Preview

POLITICS, POWER AND VIOLENCE - Cultural Anthropology

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3715 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
POLITICS, POWER AND VIOLENCE - Cultural Anthropology
POLITICS, POWER AND VIOLENCE
Politics and power can be thought of as intimate aspects of all subjects that anthropologists investigate, as processes of domination, resistance and social transformation are inevitably involved in the creation and representation of cultural practices and relationships.
Power and violence are not the same. Power is psychological, a moral force that makes people want to obey. Violence enforces obedience through physical coercion. Those who use violence may manage to temporarily impose their will, but their command is always tenuous because when the violence ends, or the threat of it lessens, there is even less incentive to obey the authorities. Control through violence requires constant vigilance. Too little violence is ineffective; too much violence generates revolt.
Violence is the weapon of choice for the impotent. Those who don't have much power often attempt to control or influence others by using violence. Violence rarely creates power. On the contrary, groups or individuals that use violence often find their actions diminish what little power they do have.
Groups that oppose governments often try to compensate for their perceived lack of power by using violence. Such violence simply reinforces state power. A terrorist that blows up a building or assassinates a politician gives government the excuse it wants to crack down on individual liberties and expand its sphere of influence.
When a government turns to violence, it is because it feels its power is slipping away. Governments that rule through violence are weak. Dictators have always had to rely on terror against their own populations to compensate for their powerlessness.

Conflict and conflict resolution

Conflict - competitive or opposing action of incompatibles : antagonistic state or action (as of divergent ideas, interests, or persons) conflict resolution is conceptualized as the methods and processes involved in facilitating the peaceful ending of conflict.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUAD 304 final study guide

    • 2175 Words
    • 9 Pages

    1. Conflict – a process that begins when one party perceives another party has negatively affected, or is about to negatively affect, something that the first party cares about.…

    • 2175 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power is the ability to influence people to perform in a specific way. The ambition of having power, has made humans influence other peoples’ lives and nature. For example, writer David Hume presented and criticized the “is-ought problem—the notion that we can derive what ought to be from an example of what is” (Barash 283). People are not satisfied with what is natural, so they want to go furthermore and try to change it, using any sources they have within their reach. We are unstoppable, the more we have the more we want.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Violence only instigates further hatred and fighting, thus it only digs the oppressed into a deeper hole while increasing the death toll of the innocent.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Violence In Kingdom Come

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Violence has been taught since childhood, everywhere people go, everywhere people look, violence is surrounding us in daily life. Throughout the years violence has become a dangerous trend. People use violence everyday as a sense of protection and even because it seems like the thing to do. Violence is so widespread it has become normal, and society is slowly becoming numb to the idea that violence is making our world worse. Many innocent people are being killed and questions are not being asked as well as the right actions are not being taken for the people using violence illogically. When reports come in saying someone was murdered there is always an excuse for a criminal’s actions. Usually the person is mentally ill, had a rough childhood, or saw things as a child that made them use violence. Whether a person is in their right mind or not, violence is not acceptable. Violence is unsafe for our world and makes society live in fear because they worry about the possibility of dying each day. Living in a world where a culture of violence is accepted as the norm will always bring fear to the world. This violence makes us feel like the end is near, and as time goes on it will bring about an apocalypse.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, the idea of violent revolution is never the solution to a problem. It may seem the most effective, like in the American Revolution, but how many people payed the price of their life for change? Also, using the fear tactic and intimidation…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People over time will fight and stand up for what they believe, even if that means violence. Violence attracts attention to the situation, good as well as bad. Violence may not always be the answer, but it can move and motivate people. In America we have seen this over and over again. Situations such as Martin Luther King Civil Rights movement, and Malcolm X. Each one of these movements took brave and courageous people knowing that they could both lose their life because of what…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ZINN chapter 11

    • 1342 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Everywhere you go you see it, whether it is children on the playground fighting over who uses the swings next or the evening news blaring from the television about another suicide bombing, violence follows us wherever we go. Throughout history violence has been socially accepted. Our ancestors used it to determine weakness and now we are using it again for the same reasons. Today the United States must still be the alpha dog, greater than all other countries but it isn’t about who has the larger club it’s about who has the bigger weapon. If you asked people on the streets if they thought violence was appropriate for achieving things most would say no unless it was absolutely necessary. This is idea has been instilled in us for many years, we are taught not to use violence unless it’s needed but what if we were taught that violence is never needed? Maybe our politicians wouldn’t send millions of people to die in wars that are “necessary”, maybe there would be billions of dollars left over to educate our children, create jobs, and clean our planet. Politicians have been using this concept for years by telling us that it is necessary to kill millions of people in war and it is necessary for billions of dollars to be spent on weapons. Not many people have questioned authority and plead for justice and if they had not very many of us have heard of it, Chapter 11 is ultimately about achieving justice without massive violence using dissent.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do we live in a world where violent resistance is no longer a realistic option to oppose an oppressive regime? The Kenny reading showed that non-violence is a path that can lead to regime change. Why is that? Is it because a non-violent struggle is morally superior to a violent one, and is therefore difficult to oppose? After all, it’s difficult to justify violence against those who struggle without violence, for human rights, justice and democracy, things most people desire. To repress them would be a blatant violation of basic human decency, whereas in an armed struggle, repression can be justified, and implemented on a mass scale, in the name of stability. Perhaps a non-violent struggle is also superior to an armed one because of the question it poses? When a government faces a rebellion, its survival depends on its ability to out-kill the other side. But in a non-violent struggle, the government’s survival depends on its legitimacy in the eyes of the people. The struggle therefore becomes over votes, and rally sizes, both of which governments cannot win over easily when they are struggling against the numerically larger and more in-touch members of civil society. This could explain why governments often rely on crowd dispersal and repression, to combat non-violent activism.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Family Stone

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Conflict, according to Wilmot & Hocker (2011), is defined as an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, scarce resources, and interference from others in achieving their goals.…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The practice of violence, like all action, changes the world, but the most probable change is to a more violent world” (Arendt pg 80). Violence is contagious, like a disease, which will destroy nations and our morals as human beings. Each individual has his or her own definition of violence and when it is acceptable or ethical to use it. Martin Luther King Jr., Walter Benjamin, and Hannah Arendt are among the many that wrote about the different facets of violence, in what cases it is ethical, the role we as individuals play in this violent society and the political aspects behind our violence.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Non Violent Revolutions

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Violence against violence is only the most logical way to expel overpowering executives. Government has used brutality to keep their citizens “in check” since the beginning of time. Violence is natural to humans. Humanity has always known this concept of cruelty and it is impossible to avoid. Karl Peter Heinzen was a notable author who wrote a pamphlet advocating violent revolutions. The pamphlet emphasized the use of violence to allow change in government. Avoiding the use of cruelty and barbarity will result in avoiding a future where real change is enabled everywhere in society (Heinzen 10). The reality is humanity is shaped by brute force. By avoiding violence, the citizens are avoiding a different and better future. Violent revolutions should be considered legitimate because totalitarian governments are allowed to get away with “legal” murder everyday. The inhabitants are just guarding themselves from the ferocious regimes. Karl Heinzen’s pamphlet also argues the legitimacy of violent revolutions. “It was my object to vindicate not only the aims of revolution, but also its means, including assassination and to render it as legitimate as the tyrants have done with their murder by war, their ‘legal’ murder, their murder by ‘court-martial’” (Heinzen 12). Violent governments have always used “legal” murder to control their citizens. The…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terrorism Final

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Terrorism happens all over the world, but tends to be heavier in certain parts of the world. The cause of heavier terrorism in certain areas of the world can be from the want of overriding the government and changing the rules/laws. Violence is something that goes hand-in-hand with terrorists. They believe there is no other way for them to get their political, economic, and/or religious demands seen. By killing innocent civilians at random places and random times, they think it will give more publicity to their causes. Their main goal is that causing more violence and uprisings will forces changes in their favor to their political, economic, and/or religious demands.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mass Shooting Speech

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Violence is one of the cruelest acts in this world. From terror attacks, to bullying, violence is everywhere. Martin Luther once said, "Nothing good ever comes of violence." Luther was saying that whenever something bad happens that is violence related nothing good comes from it. We should have Peace not violence.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Watching videos, seeing pictures, and hearing audio of vicious cold blooded war that 's going on around is getting us no where. The progress of wars and fighting proves that most effective revolutions occur when there is minimal yet any bloodshed or violence takes place. Political, economical, and social aspects of countries configure down to the basis of this reasoning. If cruel violence, innocent death, and undeservedly bloodshed did not effect any then by all means go for it but in all cases that does not apply. Fighting without bloodshed is most effective way to begin and conclude a revolution. Revolutions such as Gandhi’s (India) Egyptian, and the Rose (Georgia) have all worked effectively therefore proving that non-violent revolutions can be successful.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    If a government is not powerful and strong, it will not have the capacity to rule its citizens and enforce the law to prevent crime. According to the United Nations World Crime Survey, countries entrenched in turmoil like Columbia and South Africa have homicide rates 63 and 51 per 100,000, respectively. Compare this to the homicide rate of the US, "5.5 homicides per 100,000 people." Countries that are in turmoil obviously do not have a strong government that can enforce the law and bring safety to its citizens. As you can see, lack of a government means that there is no law to be enforced. This puts the lives of a country's citizens in danger. However, an oppressive government will be strong enough to enforce the law and ensure the safety of its citizens, making an oppressive government more desirable than no government when it comes to assuring safety and stability.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics