Preview

Philip Ii

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3171 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philip Ii
Philip II, king of Spain and only son of the Holy Roman emperor Charles V, had everything in his favor to become the dominant power in Europe and probably the world at that time. Nonetheless, he did not succeed in doing so due to his poor leadership, incompetence, bad fortune and his inept financial understanding. As an ardent Catholic defender and due to his strong sense of duty and devotion to his empire, Philip focused on expanding the Spanish realm throughout Europe and promoting Catholic faith. Barbara Tuchman analyzing Philip's incompetence: "No experience of the failure of his policy could shake his belief in its essential excellence. That whatever he did was done for the service of God, that success or failure depended on the inscrutable will of the Almighty and not on himself, were his guiding convictions, which he transmitted to his successors." (The March of Folly) Furthermore, Philip II was not only incompetent due to his unshakable and often erroneous beliefs and interpretations of them. Despite having everything in his favor to become the dominant power in Europe and defy the traditional European balance of powers imposed since the dissolution of Charlemagne's empire, he did not achieve to rule his empire astutely and rise as the dominant nation in Europe . He received an annual income of 2 million ducats in form of gold and silver from the Spanish territory in the New World. He inherited a huge part of land in Europe and the Americas as well as several colonies in Africa and India from his father, Charles V. He possessed the largest fleet in the world and the best military formation. He had the power to dominate the world. Regardless of these advantages, he was not able to dominate Europe and become the most powerful absolute ruler. Philip acted "for the service of God," hence he believed that the Almighty would grant him the power to dominate the world if he promoted and defended the only true religion, Catholicism. Therefore, he believed that all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    His decision to make Duke of Medina Sidonia in charge of the fleet was very questionable especially since he had never been to sea before. Philip II had ideas about how the English would attack from distance and he warned Santa Cruz and then the Duke of Medina Sidonia that the English would use this strategy (Geoffrey Parker, Why the Armada Failed). Instead of devising a strategy that would help the Armada avoid these pitfalls, he chose a strategy that made the fleet a sitting target to precisely the kind of tactics he worried about (Geoffrey Parker, Why the Armada Failed). Philip II also did not meet with his senior commanders to hear their opinions on the plans that were about to doom the Armada. (Geoffrey Parker, Why the Armada Failed). Philip II had made every decision on his own and ultimately the defeat of the armada was his fault.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolute Monarchs were eithere kings or queens who controlled the complete way of life in the country they ruled. Absolutism is the rule of one person over any given thing. The two rulers that showed absolutism in the documents are Louis 14th and Peter the Great. They were both absolute monarchs and both ruled over large territories.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oppositely, Phillip and Fredrick William disagreed on foreign policies. During Phillip’s reign, Spain was known as “the Empire on which the sun never sets,” for it became so large through his expansionist mindset. Philip II created military campaigns to defend Catholic Europe, for example his 1588 failed invasion of Protestant England. In contrast, Fredrick held a large European army, yet had little to no military campaigns throughout his ruling. Domestic matters concerned him more than foreign, such as agriculture and primary schools to benefit his nation in the long run. He looked upon the manual of Regulations for State Officials with great…

    • 648 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book King Philip’s War by Daniel R. Mandell, Mandell argues that King Philip’s War is the fundamental turning point in the relations between the Indians and Anglo Americans and the Sovereignty of the Indians. This ultimately led to the war known as King Philip’s War.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ap Euro Seminar

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages

    i. King Philip II was named the paper king because he always read over what he signed and worked on literature.…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the years of Philip's ruling, he successfully maintained legitimacy. He did this through winning coalition, divine right, and elitist. Philip was the wealthiest man of Spain. He could afford concessions to make the people happy. In return, they gave him legitimacy. He was also a…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phillip II was the ruler of Spain. He lived from 1527 to 1598. Because he was the defender of Catholicism he was the most powerful ruler in Europe at the time. Phillip demanded reports from his advisers and would conduct discussions in his office.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During May 1527 – the year of 1598 Phillip II was the ruler of Spain and also other regions because of his marriage to Queen Mary I. While Spain was under the ruling of King Phillip he died on September 13, 1598. After his death no one was able to label the cause of it, even now people are still not sure how the king of Spain died. There are many possibilities like murder or even illness but between the two it would be more appropriate to state that King Phillip was murdered, but who would kill the king of Spain? Hilariously when you investigate who might have planned on killing him or even wish him to be dead the results are shocking, because a lot of people wanted King Phillip’s head. Throughout all of the suspects only one person personally stands out and would have most likely have been the murder of King Phillip was Queen Elizabeth I.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter the Great was the absolute monarch of Russia from 1682 to 1725. His goal was to turn Russia into a better country by “modernizing” it or becoming more westernized (European ).In General Alexander Gordon’s History of Peter The Great , he states ‘He was at little or no expense about his person and by living like a private gentleman than a prince he saved wholly that great expense which other monarchs..support their courts”. This statement shows the character of Alexander and how he saved money because he knew there were more important things than living super fancy .According to Doc. 6 Alexander the Great “... had a great regard for learning and was at much pains to introduce it into the country .” This is an example of how he brought prosperity to Europe by trying his hardest to introduce learning to his country and make a more educated modern place . Another way Peter brought prosperity as an absolute monarch is talked about in document 8 , by Michael Gibson (Excerpt from Peter the Great). Its says “..Russia was in an insignificant state . he made it into a great power feared by all . At his accession Russia had no armed forces ...when he died,there was professional army of 210,000 men . He created a navy out of nothing…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis the XIV

    • 990 Words
    • 29 Pages

    Louis the XIV was king of France from 1693 to 1715. He was an example of how to rule for many of the political leaders of the 18th century. An absolute ruler is defined by seven traits. Pacify and subjugate nobles, and centralize power around oneself. Another is to make both money and war. Dominate culture, make religion and finally build something worthy of your glory. Two Enlightened despots that took after Louis were Joseph II of Austria and Peter the Great, Czar of Russia. Both rulers had enlightened and despotic characteristics. Yet Joseph was more Enlightened and Peter more despotic. Both characteristics were important to have a strong nation, but as Peter exemplifies having more despotic characteristics helps a ruler maintain power and strengthen the nation, more so then enlightened ones. Joseph II takes full power in 1780 after his mother Maria Theresa dies, instantly he begins to institute many enlightened ideas. Joseph is radical and makes many changes to long withstanding traditions in Austrian society and government. First, he grants religious freedom and cuts off communication between his state clergy and Rome. Though Austria had always been staunchly Catholic, now a person of any religion could practice it freely. This is a very enlightened idea much before its time. Also, it was one of his only major changes which were kept after his reign ended. This was how Joseph II fits under the trait of making religion work for you; he actually tried to make it work for everyone. Another enlightened reform he implemented was a universal law code in which all Austrians have to follow the same rules and suffer the same punishments. He eliminates noble privileges, in matters like taxation, and crimes. This reform angered the nobility and almost put the nation in crisis. But it was one last reform which set off a spark of rebellion. Joseph II outlawed serfdom, he freed millions of peasants. They were free to go wherever, and choose…

    • 990 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Phillip II, King of Macedonia was murdered in 336 BC when he attended the wedding between his daughter, Cleopatra and his brother in law, Alexander of Epirus. As he walked into the theatre where the wedding was to be held, he was fatally stabbed by a man named Pausanias, his head of guards. There were many theories behind the reason for Pausanias’ actions. Many said that it was pent up anger that drove Pausanias, while others suggested that Phillip’s wife, Olympias of Epirus and his son; Alexander had put him up to it. The Lyncestis brothers (a notable Macedonian family), Antipater (a powerful politician), Demosthenes (a prominent Greek statesmen and orator) and the Persian King Darius III were all said to be involved in the murder of Phillip.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Philip's War

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    King Philip’s War lasted from 1675 to 1676. It was the bloodiest conflict between American colonists and Indians in the 17th century New England. By 1600, colonial settlers no longer depended on the Indians for survival; therefore they pushed into Indian Territory in Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island. To protect their lands, the Wampanoag chief, King Philip, also known as Metacom organized a federation of tribes, which in 1675 destroyed several frontier settlements. King Philip’s War was the beginning of the development of a greater American identity; the conflicts suffered by the colonists gave them a distinct identity than that of the subjects of the English crown.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medieval Kings and Popes

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Due to the ongoing support of Frankish Kings, the papacy and Church grw in influence and their congregation of followers increased in size. Kings like Pepin the Short, who defended the papacy, began to gain power not because they were royal, but because they were recognized and honored by the pope. By the time Charlemagne, Pepin’s son and a strong King of the Franks, was coronated in 800 AD by Pope Leo III, it became questionable whether popes and kings were separate…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Saint Philip Neri

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    families. He was kind hearted as a kid and soon became known as Philip the…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Phillip II was an heir to a catholic dominant and military supreme western Hapsburg Kingdom. He ruled and paid all his debts with the support of his naval dominance, and hi colonies in the new world which were the major source of his wealth. The wealth Phillip was gaining from the new world was ironically a misstep for Phillip because all the wealth led to a huge increase in population. The demand for food and work grew steadily as the imports from the new world continued to supply Phillips needs. Another thing also occurred as a result, inflation effected Spain and much of Europe all due to Phillips II demand for goods in the new world. In the end what Phillip II used to pay all his debts triggered a devastating effect on all of Europe with Spain taking the mayor setback. Phillip of Spain is unmistakably the reason why Spain lost its status as the preeminent, militarily power. Although Spain was at its “Golden Age“ during Phillip rule, it’s still valid to say that his decisions caused the Great power of Spain to Plummet and it gave way…

    • 1263 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays