Preview

Politics of Sumer Civilization

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
398 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Politics of Sumer Civilization
A council of nobles mainly governed city-states. Also an assembly of citizens governed political affairs. Later kings arouse to claim themselves as the military leaders and the highest priest in that city-state. The king was who represented the city-state deity. The Sumerians also believed that most of the land belonged to the city-states god or goddess. The king enforced laws and set penalties for wrong doers. Although there was some type of punishment, it wasn't severe-meaning any physical injury to the body, they were only fined. This proves that Sumer wasn't just monarchy but also theocracy government. City-states began to struggle for power among them causing, some city-states dominated certain areas for centuries. Those named the highest, the king and nobles, consisted in the center of the city. Around them were the merchants, then the farmers, and on the most outer wall were the peasants. When war would arrive the peasants would arrive in the inner wall for protection.

There were many city-states in the time period of Sumer. The main important city-states of Sumer were Eridu, Kish, Uruk, Ur, Sippar, Nippur, Adab, Umma, Lagash, Larsa, Eshunna, Shaduppum, Isin, Jemdet Nasr, and Shurupak. "Such cities as Kish, Ur, Erech, Lagash, and Larsa, dominated the region for several centuries, combining prowess with economic dominance to better their neighbors." Ur was a major city for commerce and Trade. Nippur was also known for something like this, but it was known for becoming the cultural and religious center of Sumer because of the temple there. Around 2800 B.C. flourished Etana, the king Enmebasagesi of the city –state of Kish. He was a famous ruler among his people, he was known as the "man who stabilized the land." The king had constructed the temple of Enlil at Nippur. Around 2650 B.C. Enmebasagesi gave his kingship to his son Agga. Soon after he was overrun by the king of Ur and had dieded around that time. Near that time another ruler arose named

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    14. Sumer was located in southern Mesopotamia and was divided into different city-states. What’s a city-state?…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Emergence of Kings, exercised distinct political rather than religious authority. Also warring Sumerian city-states, which fought for control of the river valleys in the lower Mesopotamia.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | -extensive trade networks-had a main river for over-seas trade-traded with neighbors for cooperation and to maintain peace-bronze metallurgy, which was the production of bronze for utilization-nomads contributed to trade…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia PERSIAN CHART

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mesopotamia was made up of city-states. It was one nation as a whole, but each city-state had it’s own government and own set of laws. City-states could also conquer one another for power and more territory.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia Social System

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are some stark differences in the social structure when comparing Mesopotamia and India in the early time of the world, but there were many similarities as well. Religion was very powerful in that time and helped guide the social structure. In Mesopotamia you had a central monarchy that introduced the code of Hammurabi, while India lacking any form of bureaucracy followed a stringent caste system that has evolved and a form of it still used today.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mesopotamia was about 300 miles long and 150 miles wide. It was located between two rivers, the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers. The word Mesopotamia itself means "The land between two rivers". With this, Mesopotamia depended on the cultivation of the land for survival. As Mesopotamia began to develop there were city-states that were established. These city-states were surrounded by a mud brick wall and farmland. Sumerians would take great pride in their city-state, and that created chaos. At times wars would break out to prove which city-state was the strongest. Each city-state had a priest-king to rule over their people. However, their beliefs were polytheistic and centered their beliefs in four Gods that represented power. These Gods provided for mankind and every year the Sumerians believed that the Gods would decide their faith. During the time between 2700 ca. and 2600ca. there was a ruler who ran the city-state of Uruk, Gilgamesh the famously known king who was two-thirds God and one third-man. On the other hand, during the time of Roland their civilization was ran by one king known as Charlemagne, who believed in monotheism and that Christianity was the one true religion. During this reign Charlemagne was anointed as the head of the Roman Empire. Their goal as a society was based on conquering cities to convert them to Christianity. Both our epic heroes are from different eras in time that may have contributed to their actions; however, as contradictory as their civilizations were they share distinctions and parallels in their character.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around 2000 BCE, Mesopotamia's city-states of prospered because of their geographic location along the Tigris and Euphrates River, but Mesopotamia is now divided among separate countries. In the midst of the dry desert climate, the fertile crescent of Mesopotamia attracted early man's inhabitance because of its access to the river highways. The rivers' annual flooding left a layer of rich fertile ground for the growth of agriculture, and the river's ease of access helped farmers trade food surpluses for other necessary goods and travel across long distances. Because of its resourceful geographic location, many successful city-states such as Sumer, Akkad, Assyria, Assur, Ninevah, Ur, Uruk, Mari, and Babylon were developed as the population grew. In current day the geography of the region has changed over time from a series of cities to its current day countries. Today, the Tigris and Euphrates start in the mountains of modern day Turkey, and flow southeast through Syria, Iraq, and parts of Iran. Additionally The population has grown significantly since ancient Mesopotamia which has lead to the growth of villages, towns, and cities throughout Mesopotamia in current day. On the other hand, one thing that has continued from Ancient Mesopotamia to current day is its lack…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politically, Mesopotamia culture created compact self-governing political units (the city-states). By the third millennium B.C.E. the concept of king developed, possibly because of increased quarrels over resources. The power of religious leaders was undermined by the…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sumer & Egypt Comparison

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although Sumer and Egypt were very similar civilizations, their governments were not the same in every aspect. While Sumer was a region of city-states ruled by one, Egypt was a unified country under a unitary government composed of one Pharaoh. The kings of Sumer and Egypt shared many duties and powers, but unlike the political structure of Sumer, the king of Egypt was in control of an absolute monarchy and created every law. The kings of Sumer often rose to power by claiming divine authority- the right to rule destined by the gods. The kings of Egypt, however, were viewed as one of the many gods in their religion once they rose to power. Egypt and Sumer, although very similar, held differences between their political structures.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Egypt, the pharaoh was considered a god, and so had ultimate power over all of Egypt – no one dared to cross him. The Mesopotamians were similar – when Sargon conquered Sumer, he began the series of Akkadian rulers, who were basically dictators. In Crete and Greece, however, none of the kings had the same absolute power as the Egyptian and Mesopotamian monarchs. A king was expected to consult with a group of nobles before making any decisions. As a result, the continuation of a Mycenaean king’s rule relied on the quality of his or her leadership and the support of the…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is interesting to note that both civilizations grew along great rivers, for example the Euphrates River for Mesopotamia. The civilization of Sumer was even richer than that of the Egyptians and they had developed а civilized community and way of life based on some of the archeology from the time. Their cities were well planned and had great monuments that were made for their rulers, which is also analogous to the Egyptians. Their rulers were powerful, had а firm hold on their people and liked to be praised and linked with Gods. For this to be achieved, they built some of the most amazing monuments that the world has ever seen, from the Sumerian Ziggurats to the Assyrian…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mesopotamia there were 4 classes of people. The Kings and Priests were at the top of the class. The Upper Class was the wealthy. The Lower Class was salaried for their work. The slaves were at the foot system. The kings and priests were very influential. The priests controlled the society because they owned most of the land, and a lot of. The Priests were over the schools and the libraries in their temples.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A small group of noblemen led the government in an aristocracy. This was after the monarchies died out. Aristocracy is what is known as to be ruled by few. Overtime they eventually became an oligarchy. This is when rich citizens not of a noble birth were also allowed to participate. They did not offer citizens a say in their government and could also be as harsh and corrupt. A minority of men from rich families controlled the state. Sparta was one of the last with a successful oligarchy.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Paleolithic Era

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Order was maintained by a recognized person of power. This was usually the person who controlled agriculture and/or the military. Early Sumerians were fairly advanced at this point in time. They built large walls around their cities to protect their dwellings. They also built many temples to worship various deities. An irrigation system was developed to help improve and increase food production. Sumerian leaders developed a militaristic society and Sumerians built up a strong hatred towards the military and the leader for it. They were forced to provide food, lodging, and money for the military every time it came to visit. As time progressed, kinks were worked out of the system. The leader ruled from the capitol, Babylon, and had deputies stationed in each city state to maintain order. This way taxes were more predictable and were a more manageable price. Sumerians were eventually replaced by many other empires. Akkadians and Babylonians for example. Sargon, ruler of the Akkadian Empire had a thirst for conquest that brought much hatred from his citizens. Eventually they rebelled against him. However, Hammurabi wrote and implemented the first laws seen in the region of Mesopotamia. He provided the territories he controlled with a code of law compiled of laws from his predecessors and of his own making. He provided the “Law of Retaliation”. In layman's terms: an eye for an eye, a…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Mesopotamian civilization was a theocracy ruled by a monarchy which they believed to be divine in origin, Meaning kings derived their power from the gods and were in direct connection with the gods.The religion of the people of Mesopotamia was polytheistic, as they worshiped over 3000 gods and goddesses. The people believed the gods and goddesses owned the cities so each city had a temple that was built with much wealth. The temples owned much of the land and livestock. The temple was the center of the city as well as a political and economical center. There was three main social classes, nobles, commoners and slaves. Nobles included royal and priestly officials and their families. Commoners were the noble’s clients as they worked for the palace and temple as well as other common workers of the city. Slaves were owned by palace officials and were used for building project and weaving. The economy was based on agriculture. The valley between the Tigris and Euphrates is where the mesopotamian peoples thrived. The river valley is the main reason why the society survived and prospered being that their economy was based solely on agriculture. The law code of the people was based on the principle of retribution, (eye for an eye).…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics