Police Brutality Against Minorities

At the same time, the government of the US, having passed the transitional stage long ago, is alarmed by the same issue of police brutality against minority citizens. While the Indian government excessively intervenes in the police conduct, in some countries, such as in the US, this is not the case (Chevigny, 2008, p. 1617). Since the country is ruled by the voice of the majority, this group of people has a certain control over politicians. The latter, especially the president of the US, represent the whole society and non specific parts of it, so they tend to address the issues of the whole community, marginalizing the issues of smaller communities such as minority groups (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/14/barack-obama-us-racism-police-brutality-failed-victims). For instance, West argues that by attempting to take a position in the ‘middle’, police brutality remains without any political accountability.
Furthermore, citizens along with constituted bodies of the state, feel free to disregard the laws and apply violence in a hazardous way, because the government is not strong enough to restrain such incidents. For instance, Zwach (2015) introduces a case of police brutality against a minority male, which resulted ultimately in his death (p. 190). Court of justice, however, concluded that the police officer was not responsible for such a lethal resolution of the events (p. 191). Unfortunately, very often, police officers of the US do not follow the proper procedure of detaining a suspect belonging to racial minorities. Moreover, they may also take away the life of a innocent citizen without facing a legal punishment (p. 202). Hence, police violence occurs in the countries with weak leadership, because police officers rarely get accountable for their misconduct that is directed toward an ‘undesirable’ part of the