Marx, although, believed the forces of production disenfranchised man from his ability to see nature in its grandeur. That is, nature in its beauty, has already existed in such form outside man's idealism and it is man's productive essence to work with the material around him that in turn recognised that beauty. Man`s natural work is warped by the unnatural forms of capitalist labour: the “superfluously coarse labours of life [make it so] its finer fruits cannot be plucked by them” (Thoreau, “Economy,” 2). Man’s drive is directed towards the desire of capital in “commerce” and “industry” (Marx, “Manifesto,” 210) which repurposes the labouring conscience of man’s “essence” (Ibid., “German Ideology,” 182) to the working “appendage of the machine” (Ibid., “Manifesto,” …show more content…
Thus man is caught in the paradoxically
drive of the capital-value system, insofar, as his/her desire for capital as a means of freeing
themselves from material bondage. Here, man mistakes the ideal image promised by
capitalism as a false sense of freedom. The unhealthy promise of an idealised image of
his/her body’s ideal reflects in the rotating brass of the capitalist machine. One may desire
that image driven by the perceived unpleasure of their own. S/he is tailored to an all-fitting
suit: man is made to measure. Those in resistance to the garbs of power, must develop an
individual form of liberty that is independent from external authority. S/he may be alienated
from others, but s/he is protected from the capital production of himself or herself.
The individual is coded by the master’s discourse which entangles the collective
conscience and dilutes consciousness of power. The capitalist theory of practice goes
unquestioned in the practice of its theory. Power becomes visible but is divisible between its
capitalist functionaries. There is no single authority. Therein, solidarity gives way