exists evidence of recency effect, or lasting effects on impression by the most recent encounter. There have been countless numbers of studies done assessing primacy effects, recency effects, and the two together. While the findings are scattered across the board, with some studies claiming primacy effects are more prevalent than recency effects and other studies claiming the contrary. The differences in such findings can be attributed to the context the effects were studied in, perhaps introducing some outside variables that create interaction effects. For the purposes of our study, we turned to literature that focused on the effects in evaluations and judgements of others. One such a study, conducted by Hennessy et al. (2016) tried to measure the effects of primacy and recency effects in judgements of hazardous drivers. They found that participants who were shown videos of car accidents where the accident happens in the beginning of the video (primacy) were more likely to judge the driver harshly as opposed a collision at the end of the video (recency.) Such findings suggests that the impressions the beginning of some correspondence resonate with final judgements more than impressions are the end of a
seemed to come into contact with but did not discuss is a primacy effect. Primacy effect can be be described as a lasting effect on impression by a first encounter. Alternatively, there also exists evidence of recency effect, or lasting effects on impression by the most recent encounter. There have been countless numbers of studies done assessing primacy effects, recency effects, and the two together. While the findings are scattered across the board, with some studies claiming primacy effects are more prevalent than recency effects and other studies claiming the contrary. The differences in such findings can be attributed to the context the effects were studied in, perhaps introducing some outside variables that create interaction effects. For the purposes of our study, we turned to literature that focused on the effects in evaluations and judgements of others. One such a study, conducted by Hennessy et al. (2016) tried to measure the effects of primacy and recency effects in judgements of hazardous drivers. They found that participants who were shown videos of car accidents where the accident happens in the beginning of the video (primacy) were more likely to judge the driver harshly as opposed a collision at the end of the video (recency.) Such findings suggests that the impressions the beginning of some correspondence resonate with final judgements more than impressions are the end of a