Preview

Phaedo By Plato

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1073 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Phaedo By Plato
In his work titled Phaedo, Plato portrays his master Socrates in his final day before execution. Many philosophers gather with him and a dialogue arises, by which Plato conveys one of the most fundamental theories unfolding the after life. During this conversation Socrates exposes his believe of the immortality of the soul, arguing that he indeed is eager to die, claiming that death just represents the separation of soul and body. According to him, philosophers prepare throughout their lives for this, given that by the soul alone, reason, and wisdom flourish. By presenting different ideas like the argument of opposites, the theories of recollection and forms, and the simplicity argument, Socrates manages to fully convince his visitors of his …show more content…
He claims that everything comes to be from an opposing side. “Everything that has an opposite necessarily comes to be from nowhere other than from its opposite…whenever something comes to be larger, that it is necessarily from being smaller” (Phaedo 70e-71a). By presenting this, Plato shows that nothing can naturally come into being or end, and that life and death, likewise follow this progression; each one coming to be from the other one. Interestingly many philosophers around Greece and the world also expose this argument. The Pythagoreans for instance, developed the table of opposites, which compromised of a set of ten pairs of opposing qualities. On the other side, Lucretius’s On Natural Things, contemplates the idea that “Nothing ever comes from nothing” (156), claiming that in order of something to come to be, “a seed is needed”. Further on, Plato presents two types of opposites, comparative and absolute. The difference between these two is that comparative opposites contain gradations and can vary. Absolute opposites on the other way, must come into being totally from their opposite and they can’t contain both at the same time. According to this, when the soul is connected to a body there is life, therefore the soul is associated to life and cannot admit its opposite, death. When death comes therefore, the soul simply “withdrawals” from the body, living perpetually. Plato also …show more content…
In here he states that humans possess knowledge before being born and that the process of learning is just recollecting the information they already know. For Plato this is called “knowledge of the forms”. Equality, justice, and beauty are some of the elements that conform this theory. “Now if having got it before we were born, we were born with it in our grasp, did we know both before birth and from the moment we were born not only the equal, the larger, and the smaller but also the entire set of such things? For our present argument is no more about the equal than about the beautiful itself, the good itself, the just, the pious… So we must have got the knowledge of each of these before we were born” (Phaedo 75c-d). As Plato explains, we all have this knowledge in our sub consciousness and through the process of recollection we bring it out. As Plato shows in this excerpt, the soul doesn’t born with the body, but rather has been perpetually living long

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plato believed the world we live in is only a world of appearances and that it wasn't actually that real. He believed that their was another world, this is called dualism. He believed this other world is where the true forms of everything existed and only left a mere imprint on our world. Plato argued this world was immutable (unchanging) and that it was only a world of ideas and concepts that made every object like what it is. For example there are lots of different types of cat. He believed in the world of the forms that what makes a cat a cat existed there and is imprinted onto our souls allowing us to identify all the different types of cat as cats.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Plato’s Phaedo, socrates tells us his theories of the soul before and after death. He shows us that the body and soul are separate and the soul stays after death and lives before being born.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: In the section of immortal souls I learned that Socrates believe that the soul would never die. People saw him with craziness. They told him that how was it possible if it had not…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Plato’s Republic, Socrates formulates an argument that is cohesive with the notion that one’s soul consists of three parts. He begins this argument by alluding to the fact that we need to determine whether or not the parts of our soul are similar, or different. “The same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time,” this statement is an effective premise in his argument due to its unified applicability within the confines of ones soul. If ones…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He reiterates his point that something cannot accept its characteristic’s opposite by stating that, “…not only opposites will receive opposites, but also that nothing which brings the opposite will admit the opposite of that which it brings, in that to which it is brought” (Plato 3). He says that one of the characteristics that the soul possesses is life, which is the opposite of death, so, “…the soul, as has been acknowledged, will never receive the opposite of what she brings” (Plato 3). Socrates explains that the soul can never admit death because it possesses a quality that is death’s opposite. When death approaches the soul, according to his previous arguments, it would either retire or perish; however, “…the soul when attacked by death cannot perish” (Plato 4) because the soul cannot admit death. He believes that when death comes to a man, his body dies, but his soul is preserved (Plato 5). Socrates proves that the soul will not admit death and when it is approached by death, it will not perish, but retire to another…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with Plato's objections stated above, however not to the degree where what is…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final Paper PHL Kloke

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato considered the soul ‘to be the immortal essence of the person’ and to house three individual parts- Reason, Emotion, and Desire (Jowett, 2007). While the soul…

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato understood that there are concepts that we can all recognise in various things, for example the concept of beauty. We all recognise beauty in art, nature, people, or music, and we all understand the idea when we hear the word used. Although we can all recognise beauty, our opinions of what classes as beautiful are widely varied and subjective. The conclusions Plato drew from this is that beauty must exist, otherwise we would not know it at all. This is the Perfect Form of Beauty. However, we must have only partial knowledge of it or we would not have subjective opinions.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To Socrates death was only a parting of the soul from the body and due to this he thought that philosophers should stay away from as many bodily pleasures as possible. Bodily pleasures could include fine food, liquor, extravagant outfits, jewelry, and so on. This was in order to keep the souls well-being in the forefront of the mind. Socrates felt the soul should not be bound to the body; it should be free to be released when the time came. Socrates seemed to believe that the soul was immortal and that it would live on in the afterlife. He thought that after a very long time the soul would be brought back again.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After all this, Socrates goes on to the story about a man returning from the afterlife and describing it. At the end of the story, he says that because he and his companions have established that the soul is immortal, and because this story speaks about the immortality of the soul, it is even more important for people to be just and seek good and true knowledge in their life. This, in turn, will bring them much happiness in both this life and the…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this paper, I will evaluate Socrates’ argument from Phaedo for why philosophers should desire death, perhaps only secondly to wisdom. I will argue that Socrates unfairly characterizes the truthfulness of the senses, and therefore projects a pessimistic view of the philosopher’s virtue during life. This pessimism towards life in conjunction with arguments for an afterlife that liberates reason, seems to suggest that Socrates believes philosophers should desire death: a happy prospect for condemned man, but perhaps a biased one.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    People have a choice whether to believe or not believe in the existence of the world and in those who question people's knowledge. Socrates is a firm believer in questioning the universe and every aspect that exist within it. From justified true belief to immortality of the soul, Socrates dedicated his life to form opinions, challenge other people's thoughts, and to asking all the questions. In The Trial and Death of Socrates, particular in the dialogues from Crito and Apology, Plato explored Socrates argument that the purpose of philosophy is to prepare for death without fear.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was a man of very distinct descriptions. He believed that we all would meet in a place in the afterlife. We would follow a guide down our chosen path according to the life we lived. Socrates didn’t have a fear of death or the path he would travel in the afterlife. He had a very detailed idea of how the terrain would be. He envisioned in exquisite detail of the beauty of the afterlife. He spoke of the path that people would take based on the type of person they were and the acts they committed. He is a man that doesn’t have a fear for death. He is a man that believes that there is life after death.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato Vs Buddhism Essay

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages

    He believes that our bodies are material. And eventually, they will die. He says “Who were the dead, for Plato? They were souls who had been released from their temporary embodiment.” Meaning that he believes that humans should welcome death as it liberates the soul from being trapped within the body. If a person lives a good life with contemplation, after they die the soul will go to a “perfect universe” and will stay there until a baby is born. Plato believes these new transferred souls are full of knowledge but are limited by their new body because a baby must grow up and re-learn the abilities that the soul already knows. This is the reason why Plato believes that the soul is “better off” after the body has died.…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Platos Tripartite Soul

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages

    As a philosophical treatise, it is to be commended for appreciating the complexity of human motivations, however given our contemporary biological knowledge we can see that the simplified composition of the ‘soul’ espoused by Plato may be untenable. Also, by virtue of the soul being a conglomerate of three distinct forces, this raises philosophical issues regarding the soul’s immortality (that has been and is still affirmed by the author).…

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays